Home Durability of tannin-citric acid modified Scots pine against weathering and fungal exposures
Article Open Access

Durability of tannin-citric acid modified Scots pine against weathering and fungal exposures

  • Sheikh Ali Ahmed ORCID logo , Gianluca Tondi ORCID logo and Reza Hosseinpourpia ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 1, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Holzforschung
From the journal Holzforschung

Abstract

Wood modification is essential to enhance the performance and longevity of wood as a material while maintaining its natural and sustainable characteristics. By modifying wood, its properties can be significantly improved without the need for toxic preservatives. Thus bio-based wood modification is vital for enhancing wood properties sustainably, reducing environmental impact, and meeting the demand for eco-friendly, non-toxic, and renewable material solutions. In this study, bio-based formulae were used on pine sapwood for enhanced decay and weathering resistance. Quebracho tannin solutions (20 %) with different concentrations of citric acid (CA) as a cross-linker were prepared and then vacuum-pressure impregnated in Scots pine sapwood before curing them at 140 °C. The durability performance of untreated and tannin-impregnated wood samples was assessed against accelerated weathering, mould growth and brown rot decay fungus Coniophora puteana (Schumach.) P. Karst. Experimental results showed that the weathering resistance was apparently improved by tannin modification with higher levels of CA, as reflected by color stability, crack formation and contact angle. While tannin modification increased mould susceptibility, the decay resistance was notably enhanced in all modified wood samples. The acidity of the formulas at high CA levels may increase the risks of hydrolytic degradation of wood, and thus, low CA concentrations (e.g. 2 %) appear optimal for balancing performance and chemical stability. These findings underscore the potential of 100 % bio-based tannin–CA systems to enhance wood durability, offering a promising pathway for sustainable wood protection strategies.

1 Introduction

Wood, as a biomaterial, is generally susceptible to abiotic and biotic degradation agents (Rowell 2005), and this is a major limitation of its outdoor application. The most commonly used method to protect wood involves impregnation with biocides which remain highly effective and provide long service life for wood, making them a key component of the wood protection industry for the foreseeable future (Craciun et al. 2009). However, the widely used copper (Cu)-based and second-generation organic biocide preservatives have several drawbacks, viz. poor biocidal fixation (Freeman and Mcintyre 2008; Humar et al. 2006), dimensional instability of wood against water (Hadi et al. 2016), potential negative environmental impact, and the need for high retention levels to ensure long-term durability (Brient et al. 2020). This is further evidenced by the slow progress in developing new preservative methods for rot fungi, despite advancements in understanding wood degradation mechanisms. In addition, some wood decaying fungi have shown tendency to resist preservative treated wood (Collet 1992; Thaler et al. 2013). As these treated wood products reach the end of their service life, concerns have grown over the past few decades regarding the environmental impact of treated waste wood, particularly the release of biocides and metals through disposal methods such as landfilling, burning, or composting (Kartal et al. 2015). In response, new Cu-based preservative formulations without chromium and arsenic have been introduced over the last decade. These newer systems, including ACQ (alkaline Cu quat), CCA (Cu azole), Cu citrate, and Cu ethanolamine, have a reduced environmental impact compared to older heavy-metal formulations (Rajput et al. 2023). However, concerns regarding environmental pollution and recyclability persist (Sierra-Alvarez 2009).

Alternatively, several emerging environmental-friendly wood modification techniques, including chemical, thermal, and enzymatic, have been developed to improve wood properties during the last decades (Hill 2006). While some modification techniques, e.g., acetylation, furfurylation, and thermal modification, have been commercialized, a wide number of methods, such as those based on melamine formaldehyde, phenol formaldehyde, dimethylol-dihydroxy-ethylene-urea, glutaraldehyde, etc. are still in the research state or have a limited market share (Liao and Mubarok 2024). Most of these modification methods can effectively improve the material properties of wood, but the majority of them are composed of non-renewable and petroleum-derived backbone monomers (Hill 2006) or contain hazardous compounds like formaldehyde, which can be released during use and thus restrict their use in indoor applications (Shi et al. 2007).

Wood modification with renewable chemicals like humins, natural sugars or tannin-based compounds poses a number of advantages. This is not only because of their sustainability and availability in the future as a result of the growth in biomass refinery industries, but also due to their nonbiocidal characteristics (Broda 2020; Ghavidel and Hosseinpourpia 2024; Ghavidel et al. 2025). Tannins are biopolymers that are mainly are grouped as condensed tannins or hydrolysable tannins. The earlier one consists of flavonoid units linked with C–C bonds (Okuda 2005), whereas the latter type contain phenolic acids, especially gallic acid, and simple sugars (Fengel and Wegener 1989). The application of tannin for improving the durability of wood was studied since the 1980s but their high water solubility showed a drawback for their use (Laks et al. 1988). According to the authors, as evidenced by studies showing that treating wood with catechu and CuSO4/NH4OH enhances decay resistance, while a dual treatment with a sulphited bark extract followed by CuCl2 is also an effective preservation method. Tascioglu et al. (2013, 2012) assessed the resistance of bark extracts with high tannin content from mimosa, quebracho, and pine impregnated on Scots pine wood against fungi and termites, yielding promising outcomes for indoor applications. While attempting to enhance the properties of different wood species through tannin modification, the resulted improvements in modified wood are found to be limited, especially concerning dimensional stability, leaching resistance, and decay durability (Bernardis and Popoff 2009; Mubarok et al. 2023).

To effectively modify wood, cross-linkers and other reactive chemicals or additives must be used to anchor tannin with the wood substrate. Sommerauer and coworkers (2019) reported Mimosa tannin extract (Acacia mearnsii De Wild.) with hexamine formulation reticulated into the wood structure improve the biological, weathering resistance and strength properties of beech (Fagus sylvatica) wood. Authors had studied the leaching resistance of tannin by using hexamine or formaldehyde as hardener. The authors quoted that the leaching resistance was considerably improved after 40 h of hardening time, all of the samples showed over 80 % water resistance. Despite their effectiveness, these cross-linking agents are formaldehyde-based compounds or use fossile-fuel during their production and raise environmental concerns. The research on developing biobased adhesives revealed that the polyphenols in tannin can be effectively crosslinked with cost-effective bio-based compounds such as citric acid (CA), sucrose, furfuryl alcohol, lignin etc. (Arias et al. 2022; Dhawale et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023; Navarrete et al. 2010; Sun and Zhao 2018; Trosa and Pizzi 1998). CA is sourced through a bio-based process involving the fermentation of glucose, primarily obtained from beet and cane molasses (Soccol et al. 2006). This compound, commonly employed as a buffering agent and flavor enhancer, emerges as a common biomass with three carboxyl (–COOH) groups, holding significant potential for interaction with –OH groups in tannic acid (Lee et al. 2020). The modification of wood using CA presents both advantages and disadvantages for the treated wood, including a reduction in water absorption, enhanced resistance against termites and fungi, improved modulus of elasticity (MOE) and compression strength, and enhanced dimensional stability (Essoua Essoua et al. 2016; Lee et al. 2020). No improvement in weathering resistance, reduction in modulus of rupture (MOR) and impact strength were reported by the authors. However, the utilization of tannin and CA as a cross-linker for wood protection remains understudied in the current scientific landscape. Very recently, Ahmed and colleagues (2025) demonstrated a significant improvement in leaching resistance and the dimensional stability of pine sapwood with the proper concentration of tannin and CA. However, the durability performances of tannin-citric acid (TCA) modified wood remains unexplored. The present research thus aims to address this gap by investigating the resistance of TCA-modified pine wood against mould, decay fungi and artificial weathering.

