Abstract
In order to study the dynamic compression mechanical properties of engineering rock under high strain rate (100~102 S−1)loads, dynamic compression tests of three common engineering rocks (marble, sandstone and granite) taken from the Qinling Mountain are studied subjected to five different kinds of shock air pressure using Φ 100 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar test system improved with purple copper waveform shaper. The dynamic compression stress-strain curves, dynamic compressive strength, peak strain, energy absorption rate and elastic modulus of three rocks variation with strain rate are researched. The dynamic compression failure modes under different strain rates are analyzed. Then the three-dimensional numerical simulations of waveform shaper shaping effects and stress wave propagation in the SHPB tests are carried out to reproduce the test results. The research results show that the dynamic compression stress-strain curves show certain discreteness, and there is an obvious rebound phenomenon after the peak. With the increase in strain rate, the dynamic compressive strength, peak strain and energy absorption rate are all in a certain degree of increase, but the elastic modulus have no obvious change trend. Under the same strain rate, the dynamic compressive strength of granite is greatest while of sandstone is least. With the increase in strain rate, the margin of increase in peak strain and energy absorption rate of granite is greatest while of sandstone is least. The failure modes of the sample experience a developing process from outside to inside with the increase of strain rate.
Funding statement: Funding: This work has been supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51378497).
References
[1] B.Bohloli, Effects of the geological parameters on rock blasting using the Hopkinson split bar, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34, 3–4 (1997), 321–329.Search in Google Scholar
[2] W. G.Liang, Y. S.Zhao, S. G.Xu and M. B.Dusseault, Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of salt rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 48 (2011), 161–167.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.012Search in Google Scholar
[3] Q. B.Zhang and J.Zhao, Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 60 (2013), 423–439.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.005Search in Google Scholar
[4] F.Yan, X. T.Feng, R.Chen, K. W.Xia and C. Y.Jin, Dynamic tensile failure of the rock interface between tuff and basalt, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 45 (2012), 341–348.10.1007/s00603-011-0177-ySearch in Google Scholar
[5] Z. L.Zhou, X. B.Li, Z. Y.Y and K. W.Liu, Obtaining constitutive relationship for rate-dependent rock in SHPB tests, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 43 (2010), 697–706.10.1007/s00603-010-0096-3Search in Google Scholar
[6] T.Saksala, M.Hokka, V. T.Kuokkala and J.Makinen, Numerical modeling and experimentation of dynamic Brazilian disc test on Kuru granite, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 59 (2013), 128–138.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.018Search in Google Scholar
[7] S.Demirdag, K.Tufekci, R.Kayacan, H.Yavuz and R.Altindag, Dynamic mechanical behavior of some carbonate rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47 (2010), 307–312.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar
[8] W.Wu, J. B.Zhu and J.Zhao, Dynamic response of a rock fracture filled with viscoelastic materials, Eng. Geol. 160 (2013), 1–7.10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.022Search in Google Scholar
[9] L. F.Fan, F.Ren and G. W.Ma, Experimental study on viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rock under dynamic loading, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 45 (2012), 433–438.10.1007/s00603-011-0197-7Search in Google Scholar
[10] P.Bailly, F.Delvare, J.Vial, J. L.Hanus, M.Biessy and D.Picart, Dynamic behavior of an aggregate material at simultaneous high pressure and strain rate: SHPB triaxial tests, Int. J. Impact Eng. 38 (2011), 73–84.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.005Search in Google Scholar
[11] R.Naghdabadi, M. J.Ashrafi and J.Arghavani, Experimental and numerical investigation of pulse-shaped split Hopkinson pressure bar test, Mater. Sci. Eng. A539 (2012), 285–293.10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.095Search in Google Scholar
[12] S.Liu, J. Y.Xu, L. P.Zhi and T. F.Chen, Experimental research on mechanical behaviors of marble after high temperatures subjected to impact loading, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 32, 2 (2013), 273–280. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar
[13] S.Liu and J. Y.Xu, Study on dynamic characteristics of marble under impact loading and high temperature, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 62 (2013), 51–58.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.014Search in Google Scholar
[14] ISRM, 1979. SM for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. ISRM Suggest. Methods 2, 137–140.10.1016/0148-9062(79)91450-5Search in Google Scholar
[15] S.Liu, J. Y.Xu, J. Z.Liu and X. C.Lv, SHPB test on sericite-quartz schist and sandstone, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 30, 9 (2011), 1864–1871. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar
[16] R. L.Shan, Y. S.Jiang and B. Q.Li, Obtaining dynamic complete stress-strain curves for rock using the split Hopkinson pressure bar technique. International, J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37 (2000), 983–992.10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00031-9Search in Google Scholar
[17] G.Gary and P.Bailly, behavior of a quasi-brittle material at high strain rate. Experiment and modelling, Eur. J. Mech-A/Solids17, 3 (1998), 403–420.10.1016/S0997-7538(98)80052-1Search in Google Scholar
[18] H.Zhao and G.Gary, On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains, Int. J. Solids Struct. 33 (1996), 3363–3375.10.1016/0020-7683(95)00186-7Search in Google Scholar
[19] W.Janach, The rule of bulking in brittle failure under rapid compression, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 13, 6 (1976), 177–186.10.1016/0148-9062(76)91284-5Search in Google Scholar
[20] W. F.Brace and A. H.Jones, Comparison of uniaxial deformation in shock and static loading of three rocks, Geophys. res. 76, 20 (1971), 4913–4921.10.1029/JB076i020p04913Search in Google Scholar
[21] T. J.Holmquist, G. R.Johnson and W. H.Cook. A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strains high strain rates, and high pressure. In: 14th Int. symposium on ballistics, Quebec, Canada; 26–29 Sep 1993.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Study on the Complex Neuron Model’s Reduction and Its Dynamic Characteristics
- Collocation Method for the Modeling of Membrane Gas Permeation Systems
- Three-Dimensional Flow Optimization of a Nozzle with a Continuous Adjoint
- Numerical Simulations and Research of Heat Transfer in Pneumatic Pulsator
- Numerical Solution of MHD Stagnation Point Flow of Williamson Fluid Model over a Stretching Cylinder
- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Qinling Mountain Engineered Rocks during Pulse-Shaped SHPB Test
- Numerical Study of Free Convection in a Doubly Stratified Non-Darcy Porous Medium Using Spectral Quasilinearization Method
- Existence and Exponential Stability of the Unique Almost Periodic Positive Solution for Discrete Nicholson’s Blowflies Model
- Conservation Laws and Exact Solutions with Symmetry Reduction of Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion Equations
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Study on the Complex Neuron Model’s Reduction and Its Dynamic Characteristics
- Collocation Method for the Modeling of Membrane Gas Permeation Systems
- Three-Dimensional Flow Optimization of a Nozzle with a Continuous Adjoint
- Numerical Simulations and Research of Heat Transfer in Pneumatic Pulsator
- Numerical Solution of MHD Stagnation Point Flow of Williamson Fluid Model over a Stretching Cylinder
- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Qinling Mountain Engineered Rocks during Pulse-Shaped SHPB Test
- Numerical Study of Free Convection in a Doubly Stratified Non-Darcy Porous Medium Using Spectral Quasilinearization Method
- Existence and Exponential Stability of the Unique Almost Periodic Positive Solution for Discrete Nicholson’s Blowflies Model
- Conservation Laws and Exact Solutions with Symmetry Reduction of Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion Equations