Optimal Design of an Olive Oil Mill by Means of the Simulation of a Petri Net Model

References

1. AloiniD, DulminR, MininnoV. A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection. Expert Syst Appl2014;41:2157–65.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.014Suche in Google Scholar

2. AlidrisiH, MohamedS. Resource allocation for strategic quality management: a goal programming approach. Int J Qual Reliability Manage2012;29:265–83.10.1108/02656711211216135Suche in Google Scholar

3. BruzzoneAG, LongoF. An advanced modeling & simulation tool for investigating the behavior of a manufacturing system in the hazelnuts industry sector. Int J Food Eng2013;9:241–57.10.1515/ijfe-2013-0039Suche in Google Scholar

4. ChangKL. Combined MCDM approaches for century-old Taiwanese food firm new product development project selection. Br Food J2013;115:1197–210.10.1108/BFJ-08-2011-0204Suche in Google Scholar

5. ChenYK, WangTC, ChenCY, HuangYC, WangCY. Consumer preferences for information on Taiwan’s pork traceability system. Inf Technol J2012;11:1154–65.10.3923/itj.2012.1154.1165Suche in Google Scholar

6. KirezievaK, NanyunjaJ, JacxsensL, van der VorstJG, UyttendaeleM, LuningPA. Context factors affecting design and operation of food safety management systems in the fresh produce chain. Trends Food Sci Technol2013;32:108–27.10.1016/j.tifs.2013.06.001Suche in Google Scholar

7. MhangoWG, SnappSS, PhiriGY. Opportunities and constraints to legume diversification for sustainable maize production on smallholder farms in Malawi. Renewable Agric Food Syst2013;28:234–44.10.1017/S1742170512000178Suche in Google Scholar

8. MendozaGA, PrabhuR. Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. For Ecol Manage2013;131:107–26.10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00204-2Suche in Google Scholar

9. QuangDV, SchreinemachersP, BergerT. Ex-anteassessment of soil conservation methods in the uplands of Vietnam: an agent-based modeling approach. Agric Syst2013;123:108–19.10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

10. SarutaK, HiraiY, TanakaK, InoueE, OkayasuT, MitsuokaM. Predictive models for yield and protein content of brown rice using support vector machine. Comput Electron Agric2013;99:93–100.10.1016/j.compag.2013.09.003Suche in Google Scholar

11. WangL, WangH, LiH, LiH, YangJ, HuangW. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for estimating the quality of extruded corn used as animal feed ingredient. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng Annu Int Meet2013;3:1997–2005.Suche in Google Scholar

12. WautersT, VerbeeckK, VerstraeteP, Vanden BergheG, De CausmaeckerP. Real-world production scheduling for the food industry: an integrated approach. Eng Appl Artif Intell2012;25:222–8.10.1016/j.engappai.2011.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

13. ZareiM, FakhrzadMB, Jamali PaghalehM. Food supply chain leanness using a developed QFD model. J Food Eng2011;102:25–33.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.07.026Suche in Google Scholar

14. ShikanaiT, NakamuraM, GuanS, TamakiM. Supporting system for management of agricultural corporation of sugarcane farming in Okinawa islands. In: Proceedings of the World conference on agricultural information and IT, IAALD AFITA WCCA 2008, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan, August 24–27, 2008:1101–10.Suche in Google Scholar

15. MelbergR, DavidrajuhR. Modeling Atlantic salmon fish farming industry. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on industrial technology, Gippsland, Australia, February 10–13, 2009:1–6.10.1109/ICIT.2009.4939676Suche in Google Scholar

16. GuanS, NakamuraM, ShikanaiT. Hybrid Petri nets and metaheuristic approach to farm work scheduling. In: TauseefAized, editors. Advances in Petri net theory and applications, 2010. InTech-Sciyo, Rijeka, Croatia, ISBN: 978-953-307-108-4, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/10298. Available from:http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-petri-net-theory-and-applications/hybrid-petri-nets-and-metaheuristic-approach-to-farm-work-scheduling.10.5772/10298Suche in Google Scholar

17. CicirelliFD, FurfaroA, NigroL. A service-based architecture for dynamically reconfigurable workflows. J Syst Softw2010;83:1148–64.10.1016/j.jss.2010.01.003Suche in Google Scholar

18. LégerB, NaudO, GouacheD. Specifying a strategy for deciding tactical adjustment of crop protection using CPN tools. In: Proceedings of the congress of the European federation for information technology in agriculture, food and the environment, July 11–13, 2011:1–6.Suche in Google Scholar

19. WangF, DuanQ, ZhangL, LiG. Modeling and analysis of pollution-free agricultural regulatory based on Petri-net. Computer and computing technologies in agriculture IV. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol2011;347:691–700.10.1007/978-3-642-18369-0_82Suche in Google Scholar

20. LatorreJI, JiménezE. Petri nets with exclusive entities for decision making. Int J Simulation Process Model2013;8:66–73.10.1504/IJSPM.2013.055178Suche in Google Scholar

21. LatorreJI, JiménezE, BlancoJ, SáenzJC. Integrated methodology for efficient decision support in the Rioja wine production sector. Int J Food Eng2013;9:267–79.10.1515/ijfe-2013-0032Suche in Google Scholar

22. JiménezE, TejedaA, PérezM, BlancoJ, MartínezE. Applicability of lean production with VSM to the Rioja wine sector. Int J Prod Res2012;50:1890–904.10.1080/00207543.2011.561370Suche in Google Scholar