2 Materials and methods

Kiln-dried Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) lumber, dimensions 380 (width) × 40 (thickness) mm, was sourced from Hanåsa Såverket AB (Högsby, Sweden). Samples were prepared from both sapwood and heartwood for various testing procedures. Working samples with specific dimensions were converted from the lumber. The samples were then oven-dried at 103 ± 2 °C for 18 h before impregnation with tannin solutions.

The water-soluble tannin derived from ‘quebracho colorado’ with a moisture content of 6.8 % and a flash point over 190 °C, was kindly supplied from Silvateam SpA (San Michele di Mondovi, Italy). The tannin solution in water was prepared at 20 wt%. CA (molecular weight: 210.14 g/mol, purity: ≥99.5 %, solubility: 50 g/L at 20 °C and flash point: 173.9 °C) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany) and was added as a cross-linking agent in concentrations of 2, 10, and 20 wt% relative to the tannin solids (Table 1). The mixtures were continuously stirred using a mechanical stirrer until all solids were fully dissolved.

Table 1:

Tannin-based formulations for modification of Scots pine samples. Values in parenthesis are standard deviations.

Sample description Code Tannin (%) CA (%) Solution pH Weight percentage gain (WPG)
QUV (%) Mold (%) Decay (%)
Heartwood HW
Sapwood SW
Sapwood T 20 0 5.0 20.0 (±1.5) 21.1 (±2.0) 34.1 (±1.5)
Sapwood TCA2 20 2 4.2 20.2 (±0.3) 22.3 (±2.2) 36.1 (±1.4)
Sapwood TCA10 20 10 3.3 22.8 (±1.6) 23.2 (±1.9) 38.0 (±1.9)
Sapwood TCA20 20 20 2.9 24.0 (±1.1) 25.7 (±1.3) 41.2 (±2.0)
  1. QUV: accelerated weathering samples.

2.1 Tannin impregnation

Pine sapwood samples were pressure-impregnated with a tannin-based solutions using an impregnating plant (Scholz, Maschinenbau SCHOLZ GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) with a capacity of 0.074 m3. The process began with applying a vacuum (−91.19 kPa) to the impregnation chamber for 60 min, followed by filling the chamber with the tannin solution. A pressure of 700 kPa was then applied for 60 min, after which the liquid was drained. The untreated heartwood and sapwood samples served as reference controls. One modification condition was prepared to use sole tannin (code: T). The samples were treated with the impregnation solutions by placing them on a metal grid on their narrow side down with at least a 10 mm gap between them and left to rest at room temperature for 24 h. To prevent cracking, the samples were gradually dried at temperatures of 35 °C, 45 °C, 65 °C, 85 °C, and finally 100 °C for 18 h at each step. They were then cured at 140 °C for 10 h in a drying oven. After treatment, the wood darkened, especially at higher CA concentrations (Figure 1). All samples were conditioned at 20 °C and 65 % RH for four weeks prior to testing.

Figure 1: 
Modified wood after curing. Tannin (T) impregnated sapwood (SW) samples with citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid.
Figure 1:

Modified wood after curing. Tannin (T) impregnated sapwood (SW) samples with citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid.

2.2 Accelerated weathering test

The modified and unmodified samples with dimensions of 70 mm (width) × 15 mm (thickness) × 300 mm (length) were used for accelerating weathering test conducted using the QUV Accelerated Weathering Tester, QUV/spray (Q-Lab Co., Westlake, NJ, USA), following the standard SS-EN 927-6 (2006). A total of four samples were used per modification condition (n = 24). The QUV system, equipped with the AUTOCAL system, simulates real-world environmental conditions such as sunlight, rain, and dew to assess the weatherability, light stability, and corrosion resistance of products. The test lasted for 672 h, with each complete cycle lasting one week (168 h), consisting of 24 h of condensation at 45 °C, followed by 2.5 h of UV radiation at 60 °C (0.89 W/m2/nm, wavelength of 340 nm), and 0.5 h of water spray (6–7 L/min). The color of the samples was measured using a Chroma Meter CR-410 (Minolta Co. Ltd., Japan) before and after weathering. The CIELAB color system was used to describe color in three-dimensional L*a*b* coordinates, where L* represents lightness (0 for black, 100 for white), +a* indicates the red direction, −a* the green direction, +b* the yellow direction, and −b* the blue direction. The color change (∆E*ab) was calculated using the following equation:

(1) E a b * = L * 2 + a * 2 + b * 2

where ∆L, ∆a, and ∆b are the color changes after accelerated weathering. The values were measured on the two points of the flat side for each set of samples. Reference marks were used to ensure that the measurements were taken at the same position for each sample. In addition, the number length of cracks on the surface of weathered wood samples was counted and measured under a stereo microscope at 1.5× magnification.

2.3 Contact angle

The contact angle between the wood surfaces and 10 μL distilled water droplets at room temperature was determined at 1, 30 and 60 s through the sessile drop method using A high-resolution drop shape analysis system (DSA 10-MK2, KRUESS, Germany) (model DSA25; KRÜSS GmbH). The charge-coupled device (CCD) camera captured the side view of water drop and the contact angle was measured in the recorded image by using drop shape analysis software, Scientific Drop Shape Analysis Software, DSA 1, Version 1.70 (KRUESS GmbH, Germany). Contact angle was measured on the flat surfaces for all conditioned (20 °C and 65 % RH) specimens (unweathered and weathered) per treatment or control, and at least three locations per specimen.

