Home A cross-sectional study on risk factors of premenstrual syndrome among college-going students in Pune
Article Open Access

A cross-sectional study on risk factors of premenstrual syndrome among college-going students in Pune

  • Shriya Vitthal Lamkhade , Devaki Gokhale and Harshada Ketan Thakur ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 24, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) is a combination of emotional and physical symptoms occurring the week before menstruation and lasts 2–3 days during menstruation. This study aims to examine the dietary intake and lifestyle triggers among students with and without PMS from Pune, India.

Methods

We conducted an interview-based, cross-sectional study among 360 college-going students aged 18 to 24 in Pune. The questionnaire recorded socio-demographic details, anthropometry, physical activity, substance abuse, and dietary habits. A Food Frequency Questionnaire assessed dietary patterns, while the MDQ (Menstrual Distress Questionnaire) diagnosed PMS. PMS severity was measured using the Premenstrual Screening Tool (PSST). Risk determinants for PMS were analyzed, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results

The prevalence of PMS among 18-24-year-old college students was 51.4 %. There is no association observed between participants’ demographic and anthropometric characteristics with PMS. It was observed that participants who frequently consumed cakes, pastries, and pizza and those who consumed contraceptive pills, slept 5–6 h on weekdays were at higher risk of experiencing PMS symptoms.

Conclusions

This study suggests that frequent consumption of cakes, pastries, and pizza is a potential risk factor for increasing the incidence of PMS among college students. The severity of symptoms was notably higher among those who used contraceptive pills and had shorter sleep durations.

Introduction

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is one of the most common disorders experienced by women throughout their reproductive age. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) defines PMS as a combination of physical and psychological symptoms that are clinically significant during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. These symptoms typically improve or disappear within a few days after the start of menstruation. In three consecutive cycles, symptoms emerge five days before menses and vanish four days after the beginning of the menstrual cycle, ranging from mild to severe [1]. Several studies have reported the severity of PMS by using Rudolf Moose’s menstrual questionnaire. It is a precise tool comprises of 46 symptoms that are used to diagnose and assess the severity of PMS symptoms [2].

PMS is characterized by recurrent physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms that occur at the beginning of menstruation and usually disappear shortly before it begins [3]. Breast tenderness, cravings for certain foods, an increase in appetite, pain, fatigue, water retention in some parts of the body, and acne are among the most common physical symptoms of PMS [4]. In an Egyptian study, the most common PMS symptoms reported among university students were fatigue (34.8 %), mood swings (28.9 %), anxiety (24.1 %), irritability (21.7 %), and heavy aching legs (19 %) [5]. Most participants in an Indian study cited physical discomfort (52 %) and irritation (50 %) as their primary symptoms [6]. According to a study conducted among university students in Pakistan, 81.7 % commonly experience irritability as a symptom of PMS. Furthermore, the study highlighted that a majority (81.5 %) of female participants identified stress as an exacerbating factor in their daily routines [7]. They often experience symptoms such as depression, irritability, change in sleep pattern, abdominal bloating, and backache, which can affect their work capacity and academic performance among college-going students [8], 9]. Among university students, academic stress has been linked to risky behaviors such as excessive drinking and drug use, poor eating habits, and poor sleeping habits, all of which have been reported to increase risk of PMS [10].

Though PMS etiology is still undetermined, studies have found several factors responsible for it, including genetic, environmental, psychological, and diet [11]. Both an Indian study [12] and corresponding research conducted in the USA13 involving women aged 18–25 years revealed consistent findings and concluded that women with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 are at high risk of experiencing PMS symptoms. In addition to this, several other factors, such as the consumption of birth control pills, a sedentary lifestyle, and the presence of stress, are linked with an increased risk of PMS symptoms [13].

The diet of college students has a considerable impact on the experience of PMS. Consuming a balanced and nutrient-rich diet while avoiding excessive unprocessed foods, refined fats, salt, and stimulants can potentially mitigate PMS symptoms, promoting overall health during this phase [14].

Despite the negative impact of these risk factors on students’ health and academic quality of life, little attention has been given to them, which may indicate the need for implementing preventive measures [8], 9], 11]. Thus, the objective of the study was to examine the food intake of women with and without PMS and identify lifestyle triggers for the condition.

