Home Co3O4 and CDots nanocrystals on g-C3N4 as a synergetic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction
Article Open Access

Co3O4 and CDots nanocrystals on g-C3N4 as a synergetic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction

  • Huihua Wang

    Huihua Wang obtained her doctoral degree at Northeastern University, China. Currently, she works in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. She mainly engages in development of novel materials used in the environmentally friendly field.

    , Yanmei Yang

    Yanmei Yang is pursuing her Master’s degree in the Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. Now, her primary research interests involve the development of catalysts applied in ORR and OER.

    , Tianpeng Qu

    Tianpeng Qu is an Associate Professor in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University. He mainly engages in evaluation and multipurpose utilization of metal-based composite material.

    , Zhenhui Kang

    Zhenhui Kang works in the Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Suzhou, China. He is a known expert in the development and application of carbon-based catalyst materials.

    EMAIL logo
    and Deyong Wang

    Deyong Wang works in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. He mainly engages in recovery and recycle of second resources such as technological progress toward the environmentally friendly treatment of waste water and waste slag.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 15, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Due to the demand of an efficient, inexpensive and scalable synthesis of an oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyst for practical application in fuel cells, we demonstrate a facile strategy to fabricate the flexible Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalyst. The results show that Co3O4-C/C3N4 exhibits a remarkably enhanced ORR electrocatalytic activity due to the introduction of Co and carbon nanodots (CDots) into the graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) sheet. The electron-transferred number of Co3O4-C/C3N4 toward ORR is calculated to be about 3.69, suggesting a desirable four-electron pathway. Furthermore, Co3O4-C/C3N4 shows better durability and tolerance to methanol crossover effects than the commercial platinum (Pt)/C catalyst, indicating a promising potential as an ORR electrocatalyst in practical applications.

1 Introduction

There is increasing interest in developing renewable energy including fuel cells and metal-air batteries [1, 2]. A catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has attracted more attention due to its technological importance in alkaline hydrogen fuel cells, where the ORR is much faster than that in the acidic media of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) [3]. Platinum (Pt)-based nanomaterials have long been regarded as the most effective catalysts for the ORR process in fuel cells, although the Pt-based electrodes still suffer from their susceptibility to time dependent drift and CO deactivation. Moreover, the high cost of the Pt-based catalysts has been shown to be the major “showstopper” to mass market fuel cells for commercial applications [4–7]. Along with recent intensive research efforts in reducing or replacing Pt-based catalysts in alkaline fuel cells, alternative catalysts, such as Co or Fe-based doped catalysts, and non-precious metal-free doped carbon materials, such as doped carbon nanotubes, graphene, mesoporous graphitic arrays and mesoporous carbon have been revealed to be viable, given their comparable catalytic activities toward ORR [8–13]. Among these doped carbon-based materials, nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials have drawn the most attention and been accepted as excellent substitutes for Pt or Pt-based materials to improve the commercialization prospect of fuel cell technology. However, the shortage of nitrogen active sites and low nitrogen content (lower than 5%) always results in unsatisfying electrocatalytic activity toward ORR [14].

As is well known, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has been reported to show remarkable high catalytic activities for many chemical reactions, such as photocatalytic hydrogen production and contaminant degradation, due to its abundant nitrogen active sites [15]. However, g-C3N4 exhibits a negligible application in the electrocatalytic field because of its poor conductivity (10-9 S/m) [16]. If the active sites from g-C3N4 could be transferred to the carbon materials, the catalytic activity toward ORR would be enhanced due to a bountiful supply of active sites which have been considered to be related to electron-rich N atoms with electron lone pairs and an electron-donating conjugated π-bond system [17]. Also, the conductivity of g-C3N4 could be improved by the addition of carbon materials which has been documented in the literature [18]. Furthermore, due to their graphene-like structure, the g-C3N4 sheets display large surface area and good mechanical properties similar to those of graphene, indicating that more active sites could be introduced into the nanosheets.

Carbon nanodots (CDots) are recently emerging monodisperse graphite particles with a size <10 nm in diameter and have exhibited a wide application of advantages in bio-imaging, drug delivery and catalysis due to their benign, biocompatible, accessible and distinctive catalytic properties [15, 19].