2.4 Mould resistance

The samples with dimensions of 70 mm (width) × 15 mm (thickness) × 150 mm (length) were prepared for the assessment of mould resistance, according to the method described previously (Ahmed et al. 2013a). A total of eight samples per group were tested (n = 48) in a Memmert HCP 246 humidity chamber (Memmert GmbH, Germany) at 30 °C and 95 % RH by suspending from the top of the chamber with the flat surface set vertical and parallel to the other sample surfaces with a 10 mm gap between in a randomly ordered fashion to minimize the positioning error. Three Scots pine sapwood (P. sylvestris L.) samples naturally infested mainly with Aspergillus, Rhizopus, and Penicillium genera were placed on the bottom of the climate chamber as the sources of mould inocula. After 4 weeks of incubation, the experiment was stopped because of abundant mould growth on some of the sample surfaces. Both flat surfaces of the samples were evaluated visually and graded on a scale of 0 (no infestation) to 6 (extremely heavy infestation).

2.5 Basidiomycete decay test

The resistance of the modified wood against brown rot fungus decay was evaluated in a malt agar incubation test according to SS-EN 113-1 (2020). The modified and unmodified samples of 50 mm (length) × 25 mm (width) × 15 mm (thickness) were incubated for 16 weeks. A total of four replications were used for each group. Samples were oven-dried at 103 ± 2 °C till constant mass and weighed to the nearest 0.001 g to determine oven-dry mass. After steam sterilization in an autoclave at 120 °C for 30 min, sets of two specimens of the same group were placed on fungal mycelium grown on 70 mL malt extract agar in 400 mL Kolle flasks. The brown rot fungus Coniophora puteana (Schumach.) P. Karst was used for the tests. Further, 6 replicates made from Scots pine sapwood were used as virulence controls. All specimens were incubated for 16 weeks at 22 °C and 70 % RH.

After incubation, specimens were cleansed from adhering fungal mycelium, weighed to the nearest to 0.001 g, oven-dried at 103 ± 2 °C, and weighed again to the nearest 0.001 g to determine mass loss through wood-destroying basidiomycetes as follows:

(2) M L F = M 0 M 0 , inc M 0 × 100

where ML F is the mass loss by fungal decay (%), M0,inc is the oven-dry mass after incubation (g), and M0 is the oven-dry mass before incubation (g).

2.6 Microscopical analysis

The control sapwood, heartwood, and TCA-20 from basidiomycete decay test were selected for microscopic analysis. Small blocks measuring 5 mm (radial) × 5 mm (tangential) × 10 mm (longitudinal) were soaked in water overnight. Thin hand-cut sections approximately 15–20 µm thick were prepared using a Leica microtome blade. These sections were mounted on glass slides and a drop of lactophenol blue (Sigma-Aldrich Sweden AB) was added to stain fungi mycelium, followed by a subsequent wash with water. One drop of glycerin was then added before covering the sections with coverslips. The prepared slides were examined under a motorized Olympus BX63F light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DP73 color CCD cooled camera (maximum resolution 17.28 megapixels) and OLYMPUS cellSens Dimension software, version 1.18 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.7 Statistical analysis

For statistical evaluation, the IBM SPSS Statistics software package, Version 30.0.0.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA) was used to determine differences of color change, mould rating and mass loss due to decay among the treatments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 significance level was applied to determine significant differences. Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test was performed to separate the effects of the cross linker when significant differences were observed.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Weathering stability

The weathering stability of the unmodified and modified samples was evaluated by means of color changes and crack formation after 672 h of exposure to an accelerated weathering device. The color of the treated wood was darker with the higher concentration of CA used in the system (Table 2). This could be due to the increasing acidity of the system producing furanic compounds from the wood polymeric carbohydrates (Zhang et al. 2023). After the weathering test, the surface of the specimens became darker. After weathering, the most significant color changes were detected on the wood surfaces of untreated heartwood and sapwood. Heartwood showed a slightly higher color change than sapwood, but the difference was found to be statistically insignificant. A similar trend was also obtained after exposure of sapwood and heartwood to ultraviolet light by Laskowska (2018). Tannin-modified wood with different CA concentrations did not show any specific trend with significant differences but demonstrated significantly lower color changes (ΔE*) compared to unmodified sapwood or heartwood. Tannin modification without the cross-linker (T) resulted in the least color change (ΔE*) after weathering; however, the difference was not statistically significant compared to the other modified wood samples treated with varying levels of cross-linkers. Higher CA concentrations resulted in an increased Δa* value, thus darkening the samples after modification. During weathering, lignin degrades first due to its high UV absorption capacity (Yalcin et al. 2017). Degradation products of lignin are conjugated ketones, aldehydes, and quinones, which make the weathered surface darker (Kanbayashi et al. 2018). Those degraded products are washed away from the surface during the condensation cycle and leave cellulose as the primary component, which exhibits greater color stability against UV light (Kránitz et al. 2016). Therefore, the color of untreated sapwood, heartwood and different TCA-treated wood faded, exhibiting a decrease in ΔL* value after 672 h weathering (Table 2). The total color change (ΔE*) is a crucial parameter for evaluating the color stability of weathered samples. After weathering, all color coordinates in the modified samples decreased, likely due to the tannin leaching during the condensation cycles. However, wood treated with or without CA, demonstrated better resistance to color change after the weathering process. Tannin-impregnated wood samples had more stability against discolorations agains artificial weathering and this experimental results are in line with Tondi et al. (2012).

Table 2:

Color change of different treated sample after accelerated weathering test.

Wood Before weathering After weathering Color change
L* a* b* L* a* b* E*ab
SW 83.5 (±1.0) 2.9 (±0.4) 24.7 (±0.8) 70.5 (±1.7) 8.0 (±0.4) 15.6 (±0.7) 17.0a (±0.9)
HW 80.3 (±1.0) 4.4 (±0.3) 25.1 (±0.2) 64.8 (±1.7) 10.0 (±0.4) 16.9 (±0.9) 18.5a (±1.2)
T 41.6 (±1.2) 13.3 (±0.7) 14.1 (±1.5) 35.9 (±2.8) 12.4 (±0.6) 10.3 (±1.5) 7.5b (±3.7)
TCA2 43.6 (±1.8) 15.0 (±0.5) 16.0 (±1.4) 37.1 (±2.6) 14.2 (±0.7) 11.3 (±1.2) 8.1b (±2.9)
TCA10 44.1 (±1.6) 16.0 (±0.7) 17.8 (±0.7) 36.8 (±5.7) 11.7 (±1.1) 9.9 (±3.4) 11.8b (±5.3)
TCA20 41.2 (±1.7) 15.0 (±1.2) 15.3 (±1.9) 38.6 (±5.7) 12.0 (±0.4) 11.1 (±2.6) 7.9b (±4.4)
  1. Treatments represent with unimpregnated sapwood, heartwood and treated wood with citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Values in parentheses are the standard deviations. Mean values of ∆E*ab followed by different letter indicate that there is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test.