Materials and methods

Study design, settings, participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 360 college students in the age group of 18–24 years from three different universities by purposive sampling to ensure adequate representation of female students in Pune City, Maharashtra. The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula (n0=Z2pq/e2), which was estimated to be 349, considering the prevalence of PMS is 65 %. The confidence interval (CI) was considered 95 %, and the margin of error for acceptance was 5 %. The inclusion criteria were considered to be 18-24-year-old university students studying and residing in Pune. In contrast, students with any chronic degenerative disease, such as cancer or diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and neurodegenerative disease, were the exclusion criteria.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Symbiosis International (Deemed University) (IEC/SIU/553). Participants were provided written informed consent forms, and those who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study were enrolled.

Data collection procedure

The data collection period was from May 30th to June 14th. A pilot study was conducted to assess the dietary intake and lifestyle patterns among 18–24-year-old college students. The consent forms and subject information sheet were circulated among students, and those who willingly participated completed the final questionnaires themselves. A structured questionnaire was developed after reviewing the existing data, which nutrition experts later reviewed to ensure validity and relevance. A preliminary test was conducted to validate its effectiveness. A language expert translated the questionnaire into the local language (Marathi) to overcome the language barrier. The questionnaire was conducted through one-on-one interviews, however, MDQ and PSST were self-reported questionnaires by the study participants. The questionnaire is divided into four major domains- The data collection tools consisted of the following:

  1. General Information Questionnaire- This section consists of six questions to obtain basic sociodemographics (age and educational background). The researcher recorded anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, waist, and hip circumference, using calibrated equipment and standardized protocols. BMI was calculated using the formula BMI=weight (kg)/height (m2), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was determined by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. These measurements were used to assess nutritional status and fat distribution, facilitating a comparative analysis between the PMS and non-PMS groups [15].

  2. Menstruation History- This questionnaire section consists of 15 questions intended to obtain information regarding the participant’s menarche age, menstrual flow, duration of menstruation, and duration of symptom occurrence. The participants were diagnosed with PMS by using diagnostic criteria set by ICD10. Rudolf Moose’s Menstrual Distress Questionnaire comprised 46 symptoms under eight subscales: pain, water retention, autonomic reaction, adverse effect, impaired concentration, behavioral changes, arousal, and control [16]. The participants were asked to rate the severity of symptoms in the premenstrual and intermenstrual phases of the menstrual cycle on a scale of 0- None to 4- Severe. Each symptom was rated on the severity of occurrence on the Likert scale and the total score known as the ‘raw score’ was calculated. Raw scores for eight subscales were calculated and conversion ‘T scores for each criterion were obtained from the MDQ manual. Raw scores of each criterion and equivalent T scores were calculated for the intermenstrual and premenstrual phase. The T-score between the intermenstrual and premenstrual phases was compared to determine whether the participant was diagnosed with PMS [17]. Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool Revised for Adolescents (PSST-A) was used to categorize the participants based on symptom severity. PSST includes a list of premenstrual symptoms. It interprets categorical DSM-IV criteria into a rating scale for degree of severity ranging as mild, moderate, and severe. Individual reporting of each symptom along with severity helps in the diagnosis of PMS and PMDD as per the criteria laid down by DSM-IV [18].

  3. Lifestyle habits- This questionnaire section consists of nine questions intended to obtain information regarding the participant’s academic stress, physical activity, sleep quality, smoking, and alcohol-related questions. In addition to this, it also included questions related to doctor consultation, consumption of prescribed medications, and alternative therapies.

  4. Dietary intake- The participant’s dietary intake was assessed using a structured Food Frequency questionnaire, which comprised 12 food groups and 34 food items: cereals, pulses, legumes, nuts, oilseeds, milk and milk products, meat and poultry, vegetables, fruits, oil, sugar, junk food, and beverages. The frequency of consumption ranges was considered to be “Frequent- 1” to “Infrequent- 2”.

Data analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The categorical and continuous data were represented using descriptive statistics percentage, frequencies and mean, standard deviation, respectively. The mean and standard deviation for baseline characteristics (age, height, weight, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio) and menstrual history (age at menarche) were calculated. The frequency of consuming dietary items was converted to a binary variable, with frequent meaning daily or weekly consumption and infrequent meaning monthly or yearly consumption. The association between anthropometry data, menstrual history, lifestyle, and dietary habits with PMS was analyzed using the chi-square test. All tests with a p-value less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the odds ratio and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for determinants associated with PMS.

