Home Tone variation in the Baltic ia-presents
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Tone variation in the Baltic ia-presents

  • Miguel Villanueva Svensson EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 16, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The ia-presents frequently present tone variants in the dialects, e. g. Lith. spr̨ę́sti, spréndžia, spréndė ∼ sprę̃sti, spreñdžia, spreñdė ‘decide’, lémti, lẽmia, lė̃mė ∼ lemti, lẽmia, lė̃mė ‘predetermine’. In the case of °ER- and °EU‑roots acute intonation is clearly expansive, whereas the circumflex is strongly favored in the case of roots in °ERK‑, °EUK‑, °ĒK‑. A complete survey of the evidence shows that circumflex/acute variation is extremely widespread among ia-presents of °ERK-/°EUK-/°ĒK-roots and that acute intonation is clearly the original one, thus pointing to a general trend invariant acute → circumflex/acute variation → invariant acute or invariant circumflex. The circumflex variants probably arose in the ē‑preterite: *sprénd-ˈii̯ā > *ˈspreñd‑e > Lith. dial. spreñdė. In most controllable cases the original acute is due to regular sound law (a laryngeal or Winter’s Law), whereas a minority of examples most probably continue Indo-European Narten formations.

Online erschienen: 2014-12-16
Erschienen im Druck: 2014-11-1

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/if-2014-0012/html
Scroll to top button