Extraterritorial experiences and China’s decision to curb extortion of confessions through torture

References

Chen, Weidong, Jihua Liu & Lei Cheng. 2007. The experience and enlightenment of anti-torture in three European countries. People’s Procuratorate 15. 55–58.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le. 2011. Administration of justice and multimodality in media: Semiotic translation, conflict and compatibility. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 24. 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9175-8.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Winnie Cheng. 2010. Language modeling for legal proof. In Paper presented at 2010 IEEE international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering, 13–14 October.10.1109/ISKE.2010.5680745Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & King-Kui Sin. 2011. A sociosemiotic interpretation of linguistic modality in legal settings. Semiotica 185. 123–146.10.1515/semi.2011.036Search in Google Scholar

Deng, Siqing. 2006. On the theoretical foundation of the rule of excluding illegal evidence. Science of Law 3. 105–115.Search in Google Scholar

Duan, Mingxue. 2007. Analysis on the recording system of investigation and interrogation. Journal of the National Prosecutor’s College 1. 108–114.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Daoxiu. 2006. Interpretation of the criminal code of the Russian federation. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Qi & Liangfang Ye. 2002. On the inadequacy of defendant’s burden of proof. Journal of the National Prosecutor’s College 3. 61–65.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jian, Ning Ye & Anne Wagner. 2019. A memetic exploration of court interpretation. International Journal of Legal Discourse 4(2). 181–196.10.1515/ijld-2019-2022Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Ang. 2012. The theory and practice of curbing extorting a confession by torture. Beijing: Chinese People’s Public Security University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Yanping & Fuirui Wang. 2022. Verena, Klappstein and Maciej Dybowski: Theory of legal evidence—evidence in legal theory. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7(1). 215–222.10.1515/ijld-2022-2070Search in Google Scholar

Luo, Jiezhen. 2006. French Code of criminal procedure. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Victoria Newnham. 2000. Miranda rule is a constitutional rule: Dickerson v. United states. American Journal of Criminal Law 27(3). 421–426.Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Gregory W. 1994. England limits the right to silence and moves towards an inquisitorial system of justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 85(2). 402–452.10.2307/1144105Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Xiaofu & Yaojun Lan. 2005. Comparison: The rational inner core of interrogation system of the two major legal systems, vol. 3949. Beijing: Procuratorate Daily.Search in Google Scholar

Trainor, Scott A. 1995. A comparative analysis of a corporation’s right against self-Incrimination. Fordham International Law Journal 18(5). 2139–2186.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Jeffrey K. 1993. A comparative discussion of the privilege against self-incrimination. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 14(1). 1–38.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jingjing & Le Cheng. 2020. Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica 2020(236–237). 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0031.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Min & Min Wang. 2021. A science mapping of studies on courtroom discourse with CiteSpace. International Journal of Legal Discourse 6(2). 291–322.10.1515/ijld-2021-2057Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Mingkai. 2006. Criminal Code. Beijing: Law Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Bingzhi & Xinlin Peng. 2015. Anti-forced confession in China and foreign countries. Jianghai Academic Journal 1. 139–149.Search in Google Scholar