Modeling of unforced demand response programs
-
Hassan Jalili
and
Pierluigi Siano
Abstract
Demand response programs are useful options in reducing electricity price, congestion relief, load shifting, peak clipping, valley filling and resource adequacy from the system operator’s viewpoint. For this purpose, many models of these programs have been developed. However, the availability of these resources has not been properly modeled in demand response models making them not practical for long-term studies such as in the resource adequacy problem where considering the providers’ responding uncertainties is necessary for long-term studies. In this paper, a model considering providers’ unavailability for unforced demand response programs has been developed. Temperature changes, equipment failures, simultaneous implementation of demand side management resources, popular TV programs and family visits are the main reasons that may affect the availability of the demand response providers to fulfill their commitments. The effectiveness of the proposed model has been demonstrated by numerical simulation.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Shoreh, MH, Siano, P, Shafie-Khah, M, Loia, V, Catalao, JPS. A survey of industrial applications of demand response. Elec Power Syst Res 2016;141:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.07.008.Search in Google Scholar
2. Siano, P. Demand response and smart grids – a survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;30:461–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.022.Search in Google Scholar
3. IEA, Strategic plan for the IEA-demand side management program; 2004–2009. Available from: http://www.iea.org.Search in Google Scholar
4. Smith, V, Kiesling, L. A market-based model for ISO-sponsored demand response programs. In: A white paper prepared for the multi-client study. Georgia: Organized by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM) and Distributed Energy Financial Group, LLC (DEFG); 2005.Search in Google Scholar
5. Marwan, M, Ledwich, G, Ghosh, A. Demand-side response model to avoid spike of electricity price. J Process Contr 2014;24:782–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.01.009.Search in Google Scholar
6. Ying, L, Loong, NB, Trayer, M, Lingjia, L. Automated residential demand response: algorithmic implications of pricing models. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012;3:1712–21.10.1109/ICCE.2012.6161807Search in Google Scholar
7. Na, L, Lijun, C, Dahleh, MA. Demand response using linear supply function bidding. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2015;6:1827–38.10.1109/TSG.2015.2410131Search in Google Scholar
8. Safamehr, H, Kian, AR. A cost-efficient and reliable energy management of a micro-grid using intelligent demand response program. Energy 2015;91:283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.051.Search in Google Scholar
9. Aghajani, GR, Shayanfar, HA, Shayegani, H. Presenting a multi-objective generation scheduling model for pricing demand response rate in micro-grid energy management. Energy Convers Manag 2015;106:308–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.059.Search in Google Scholar
10. Shafie-Khah, M, Heydarian-Forushani, E, Golshan, MEH, Siano, P, Moghaddam, MP. Optimal trading of plug-in electric vehicle aggregation agents in a market environment for sustainability. Appl Energy 2016;162:601–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.134.Search in Google Scholar
11. Heydarian-Forushani, E, Moghaddam, MP, Sheikh-El-Eslami, MK, Shafikhah, M, Catalao, JPS. Risk-constrained offering strategy of wind power producers considering intraday demand response exchange. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2014;5:1036–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2014.2324035.Search in Google Scholar
12. Siano, P, Sarno, D. Assessing the benefits of residential demand response in a real time distribution energy market. Appl Energy 2016;161:533–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.017.Search in Google Scholar
13. Parvania, M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M, Shahidehpour, M. Optimal demand response aggregation in wholesale electricity markets. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2013;4:1957–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2013.2257894.Search in Google Scholar
14. Parvania, M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Demand response scheduling by stochastic SCUC. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2010;1:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2010.2046430.Search in Google Scholar
15. Schweppe, FC, Caramanis, MC, Tabors, RD, Bohn, RE. Spot pricing of electricity. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston, MA: Springer; 1989.10.1007/978-1-4613-1683-1Search in Google Scholar
16. Aalami, HA, Yousefi, GR, Moghaddam, MP. Demand response model considering EDRP and TOU programs. In: 2008 IEEE, PES, T&D conference and exposition. Chicago, IL, USA; 2008.10.1109/TDC.2008.4517059Search in Google Scholar
17. Yu, N, Yu, J. Optimal TOU decision considering demand response model. In: 2006 International conference on power system technology. Chongqing, China; 2006:1–5 pp.10.1109/ICPST.2006.321461Search in Google Scholar
18. Yousefi, A, Aalami, HA, Shayesteh, E, Moghaddam, MP. Enhancement of spinning reserve capacity by means of optimal utilization of EDRP program. In: Proceedings of the fourth IASTED international conference April 2–4, 2008 Langkawi, Malaysia, power and energy systems (AsiaPES 2008); 2008. ISBN CD: 978-0-88986-732-1.Search in Google Scholar
19. Aalami, HA, Moghaddam, MP, Yousefi, GR. Demand response modeling considering interruptible/curtailable loads and capacity market programs. Appl Energy 2010;87:243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.041.Search in Google Scholar
20. Aalami, HA, Moghaddam, MP, Yousefi, GR. Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Elec Power Syst Res 2010;80:426–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.007.Search in Google Scholar
21. Mohajeryami, S, Schwarz, P, Baboli, PT. Including the behavioral aspects of customers in demand response model: real time pricing versus peak time rebate. In: North American power symposium (NAPS). Charlotte, NC, USA; 2015.10.1109/NAPS.2015.7335116Search in Google Scholar
22. Faruqui, A, Sergici, S. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. J Regul Econ 2010;38:193–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y.Search in Google Scholar
23. Aalami, HA, Moghaddam, MP, Yousefi, GR. Evaluation of nonlinear models for time-based rates demand response programs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;65:282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.021.Search in Google Scholar