Results

A total of 360 participants ranged from 18 to 24 years, with a mean age of 20.8 ± 1.91 years. 202 participants were postgraduate students (56.1 %), while 158 were undergraduate students (43.9 %). Anthropometric data indicated that the mean height of the participants was 157 ± 6.7 cm, weight was 53 ± 11.07 kg, waist was 30.39 ± 4.22-inch, and hip was 37.17 ± 4.63 inch. The mean BMI and Waist-to-hip ratio was 21.5 ± 4.47 kg/m2 and 0.81 ± 0.55, respectively, with 75 (20.8 %) participants being overweight and 17 (4.7 %) obese.

The majority of the study participants, 119 (33.1 %), were rarely physically active, 67 (18.6 %) were as very few engaged in light to moderate physical activity daily, 170 (47.6 %) preferred yoga and 51 (14.6 %) were doing cardio exercises. No association was observed between participants’ demographic and anthropometric characteristics with PMS.

The prevalence of PMS was 51.4 %. Thus, 185 (51.4 %) participants were identified as with PMS using the MDQ [17]. For further analysis, participants were grouped into two groups – PMS and non-PMS.

Table 1 shows a comparison of anthropometric measurements between PMS and non-PMS groups, revealing no statistically significant differences. Additionally, no significant association was observed between BMI classification and the presence of PMS (p=0.13).

Table 1:

Anthropometric Characteristics of study participants (n=360).

Characteristics Total

(n=360)
PMS

(n=185)
Non-PMS

(n=175)
p-Value
Mean (SD)

Weight, kg 53.06 ( ± 11.07) 53.1 ( ± 11.08) 52.98 ( ± 11.08) 0.38
BMI, kg/m2 21.5 ( ± 4.47) 21.56 ( ± 4.42) 21.47 ( ± 4.54) 0.31

n (%)

BMI category
Severely underweight 54 (15) 26 (14.1) 28 (16)









0.13
Moderately underweight 25 (6.94) 10 (5.4) 15 (8.6)
Mild underweight 37 (10.27) 20 (10.8) 17 (9.7)
Normal 150 (41.6) 83 (44.9) 67 (38.3)
Overweight 73 (20.27) 39 (21.1) 34 (19.4)
Obese 21 (5.83) 7 (3.8) 14 (8)

Mean (SD)

Waist, cm 77.19 ( ± 10.71) 77.62 ( ± 11.98) 76.70 ( ± 9.16) 0.77
Hip, cm 94.41 ( ± 11.76) 94.58 ( ± 13.49) 94.20 ( ± 9.67) 0.76
Waist to hip ratio 0.81 ( ± 0.55) 0.82 ( ± 0.05) 0.81 ( ± 0.05) 0.57
  1. p-value calculated using ‘t’ test.

Table 2 shows an association between the menstrual history of participants and PMS. A positive significant association was found between the flow of menstruation (p=0.048) and the occurrence of symptoms (p=0.001) with PMS. Notably, 47 (25.4 %) individuals who encountered heavy menstrual flow exhibited a higher prevalence of PMS symptoms compared to 25 (14.3 %) without PMS. Moreover, 79 (42.7 %) PMS-affected participants experienced symptoms within 1–7 days preceding menstruation, indicating a more frequent occurrence in contrast to symptoms emerging 7–14 days before menstruation.

Table 2:

Menstrual history of study participants (n=360).

Menstrual characteristics Total

(n=360)
PMS

(n=185)
Non-PMS

(n=175)
p-Value
Mean (SD)

Age at menarche 13.5 ( ± 1.57) 13.4 ( ± 1.39) 13.4 ( ± 1.76) 0.75

n (%)

