Home Bayesian Deconvolution of Vessel Residence Time Distribution
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Bayesian Deconvolution of Vessel Residence Time Distribution

  • Thomas Huddle , Paul Langston EMAIL logo and Edward Lester
Published/Copyright: October 21, 2017

Abstract

Residence time distribution (RTD) within vessels is a critical aspect for the design and operation of continuous flow technologies, such as hydrothermal synthesis of nanomaterials. RTD affects product characteristics, such as particle size distribution. Tracer techniques allow measurement of RTD, but often cannot be used on an individual vessel in multiple vessel systems due to unsuitable exit flow conditions. However, RTD can be measured indirectly by removal of this vessel from the system and deconvoluting the resulting detected tracer profile from the original trace of the entire system. This paper presents three models for deconvolution of RTD: BAY an application of the Lucy-Richardson iterative algorithm using Bayes’ Theorem, LSQ an adaptation of a least squares error approach and FFT a Fast Fourier Transform. These techniques do not require any assumption about the form of the RTD. The three models are all accurate in theoretical tests with no simulated measurement error. For scenarios with simulated measurement error in the convoluted distribution, the FFT and BAY models are both very accurate. The LSQ model is the least suitable and the output is very noisy; smoothing functions can produce smooth curves, but the resulting RTD is less accurate than the other models. In experimental tests the BAY and FFT models produce near identical results which are very accurate. Both models run quickly, but in real time control the runtime for BAY would have to be considered further. BAY does not require any filtering or smoothing here, and so potentially there are applications where it might be more useful than FFT.

Funding

This work was funded through the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), grant agreement no. FP7-NMP4-LA-2012-280983, the SHYMAN project. Anonymous advice on a previous draft regarding use of OVL and FFT has been incorporated.

References

Adeosun, J.T., and A. Lawal. 2009. “Numerical and Experimental Mixing Studies in a MEMS-based Multilaminated/Elongational Flow Micromixer.” Sensors and Actuators B 139 (2):637–647.10.1016/j.snb.2009.03.037Search in Google Scholar

Adschiri, T., Y. Hakuta, K. Sue, and K. Arai. 2001. “Hydrothermal Synthesis of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles at Supercritical Conditions.” Journal Nanopart Researcher 3 (2–3):227–235.10.1023/A:1017541705569Search in Google Scholar

Blackburn, J.A. 1970. Spectral Analysis: Methods and Techniques. New York: M. Dekker.Search in Google Scholar

Blood, P.J., J.P. Denyer, B.J. Azzopardi, M. Poliakoff, and E. Lester. 2004. “A Versatile Flow Visualisation Technique for Quantifying Mixing in A Binary System: Application to Continuous Supercritical Water Hydrothermal Synthesis (SWHS).” Chemical Engineering Sciences 59 (14):2853–2861.10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.021Search in Google Scholar

Boskovic, D., and S. Loebbecke. 2008. “Modelling of the Residence Time Distribution in Micromixers.” Chemical Engineering Journal 135:S138–S146.10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.058Search in Google Scholar

Bruce, A.E.R., P.S.T. Sai, and K. Krishnaiah. 2004. “Characterization of Liquid Phase Mixing in Turbulent Bed Contactor through RTD Studies.” Chemical Engineering Journal 104 (1–3):19–26.10.1016/j.cej.2004.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Cabanas, A., J.A. Darr, E. Lester, and M. Poliakoff. 2000. “A Continuous and Clean One-Step Synthesis of Nano-Particulate Ce1-xZrxO2 Solid Solutions in Near-Critical Water.” Chemical Communications (11):901–902.10.1039/b001424iSearch in Google Scholar

Clemons, T.E., and E.L. Bradley. 2000. “A Nonparametric Measure of the Overlapping Coefficient.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 34 (1):51–61.10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00074-2Search in Google Scholar

Gooseff, M.N., D.A. Benson, M.A. Briggs, M. Weaver, W. Wollheim, B. Peterson, and C.S. Hopkinson. 2011. “Residence Time Distributions in Surface Transient Storage Zones in Streams: Estimation via Signal Deconvolution.” Water Resources Research 47.10.1029/2010WR009959Search in Google Scholar

