Objective outcome evaluation of a leadership and intrapersonal development subject for university students

References

1. LaSala MC. Client satisfaction: consideration of correlates and response bias. Fam Soc 1997;78:54–64.10.1606/1044-3894.737Search in Google Scholar

2. Lebow JL. Research assessing consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment: a review of findings. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:211–36.10.1016/0149-7189(83)90003-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Thyer B. Evaluation of social work practice in the new millennium: myths and realities. In Shek DT, Lam MC, Au CF, Lee JJ, editors. Entering a new millennium: advances in social welfare service and research. Hong Kong: New Asia College and the Chinese University Press, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002:3–18.Search in Google Scholar

4. Rubin A, Babbie E. Research methods for social work. Delmont, CA: Thomson Learning, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

5. Singleton RA, Straits BC. Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

6. Brannick MT, Miles DE, Kisamore JL. Calibration between student mastery and self-efficacy. Stud High Educ 2005;30:473–83.10.1080/03075070500160244Search in Google Scholar

7. Joiner R, Jones S. The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. Int J Educ Res 2003;39:861–71.10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.008Search in Google Scholar

8. Suwantarathip O, Wichadee S. The impacts of cooperative learning on anxiety and proficiency in an EFL class. Journal of College Teaching & Learning 2010;7:51–7.10.19030/tlc.v7i11.252Search in Google Scholar

9. Gliner JA, Morgan GA. Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

10. Gomm R, Needham G, Bullman A. Evaluating research in health and social care. London: Sage, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

11. Shek DT, Sun RC. Promoting psychosocial competencies in university students: evaluation based on a one group pretest-posttest design. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11: 229–34.Search in Google Scholar

12. Shek DT, Sun RC. Promoting leadership and intrapersonal competence in university students: what can we learn from Hong Kong? Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:221–28.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0037Search in Google Scholar

13. Shek DT, Sun RC. Process evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university setting in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:235–41.Search in Google Scholar

14. Shek DT, Sun RC. Qualitative evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university setting in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:243–48.Search in Google Scholar

15. Shek DT, Sun RC. Focus group evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:249–54.Search in Google Scholar

16. Shek DT, Sun RC, Chui YH, Lit SW, Yuen WW, Chung YY, et al. Development and evaluation of a positive youth development course for university students in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, Article ID 263731, 8 pages. DOI: 10.1100/2012/263731.10.1100/2012/263731Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Shek DT. Post-lecture evaluation of a positive youth development subject for university students in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, Article ID 934679, 8 pages. DOI:10.1100/2012/934679.10.1100/2012/934679Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Shek DT, Siu AM, Lee TY. The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: a validation study. Res Soc Work Pract 2007;17:380–91.10.1177/1049731506296196Search in Google Scholar

19. Shek DT, Ma CM. Dimensionality of the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: confirmatory factor analyses. Soc Indic Res 2010;98:41–59.10.1007/s11205-009-9515-9Search in Google Scholar

20. Spooren P, Mortelmans D, Denekens J. Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2007;32:667–79.10.1080/02602930601117191Search in Google Scholar

21. Stringer M, Irwing P. Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: a structural modeling approach. Br J Educ Psychol 1998;68:409–26.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01301.xSearch in Google Scholar

22. Waugh RF. The course experience questionnaire: a Rasch measurement model analysis. Higher Education Research and Development 1998;17:45–64.10.1080/0729436980170103Search in Google Scholar

23. Kim C, Damewood E, Hodge N. Professor attitude: its effect on teaching evaluations. J Management Education 2000;24:458–73.10.1177/105256290002400405Search in Google Scholar

24. St Pierre TL, Kaltreider DL, Mark MM, Aikin KJ. Drug prevention in a community setting: a longitudinal study of the relative effectiveness of a three-year primary prevention program in Boys and Girls Clubs across the nation. Am J Com Psychol 1992;20:673–706.10.1007/BF01312603Search in Google Scholar

25. Lam CW, Shek DT. Objective outcome evaluation of a drug prevention program for high-risk youths in Hong Kong: the Project Astro. Int J Child Health Hum Dev 2011;4:361–76.Search in Google Scholar

26. Shek DT, Yu L. A review of validated youth prevention and positive youth development programs in Asia. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:317–24.10.1515/IJAMH.2011.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Shek DT. Nurturing holistic development of university students in Hong Kong: where are we and where should we go? ScientificWorldJournal 2010;10:563–75.10.1100/tsw.2010.62Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Shek DT, Wong KK. Do adolescent developmental issues disappear overnight? Reflections about holistic development in university students. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:353–61.10.1100/tsw.2011.5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Shek DT, Ma CM, Tang CY. Predictors of subjective outcome evaluation findings in a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2011;10:249–55.10.1515/ijdhd.2011.040Search in Google Scholar

30. Shek DT, Sun RC, Merrick J. Training programs and implementation process of positive youth development programs. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:303–4.10.1515/IJAMH.2011.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. Development of a new curriculum in a positive youth development program: the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2207–18.10.1100/2011/289589Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Shek DT. Quality of life research: responses to emerging issues in a changing world. Soc Indic Res 2011;100:371–4.10.1007/s11205-010-9628-1Search in Google Scholar

34. Shek DT. Evaluation of a positive youth development program based on the repertory grid test. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, Article ID 372752, 12 pages. DOI 10.1100/2012/372752.10.1100/2012/372752Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Bok D. Our underachieving colleges: a candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

36. Lewis HR. Excellence without a soul: how a great university forgot education. New York: Public Affairs Publishing, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

37. Tull A. What they’re reading – excellence without a soul: how a great university forgot education. J Coll Character 2007;8:1–2.Search in Google Scholar

38. Dalton J, Crosby P. The neglected inner lives of college students. J Coll Character 2006;7:1–2.10.2202/1940-1639.1237Search in Google Scholar

39. Dalton J, Crosby P. Being and having: shouldn’t excellence in higher education (and people) be a measure of what one does rather than what one has? J Coll Character 2007;9:1–5.10.2202/1940-1639.1099Search in Google Scholar