Given the excellent properties of CDots, transition metal oxide (Co3O4) and g-C3N4, we hypothesized that a combination of CDots, Co3O4 and g-C3N4 could constitute a high-performance electrocatalyst towards the ORR process. In this study, Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalyst was synthesized by a two-step process using cobalt acetate (Co[Ac]2), CDots and g-C3N4 sheets as the starting materials. The results show that Co3O4-C/C3N4 exhibits a remarkably enhanced ORR electrocatalytic activity because of the introduction of Co and CDots into the g-C3N4 sheet. Based on the results of electrochemical analysis, more active sites and better conductivity could be obtained in the Co3O4-C/C3N4 compared to the single introduction of Co or CDots into g-C3N4 sheets. The electron-transferred number of Co3O4-C/C3N4 toward ORR is calculated to be about 3.69, indicating a desirable four-electron pathway. Furthermore, the obtained catalyst shows better durability and tolerance to methanol crossover effects than the commercial Pt/C catalyst. Such novel and high-efficient Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts could give a promising substitute for commercial Pt/C in fuel cells as well as other energy storage and conversion systems.

2 Materials and methods

Cobalt acetate [Co(Ac)2.6H2O] and urea (C2H6N2O2) (purity, >99%) were purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and methanol were purchased from Suzhou Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Suzhou, China). Ultrapure graphite rods were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Trading Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All the chemical reagents used in this work were used as received without further purification unless otherwise stated.

2.1 Synthesis of free Co3O4, CDots, C3N4, Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4, C/C3N4and Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts

Two graphite rods were inserted parallelly into the ultrapure water (18.4 MΩ/cm) as the anode and cathode, respectively. Static potential of 25–30 V was applied to the two electrodes using a direct current power supply. After 140 h of continuous stirring, the anode was eroded, and a dark yellow solution appeared gradually in the reactor. CDots were obtained by filtering the solution with slow speed quantitative filter paper followed by high speed centrifugation (60,000 rpm). g-C3N4 sheets were fabricated by heating urea at 0.5°C/min to 550°C and then holding for 9 h. The as-produced g-C3N4 sheets were dispersed uniformly in anhydrous ethanol (EtOH) by stirring continually for 40 min, and the concentration of the final C3N4 solution was about 0.3 mg/ml. To prepare the Co3O4-C/C3N4 hybrid, the first step reaction mixture was prepared by adding 1.2 ml of 0.2 m Co(Ac)2 aqueous solution to 25 ml of as-prepared C3N4 EtOH suspension, followed by addition 1 ml of H2O at room temperature. The reaction was kept at 80°C with stirring continually for 2 h. After that, 1 ml condensed CDots aqueous solution was added dropwise to the above mixture whilst stirring, and then the reaction mixture was transferred into a 40 ml autoclave for solvothermal reactions at 150°C for 8 h. The obtained product was collected by high speed centrifugation (25,000 rpm) and washed several times with ethanol and water. The same steps were applied for the preparation of Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4, and C/C3N4 and free Co3O4 nanopowders without the addition of g-C3N4, CDots, Co(Ac) 2 or g-C3N4 and CDots to the reaction mixture, respectively. The schematic illustration of the preparation of Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the preparation of Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets catalysts and their catalytic ability for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
Figure 1:

Schematic illustration of the preparation of Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets catalysts and their catalytic ability for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).

2.2 Characterizations

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were recorded on an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement was performed on a KRATOS Axis ultra-DLD X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using an Mg Kα radiation excitation source (hv=1283.3 eV). The phase component of the synthesized catalysts was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (PW3040/60) with Cu Kα radiation by comparing the peak positions and the intensities with those from the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) databases.