Duration of menstruation
Less than 2 days 17 (4.7) 8 (4.3) 9 (5.1) 0.93
2–5 days 260 (72.2) 134 (72.4) 126 (72)
More than 5 days 83 (23.1) 43 (23.2) 40 (22.9)
Length of menstruation
Less than 21 days 54 (15) 26 (14.1) 28 (16) 0.48a
21–35 days 263 (73.1) 140 (75.7) 123 (70.3)
More than 35 days 43 (11.9) 19 (10.3) 24 (13.7)
Flow of menstruation
Very light 9 (2.5) 5 (2.7) 4 (2.3) 0.048a
Light 23 (6.4) 9 (4.9) 14 (8)
Normal 256 (71.1) 124 (67) 132 (75.4)
Heavy 72 (20) 47 (25.4) 25 (14.3)
Dysmenorrhea
Yes 253 (70.3) 138 (74.6) 115 65.7) 0.65
No 107 (29.7) 47 (25.4) 60 (34.3)
Amenorrhea
Yes 88 (24.4) 43 (23.2) 45 (25.7) 0.57
No 272 (75.6) 142 (76.8) 130 (74.3)
Symptoms occurrence
7–14 days before menstruation 35 (9.7) 25 (13.5) 10 (5.7) 0.001b
1–7 days before menstruation 136 (37.8) 79 (42.7) 57 (32.6)
Right before and during menstruation 189 (52.5) 81 (43.8) 108 (61.7)
Consecutive PMS symptoms occurrence
<3 consecutive months 118 (32.8) 60 (32.4) 58 (33.1) 0.99
>3 consecutive months 137 (38.1) 71 (38.4) 66 (37.7)
Over a year or longer 105 (29.2) 54 (29.2) 51 (29.1)
Symptoms affect social and academic life.
Yes 220 (61.1) 120 (64.9) 100 (57.1) 0.08
No 140 (38.9) 65 (35.1) 75 (42.9)
If yes
Concentration impairment 56 (15.6) 29 (15.7) 27 (15.4) 0.11
College productivity impairment 78 (21.7) 42 (22.7) 36 (20.6)
Social life impairment 25 (6.9) 14 (7.6) 11 (6.3)
Relationships with family 56 (15.6) 35 (18.9) 21 (12)
All of the above 15 (4.2) 10 (5.4) 5 (2.9)
None 130 (36.1) 55 (29.7) 75 (42.9)
  1. p-value calculated using t test. aSignificant with p<0.05; bSignificant with p<0.01.

Table 3 demonstrates an association between participant’s lifestyle habits and PMS. A significant association was observed between consumption of prescribed medicines (p=0.05) and weekdays sleep duration (p=0.014) with PMS. Fifteen (8.1 %) participants who consume contraceptive pills and 70 (40 %) participants who sleep for 6–7 h on weekdays are likely to experience PMS. However, no association was observed with other lifestyle habits.

Table 3:

Lifestyle Characteristics of study participants (n=360).

Lifestyle Factors Total

(n=360)
PMS

(n=185)
Non-PMS

(n=175)
p-Value
n (%)

Doctor/consultation
Yes. I Have been diagnosed with PMS by a doctor. 66 (18.3) 39 (21.1) 27 (15.4)

0.37
No, I have not been diagnosed with PMS by a doctor. 197 (54.7) 97 (52.4) 100 (57.1)
No. I have not consulted any doctor. 97 (26.9) 49 (26.5) 48 (27.4)
Prescribed medication
Analgesic 44 (12.2) 19 (10.9) 25 (13.5)



0.05a
Contraceptive pill 20 (5.6) 15 (8.1) 5 (2.9)
Antidepressants 10 (2.8) 7 (3.8) 3 (1.7)
None 286 (79.4) 138 (74.6) 148 (84.6)
Alternative medicine
Herbal medicine 26 (10) 14 (7.6) 12 (6.9) 0.97
Supplements 15 (5.76) 7 (3.8) 8 (4.6)
Diet change 61 (23.46) 33 (17.8) 28 (16)
Physical activity 34 (13.07) 18 (9.7) 16 (9.1)
None 224 (86.15) 113 (61.1) 111 (63.4)
Sleep duration on weekdays
>7 h 96 (26.7) 58 (31.4) 38 (21.7) 0.014b
6–7 h 164 (45.6) 74 (40) 90 (51.4)
5–6 h 74 (20.6) 44 (23.8) 30 (17.1)
<5 h 26 (7.2) 9 (4.9) 17 (9.7)
Sleep duration on weekend
>7 h 185 (51.4) 98 (53) 87 (49.7) 0.94
6–7 h 109 (30.3) 54 (29.2) 55 (31.4)
5–6 h 44 (12.2) 22 (11.9) 22 (12.6)
<5 h 22 (6.1) 11 (5.9) 11 (6.3)
Rate of quality of sleep
Very good 147 (40.8) 70 (37.8) 77 (44) 0.39
Fairly good 185 (51.4) 97 (52.4) 88 (50.3)
Fairly bad 21 (5.8) 14 (7.6) 7 (4)
Very bad 7 (1.9) 4 (2.2) 3 (1.7)
Smoke
Yes 61 (16.9) 28 (15.1) 33 (18.9) 0.4
No 299 (83.1) 157 (84.4) 142 (81.1)
Frequency
Frequent 15 (4.2) 15 (8.1) 6 (3.5) 0.49
Infrequent 345 (95.8) 165 (91.9) 169 (96.5)
Alcohol consumption
Yes 74 (20.6) 38 (20.5) 36 (20.6) 0.54
No 286 (79.4) 147 (79.5) 139 (79.4)
Frequency
Frequent 9 (2.5) 6 (3.2) 3 (1.7) 0.84
Infrequent 351 (97.5) 179 (96.8) 172 (98.3)
  1. aSignificant with p<0.05; bSignificant with p<0.01.

