Home Numerical simulation and experimental study of an efficient multi-orifice-impinging transverse (MOIT) jet mixer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical simulation and experimental study of an efficient multi-orifice-impinging transverse (MOIT) jet mixer

  • Duan Zhenya , Liu Tailong , Li Wenchen , Zhai Hongyan , Zhang Junmei EMAIL logo , Lin Longlong and Wang Jingtao
Published/Copyright: May 9, 2022

Abstract

In order to accomplish efficient mixing of liquids with large differences in flow rates, an efficient multi-orifice impinging transverse (MOIT) jet mixer is used in this paper. Its structure combines a conventional MOIT jet mixer with a venturi jet mixer to improve the mixing efficiency of the MOIT jet mixer. The flow characteristics and mixing effects inside the conventional and efficient jet mixer are numerically simulated by means of a Multiphase Models. Based on building the experimental platform, the maximum error between the simulation results and the experimental results obtained with the high-speed camera is 8.42%, which verifies that the model and simulation method applies to the simulation of the mixer. In addition, the paper uses MATLAB software to obtain the interphase contact area at the transverse orifice section and verifies that the contact area at the transverse orifice section affects the mixing effect of the mixer. The droplet size distribution was also analyzed by the CFD-PBM model. The results show that the efficient MOIT jet mixer has better mixing efficiency and mixing effect, and the optimal values of the number of orifices and main fluid flow rate of the jet mixer exist. In addition, the mixing effect of the mixer showed a decreasing trend with the increase of the orifice size. The results of this paper complete the optimization of the parameters of the MOIT jet mixer, facilitating its industrial application. And combining two different mixers to create a novel jet mixer, which provides a direction for the development of new jet mixers and helps to promote the development of the fine chemical industry.


Corresponding author: Junmei Zhang, College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, Shandong Province, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2019GSF109009

Funding source: Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: ZR2020MB122

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The financial support of Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong (grant no. 2019GSF109009) and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (no. ZR2020MB122) are sincerely appreciated by the authors.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Araki, K., M. Yoshizumi, S. Kimura, A. Tanaka, D. Inoue, T. Furubayashi, T. Sakane, and M. Enomura. 2019. “Application of a Microreactor to Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: Preparation of Amorphous Curcumin Nanoparticles and Controlling the Crystallinity of Curcumin Nanoparticles by Ultrasonic Treatment.” AAPS PharmSciTech 21 (1): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1418-8.Search in Google Scholar

Azizi, F., and A. Taweel. 2011. “Turbulently Flowing Liquid–Liquid Dispersions. Part I: Drop Breakage and Coalescence.” Chemical Engineering Journal 166 (2): 715–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.050.Search in Google Scholar

Banasiak, K., A. Hafner, and T. Andresen. 2012. “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Influence of the Two-phase Ejector Geometry on the Performance of the R744 Heat Pump.” International Journal of Refrigeration 35 (6): 1617–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2012.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

Gutmann, B., D. Cantillo, and C. O. Kappe. 2015. “Continuous-Flow Technology – A Tool for the Safe Manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (23): 6688–728, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409318.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, M., J. E. Cater, and J. Soria. 2004. “Investigation of the Mean Passive Scalar Field in Zero-Net-Mass-Flux Jets in Cross-Flow Using Planar-Laser-Induced Fluorescence.” Physics of Fluids 16 (3): 794–808, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1647143.Search in Google Scholar

Holdeman, J. D. 2005. “Mixing of Multiple Jets with a Confined Subsonic Crossflow.” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 19 (1): 551–62.10.1016/0360-1285(93)90021-6Search in Google Scholar

Karagozian, A. R. 2014. “The Jet in Crossflow.” Physics of Fluids 26 (10): 1–47, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895900.Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, J. T., W. A. Sowa, G. S. Samuelsen, and J. D. Holdeman. 2000. “Optimization of Orifice Geometry for Crossflow Mixing in a Cylindrical Duct.” Journal of Propulsion and Power 16 (6): 929–38, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5669.Search in Google Scholar