Tannic acid stabilizes wood during weathering by absorbing UV light through its hydroxyl groups, converting it into heat, and scavenging free radicals to prevent degradation (Wang et al. 2023). However, this process leads to the hydrolysis of tannic acid into gallic acid and the formation of quinone structures, consuming tanninc acid over time and thus resulting the formation of chromophores causes a darker color (Peng et al. 2021).

After 672 h of weathering, longitudinal microcracks were observed on the exposed surface (Figure 2). The length and number of these microcracks decreased as the CA concentration in the formulation increased. The highest number and length of the crack were observed in the unmodified sapwood sample with respective average values of 22.5 and 19.3 mm and the lowest was detected in TCA20- treated wood with respective values of 11.6 and 13.0 mm. The phenomenon of crack formation is associated with the photodegradation of lignin, which acts as the binder of cellulose microfibrils in wood cell wall layers (Huang et al. 2013). Peng et al. (2021) demonstrated that the tannin acid-modified wood exhibited excellent photostability, which effectively reduced the frequency of crack formation. Authors explained that the leaching of degraded products, the exposure of new surfaces, and the appearance of more pits on the tracheids became noticeable. In addition, after 480 h of accelerated weathering, the tannin acid- treated wood showed a flatter surface compared to the control samples, possibly due to the migration of tannin acid particles that filled the holes and microcracks on the exposed surface. As exposure time increased, these particles accumulated and contributed to a coarser surface and significantly related with the weathering duration (Yalcin and Ceylan 2017). Long exposure to artificial and natural weathering thus could lead to higher number of cracks in tannin-hexamine-treated wood (Tondi et al. 2012).

Figure 2: 
Surfaces of the sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples after accelerated weathering for 672 h. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2:

Surfaces of the sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples after accelerated weathering for 672 h. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Scale bar = 2 mm.

3.2 Contact angle

Figure 3 illustrates the contact angle of water droplets on different wood samples before and after weathering. Before weathering, the contact angles remain relatively high across all treated wood samples, with minor variations between the treatments. However, a significant decrease in contact angle was observed after weathering, particularly for untreated sapwood and heartwood samples, suggesting increased wettability. In contrast, tannin-modified samples, especially those treated with higher CA concentrations, retain higher contact angles after weathering, demonstrating improved water repellency. Even after 60 s of measurement, tannin-treated wood (10 and 20 wt% CA of total tannin solids) retained contact angle similar to or higher than that measured at 1 s for the control sapwood and heartwood. A higher CA concentration in tannin-treated wood resulted in improved hydrophobicity, and this result aligns with previous findings by Ahmed et al. (2025), which demonstrated better dimensional stability in tannin-treated wood with higher CA concentrations.

Figure 3: 
Contact angle of water droplet with the surfaces of unweathred and accelerated weathering samples measured at 1, 30 and 60 s. Treatment represents tannin (T)-modified wood with citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. The error bars in columns indicate the standard deviations.
Figure 3:

Contact angle of water droplet with the surfaces of unweathred and accelerated weathering samples measured at 1, 30 and 60 s. Treatment represents tannin (T)-modified wood with citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. The error bars in columns indicate the standard deviations.

Figure 3 clearly illustrates that the contact angle decreases after weathering. Weathering increases the wettability of wood by reducing the water-repellent effect of extractives and degrading its hydrophobic components, such as lignin (Kalnins and Feist 1993). As a result, the wood surface becomes richer in hydrophilic cellulose and hemicelluloses. Additionally, microcracks caused by weathering (Kishino and Nakano 2004) may further enhance wettability by allowing liquids to penetrate more easily into the surface. This effect is particularly evident in the control sapwood and heartwood samples, which display a more hydrophilic surface after artificial weathering. In contrast, TCA-modified wood exhibited improved hydrophobicity after weathering, especially in samples treated with a higher concentration of CA (20 wt% of total tannin solids). This could be attributed to the tannin treatment reducing the wettability of the wood surface while also enhancing resistance to leaching, thereby preventing water from easily penetrating the wood material (Tondi et al. 2013).

The acidic nature of the TCA system, particularly at higher concentrations of CA, is evident from the pH values presented in Table 1. It is well recognized that strongly acidic environments (pH 2–3), as observed in formulations containing 20 % CA, can promote the hydrolysis of polymeric carbohydrates in wood, potentially leading to a deterioration in mechanical strength. Furthermore, the addition of CA may contribute to the hydrolysis of carbohydrate fractions naturally present in the tannin extract, typically ranging from 6.8 to 9.0 % (Bianchi et al. 2015). This reaction could also partially explain the observed color darkening at higher CA concentrations. Recent developments in self-neutralizing CA-based systems offer a promising direction for future work. Notably, Zhou et al. (2025) and Xu et al. (2024) have demonstrated that self-neutralizing formulations in both starch- and tannin-based adhesives can maintain performance while reducing the risks associated with low pH. Incorporating such systems may provide a viable solution to address acidity-related limitations in TCA wood treatments and thus could be addressed to the continuation of this current research work.

3.3 Durability against mould

The mould growth rate was evaluated visually after 4 weeks of testing and graded from 0 to 6 (Figure 4). The results showed that the mould growth was apparently low in unmodified heartwood and followed by unmodified sapwood. The unmodified control samples showed statistically lower mould growth rates than the modified samples (ANOVA, α = 0.05). Although the mould growth was slightly decreased with increasing the crosslinker, the differences between the TCA-modified wood samples were statistically insignificant.

Figure 4: 
Mould surfaces (top) and grades (bottom) of untreated sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Mean values followed by different letter within each group indicate that there is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test. The error bars in columns indicate the standard deviations.
Figure 4:

Mould surfaces (top) and grades (bottom) of untreated sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Mean values followed by different letter within each group indicate that there is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test. The error bars in columns indicate the standard deviations.

The mould resistance of pine and spruce heartwood was reported previously by Ryparová and Rácová (2024) and Lie et al. (2019), who discussed the low amount of nutrients as a major reason for limited mould growth in the heartwood. In contrast, sapwood and also tannin may contain low-molecular-weight sugars such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose depending on the extraction process (Khanbabaee and van Ree 2001; Sharma 2019; Terziev et al. 1993), which can provide nutrients for mould and determines the intensity of mould infestation (Ahmed et al. 2013b). The higher amounts of low-molecular-weight sugars in the outer sapwood, which gradually decrease towards the innermost sapwood and heartwood (Saranpää and Höll 1989), contribute to greater susceptibility to mold in sapwood. In contrast, TCA-modified wood exhibited even greater mold growth than both sapwood and heartwood, possibly due to the presence of low-molecular-weight sugars in tannin.