Table 4 illustrates an association between the consumption of foods and PMS. The table shows that the frequent category represents food items consumed daily or weekly, while the infrequent category represents food items consumed monthly or rarely. A significant association was observed between the consumption of nuts (p=0.05), oilseeds, cakes, and pastries (p=0.05), and pizza (p=0.03) with PMS, in comparison to 50 (27.03 %) who rarely consume nuts and oilseeds, 135 (72.97 %) who consume nuts and oilseeds often experience PMS symptoms. Additionally, 79 (42.71 %) participants who frequently consumed cakes and pastries and 71 (38.8 %) who frequently consumed pizza, pasta, and burgers are more likely to experience PMS symptoms than those with infrequent consumption.

Table 4:

Dietary Intake of Healthy Foods among study participants (n=360).

Intake of food groups Total

(n=360)
PMS

(n=185)
Non-PMS

(n=175)
p-Value
n (%)

Wheat and wheat products
Frequent 348 (96.6) 181 (97.83) 167 (95.43) 0.258
Infrequent 12 (3.4) 4 (2.17) 8 (4.57)
Pulses and legumes
Frequent 328 (91.1) 164 (88.64) 163 (93.14) 0.314
Infrequent 32 (8.6) 21 (11.36) 12 (6.86)
Nuts and oilseeds
Frequent 278 (77.2) 135 (72.97) 95 (54.29) 0.05a
Infrequent 82 (22.8) 50 (27.03) 80 (45.71)
Paneer
Frequent 228 (63.3) 109 (58.92) 119 (68) 0.07
Infrequent 132 (36.7) 76 (41.08) 56 (32)
Egg
Frequent 200 (55.6) 102 (55.14) 98 (56) 0.86
Infrequent 160 (44.4) 83 (44.86) 77 (44)
Chicken
Frequent 179 (49.72) 97 (52.43) 82 (46.86) 0.29
Infrequent 181 (50.28) 88 (47.57) 93 (53.14)
Fish and seafood
Frequent 100 (27.78) 47 (25.41) 53 (30.29) 0.301
Infrequent 260 (72.22) 138 (74.59) 122 (69.71)
Vegetables
Frequent 325 (90.28) 166 (89.73) 159 (90.86) 0.71
Infrequent 35 (9.72) 19 (10.27) 16 (9.14)
Fruits
Frequent 294 (81.67) 155 (83.78) 139 (79.43) 0.286
Infrequent 66 (18.33) 30 (16.22) 36 (20.57)
Refined wheat
Frequent 203 (56.39) 106 (57.29) 97 (55.43) 0.72
Infrequent 157 (43.61) 79 (42.71) 78 (44.57)
Sugar
Frequent 343 (63.33) 177 (95.68) 166 (94.86) 0.71
Infrequent 132 (36.67) 8 (4.32) 9 (5.14)
Pizza, pasta, burger
Frequent 158 (43.89) 71 (38.38) 87 (49.71) 0.03a
Infrequent 202 (56.11) 114 (61.62) 88 (50.29)
Chips
Frequent 264 (73.33) 55 (29.73) 110 (62.86) 0.567
Infrequent 96 (26.67) 130 (70.27) 65 (37.14)
Indian savory snacks
Frequent 226 (62.78) 112 (60.54) 112 (64) 0.327
Infrequent 134 (37.2) 73 (39.46) 63 (36)
Cakes and pastries
Frequent 167 (46.39) 79 (42.71) 88 (50.29) 0.05a
Infrequent 193 (53.61) 106 (57.29) 87 (49.71)
Indian sweets
Frequent 182 (50.56) 87 (47.03) 95 (54.29) 0.169
Infrequent 178 (49.44) 98 (52.97) 80 (45.71)
  1. aSignificant with p<0.05.