2.3 ORR performance measurement

Electrochemical measurements, including cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammograms measurements, were performed in a standard three-electrode electrochemical cell using a CHI 760E workstation (CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) equipped with a rotating disk and ring-disk electrode apparatus (RRDE-3A, ALS, Co. Ltd., Japan) at room temperature. A glass carbon electrode loaded with the electrocatalyst, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and platinum wire were used as the working electrode, reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. For the preparation of the working electrode, ~6 μl of catalyst suspension (~4 mg/ml) was loaded on a glassy carbon electrode of 3 mm in diameter, followed by coating with 5 μl of Nafion solution (0.5 mass %) and dried at ambient conditions. CV measurements were performed in Ar- and O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution at a scanning rate of 50 mV/s. Rotating-disk electrode (RDE) measurements were conducted in the O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution at a scanning rate of 5 mV/s by varying the rotating speed from 600 to 2000 rpm. Kinetic parameters were analyzed on the basis of the Koutechy-Levich (K-L) equations.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Physical characterization of Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts

Figure 2A–D present typical TEM images and XRD analysis of the synthesized catalysts. The Co3O4-C/C3N4 sample displays typical porous structures (Figure 2A). Also, the Co3O4 and CDots nanoparticles with the size <10 nm are dispersed uniformly on the surface of the C3N4 sheets shown in the inset of Figure 2A. The synthesized Co3O4-C/C3N4 sample exhibits the combination of two-dimensional sheets and nanoparticles, making it possess a larger surface area and more active sites (Figure 2B). The inset of Figure 2B displays the diffraction rings of Co3O4 marked in the red dash rectangle, confirming the formation of a spinel structure of Co3O4 nanocrystals. HRTEM of Co3O4-C/C3N4 marked in the yellow dash rectangle also shows the presence of the crystalline CDots, identified according to the calculated lattice spacing of 0.321 nm shown in Figure 2C [20]. The XRD pattern of Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets (Figure 2D) shows a diffraction peak at 2θ of about 25°, indicating the combination of the C3N4 and CDots (compare the XRD of C3N4, CDots and Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet). All the other diffraction peaks are ascribed to the Co3O4 phase (JCPDS no. 42–1467).

Figure 2: (A–C) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and (D) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the carbon nanodots (CDots), free Co3O4, C3N4 and synthesized Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets. The inset in (A) is the magnified lamellar structure of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets, the inset in (B) is the diffraction rings of Co3O4 marked in the red dash rectangle in (B), and (C) is the high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of crystalline CDots marked in the blue dash rectangle in (B).
Figure 2:

(A–C) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and (D) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the carbon nanodots (CDots), free Co3O4, C3N4 and synthesized Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets. The inset in (A) is the magnified lamellar structure of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets, the inset in (B) is the diffraction rings of Co3O4 marked in the red dash rectangle in (B), and (C) is the high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of crystalline CDots marked in the blue dash rectangle in (B).

