Home Aerobic sequential batch reactor for domestic sewage treatment: parametric optimization and kinetics studies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aerobic sequential batch reactor for domestic sewage treatment: parametric optimization and kinetics studies

  • Neela Acharya , Vijay Kumar , Vandana Gupta , Chandrakant Thakur EMAIL logo and Parmesh Kumar Chaudhari EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 22, 2021

Abstract

Domestic sewage (DS) was first treated in aerobic sequential batch reactor (SBR). In order to increase the treated water quality, DS from SBR was further treated using electrocoagulation (EC) and Ion exchange (IE) process. In the SBR study, process parameters such as hydraulic retention time (HRT) and reactor fill time (t f ) was optimized at various volume exchange ratio (VER) of 0.534, 0.4, 0.266, and 0.133. The best HRT and t f were observed to be 0.78 day (d) and 2 h, respectively, providing 72.37% chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction (initial value of COD = 270 mg/dm3). Kinetics of biodegradation in SBR was also studied. The second stage treatment was performed in EC reactor at 1 ampere (A) current for 30 min electrolysis time (tR). EC reactor, further reduced COD and biological oxygen demand (BOD) up to 72 and 21 mg/dm3 from its average initial COD and BOD of 94 and 23 mg/dm3, respectively. Second stage treatment in IE process reduced hardness, sulphate, and phosphate up to 15, 0.05, and 0.13 mg/dm3 from its initial value 350, 5.48 and 1.16 mg/dm3, respectively. The treated water can be used as potable water after disinfection as its water quality is near to river water.


Corresponding authors: Chandrakant Thakur and Parmesh Kumar Chaudhari, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India, E-mail: ; and (P. K. Chaudhari)

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: Sending my original work paper and agreed for this publication without any conflict.

References

Acharya, N., G. Jyoti, C. Thakur, and P. K. Chaudhari. 2020. “Treatment of Domestic Sewage Using Electrocoagulation Followed by Ion Exchange – Parametric and Kinetic Studies.” Desalination and Water Treatment 178: 65–73, https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.24951.Search in Google Scholar

Badawy, M. I., and M. E. M. Ali. 2006. “Fenton’s Peroxidation and Coagulation Processes for the Treatment of Combined Industrial and Domestic Wastewater.” Journal of Hazardous Materials B 136: 961–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.042.Search in Google Scholar

Badejo, A. A., D. O. Omole, J. M. Ndambuki, and W. K. Kupolati. 2017. “Municipal Wastewater Treatment Using Sequential Activated Sludge Reactor and Vegetated Submerged Bed Constructed Wetland Planted with Vetiveria Zizanioides.” Ecological Engineering 99: 525–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.012.Search in Google Scholar

Can, O. T., M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, and M. Bayramoglu. 2006. “Treatment of the Textile Wastewater by Combined Electrocoagulation.” Chemosphere 62: 181–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.022.Search in Google Scholar

CPCB. 1986. General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants Part-A: Effluents. The Environment (Protection) Rules, Schedule – VI. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.Search in Google Scholar

Eckenfelder, W. W., and G. Petr. 1998. Water Quality Management Library-Volume 1/Activated Sludge Process Design and Control: Theory and Practice. Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Company.10.1201/9780203968567Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes, H., M. K. Jungles, H. Hoffmann, R. V. Antonio, and R. H.R. Costa. 2013. “Full-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for domestic wastewater: Performance and diversity of microbial communities.” Bioresource Technology 262–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.027.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, D. W., Q. Hu, C. Yao, and N. Q. Ren. 2014. “Treatment of Domestic Wastewater by an Integrated Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor under Moderate to Low Temperature Conditions.” Bioresearches Technology 159: 193–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.086.Search in Google Scholar

Gaval, G., and J. J. Pernell. 2003. “Impact of the Repetition of Oxygen Deficiencies on the Filamentous Bacteria Proliferation in Activated Sludge.” Water Research 37: 1991–2000, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00421-9.Search in Google Scholar

Gimeno, O., J. F. García-Araya, F. J. Beltrán, F. J. Rivas, and A. Espejo. 2016. “Removal of Emerging Contaminants from a Primary Effluent of Municipal Wastewater by Means of Sequential Biological Degradation-Solar Photocatalytic Oxidation Processes.” Chemical Engineering Journal 290: 12–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.022.Search in Google Scholar