The multivariable logistic (Table 5) revealed that participants who consume contraceptive pills (OR=3.42, 95 % CI: 1.15, 10.21, p=0.02) are at higher odds of experiencing PMS symptoms. In addition to this, sleep duration for more than 7 h (OR=2.88, 95 % CI: 1.16, 7.13, p=0.02) and 5–6 h on weekdays (OR=2.77, 95 % CI: 1.09, 7.03, p=0.03) are at higher risk to experience PMS symptoms. A significantly higher risk was observed in participants whose cakes and pastries (OR=2.37, 95 % CI: 0.32, 8.37, p=0.00), pizza, pasta, and burger (OR=4.67, 95 % CI: 0.41, 0.958, p=0.031) consumption was frequent.

Table 5:

Multiple Logistic Regression related to risk determinants of PMS among study participants (n=360).

Associated variables Categories OR 95 % CI for OR p-Value
Flow of menstruation Very light 0.56 0.13–2.45 0.43
Light 0.26 0.09–0.73 0.01
Normal 0.48 0.27–0.85 0.01
Heavy (reference category)
Consecutive PMS symptoms occurrence <3 months 1.05 0.6–1.84 0.86
>3 months 1.03 0.6–1.77 0.9
Over a year or longer (reference category)
Prescribed medication Analgesic 1.32 0.68–2.58 0.4
Contraceptive 3.42 1.15–10.21 0.02a
Antidepressants 2.72 0.64–11.59 0.18
None (reference category)
Sleep duration during weekdays >7 h 2.88 1.16–7.13 0.02a
6–7 h 1.55 0.65–3.68 0.32
5–6 h 2.77 1.09–7.03 0.03a
<5 h (reference category)
Consumption of nuts & oilseeds Frequent 2.39 0.405–1.11 0.12
Infrequent (reference category)
Consumption of pizza, pasta, burger Frequent 4.67 0.41–0.958 0.031a
Infrequent (reference category)
Consumption of cake & pastries Frequent 1.505 0.505–1.17 0.04a
Infrequent (reference category)
  1. aSignificant with p<0.05.

Discussion

This study was conducted with the aim of exploring the risk predictors of PMS. The prevalence of PMS among the participants was 51.4 %. The most commonly reported symptoms were anxiety, irritability, fatigue, tearfulness, and depressed mood. Anthropometric measurements demonstrated that mean weight, BMI, waist circumference, and WHR were within normal range, and the mean WHR of participants from both groups was at a marginal cut-off <0.85 per the recommendations of the World Health Organization [19]. However, no significant difference was observed between PMS and non-PMS group participants in weight, BMI, waist circumference, and WHR. As opposed to our findings, several studies have demonstrated that BMI and WHR have been significantly associated with the occurrence of PMS [13], 20], 21]. When physical activity was assessed, it was observed that most study participants from PMS and non-PMS groups were sedentary.

The menstrual cycle is a crucial indicator of reproductive health among young women. Number of days of menstrual flow correlated significantly with PMS (p<0.01). It was observed that the occurrence of PMS was more prevalent among participants with longer days of menstrual flow. Studies have reported similar findings that menstrual flow, duration of menstrual cycle, and irregularities of menstrual cycle were associated with PMS [22], 23].

Oral contraceptive pills (OCP) intake was a risk for the occurrence of PMS (OR=3.42, 95 % CI: 1.15, 10.21, p=0.02). Studies have shown that several mild side effects of OCP use may be responsible for the occurrence of PMS [24].

Duration of sleep (OR=2.77, 95 % CI: 1.09, 7.03, p=0.03) predicted the risk for occurrence of PMS. Sleep is essential to maintain the circadian rhythm. Sleep disturbances, including less sleep (<7 h/day) and irregular sleep duration, may lead to hormonal imbalances and hormonal shifts during the luteal phase. However, this linkage has been supported by a few studies [25], 26].

