Home ANFIS based system identification of underactuated systems
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

ANFIS based system identification of underactuated systems

  • Ishan Chawla and Ashish Singla EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 14, 2020

Abstract

In this work, the effectiveness of the adaptive neural based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in identifying underactuated systems is illustrated. Two case studies of underactuated systems are used to validate the system identification i. e., linear inverted pendulum (LIP) and rotary inverted pendulum (RIP). Both the systems are treated as benchmark systems in modeling and control theory for their inherit nonlinear, unstable, and underactuated behavior. The systems are modeled with ANFIS using the input-output data acquired from the dynamic response of the nonlinear analytical model of the systems. The dynamic response of the ANFIS model is simulated and compared to the nonlinear mathematical model of the inverted pendulum systems. In order to check the effectiveness of the ANFIS model, mean square error is used as the performance index. From the obtained simulation results, it has been perceived that the ANFIS model performed satisfactorily within the trained operating range while a minor deviation is seen outside the trained operating region for both the case studies. Furthermore, the experimental validation of the of the proposed ANFIS model is done by comparing it with the experimental model of the rotary inverted pendulum. The obtained results show that the response of ANFIS model is in close agreement to the experimental model of the rotary inverted pendulum.


Corresponding author: Ashish Singla, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, 147004, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for the User, PTR Prentice Hall Information and System Sciences Series, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. J. Davison, Benchmark Problems for Control System Design, IFAC Theory Commitee, Montreal, Canada, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[3] W. Younis, M. Abdelati, “Design and implementation of an experimental segway model,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP, 2009.10.1063/1.3106501Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Elhasairi and A. Pechev, “Humanoid robot balance control using the spherical inverted pendulum mode,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 2: p. 21, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2015.00021.Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. W. Anderson, “Learning to control an inverted pendulum using neural networks,” IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 31–37, 1989, https://doi.org/10.1109/37.24809.Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. Sun, Y. Wu, H. Chen, and Y. Fang, “Antiswing cargo transportation of underactuated tower crane systems by a nonlinear controller embedded with an integral term,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1387–1398, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2018.2889434.Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Chen and N. Sun, “Nonlinear control of underactuated systems subject to both actuated and unactuated state constraints with experimental verification,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 7702–7714, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2019.2946541.Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Chen, B. Xuan, P. Yang and H. Chen, “A new overhead crane emergency braking method with theoretical analysis and experimental verification,” Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 2211–2225, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05318-6.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Y. Liu, H. Yu, S. Wane, and T. Yang, “On tracking control of a pendulum-driven cart-pole underactuated system,” Int. J. Model. Ident. Contr., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 357–372, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIC.2008.021476.Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. C. Tsai, H. C. Huang, and S. C. Lin, “Adaptive neural network control of a self-balancing two-wheeled scooter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1420–1428, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2009.2039452.Search in Google Scholar

[11] I. Chawla, V. Chopra and A. Singla, “Performance comparison of PID and ANFIS controller for stabilization of x and xy inverted pendulums,” in International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 2018, pp. 182–192.10.1007/978-3-030-16657-1_17Search in Google Scholar

[12] I. Chawla and A. Singla, “Real-time control of a rotary inverted pendulum using robust LQR-based ANFIS controller,” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 379–389, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0139.Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Ronquillo, G. J. Ríos-Moreno, A. Gómez-Espinosa, L. A. Morales-Hernández, and M. Trejo-Perea, “Nonlinear identification of inverted pendulum system using volterra polynomials,” Mech. Based Design Struct. Mach, vol. 44, no. 1-2, 2016. pp. 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2015.1028551.Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. S. Jang, “ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1993, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 665–685, https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541.Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. A. Denai, F. Palis and A. Zeghbib, “ANFIS based modelling and control of non-linear systems: a tutorial,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 4, 2004, p. 3433–3438, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400873.Search in Google Scholar

[16] I. Chawla and A. Singla, “System identification of an inverted pendulum using adaptive neural fuzzy inference system,” in Harmony Search and Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithms, Singapore, Springer, 2018, pp. 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0761-4_77.Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Kathpal and A. Singla, “SimMechanics™ based modeling, simulation and real-time control of rotary inverted pendulum,” in 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control, Coimbatore, India, IEEE, 2017, pp. 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCO.2017.7855975.Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, “Derivation of fuzzy control rules from human operator’s control actions,” in Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)62005-6.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-04
Accepted: 2020-04-20
Published Online: 2020-07-14
Published in Print: 2020-11-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. ANFIS based system identification of underactuated systems
  4. The dynamical behavior of mixed type lump solutions on the (3 + 1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Boussinesq equation
  5. A generalization of weighted companion of Ostrowski integral inequality for mappings of bounded variation
  6. Bright and dark optical solitons for the generalized variable coefficients nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  7. A multivariate spectral quasi-linearization method for the solution of (2+1) dimensional Burgers’ equations
  8. Global dissipativity and exponential synchronization of mixed time-varying delays neural networks with discontinuous activations
  9. Integrodifference master equation describing actively growing blood vessels in angiogenesis
  10. On the behaviors of rough multilinear fractional integral and multi-sublinear fractional maximal operators both on product Lp and weighted Lp spaces
  11. Approximate controllability of nonlinear Hilfer fractional stochastic differential system with Rosenblatt process and Poisson jumps
  12. Lie symmetries and singularity analysis for generalized shallow-water equations
  13. Conditions for the local and global asymptotic stability of the time–fractional Degn–Harrison system
  14. Nonlinear wave equation in an inhomogeneous medium from non-standard singular Lagrangians functional with two occurrences of integrals
  15. Lie symmetry analysis and similarity solutions for the Jimbo – Miwa equation and generalisations
  16. The barotropic Rossby waves with topography on the earth’s δ-surface
  17. Synchronization control between discrete uncertain networks with different topologies
  18. Boundary shape functions methods for solving the nonlinear singularly perturbed problems with Robin boundary conditions
  19. Global exponential stability analysis of anti-periodic solutions of discontinuous bidirectional associative memory (BAM) neural networks with time-varying delays
  20. A parallel hybrid implementation of the 2D acoustic wave equation
  21. Approximate controllability of fractional stochastic evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  22. Fractional (3+1)-dim Jimbo Miwa system: invariance properties, exact solutions, solitary pattern solutions and conservation laws
  23. Optical solitons and stability analysis for the generalized second-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation in an optical fiber
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0005/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button