As the carbon nanomaterials with higher atomic ratios of N and C have been documented to exhibit much better electrocatalytic activity, XPS measurements were performed to probe the element chemical states and the atomic ratios of N and C in the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet (Figure 3). In order to identify more active sites obtained from the implantation of g-C3N4, nitrogen-doped CDots were also used to compare the atomic ratio of N and C. It should be noted that the nitrogen-doped CDots catalyst (N/C) was also prepared by the same solvothermal process. Generally, the reported atomic ratio of N and C in nitrogen-doped carbon materials was only around 4% [21, 22]. The survey scan spectrum from XPS analysis for the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet revealed the existence of C 1s, O 1s, N 1s and Co 2p after the hydrothermal treatment (Figure 3A). The atomic ratio of N and C in the synthesized Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet was calculated to be about 17.2% from the peak areas of C 1s and N 1s, whereas that of the nitrogen-doped CDots was only 13.4%. Thus, the atomic ratio of N and C in the present Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet was significantly enhanced by the implantation of active sites. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of C 1s can be fitted with three different peaks located at 284.6 eV, 285.8 eV and 288.5 eV, corresponding to C-C, C-O and C-N, respectively (Figure 3B) [23]. The existence of C-O bonding could be attributed to the moisture, atmospheric O2, or CO2 adsorbed on Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets, as well as the residual oxygen-containing groups, such as carboxyl groups existing in Co(Ac) 2 precursors. It has been reported previously that a high content of oxygen in carbon nanomaterials can lead to a strong ability for O2 adsorption [24], which might be another advantage for Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets when being used as the electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. The C-N bonding could be regarded as the new combination between C3N4 and CDots. Comparing the featureless C-N bonding observed in C 1s of the N/C catalyst (inset in Figure 3B) and that of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet, it is found that the CDots were partly bonded with the nitrogen atom after the hydrothermal process. The detailed N 1s spectrum of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet ranging from 390 eV to 410 eV is also shown in Figure 3C. It can be found that there are three different N groups in the XPS spectrum of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet with binding energies of 401 eV, 399.8 eV and 398.6 eV, which can be attributed to sp3-hybridized nitrogen (N–[C]3) (graphite N) and amino functional groups with a hydrogen atom (C-NH) (pyrrolic N), sp2-hybridized nitrogen (C-N-C) (pyridinic N), respectively. Further exploration found that the content of pyrrolic N in the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet was improved by the implantation of active sites (compare the high resolution N 1s spectrum of Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets and that of N/C shown in the inset of Figure 3C). These analyses revealed the effective nitrogen transition in the sheets by the hydrothermal strategy [8, 25–28]. Apart from the C 1s and N 1s spectrum, the high resolution XPS spectrum of Co 2p is also displayed in Figure 3D, in which three peaks are fitted with bonding energies of 781.35eV, 788.25eV and 797.5eV. These peaks are assigned to Co 2p3/2, Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, corresponding to the partly doped Co coordinated with N (781.3 eV) and undoped oxidized Co (Co3O4) (788.2 and 797.6 eV), respectively.

Figure 3: (A) Full X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) scan of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and C/N, (B) high resolution of C 1s, (C) N 1s, and (D) Co 2p spectra of the synthesized catalysts.
Figure 3:

(A) Full X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) scan of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and C/N, (B) high resolution of C 1s, (C) N 1s, and (D) Co 2p spectra of the synthesized catalysts.

3.2 ORR performances of Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets

3.2.1 CV

To investigate the catalytic activities of the synthesized catalysts toward ORR, CV experiments are performed in an Ar and O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution at a scanning rate of 50 mV/s. All potential values given here are in reference to the SCE. Figure 4 shows the CV curves of synthesized catalysts in the absence (Ar bubbling) and presence of oxygen (O2bubbling) in 0.1 m KOH solution. As shown in Figure 4, all catalysts exhibit the ORR peaks in O2-saturated solutions in contrast to the featureless peaks observed in Ar-saturated solutions within the same potential range (compare the dot lines and solid lines in Figure 4), confirming the electrocatalytic activity of the synthesized catalysts toward ORR in alkaline medium. It also notes that the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet exhibits a more positive ORR onset potential (-0.09 V vs. SCE) than the potentials of free Co3O4, C3N4, CDots, Co3O4-C3N4, Co3O4-C, and C/C3N4, indicating more active sites produced from the transition of nitrogen in C3N4 and the nanosized Co3O4.

Figure 4: Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of free Co3O4, carbon nanodots (CDots), C3N4, Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4 and Co3O4-C/C3N4 in (solid line) O2-saturated or (dot line) Ar-saturated 0.1 m KOH solutions at a scan rate of 50 mV/s.
Figure 4:

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of free Co3O4, carbon nanodots (CDots), C3N4, Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4 and Co3O4-C/C3N4 in (solid line) O2-saturated or (dot line) Ar-saturated 0.1 m KOH solutions at a scan rate of 50 mV/s.