Intake of nutrients plays an essential role in a woman’s menstrual health. Among the present study group, we have observed a trend of eating junk/street foods rich in refined flour, sugar, fat, and salt. A significant association was seen between the occurrence of PMS and the consumption of sweet snack foods (cakes and pastries) and savory junk foods (pizza and burgers). Also, these sweet snacks (OR=2.37, 95 % CI: 0.32, 8.37, p=0.00) and savory foods (OR=4.67, 95 % CI: 0.41, 0.958, p=0.031) were found to be risk predictors for PMS. A high MDQ score was linked with a higher intake of foods containing sugars, fat, salt, and refined flour. Similar findings have been shown by studies from the UAE [27], Iran [28], and India [17]. These studies have observed that consuming foods containing high amounts of simple carbohydrates and fats was associated with an increased risk of PMS. An inverse association of oilseeds intake with the occurrence of PMS has been observed. A similar association has been reported in a study done on young Indian women of a similar age group [17]. Nutrient intake and dietary practices play a crucial role in PMS, supported by findings from various studies. Healthy food choices, intake of a balanced diet, and a healthy lifestyle have been associated with lower incidences of PMS [26].

Strengths and limitations

The strength of the present study is the larger sample size, which was collected in a shorter time. This study provides the estimated prevalence rate of PMS among university students in Pune. We have collected data regarding a wide range of lifestyle factors that are closely related to college life.

In the study, it was not possible to determine whether these risk factors are causes or effects of PMS, which is the limitation of this study. Since participants’ dietary information was collected using a qualitative questionnaire, we did not consider the food portion size, which might have contributed to a better understanding of the study findings. Another limitation of the study is that participants filled out the questionnaire; there might be a risk of over- and under-estimation of data that can be biased by social desirability.

Conclusion

Among college students aged 18–24, this research found that PMS is a prevalent menstrual disorder, with a frequency of 51.4 %. The severity of symptoms was predominantly observed for students with consumption of contraceptive pills, sleep duration, and frequent consumption of pizza, pasta, burgers, cakes, and pastries were associated with risk of PMS.

For a more profound understanding of PMS risk factors, future studies should focus on exploring hormonal, molecular, and genetic factors. Further research is warranted to investigate how an individual’s dietary choices influence the occurrence of PMS symptoms. A comprehensive analysis of participants’ food choices during the luteal phases of the menstrual cycle is crucial for identifying specific foods that impact PMS.


Corresponding author: Harshada Ketan Thakur, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, SNDT College of Home Science, SNDT Women’s University, Pune, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the colleges that permitted data collection and all the students who participated in the study.

  1. Research ethics: The Institutional Ethics Committee of Symbiosis International (Deemed University) approved the study (IEC/SIU/553).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Frey Nascimento, A, Gaab, J, Kirsch, I, Kossowsky, J, Meyer, A, Locher, C. Open-label placebo treatment of women with premenstrual syndrome: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020;10:e032868. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032868. PMID: 32071176; PMCID: PMC7045079.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Vannuccini, S, Rossi, E, Cassioli, E, Cirone, D, Castellini, G, Ricca, V, et al.. Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MEDI-Q): a new tool to assess menstruation-related distress. Reprod Biomed Online 2021;43:1107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 October 26th. PMID: 34753680.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Abeje, A, Berhanu, Z. Premenstrual syndrome and associated factors among secondary and preparatory school students in Debremarkos town, North-west Ethiopia, 2016. BMC Res Notes 2019;12:535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4549-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Acikgoz, A, Dayi, A, Binbay, T. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and its relationship to depressive symptoms in first-year university students. Saudi Med J 2017;38:1125–31. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.11.20526. PMID: 29114701; PMCID: PMC5767616.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Seedhom, AE, Mohammed, ES, Mahfouz, EM. Life style factors associated with premenstrual syndrome among el-minia university students, Egypt. Int Sch Res Not 2013;2013:617123. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/617123.Search in Google Scholar