3.4 Durability against decay fungi

The decay resistance of wood samples was assessed after 16 weeks of incubation against the brown rot fungus C. puteana (Figure 5). The unmodified pine heartwood was used for comparison purposes and served as an additional control. The unmodified sapwood showed a mass loss mean value of 54.9 %, which is considerably higher than the 20 % threshold value that is commonly used for validation of the fungal activity according to the standard EN 113-1 (2020). Although the unmodified heartwood showed an average mass loss of about 35.1 %, which was significantly lower than the sapwood samples, it was still considerably high. This is particularly in comparison with tannin-modified samples with expressively low mass loss. The mass loss values of the unmodified samples, both sapwood and heartwood, found in this experiment are in agreement with previous findings (Metsä-Kortelainen and Viitanen 2009; Sehlstedt-Persson and Wamming 2010). A slightly higher resistance of heartwood to brown rot fungal decay than sapwood might be due to the presence of phenolic compounds like stilbenes pinosylvin and pinosylvin monomethyl ether, resin acid and other extractives (Lu et al. 2016; Venäläinena et al. 2003). The differences between unmodified and tannin-modified samples were statistically significant (α = 0.05). No significant mass changes were observed among the modified samples by the addition of cross-linking agent, ranging from 2.6 % in sole tannin-modified samples to 3.7 % in TCA-modified wood samples. In comparison to sorbitol-CA treatement, higher concentration (10 %, 20 %, 30 % and 50 %) leads to lower mass loss of modified Scots pine wood sample from 26 to 2 % (Kurkowiak et al. 2023). The enhanced durability of SorCA-treated wood is attributed to the cell wall bulking and the cross-linking sorbitol-CA polyesters with wood polymers (Kurkowiak et al. 2021). Higher concentration of CA in the tannin formulation increased the bulking and moisture realetd properties of modified pine as reported previously (Ahmed et al. 2025).

Figure 5: 
Mass loss of untreated sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples with the brown rot fungus Coniophora puteana. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Mean values followed by different letter within each group indicate that there is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test. The error bars in the columns indicate the standard deviations.
Figure 5:

Mass loss of untreated sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified samples with the brown rot fungus Coniophora puteana. Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Mean values followed by different letter within each group indicate that there is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Turkey’s-b multiple comparisons test. The error bars in the columns indicate the standard deviations.

The antifungal resistance of brown rot fungi (Fomitopsis palustris and Gloeophyllum trabeum) in Scots pine samples modified with mimosa (Acacia mollissima) and quebracho (Schinopsis lorentzii) bark extracts was observed by Tascioglu and cowrkers (2012). The high antifungal activity was attributed to the presence of a high concentration of condensed tannins in these extracts. Condensed tannins make a covalent bond with hemicellulose, which strengthens or plasticizes the cell walls and improves the strength, fire resistance and durability of wood (Bariska and Pizzi 1986; Thévenon et al. 2009). The decay resistance of tannins against wood-decaying organisms is attributed to their phenolic structure (Venäläinena et al. 2003), which undergoes minimal degradation in brown rot fungi (Zabel and Morrell 1992). Brown rot fungi primarily degrade carbohydrates while leaving behind modified lignin during the decay process. They utilize both enzymatic and non-enzymatic depolymerization mechanisms, including the Fenton reaction (H2O2/Fe3+) (Hosseinpourpia and Mai 2016a,b,c). Coniophora puteana is able to break down the structural carbohydrates mainly by hydrolytic enzymes, with cellulose degradation facilitated by endo-1,4-β-glucanase, exo-1,4-β-glucanase, and 1,4-β-glucosidase, while hemicellulose degradation involves endo-1,4-β-xylanase, 1,4-β-xylosidase, their mannan equivalents, and several acetyl esterases (Zabel and Morrell 1992). Tannins enhance decay resistance by forming soluble or insoluble complexes with fungal proteins (Hart and Hillis 1972; Laks et al. 1988). Dirol and Scalbert (1991) proposed that these complexes may inactivate fungal enzymes such as cellulases or reduce enzyme accessibility to wood cell-wall polysaccharides. In addition, the authors suggested another potential antifungal mechanism involving tannins complexing with essential metal ions, such as iron, which fungi require for metabolic processes. Tannin treatment may inhibit the Fenton reaction by interacting with ferric ions in the wood, thereby further disrupting fungal degradation pathways (Tomak and Gonultas 2018), although the crosslinked tannin complex may react differently. In addition, moisture exclusion through the reduction of cell wall voids lowers the maximum moisture capacity of the wood. This limits the space available for water molecules, thereby restricting the diffusion of fungal reductants and impeding the formation of hydroxyl radicals. This may consequently prevent the penetration of hydrolyzing enzymes into the wood cell walls (Thybring 2013).

After 16 weeks of incubation, distinct differences were observed between the unmodified and modified wood samples (Figure 6). An apparent shrinkages were observed in unmodified samples due to the formation of numerous cracks and clefts within the secondary wall. The mass loss in sapwood was approximately 1.5 times greater than that of heartwood. Latewood cells exhibited relatively higher resistance (Figure 6c), which appears to be linked to their greater degree of cell wall lignification. This lignification hinders the diffusion of cellulolytic enzymes into the cell wall, thereby increasing resistance to decomposition (Schwarze et al. 2003). However, C. puteana also reported for the degradation of all cell wall layers including lignin-rich middle lamellae for the production of laccase activity (Lee et al. 2004), and thus, the unmodified wood showed considerably higher weight loss than the tannin-modified samples. The high extractive content in heartwood (Khviyuzov et al. 2021) might also be a reason for restricting the wood decay (Martínez-Iñigo et al. 1999). Microscopic observations showed significantly thinner cell walls in the tracheids of both unmodified sapwood and heartwood compared to tannin-modified wood (Figure 6b and c). Although fungal hyphae were visible in the tracheid lumen of tannin-modified wood (Figure 6d), the cell walls remained almost intact, resulting in minimal mass loss.

Figure 6: 
Decayed sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified wood after 16 weeks of incubation period (top). Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Optical micrographs of transverse sections showing undecayed sapwood (a), earlywood of decayed unimpregnated SW (b), latewood of HW (c), and tannin-treated wood with a citric acid (CA) concentration of 20 wt% of the total tannin solids on earlywood cross (d), radial (e) and tangential (f) sections. Black arrowheads showing fungal mycelia inside the cell lumen. White arrowhead showing cured tannin inside the cell lumen of tracheids. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 6:

Decayed sapwood (SW), heartwood (HW) and tannin (T)-modified wood after 16 weeks of incubation period (top). Treatment represents citric acid (CA) concentrations of 0 (T), 2 (TCA2), 10 (TCA10) and 20 (TCA20) wt% of total tannin solid. Optical micrographs of transverse sections showing undecayed sapwood (a), earlywood of decayed unimpregnated SW (b), latewood of HW (c), and tannin-treated wood with a citric acid (CA) concentration of 20 wt% of the total tannin solids on earlywood cross (d), radial (e) and tangential (f) sections. Black arrowheads showing fungal mycelia inside the cell lumen. White arrowhead showing cured tannin inside the cell lumen of tracheids. Scale bar = 50 µm.