Luo, P., Y. Tai, Y. Fang, and H. Wu. 2016. “Mixing Times in Single and Multi-Orifice-Impinging Transverse (MOIT) Jet Mixers with Crossflow.” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 24 (7): 825–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.01.018.Search in Google Scholar

Li, S., J. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Yao, X. Li, N. Wen, and G. Zou. 2019. “Optimization on Crucial Ejector Geometries in a Multi-Evaporator Refrigeration System for Tropical Region Refrigerated Trucks.” Energy 189: 116347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116347.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M. S., H. Lee, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, and H. Jeong. 2016. “Optimization of Two-Phase R600a Ejector Geometries Using a Non-Equilibrium CFD Model.” Applied Thermal Engineering 109: 272–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.078.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, R. M., J. A. Snyman, and J. P. Meyer. 2007. “Jets in Crossflow Mixing Analysis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Mathematical Optimization.” Journal of Propulsion and Power 23 (3): 618–28, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22136.Search in Google Scholar

Manjula, P., P. Kalaichelvi, and K. Dheenathayalan. 2010. “Development of Mixing Time Correlation for a Double Jet Mixer.” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 85 (1): 115–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2274.Search in Google Scholar

Mahesh, K. 2013. “The Interaction of Jets with Crossflow.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 45 (1): 379–407, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101115.Search in Google Scholar

Plumb, K. 2005. “Continuous Processing in the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 83 (6): 730–8, https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd.04359.Search in Google Scholar

Plutschack, M. B., B. Pieber, K. Gilmore, and P. H. Seeberger. 2017. “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry.” Chemical Reviews 117 (18): 11796–893, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Pechenegov, Y. Y., V. F. Simonov, B. A. Semenov, O. Y. Kosova, and A. N. Mrakin. 2017. “Oxidative Pyrolysis of Oil Shale in Tubular Flow Reactors with External Heating.” Solid Fuel Chemistry 51 (1): 40–3, https://doi.org/10.3103/s0361521917010074.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, G., and H. Meng. 2010. “Experimental Study of Turbulent Mixing in a Tee Mixer Using PIV and PLIF.” AIChE Journal 47 (12): 2653–65.10.1002/aic.690471205Search in Google Scholar

Pianko-Oprych, P., and Z. Jaworski. 2009. “CFD Modelling of Two-Phase Liquid-Liquid Flow in a SMX Static Mixer.” Polish Journal of Chemical Technology 11 (3): 41–9, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10026-009-0034-x.Search in Google Scholar

Roberge, D. M., B. Zimmermann, F. Rainone, M. Gottsponer, M. Eyholzer, and N. Kockmann. 2008. “Microreactor Technology and Continuous Processes in the Fine Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry: Is the Revolution Underway?” Organic Process Research & Development 12 (5): 905–10, https://doi.org/10.1021/op8001273.Search in Google Scholar

Sagandira, C. R., M. Siyawamwaya, and P. Watts. 2020. “3D Printing and Continuous Flow Chemistry Technology to Advance Pharmaceutical Manufacturing in Developing Countries.” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 13 (11): 7886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Schaber, S. D., D. I. Gerogiorgis, R. Ramachandran, J. M. B. Evans, P. I. Barton, and B. L. Trout. 2011. “Economic Analysis of Integrated Continuous and Batch Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50 (17): 10083–92, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2006752.Search in Google Scholar

Sigbert, H. 1989. Continuous Preparation of Monoisocyanates or Polyisocyanates. Germany: CN1034536.Search in Google Scholar

Tsaoulidis, D., and P. Angeli. 2017. “Liquid-liquid Dispersions in Intensified Impinging-Jets Cells.” Chemical Engineering and Science 171: 149–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.016.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, H., Z. Liu, B. Han, and Y. X. Li. 2014. “Numerical Investigation of the Influences of Mixing Chamber Geometries on Steam Ejector Performance.” Desalination 353: 15–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Z., L. Wang, and H. Meng. 2021. “Numerical Simulation of CFD-PBM of Droplet Fragmentation and Agglomeration Processes of Dispersed Phase in Kenics-type Static Mixer.” Journal of Food Process Engineering 21 (8): 935–43.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-20
Accepted: 2022-04-19
Published Online: 2022-05-09

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0298/html
Scroll to top button