6. Shamnani, G, Gupta, V, Jiwane, R, Singh, S, Tiwari, S, Bhartiy, S. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder among medical students and its impact on their academic and social performance. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2018;8:1. https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0415728042018.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mohib, A, Zafar, A, Najam, A, Tanveer, H, Rehman, R. Premenstrual syndrome: existence, knowledge, and attitude among female university students in Karachi. Cureus 2018;10. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2290.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Al-Shahrani, AM, Miskeen, E, Shroff, F, Elnour, S, Algahtani, R, Youssry, I, et al.. Premenstrual syndrome and its impact on the quality of life of female medical students at Bisha University, Saudi Arabia. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021;14:2373–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S327893. PMID: 34475764; PMCID: PMC8407666.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Barahona-Correa, JE, Aristizabal-Mayor, JD, Lasalvia, P, Ruiz, ÁJ, Hidalgo-Martínez, P. Sleep disturbances, academic performance, depressive symptoms and substance use among medical students in Bogota, Colombia. Sleep Sci 2018;11:260–8. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20180041. PMID: 30746044; PMCID: PMC6361310.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Kumar, B, Robinson, R, Till, S. Physical activity and health in adolescence. Clin Med 2015;15:267–72. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-267. PMID: 26031978; PMCID: PMC4953112.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Zendehdel, M, Elyasi, F. Biopsychosocial etiology of premenstrual syndrome: a narrative review. J Fam Med Prim Care 2018;7:346–56. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_336_17. PMID: 30090776; PMCID: PMC6060935.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Mahishale, A, Mesquita, JC. Association of premenstrual syndrome with body mass index and its effect on quality of life: a cross-sectional study. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2019;11:181–4. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1684.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bertone-Johnson, ER, Hankinson, SE, Willett, WC, Johnson, SR, Manson, JE. Adiposity and the development of premenstrual syndrome. J Womens Health 2010;19:1955–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2128. Epub 2010 Sep 27. PMID: 20874240; PMCID: PMC2971655.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Siminiuc, R, Ţurcanu, D. Impact of nutritional diet therapy on premenstrual syndrome. Front Nutr 2023;10:1079417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1079417. PMID: 36819682; PMCID: PMC9928757.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva 2008:27. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501491.Search in Google Scholar

16. Moos, RH. The development of a menstrual distress questionnaire. Psychosom Med 1968;30:853–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-196811000-00006. PMID: 5749738.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Thakur, H, Pareek, P, Sayyad, MG, Otiv, S. Association of premenstrual syndrome with adiposity and nutrient intake among young Indian women. Int J Womens Health 2022;14:665–75. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S359458. PMID: 35547840; PMCID: PMC9081175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Steiner, M, Macdougall, M, Brown, E. The premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) for clinicians. Arch Womens Ment Health 2003;6:203–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-003-0018-4. PMID: 12920618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Rad, M, Sabzevary, MT, Dehnavi, ZM. Factors associated with premenstrual syndrome in female high school students. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:64–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_126_17.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Mizgier, M, Jarzabek-Bielecka, G, Jakubek, E, Kedzia, W. The relationship between body mass index, body composition, and premenstrual syndrome prevalence in girls. Ginekol Pol 2019;90:256–61. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2019.0048. PMID: 31165464.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Taheri, R, Mesbah Ardekani, F, Raeisi Shahraki, H, Heidarzadeh-Esfahani, N, Hajiahmadi, S. Nutritional status and anthropometric indices in relation to menstrual disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Nutr Metab 2020;2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5980685.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Sarkar, AP, Mandal, R, Ghorai, S. Premenstrual syndrome among adolescent girl students in a rural school of West Bengal, India. Int J Med Sci Publ Health 2016;5:408–12. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2016.2407201566.Search in Google Scholar

23. Akoku, DA, Vukugah, TA, Tihnje, MA, Nzubepie, IB. Oral contraceptive use and premenstrual syndrome among sexually active female university students in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;36:333. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.333.25078. PMID: 33209157; PMCID: PMC7648490.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Erbil, N, Yücesoy, H. Relationship between premenstrual syndrome and sleep quality among nursing and medical students. Psychiatr Care 2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12628.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Gupta, R, Lahan, V, Bansal, S. Subjective sleep problems in young women suffering from premenstrual dysphoric disorder. North Am J Med Sci 2012;4:593–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.103326.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Hussein, RA, Hafiz, M, Bin-Afif, S, Al-Omari, E, Al-Helou, M. Premenstrual syndrome prevalence and correlation with carbohydrate intake in young women. HealthMED 2012;6:774–80.Search in Google Scholar

27. Hashim, MS, Obaideen, AA, Jahrami, HA, Radwan, H, Hamad, HJ, Owais, AA, et al.. Premenstrual syndrome is associated with dietary and lifestyle behaviors among university students: a cross-sectional study from Sharjah. UAE Nutrient 2019;11:1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081939. [Internet] [cited 2024 Dec 30]Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/8/1939.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Houghton, SC, Manson, JE, Whitcomb, BW, Hankinson, SE, Troy, LM, Bigelow, C, et al.. Carbohydrate and fiber intake and the risk of premenstrual syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018;72:861–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0076-8. Epub 2018 Jan 29. PMID: 29379144; PMCID: PMC5990431.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2024-11-05
Accepted: 2025-02-09
Published Online: 2025-02-24
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2024-0176/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button