4 Conclusions

This study demonstrates that tannin modification with varying concentrations of CA as a cross-linker significantly alters the weathering resistance, and durability characteristics of Scots pine sapwood. Accelerated weathering showed improved photostability in tannin-modified wood, with reduced color change and microcracking, particularly at higher CA levels compared to the control and pine heartwood. In addition, tannin-impregnated wood with higher concentrations of CA exhibited improved hydrophobicity after weathering. However, it is important to note that elevated CA levels may also lead to increased acidity, which can potentially cause hydrolysis of wood carbohydrates and affect long-term structural integrity. Tannin treatment showed higher mould susceptibility than untreated sapwood and heartwood independently on the use of CA levels. However, the decay resistance was significantly improved in all treated samples, whether with or without CA, with marginal mass loss (2.6–3.7 %) compared to unmodified controls (53.2 %) and heartwood (35.1 %). This indicates the strong potential of tannin modification, particularly at a lower CA level (2.0 %), for effectively enhancing wood durability against decay fungi while minimizing the risks associated with degradation of wood polymers at high acidic conditions. Future research should focus on the potential of self-neutralizing TCA systems to minimize acidity-related degradation and explore the resistance of tannin-modified wood against long-term outdoor weathering.


Corresponding author: Reza Hosseinpourpia, Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Faculty of Technology, Linnæus University, Georg Lückligs Plats 1, Växjö 351 95, Sweden; and College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: VINNOVA

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2023-00603

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20230005

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: RH conceptualized the investigation. RH, SAA, and GT designed the experiment. SAA performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. RH contributed to the interpretation of the data. RH and GT reviewed the final manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: The authors thank Vinnova within the BioInnovation program for the project “Artificial Heartwood: Functional modification of Scots pine sapwood for durable window applications” (project number 2023-00603). The support from the Knowledge Foundation through the project “Competitive timber structures: Resource efficiency and climate benefits along the wood value chain through engineering design” (grant number 20230005) is also greatly acknowledged.

  7. Data availability: The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Ahmed, S.A., Sehlstedt-Persson, M., and Morén, T. (2013a). Development of a new rapid method for mould testing in a climate chamber: preliminary tests. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 33: 174–187.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, S.A., Yang, Q., Sehlstedt-Persson, M., and Morén, T. (2013b). Accelerated mold test on dried pine sapwood boards: impact of contact heat treatment. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 33: 174–187, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2013.773041.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, S.A., Tondi, G., Rizzo, F., Stöd, R.-M., and Hosseinpourpia, R. (2025). Dimensional stability of Scots pine sapwood modified by tannin-based formulas. In: Goli, G., Negro, F., Cuccui, I., Todaro, L., Jones, D., Militz, H., and Cetera, P. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 11th European conference on wood modification. Springer Nature, Florence, Italy.10.1007/978-3-031-99418-0_25Search in Google Scholar

Arias, A., González-García, S., Feijoo, G., and Moreira, M.T. (2022). Tannin-based bio-adhesives for the wood panel industry as sustainable alternatives to petrochemical resins. J. Ind. Ecol. 26: 627–642.10.1111/jiec.13210Search in Google Scholar

Bariska, M. and Pizzi, A. (1986). The interaction of polyflavonoid tannins with wood cellwalls. Holzforschung 40: 299–302, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1986.40.5.299.Search in Google Scholar

Bernardis, A.C. and Popoff, O. (2009). Durability of Pinus elliottii wood impregnated with quebracho colorado (Schinopsis balansae) bio-protectives extracts and CCA. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 11: 107–115, https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-221x2009000200002.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, S., Kroslakova, I., Janzon, R., Mayer, I., Saake, B., and Pichelin, F. (2015). Characterization of condensed tannins and carbohydrates in hot water bark extracts of European softwood species. Phytochemistry 120: 53–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Brient, J.A., Manning, M.J., and Freeman, M.H. (2020). Copper naphthenate- protecting America’s infrastructure for over 100 years and its potential for expanded use in Canada and Europe. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 15: 368–376, https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.1837948.Search in Google Scholar

Broda, M. (2020). Natural compounds for wood protection against fungi: a review. Molecules 25: 3538, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153538.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Collet, O. (1992). Comparative tolerance of the brown-rot fungus Antrodia vaillantii (DC. Fr.) Ryv. isolates to copper. Holzforschung 46: 293–298, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1992.46.4.293.Search in Google Scholar

Craciun, R., Maier, M., and Habicht, J. (2009). A theoretical-industrial correlation and perspective on copper-based wood preservatives. IRG/WP 09-30499. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

Dhawale, P.V., Vineeth, S.K., Gadhave, R.V., Fatima, M.J.J., Supekar, M.V., Thakur, V.K., and Raghavan, P. (2022). Tannin as a renewable raw material for adhesive applications: a review. Mater. Adv. 3: 3365–3388, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ma00841b.Search in Google Scholar

Dirol, D. and Scalbert, A. (1991). Improvemet of wood decay resistance by tannin impregnation. IRG/WP2380. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

Essoua Essoua, G.G., Blanchet, P., Landry, V., and Beauregard, R. (2016). Pine wood treated with citric acid and glycerol mixture: biomaterial performance improved by a bio-product. Bioresources 11: 3049–3072, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.3049-3072.Search in Google Scholar

Fengel, D. and Wegener, G. (1989). Wood chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Walter de Gruyter, New York (NY).Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, M.H. and Mcintyre, C. (2008). Copper-based wood preservatives a comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives. For. Prod. J. 58: 6–27.Search in Google Scholar

Ghavidel, A. and Hosseinpourpia, R. (2024). Photodegradation stability of huminated European pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) microveneers. Holzforschung 78: 283–292, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2024-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Ghavidel, A., Eceiza, A., Xie, X., and Hosseinpourpia, R. (2025). Humination modification: a green approach to improve the material properties of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Sapwood. ACS Omega 10: 2996–3005, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c09540.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Hadi, S., Hosseinihashemi, S.K., Latibari, A.J., and Salem, M.Z.M. (2016). Effects of acid copper chromate preservative and hydrothermal treatment on the dimensional stability, hardness, and decay resistance of poplar wood. Bioresources 11: 4850–4864, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.4850-4864.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, J.H. and Hillis, W.E. (1972). Inhibition of wood-rotting fungi by ellagitannins in the heartwood of Quercus alba. Phytopathology 62: 620–626, https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-62-620.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, C.A.S. (2006). Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley Series in Renewable Resources. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.10.1002/0470021748Search in Google Scholar