23. LatorreJI, JiménezE, PérezM. Sequence of decisions on discrete event systems modeled by Petri nets with structural alternative configurations. J Comput Sci2013; in press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2013.09.00110.1016/j.jocs.2013.09.001Suche in Google Scholar

24. LatorreJI, JiménezE, PérezM. The optimization problem based on alternatives aggregation Petri nets as models for industrial discrete event systems. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2013;89:346–61.10.1177/0037549712464410Suche in Google Scholar

25. LatorreJI, JiménezE, PérezM, BlancoJ, MartínezE. The alternatives aggregation Petri nets as a formalism to design discrete event systems. Int J Simulation Process Model2010;6:152–64.10.1504/IJSPM.2010.036019Suche in Google Scholar

26. LatorreJI, JiménezE. Simulation-based optimisation of discrete event systems by distributed computation. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2013;89:1310–34.10.1177/0037549713505761Suche in Google Scholar

27. BruzzoneA, LongoF, NicolettiL, BottaniE, MontanariR. Simulation, analysis and optimization of container terminals processes. Int J Model Simulation Sci Comput2012;3:1–20.Suche in Google Scholar

28. BruzzoneAG, LongoF. An advanced system for supporting the decision process within large-scale retail stores. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2010;86:742–62.10.1177/0037549709348801Suche in Google Scholar

29. BottaniE, FerrettiG, ManfrediM, VignaliG. Modeling and thermo-fluid dynamic simulation of a fresh pasta pasteurization process. Int J Food Eng2013;9:327–39.10.1515/ijfe-2013-0036Suche in Google Scholar

30. BruzzoneAG, MasseiM, BoccaE. Fresh-food supply chain. In: MerkuryevY, MerkuryevaG, PieraMA, GuaschA, editors. Simulation-based case studies in logistics, 2009:127–46, London U.K.: Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-187-3_8Suche in Google Scholar

31. BottaniE, FerrettiG, VignaliG. Experimental analysis of a beverage carbonation system equipped with a Venturi nozzle. J Food Process Eng2013;36:302–15.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2012.00692.xSuche in Google Scholar

32. BottaniE, RinaldiM, FerrettiG, MontanariR. Analysis and optimization of inventory management policies for perishable food products: a simulation study. Int J Simulation Process Model2014;in press. Available at: http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijspm.10.1504/IJSPM.2014.061429Suche in Google Scholar

33. IOC, 2011. 2011/2012 Forecast reports. The International Olive Council (IOC).Suche in Google Scholar

34. Jiménez-JiménezF, Castro-GarcíaS, Blanco-RoldánGL, FergusonL, RosaUA, Gil-RibesJA. Table olive cultivar susceptibility to impact bruising. Postharvest Biol Technol2013;86:100–6.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.024Suche in Google Scholar

35. RondaniniDP, CastroDN, SearlesPS, RousseauxMC. Contrasting patterns of fatty acid composition and oil accumulation during fruit growth in several olive varieties and locations in a non-mediterranean region. Eur J Agron2013;52:237–46.10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

36. Ruiz-DomínguezML, RaigónMD, ProhensJ. Diversity for olive oil composition in a collection of varieties from the region of Valencia (Spain). Food Res Int2013;54:1941–9.10.1016/j.foodres.2013.06.023Suche in Google Scholar

37. KlöcknerH, LangenN, HartmannM. COO labeling as a tool for pepper differentiation in Germany: insights into the taste perception of organic food shoppers. Br Food J2013;115:1149–68.10.1108/BFJ-07-2011-0175Suche in Google Scholar

38. Garrido-DelgadoR, Mercader-TrejoF, SielemannS, de BruynW, ArceL, ValcárcelM. Direct classification of olive oils by using two types of ion mobility spectrometers. Anal Chim Acta2011;696:108–15.10.1016/j.aca.2011.03.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. LongoF. Sustainable supply chain design: an application example in local business retail. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2012;88:1484–98.10.1177/0037549712458983Suche in Google Scholar

40. MerkuryevaG, MerkuryevY, VanmaeleH. Simulation-based planning and optimization in multiechelon supply chains. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2011;87:680–95.10.1177/0037549710366265Suche in Google Scholar

41. JiménezE, SimulationP,M. Optimization of logistic and production systems using discrete and continuous Petri nets. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2004;80:143–52.10.1177/0037549704045044Suche in Google Scholar

42. MujicaM, PieraMA, NarcisoM. Revisiting state space exploration of timed coloured Petri net models to optimize manufacturing system’s performance. Simulation Model Pract Theory2010;18:1225–41.10.1016/j.simpat.2010.04.010Suche in Google Scholar

43. SilvaM. Introducing Petri nets. In: Dicesare, F, Harhalakis, G, Proth, J.-M, Silva-Suarez, M, Vernadat, F. editors. Practice of Petri nets in manufacturing. London, U.K: Chapman&Hall, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

44. JiménezE, MartínezE, BlancoJ, PerezM, GracianoC. Methodological approach towards sustainability by integration of environmental impact in production system models through LCA. Application to the Rioja wine sector. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simulation Int2014;90:143–61.10.1177/0037549712464409Suche in Google Scholar

45. MujicaM, PieraMA. A compact timed state space approach for the analysis of manufacturing systems: key algorithmic improvements. Int J Comput Integr Manufacturing2011;24:135–53.10.1080/0951192X.2010.543153Suche in Google Scholar

46. MujicaM, PieraMA. An improved time line search algorithm for manufacturing decision-making. Int J Prod Res2014;52:1116–32.10.1080/00207543.2013.839892Suche in Google Scholar

47. ReevesC, RoweJ. Genetic algorithms: principles and perspectives. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar