Applying the concept of load modeling with multiple impact factors in suburban field
-
Ernad Jabandžić
,
Tatjana Konjić
Abstract
To contribute to quality understanding of the multiple factors’ impact on load management, we provided the analysis of the concurrent impact of available multiple impact factors on load, examined correlations between the factors and load, and offered and validated the multifactor load model for the suburban field. The results show the concurrent impact of the factors under consideration on load in suburban field. This study continues to confirm that the application of load modeling using multiple impact factors is justified and reveals the importance of concurrent context and user factors effect already analyzed in urban region.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the habitants of the area where the research was conducted and the institutions that provided the data necessary for this research: Public Company Elektroprivreda Bosne i Hercegovine – Elektrodistribucija Zenica and Federal Hydrometeorological Institute of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
Multifactor load model for the suburban region for spring and summer (** - validated model relations).
Multifactor load model for the suburban region for autumn and winter (** - validated model relations).
References
1. Taherdoost, H. A systematic review of big data innovations in smart grids. Results Eng 2024;22:102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102132.Search in Google Scholar
2. Ozkop, E. A survey on direct load control technologies in the smart grid. IEEE Access 2024;12:4998–5053. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3349965.Search in Google Scholar
3. Jabandžić, E, Konjić, T, Tomašević, D. Load management framework in smart grids: a meta-analysis and review. IETE Tech Rev 2021;39:737–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2021.1906338.Search in Google Scholar
4. Yener, ŞÇ, Mutlu, R. On the equivalent ZIP parameter extraction of desktop computer cases and LCD monitors connected in parallel. Int J Adv Eng Res 2019;3:164–9. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.614997.Search in Google Scholar
5. Zhong, X, Zhang, J, Zhang, J, Shen, W, Peng, L, Liu, H. The power load forecasting model based on environment grey intelligence. Ekoloji Dergisi 2019;107:4485–90.Search in Google Scholar
6. Shahsavari, A, Farajollahi, M, Mohsenian-Rad, H. Individual load model parameter estimation in distribution systems using load switching events. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2019;34:4652–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2919901.Search in Google Scholar
7. Jabandžić, E, Konjić, T, Baraković, S. Multifactor load modeling for smart grids: an urban area case study. Elec Power Syst Res 2024;233:110452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110452.Search in Google Scholar
8. Population census in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2013, http://www.statistika.ba/?show=8#link1. [Accessed June 2024].Search in Google Scholar
9. Tešanj municipality. https://opcina-tesanj.ba/. [Accessed June 2024].Search in Google Scholar
10. Kalyanaraman, K, Ramanathan, HN, Harikumar, PN. Statistical methods for research: a step-by-step approach. Atlantic: IBM SPSS; 2021.Search in Google Scholar
11. Kotz, S, Johnson, NL. Breakthroughs in statistics: foundations and basic theory. Springer; 1992. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5.10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5Search in Google Scholar
12. Henson, RN. Analysis of variance (ANOVA). In: Brain mapping: an encyclopedic reference. Elsevier; 2015:477–81 pp. https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/www/sites/3/2015/03/Henson_EN_15_ANOVA.pdf.10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00319-5Search in Google Scholar
13. Pearson’s correlation coefficient: a comprehensive overview. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/pearsons-correlation-coefficient/. [Accessed June 2024].Search in Google Scholar
14. Rowntree, D. Statistics without tears: an introduction for non-mathematicians. Penguin; 2000. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/13568/statistics-without-tears-by-derek-rowntree/9780141987491.Search in Google Scholar
15. Jason, O, Waters, E. Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assess Res Eval 2002;8.Search in Google Scholar
16. Harrison, V, Kemp, R, Brace, N, Snelgar, R. SPSS for psychologists, 7th ed. Bloomsbury Academic; 2020. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/spss-for-psychologists-9781352009941/.Search in Google Scholar
17. Implementing the wilcoxon signed rank test in SPSS. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/the-wilcoxon-sign-test-in-spss/. [Accessed June 2024].Search in Google Scholar
18. Gupta, R, Sossan, F. Optimal sizing and siting of energy storage system considering curtailable photovoltaic generation in power distribution networks. Appl Energy 2023;339:120955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120955.Search in Google Scholar
19. Puvi, V, Lehtonen, M. Evaluating distribution network optimal structure with respect to solar hosting capacity. Elec Power Syst Res 2023;216:109019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.109019.Search in Google Scholar
20. Sheng, H, Zhu, Q, Tao, J, Zhang, H, Peng, F. Distribution network reconfiguration and photovoltaic optimal allocation considering harmonic interaction between photovoltaic and distribution network. J Electr Eng/Technology 2024;19:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01506-y.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