Haandel, A. V., and J. Lubbe. 2011. Handbook of Biological Wastewater Treatment: Design and Optimisation of Activated Sludge Systems. Colchester: IWA Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Janczukowicz, W., M. Szewczyk, M. Krzemieniewski, and J. Pesta. 2001. “Settling Properties of Activated Sludge from a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR).” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 10: 15–20.Search in Google Scholar

Jang, N, X. Ren, G. Kim, C. Ahn, J. Cho, and I. S. Kim. 2007. “Characteristics of Soluble Microbial Products and Extracellular Polymeric Substances in the Membrane Bioreactor for Water Reuse.” Desalination 202: 90–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.043.Search in Google Scholar

Katal, R., and H. Pahlavanzadeh. 2011. “Influence of Different Combinations of Aluminum and Iron Electrode on Electrocoagulation Efficiency: Application to the Treatment of Paper Mill Wastewater.” Desalination 265: 199–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.052.Search in Google Scholar

Kushwaha, J. P., V. C. Srivastava, and I. D. Mall. 2013. “Sequential Batch Reactor for Dairy Wastewater Treatment: Parametric Optimization; Kinetics and Waste Sludge Disposal.” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 1: 1036–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.018.Search in Google Scholar

Maranon, E., I. Vazquez, J. Rodriguez, L. Castrillon, Y. Fernandez, and H. Lopez. 2008. “Treatment of Coke Wastewater in a Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR) at Pilot Plant Scale.” Bioresearches Technology 99: 4192–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Monod, J. 1949. “The Growth of Bacterial Cultures.” Annual Review of Microbiology 3: 371–94, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103.Search in Google Scholar

Okpokwasili, G. C., and C. O. Nweke. 2005. “Microbial Growth and Substrate Utilization Kinetics.” African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 305–17.Search in Google Scholar

Peavy, H. S., D. R. Rowe, and G. Tchobanoglous. 2009. Environmental Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, E. W., R. B. Baired, A. D. Eaton, and L. S. Clesceri. 2012. APHA, AWWA and WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.Search in Google Scholar

Sahu, O. P., B. Mazumdar, and P. K. Chaudhari. 2019. “Electrochemical Treatment of Sugar Industry Wastewater: Process Optimization by Response Surface Methodology.” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 16: 1527–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1765-0.Search in Google Scholar

Samrani, A. G. E., B. S. Lartiges, E. Montarges-Pelletier, V. Kazpard, O. Barres, and J. Ghanbaj. 2004. “Clarification of Municipal Sewage with Ferric Chloride: The Nature of Coagulant Species.” Water Research 38: 756–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sarti, A., M. L. Garcia, M. Zaiat, and E. Foresti. 2007. “Domestic Sewage Treatment in a Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor (ASBBR).” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51: 237–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, A. K., and A. K. Chopra. 2017. “Removal of Nitrate and Sulphate from Biologically Treated Municipal Wastewater by Electrocoagulation.” Applied Water Science 7: 1239–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0320-0.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, V., V. C. Srivastava, J. P. Kushwaha, and I. D. Mall. 2010. “Studies on Biodegradation of Resorcinol in Sequential Batch Reactor.” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 64: 764–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.08.009.Search in Google Scholar

Showkat, U., and I. A. Najar. 2019. “Study on the efficiency of sequential batch reactor (SBR)-based sewage treatment plant.” Applied Water Science 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0882-8.Search in Google Scholar

Thakur, C., V. C. Srivastava, and I. D. Mall. 2014. “Aerobic Degradation of Petroleum Refinery Wastewater in Sequential Batch Reactor.” Journal of Environmental Science and Health A 49: 1436–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2014.928557.Search in Google Scholar

Wilean, B. M., and P. Balmer. 1999. “The Effect of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration on the Structure, Size and Size Distribution of Activated Sludge Flocks.” Water Research 33: 391–400.10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00208-5Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Z. Wang, Z. Wu, F. Lu, J. Tong, and L. Zang. 2010. “Formation of Dynamic Membrane in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for Municipal Wastewater Treatment.” Chemical Engineering Journal 165: 175–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-28
Accepted: 2021-10-30
Published Online: 2021-11-22

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0094/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button