Jumbam, D.N., R.A. Skilton, A.J. Parrott, R.A. Bourne, and M. Poliakoff. 2012. “The Effect of Self-Optimisation Targets on the Methylation of Alcohols Using Dimethyl Carbonate in Supercritical CO2.” Journal Flow Chemical 2 (1):24–27.10.1556/jfchem.2012.00019Search in Google Scholar

Krone-Davis, P., F. Watson, M. Los Huertos, and K. Starner. 2013. “Assessing Pesticide Reduction in Constructed Wetlands Using a Tanks-In-Series Model within a Bayesian Framework.” Ecology Engineering 57:342–352.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.053Search in Google Scholar

Kuu, W.Y. 1992. “Determination of Residence-Time Distribution in Iv Tubing of In-Line Drug Delivery System Using Deconvolution Technique.” International Journal of Pharmaceutics 88 (1–3):369–378.10.1016/0378-5173(92)90335-YSearch in Google Scholar

Langston, P.A. 2002. “Comparison of Least-Squares Method and Bayes’ Theorem for Deconvolution of Mixture Composition.” Chemical Engineering Science 57 (13):2371–2379.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00133-1Search in Google Scholar

Langston, P.A., A.S. Burbidge, T.F. Jones, and M.J.H. Simmons. 2001. “Particle and Droplet Size Analysis from Chord Measurements Using Bayes’ Theorem.” Powder Technology 116 (1):33–42.10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00359-4Search in Google Scholar

Langston, P.A., and T.F. Jones. 2001. “Non-Spherical 2-Dimensional Particle Size Analysis from Chord Measurements Using Bayes’ Theorem.” Particle Particle Systems Char 18 (1):12–21.10.1002/1521-4117(200102)18:1<12::AID-PPSC12>3.0.CO;2-4Search in Google Scholar

Lee, P.M. 2012. Bayesian Statistics : An Introduction. Chichester, West Sussex; Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Lester, E., G. Aksomaityte, J. Li, S. Gomez, J. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, and M. Poliakoff. 2012. “Controlled Continuous Hydrothermal Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide (Co3o4) Nanoparticles.” Progress Cryst Growth Charact Materials 58 (1):3–13.10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2011.10.008Search in Google Scholar

Levenspiel, O. 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering. New York: Wiley.10.1021/ie990488gSearch in Google Scholar

Lucy, L.B. 1974. “Iterative Technique for Rectification of Observed Distributions.” Astronomical Journal 79 (6):745–754.10.1086/111605Search in Google Scholar

Massoudieh, A., S. Leray, and J.R. De Dreuzy. 2014. “Assessment of the Value of Groundwater Age Time-Series for Characterizing Complex Steady-State Flow Systems Using a Bayesian Approach.” Applications Geochem 50:240–251.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Norby, P., K.M.O. Jensen, N. Lock, M. Christensen, and B.B. Iversen. 2013. “In Situ Synchrotron Powder X-Ray Diffraction Study of Formation and Growth of Yttrium and Ytterbium Aluminum Garnet Nanoparticles in Sub- and Supercritical Water.” R Social Chemical Advancement 3 (35):15368–15374.10.1039/c3ra41854eSearch in Google Scholar

Richardson, W.H 1972. “Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 62 (1): 55–59.10.1364/JOSA.62.000055Search in Google Scholar

Simmons, M.J.H., P.A. Langston, and A.S. Burbidge. 1999. “Particle and Droplet Size Analysis from Chord Distributions.” Powder Technology 102 (1):75–83.10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00197-1Search in Google Scholar

Viitanen, P. 1997. “Experiences on Fast Fourier Transform as a Deconvolution Technique in Determination of Process Equipment Residence Time Distribution.” Applied Radiation and Isotopes 48 (7):893–898.10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00029-8Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0219).


Received: 2016-12-5
Accepted: 2017-10-9
Published Online: 2017-10-21

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0219/html
Scroll to top button