Hosseinpourpia, R. and Mai, C. (2016a). Mode of action of brown rot decay resistance of acetylated wood: resistance to Fenton’s reagent. Wood Sci. Technol. 50: 413–426, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0790-0.Search in Google Scholar

Hosseinpourpia, R. and Mai, C. (2016b). Mode of action of brown rot decay resistance in phenol-formaldehyde-modified wood: resistance to Fenton’s reagent. Holzforschung 70: 253–259, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-0045.Search in Google Scholar

Hosseinpourpia, R. and Mai, C. (2016c). Mode of action of brown rot decay resistance of thermally modified wood: resistance to Fenton’s reagent. Holzforschung 70: 691–697, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-0141.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, X., Kocaefe, D., Kocaefe, Y., Boluk, Y., and Krause, C. (2013). Structural analysis of heat-treated birch (Betule papyrifera) surface during artificial weathering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 264: 117–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.137.Search in Google Scholar

Humar, M., Pohleven, F., and Žlindra, D. (2006). Influence of water properties on leaching of copper-based preservatives from treated wood. Wood Res. 51: 69–76.Search in Google Scholar

Kalnins, M.A. and Feist, W.C. (1993). Increase in wettability of wood with weathering. For. Prod. J. 43: 55–57.Search in Google Scholar

Kanbayashi, T., Kataoka, Y., Ishikawa, A., Matsunaga, M., Kobayashi, M., and Kiguchi, M. (2018). Confocal Raman microscopy reveals changes in chemical composition of wood surfaces exposed to artificial weathering. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 187: 136–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.08.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kartal, N., Terzi, E., Yilmaz, H., and Goodell, B. (2015). Bioremediation and decay of wood treated with ACQ, micronized ACQ, nano-CuO and CCA wood preservatives. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 99: 95–101.10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Khanbabaee, K. and van Ree, T. (2001). Tannins: classification and definition. Nat. Prod. Rep. 18: 641–649, https://doi.org/10.1039/b101061l.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Khviyuzov, S., Gusakova, M., Bogolitsyn, K., and Volkov, A. (2021). Differences in the physicochemical properties of lignins in the heartwood and sapwood of Pinus sylvestris. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 41: 177–184, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2021.1954951.Search in Google Scholar

Kishino, M. and Nakano, T. (2004). Artificial weathering of tropical woods. Part 1: changes in wettability. Holzforschung 58: 552–557, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2004.084.Search in Google Scholar

Kránitz, K., Sonderegger, W., Bues, C.T., and Niemz, P. (2016). Effects of aging on wood: a literature review. Wood Sci. Technol. 50: 7–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0766-0.Search in Google Scholar

Kurkowiak, K., Emmerich, L., and Militz, H. (2021). Sorption behavior and swelling of citric acid and sorbitol (SorCA) treated wood. Holzforschung 75: 1136–1149, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2021-0068.Search in Google Scholar

Kurkowiak, K., Emmerich, L., and Militz, H. (2023). Biological durability and wood-water interactions of sorbitol and citric acid (SorCA) modified wood. J. Wood Sci. 69: 34, https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-023-02108-y.Search in Google Scholar

Laks, P.E., McKaig, P.A., and Hemingway, R.W. (1988). Flavonoid biocides: wood preservatives based on condensed tannins. Holzforschung 42: 299–306, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1988.42.5.299.Search in Google Scholar

Laskowska, A. (2018). Susceptibility of thermo-mechanically modified Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sapwood and heartwood to colour change under the influence of ultraviolet radiation. Drv. Ind. 69: 253–264, https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2018.1756.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, K., Wi, S., Singh, A., and Kim, Y.S. (2004). Micromorphological characteristics of decayed wood and laccase produced by the brown-rot fungus Coniophora puteana. J. Wood Sci. 50: 281–284, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-003-0558-2.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S.H., Md Tahir, P., Lum, W.C., Tan, L.P., Bawon, P., Park, B.-D., Osman Al Edrus, S.S., and Abdullah, U.H. (2020). A review on citric acid as green modifying agent and binder for wood. Polymers 12: 1692, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081692.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Li, J., Lei, H., Xi, X., li, C., Hou, D., Song, J., and Du, G. (2023). A sustainable tannin-citric acid wood adhesive with favorable bonding properties and water resistance. Ind. Crops Prod. 201: 116933, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116933.Search in Google Scholar

Liao, J. and Mubarok, M. (2024). Revolutionizing wood: cutting-edge modifications, functional wood-based composites, and innovative applications. In: Zhou, X. (Ed.). Wood industry- impacts and benefits. IntechOpen, London.10.5772/intechopen.1007302Search in Google Scholar

Lie, S.K., Vestøl, G.I., Høibø, O., and Gobakken, L.R. (2019). Surface mould growth on wood: a comparison of laboratory screening tests and outdoor performance. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 77: 1137–1150, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-019-01444-5.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, J., Venäläinen, M., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., and Harju, A. (2016). Stilbene impregnation retards brown-rot decay of Scots pine sapwood. Holzforschung 70: 261–266, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2014-0251.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Iñigo, M.J., Immerzeel, P., Gutierrez, A., del Río, J.C., and Sierra-Alvarez, R. (1999). Biodegradability of extractives in sapwood and heartwood from Scots pine by sapstain and white rot fungi. Holzforschung 53: 247–252, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.1999.042.Search in Google Scholar

Metsä-Kortelainen, S. and Viitanen, H. (2009). Decay resistance of sapwood and heartwood of untreated and thermally modified Scots pine and Norway spruce compared with some other wood species. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 4: 105–114, https://doi.org/10.1080/17480270903326140.Search in Google Scholar

Mubarok, M., Azadeh, E., Obounou Akong, F., Dumarçay, S., Gérardin, P., and Gérardin-Charbonnier, C. (2023). Effect of tannins addition on thermal stability of furfurylated wood. Polymers 15: 2044, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Navarrete, P., Mansouri, H.R., Pizzi, A., Tapin-Lingua, S., Benjelloun-Mlayah, B., Pasch, H., and Rigolet, S. (2010). Wood panel adhesives from low molecular mass lignin and tannin without synthetic resins. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 24: 1597–1610, https://doi.org/10.1163/016942410x500972.Search in Google Scholar

Okuda, T. (2005). Systematics and health effects of chemically distinct tannins in medicinal plants. Phytochemistry 66: 2012–2031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.04.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Peng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Wang, W., and Cao, J. (2021). Improvement of wood against UV weathering and decay by using plant origin substances: tannin acid and tung oil. Ind. Crops Prod. 168: 113606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113606.Search in Google Scholar