24. Zakariazadeh, A, Jadid, S, Siano, P. Multi-objective scheduling of electric vehicles in smart distribution system. Energy Convers Manag 2014;79:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.042.Search in Google Scholar
25. Zakariazadeh, A, Homaee, O, Jadid, S, Siano, P. A new approach for real time voltage control using demand response in an automated distribution system. Appl Energy 2014;114:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.004.Search in Google Scholar
26. Felice, MD, Alessandri, A, Catalano, F. Seasonal climate forecasts for medium term electricity demand forecasting. Appl Energy 2015;137:435–44.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.030Search in Google Scholar
27. Yan, C, Xue, W, Wang, S, Cui, B. A novel air-conditioning system for proactive power demand response to smart grid. Energy Convers Manag 2015;102:239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.072.Search in Google Scholar
28. Sun, Z, Li, L, Dababneh, F. Plant-level electricity demand response for combined manufacturing system and heating, venting, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system. J Clean Prod 2016;135:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.098.Search in Google Scholar
29. Carcedo, JM, Garcia, JP. Temperature effects on firms’ electricity demand: an analysis of sectorial differences in Spain. Appl Energy 2015;142:407–25.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.064Search in Google Scholar
30. Hor, CL, Watson, SJ, Majithia, S. Analyzing the impact of weather variables on monthly electricity demand. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2005;20:2078–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857397.Search in Google Scholar
31. Christy, C, Zhu, Y. The application of simple thermal models to improve dynamic load models. In: 2013 3rd International conference on electric power and energy conversion systems, Istanbul, Turkey; 2013:1–5 pp.10.1109/EPECS.2013.6713057Search in Google Scholar
32. Lee, CC, Chiu, YB. Electricity demand elasticities and temperature: evidence from panel smooth transition regression with instrumental variable approach. Energy Econ 2011;33:896–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.009.Search in Google Scholar
33. Chen, GH, Lie, TT. The impact of climate change on New Zealand’s electricity demand. In: 2010 IEEE 11th International conference on probabilistic methods applied to power system, Singapore; 2010:808–13 pp.10.1109/PMAPS.2010.5528429Search in Google Scholar
34. Hekkenberg, M, Benders, RMJ. Indications for a changing electricity demand pattern: the temperature dependence of electricity demand in the Netherlands. Energy Pol 2009;37:1542–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.030.Search in Google Scholar
35. Psiloglou, B, Giannakopoulos, C, Majithia, S, Petrakis, M. Factors affecting electricity demand in Athens Greece and London, UK: a comparative assessment. Energy 2009;34:1855–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.033.Search in Google Scholar
36. Zhang, W. Reliability evaluation of bulk power systems using analytical and equivalent approaches. A thesis Submitted of the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan; 1998.Search in Google Scholar
37. Wang, P, Billinton, R. Implementation of nonuniform reliability in a deregulated power market. Can Conf Electr Comput Eng 2001;2:857–61.10.1109/CCECE.2001.933553Search in Google Scholar
38. Ding, Y, Wang, P. Reliability and price risk assessment of a restructured power system with hybrid market structure. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2006;21:108–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857835.Search in Google Scholar
39. Goldman, C, Reid, M, Levy, R, Silverstein, A. Coordination of energy efficiency and demand response. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Permitting, Sitting and Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy; 2010.10.2172/981732Search in Google Scholar
40. Ghaderi, A, Moghaddam, MP, Sheikh-El Eslami, MK. Energy efficiency resource modeling in generation expansion planning. Energy 2014;68:529–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.028.Search in Google Scholar
41. Kwag, HG, Kim, J. Optimal combined scheduling of generation and demand response with demand resource constraints. Appl Energy 2012;96:161–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.075.Search in Google Scholar
42. Kalati, RN, Sheikh-El-Eslami, MK. Determination of DSM strategy to participate in the capacity market (in Persian) [M. S. thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2015.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Fault location in the distribution network based on power system status estimation with smart meters data
- Research Articles
- Study on the characteristics of secondary arc current of UHV high compensation degree TCSC line under the fine-tuning mode
- Reactive power and harmonic compensation in a grid-connected photovoltaic system using fuzzy logic controller
- Enhancement of system performance using STATCOM as dynamic compensator with squirrel cage induction generator (SCIG) based microgrid
- A novel non-isolated dual-input DC-DC boost converter for hybrid electric vehicle application
- Suppression of very fast transients in 245 kV gas insulated substation
- Locational marginal price computation in radial distribution system using Self Adaptive Levy Flight based JAYA Algorithm and game theory
- Modeling of unforced demand response programs
- Probability box theory-based uncertain power flow calculation for power system with wind power
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Fault location in the distribution network based on power system status estimation with smart meters data
- Research Articles
- Study on the characteristics of secondary arc current of UHV high compensation degree TCSC line under the fine-tuning mode
- Reactive power and harmonic compensation in a grid-connected photovoltaic system using fuzzy logic controller
- Enhancement of system performance using STATCOM as dynamic compensator with squirrel cage induction generator (SCIG) based microgrid
- A novel non-isolated dual-input DC-DC boost converter for hybrid electric vehicle application
- Suppression of very fast transients in 245 kV gas insulated substation
- Locational marginal price computation in radial distribution system using Self Adaptive Levy Flight based JAYA Algorithm and game theory
- Modeling of unforced demand response programs
- Probability box theory-based uncertain power flow calculation for power system with wind power
