Home Efficient power scheduling in smart homes using a novel artificial ecosystem optimization technique considering two pricing schemes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Efficient power scheduling in smart homes using a novel artificial ecosystem optimization technique considering two pricing schemes

  • Souhil Mouassa ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Marcos Tostado-Véliz and Francisco Jurado ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: August 10, 2021

Abstract

With emergence of automated environments, energy demand increased with unexpected ratio, especially total electricity consumed in the residential sector. This unexpected increase in demand in energy brings a challenging task of maintaining the balance between supply and demand. In this work, a robust artificial ecosystem-inspired optimizer based on demand-side management is proposed to provide the optimal scheduling pattern of smart homes. More precisely, the main objectives of the developed framework are: i) Shifting load from on-peak hours to off-peak hours while fulfilling the consumer intends to reduce electricity-bills. ii) Protect users comfort by improving the appliances waiting time. Artificial ecosystem optimizer (AEO) algorithm is a novel optimization technique inspired by the energy flocking between all living organisms in the ecosystem on earth. Demand side management (DSM) program is modeled as an optimization problem with constraints of starting and ending of appliances. The proposed optimization technique based DSM program is evaluated on two different pricing schemes with considering two operational time intervals (OTI). Extensive simulation cases are carried out to validate the effectiveness of the proposed optimizer based energy management scheme. AEO minimizes total electricity-bills while keeping the user comfort by producing optimum appliances scheduling pattern. Simulation results revealed that the proposed AEO achieved a minimization electricity-bill up to 10.95, 10.2% for RTP and 37.05% for CPP for the 12 and 60 min operational time interval (OTI), respectively, in comparison to other results achieved by other optimizers. On the other hand peak to average ratio (PAR) is reduced to 32.9% using RTP and 31.25% using CPP tariff.


Corresponding author: Souhil Mouassa, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Bouira, Bouira, Algeria; and Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaén, 23700 EPS Linares, Jaén, Spain, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the Electrical Engineering Department, Universities of Bouira and Jaén for financing this work. This work was conducted in Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaen-Linares; Spain. This work dedicate to the memory of my dear Professor Tarek Bouktir may Allah forgive him, raise his ranks and grant him the highest degrees in Jannah.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Kakran, S, Chanana, S. Operation scheduling of household load, EV and BESS using real time pricing, incentive based DR and peak power limiting strategy. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2019;20:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2018-0186.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gul, H, Arif, A, Fareed, S, Anwar, M, Naeem, A, Javaid, N. Classification and regression based methods for short term load and price forecasting: a survey. In: Barolli, L, Okada, Y, Amato, F, editors. Adv. internet, data web technol. 8th int. conf. emerg. internet, data web technol. Barcelona, Spain: Springer Switzerland; 2020:416–26 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-39746-3_43Search in Google Scholar

3. Sarker, E, Halder, P, Seyedmahmoudian, M, Jamei, E, Horan, B, Mekhilef, S, et al.. Progress on the demand side management in smart grid and optimization approaches. Int J Energy Res 2021;45:36–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5631.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cavalcante, L, Alexandre, S, Aoki, R, Fernandes, TSP, Torres, GL. Customer targeting optimization system for price – based demand response programs. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 2018;29:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2709.Search in Google Scholar

5. Aslam, S, Khalid, A, Javaid, N. Towards efficient energy management in smart grids considering microgrids with day-ahead energy forecasting. Elec Power Syst Res 2020;182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106232.Search in Google Scholar

6. Khalid, A, Javaid, N, Mateen, A. Demand side management using hybrid bacterial foraging and genetic algorithm optimization techniques. In: 10th int. conf. complex, intelligent, softw. intensive syst. demand. Fukuoka, Japan: IEEE; 2016:494–502 pp.10.1109/CISIS.2016.128Search in Google Scholar

7. Cetin, KS, Tabares-Velasco, PC, Novoselac, A. Appliance daily energy use in new residential buildings: use profiles and variation in time-of-use. Energy Build 2014;84:716–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.045.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kakran, S, Chanana, S. Optimal energy scheduling method under load shaping demand response program in a home energy management system. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2019;20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2018-0147.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mahmood, A, Javaid, N, Ahmed Khan, AK, Razzaq, S. An optimized approach for home appliances scheduling in smart grid. In: 19th int. multi-topic conf. IEEE, Islamabad, Pakistan; 2016:1–5 pp.10.1109/INMIC.2016.7840158Search in Google Scholar