Rajput, H., Rajan, P., Li, S., Stratton, G.W., Murray, G., and He, Q. (2023). Development of wood preservatives to prevent biodeterioration. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 43: 371–389, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2023.2284161.Search in Google Scholar

Rowell, R.M. (2005). Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, New York.10.1201/9780203492437Search in Google Scholar

Ryparová, P. and Rácová, Z. (2024). Characteristics of mould growth in pine and spruce sapwood and heartwood under fluctuating humidity. Appl. Sci. 14: 8417, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188417.Search in Google Scholar

Saranpää, P. and Höll, W. (1989). Soluble carbohydrates of Pinus sylvestris L. sapwood and heartwood. Trees 3: 138–143, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00226648.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarze, F.W.M.R., DeFloroio, G., and Fink, S. (2003). Resistance of parenchyma cells in wood to degradation by brown rot fungi. Mycol. Prog. 2: 267–274.10.1007/s11557-006-0064-1Search in Google Scholar

Sehlstedt-Persson, M. and Wamming, T. (2010). Wood drying process: impact on Scots pine lumber durability. J. Wood Sci. 56: 25–32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1066-9.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, K.P. (2019). Tannin degradation by phytopathogen’s tannase: a plant’s defense perspective. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 21: 101342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101342.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, J., Li, J., Zhou, W., and Zhang, D. (2007). Improvement of wood properties by urea-formaldehyde resin and nano-SiO2. Front. For. China 2: 104–109, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-007-0017-0.Search in Google Scholar

Sierra-Alvarez, R. (2009). Removal of copper, chromium and arsenic from preservative-treated wood by chemical extraction-fungal bioleaching. Waste Manag. 29: 1885–1891, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Soccol, C.R., Vandenberghe, L.P.S., Rodrigues, C., and Pandey, A. (2006). New perspectives for citric acid production and application. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 44: 141–149.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerauer, L., Thevenon, M.F., Petutschnigg, A., and Tondi, G. (2019). Effect of hardening parameters of wood preservatives based on tannin copolymers. Holzforschung 73: 457–467, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2018-0130.Search in Google Scholar

SS-EN 113-1 (2020). Durability of wood and wood-based products – test method against wood destroying basidiomycetes – part 1: assessment of biocidal efficacy of wood preservatives. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

SS-EN 927-6 (2006). Paints and varnishes – coating materials and coating systems for exterior wood – part 6: exposure of wood coatings to artificial weathering using fluorescent UV lamps and water. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, S. and Zhao, Z. (2018). Influence of acid on the curing process of tannin-sucrose adhesives. Bioresources 13: 7683–7697, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.7683-7697.Search in Google Scholar

Tascioglu, C., Yalcin, M., de Troya, T., and Sivrikaya, H. (2012). Termiticidal properties of some wood and bark extracts used as wood preservatives. Bioresources 7: 2960–2969, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.3.2960-2969.Search in Google Scholar

Tascioglu, C., Yalcin, M., Sen, S., and Akcay, C. (2013). Antifungal properties of some plant extracts used as wood preservatives. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 85: 23–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Terziev, N., Boutelje, J., and Söderström, O. (1993). The influence of drying schedules on the redistribution of low-molecular sugars in Pinus sylvestris L. Holzforschung 47: 3–8, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1993.47.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, N., Lesan, B., and Humar, M. (2013). Performance of copper-ethanolamine-impregnated Scots pine wood during exposure to terrestrial microorganisms. Bioresources 8: 3299–3308, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.3.3299-3308.Search in Google Scholar

Thévenon, M.F., Tondi, G., and Pizzi, A. (2009). High performance tannin resin-boron wood preservatives for outdoor end-uses. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 67: 89–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-008-0290-0.Search in Google Scholar

Thybring, E.E. (2013). The decay resistance of modified wood influenced by moisture exclusion and swelling reduction. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 82: 87–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

Tomak, E.D. and Gonultas, O. (2018). The wood preservative potentials of valonia, chestnut, tara and sulphited oak tannins. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 38: 183–197, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2017.1418379.Search in Google Scholar

Tondi, G., Palanti, S., Wieland, S., Thevenon, M.-F., Petutschnigg, A., and Schnabel, T. (2012). Durability of tannin-boron-treated timber. Bioresources 7: 5138–5151, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.4.5138-5151.Search in Google Scholar

Tondi, G., Schnabel, T., Wieland, S., and Petutschnigg, A. (2013). Surface properties of tannin treated wood during natural and artificial weathering. Int. Wood Prod. J. 4: 150–157, https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645313y.0000000047.Search in Google Scholar

Trosa, A. and Pizzi, A. (1998). Industrial hardboard and other panels binder from tannin/furfuryl alcohol in absence of formaldehyde. Holz Roh- Werkstoff 56: 213–214, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050301.Search in Google Scholar

Venäläinena, M., Harjua, A.M., Kainulainenb, P., Viitanenc, H., and Nikulainenb, H. (2003). Variation in the decay resistance and its relationship with other wood characteristics in old Scots pines. Ann. For. Sci 60: 409–417, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003033.10.1051/forest:2003033Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J., Tan, W., Yang, H., Rao, X., Luo, X., Ma, L., Ren, C., Mol, A., and Zhang, D. (2023). Towards weathering and corrosion resistant, self-warning and self-healing epoxy coatings with tannic acid loaded nanocontainers. npj Mater. Degrad. 7: 39, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00360-7.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, D., Li, C., Pizzi, A., Xi, X., Wang, Z., Du, G., Chen, Z., and Lei, H. (2024). Self-neutralizing citric acid−corn starch wood adhesives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12: 13382–13391, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05590.Search in Google Scholar

Yalcin, M. and Ceylan, H. (2017). The effects of tannins on adhesion strength and surface roughness of varnished wood after accelerated weathering. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 14: 185–193, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-016-9841-1.Search in Google Scholar

Yalcin, M., Pelit, H., Akcay, C., and Cakicier, N. (2017). Surface properties of tannin-impregnated and varnished beech wood after exposure to accelerated weathering. Color. Technol. 133: 334–340, https://doi.org/10.1111/cote.12287.Search in Google Scholar

Zabel, R.A. and Morrell, J.J. (1992). Wood microbiology: decay and its prevention. Academic Press, London.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., Petrissans, M., Petrissans, A., Pizzi, A., and Colin, B. (2023). Furanic polymerization causes the change, conservation and recovery of thermally-treated wood hydrophobicity before and after moist conditions exposure. Polymers 15: 221, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010221.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zhou, Y., Xu, D., Li, C., Pizzi, A., Du, G., and Lei, H. (2025). Self-neutralizing tannin-citric acid wood adhesives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 310: 143419, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143419.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2025-06-11
Accepted: 2025-08-19
Published Online: 2025-09-01

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2025-0080/html
Scroll to top button