10. Elsayed, AM, Hegab, MM, Farrag, SM. Smart residential load management technique for distribution systems’ performance enhancement and consumers’ satisfaction achievement. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 2019;29:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2795.Search in Google Scholar

11. Rekha, CBD, Vijayakumar, V. Genetic algorithm based demand side management for smart grid. Wireless Pers Commun 2017;93:481–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-3959-z.Search in Google Scholar

12. Javaid, N, Javaid, S, Abdul, W, Ahmed, I, Almogren, A, Alamri, A, et al.. A hybrid genetic wind driven heuristic optimization algorithm for demand side management in smart grid. Energies 2017;10:1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030319.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mouassa, S, Bouktir, T, Jurado, F. Scheduling of smart home appliances for optimal energy management in smart grid using Harris-Hawks optimization algorithm. Optim Eng 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09572-1.Search in Google Scholar

14. Recep, C, Altas, IH. Scheduling of domestic shiftable loads via cuckoo search optimization algorithm. In: 4th int. Istanbul smart grid congr. fair. Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE; 2016:16–9 pp.Search in Google Scholar

15. Khan, ZA, Zafar, A, Javaid, S, Aslam, S, Rahim, MH, Javaid, N. Hybrid meta-heuristic optimization based home energy management system in smart grid. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019;10:4837–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-01169-y.Search in Google Scholar

16. Faiz, Z, Bilal, T, Awais, M, Gull, S. Demand side management using chicken swarm optimization. In: Int. conf. intell. netw. collab. syst. Toronto, Canada: Springer International Publishing AG 2018; 2018:155–65 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-65636-6_14Search in Google Scholar

17. Shuja, SM, Javaid, N, Khan, S, Khan, ZA. Efficient scheduling of smart home appliances for energy management by cost and PAR optimization algorithm in smart grid. In: Work. int. conf. adv. inf. netw. appl. Cham: Springer; 2019:398–411 pp. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-15035-8_37.10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_37Search in Google Scholar

18. Khan, ZA, Khalid, A, Javaid, N, Haseeb, A, Saba, T, Shafiq, M. Exploiting nature-inspired-based artificial intelligence techniques for coordinated day-ahead scheduling to efficiently manage energy in smart grid. IEEE Access 2019;7:140102–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942813.Search in Google Scholar

19. Khalid, A, Khan, ZA, Javaid, N. Game theory based electric price tariff and salp swarm algorithm for demand side management. In: Fifth HCT inf. technol. trends. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: IEEE; 2019:1–5 pp.10.1109/CTIT.2018.8649489Search in Google Scholar

20. Abushnaf, J, Rassau, A. An efficient scheme for residential load scheduling integrated with demand side programs and small – scale distributed renewable energy generation and storage. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 2018;29:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2720.Search in Google Scholar

21. Aslam, S, Herodotou, H, Mohsin, SM, Javaid, N, Ashraf, N, Aslam, S. A survey on deep learning methods for power load and renewable energy forecasting in smart microgrids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110992.Search in Google Scholar

22. Egziabher, TBG, Edwards, S. Studies in computational intelligence. In: Kacprzyk, J, editor. Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2013, vol 284.Search in Google Scholar

23. Mirjalili, S. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Base Syst 2015;89:228–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mirjalili, S, Lewis, A. Advances in engineering software the whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Software 2016;95:51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.Search in Google Scholar

25. Asghar, A, Mirjalili, S, Faris, H, Aljarah, I. Harris Hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Generat Comput Syst 2019;97:849–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhao, W, Wang, L. Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm. London: Springer; 2019.10.1007/s00521-019-04452-xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Shuja, SM, Javaid, N, Qasim, U, Butt, AA. Towards efficient scheduling of smart appliances for energy management by candidate solution updation algorithm in smart grid. In: Int. conf. adv. inf. netw. appl. Matsue, Japan: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2019:67–81 pp. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_6.10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_6Search in Google Scholar

28. Naz, M, Iqbal, Z, Javaid, N, Khan, ZA, Abdul, W, Almogren, A, et al.. Efficient power scheduling in smart homes using hybrid grey Wolf differential evolution optimization technique with real time and critical peak pricing schemes. Energies 2018;11:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020384.Search in Google Scholar

29. Zhao, Z, Lee, WC, Shin, Y, Bin, Song K. An optimal power scheduling method for demand response in home energy management system. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2013;4:1391–400. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2251018.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-15
Accepted: 2021-07-16
Published Online: 2021-08-10

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0104/pdf
Scroll to top button