3.2.2 RDE results (linear sweep voltammograms)

In order to obtain more information into the kinetics of ORR, RDE measurements were performed to investigate the ORR activities of the synthesized samples, including the free Co3O4, CDots, C3N4, Co3O4-C3N4, Co3O4-CDots, Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets and commercial 20 mass % Pt/C, in O2-satuated 0.1 m KOH electrolyte at a scanning rate of 5 mV/s. As shown in Figure 5A, the free Co3O4, C3N4 and Co3O4-C3N4 exhibited the low ORR electrocatalytic activities due to their poor conductivity. Among these prepared catalysts, Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets showed an enhanced ORR performance with more positive onset potential and larger current density, which are comparable to those of the commercial Pt/C. The desirable properties could be attributed to the synergistic effects of three materials and the combination of CDots and C3N4, effectively increasing electrical conductivity. During the ORR process, oxygen dissolved in the solution diffuses to the surface of the glass carbon electrode and reacts to form water through a four-electron pathway, or to produce hydrogen peroxide through a two-electron pathway. The four-electron pathway is preferred to the two-electron pathway toward ORR because the intermediate H2O2 produced in the two-electron pathway may erode the membrane and electrocatalyst which frustrate the efficiency of fuel cells [29]. Therefore, when evaluating the ORR activity of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets, an RDE at various rotating speeds (600~2000 rpm) was employed to determine its electron-transferred numbers (Figure 5B). As shown in Figure 5B, the oxygen reduction current density increased with increasing rotation rate, suggesting the enhanced mass transfer effect of oxygen dissolved in the solution. The electron-transferred numbers/oxygen molecule could be calculated by the K-L equation:

Figure 5: (A) Rotating-disk electrode (RDE) curves of samples (free Co3O4, carbon nanodots [CDots], C3N4, Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4 and Co3O4- C/C3N4) in O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution with a rotation speed of 1600 rpm and a sweep rate of 5 mV/s. (B) RDE voltammograms of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 in an O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution at 5 mV/s and various rotation speeds. The inset in (B) is the Koutechy-Levich (K-L) plots (j-1 vs. ω-1/2) of Co3O4-C/C3N4 at potentials of -0.8 V, -0.9 V and -1 V. (C) K-L plots of a series of prepared catalysts at -0.8 V. (D) Electron transfer number given at -0.8 V for samples (a–g). a: Co3O4; b: C3N4; c: CDots; d: Co3O4-C3N4; f: Co3O4-C; and g: Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet.
Figure 5:

(A) Rotating-disk electrode (RDE) curves of samples (free Co3O4, carbon nanodots [CDots], C3N4, Co3O4-C, Co3O4-C3N4 and Co3O4- C/C3N4) in O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution with a rotation speed of 1600 rpm and a sweep rate of 5 mV/s. (B) RDE voltammograms of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 in an O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution at 5 mV/s and various rotation speeds. The inset in (B) is the Koutechy-Levich (K-L) plots (j-1 vs. ω-1/2) of Co3O4-C/C3N4 at potentials of -0.8 V, -0.9 V and -1 V. (C) K-L plots of a series of prepared catalysts at -0.8 V. (D) Electron transfer number given at -0.8 V for samples (a–g). a: Co3O4; b: C3N4; c: CDots; d: Co3O4-C3N4; f: Co3O4-C; and g: Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheet.

(1)1/j=1/Bω1/2+1/jk (1)

in which j is the measured current density and ω is the rotation speed expressed with rad/s; B is the Levich slope given by:

(2)B=0.62nFD2/3ν-1/6C (2)

where n is the overall number of transferred electrons in the ORR process, F is the Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol), D is the diffusion coefficient of oxygen, ν is the kinematic viscosity of the electrolyte and C is the saturated oxygen concentration in the electrolyte. The reported values for D, ν and C in 0.1 m KOH solution are 1.9×10-5 cm2/s, 0.01 cm2/s and 1.2×10-6mol/cm3, respectively [30]. The corresponding K-L plots (J-1 vs. ω-1/2) at various electrode potentials of -0.8, -0.9 and -1 V (vs. SCE) exhibit good linearity shown in the inset of Figure 5B. The linearity and parallelism of the K-L plots suggest first-order reaction kinetics toward the dissolved oxygen and similar electron transfer numbers for ORR at different potentials. Based on the slopes of K-L plots in the inset of Figure 5B, the electron- transferred number (n) is calculated to be about 3.69 at -0.8 V, indicating that Co3O4-C/C3N4 sheets favored a 4e- oxygen reduction process. Figure 5C shows the K-L plots of a series of the controlled samples at -0.8 V according to their corresponding RDE curves (ESI, Supplementary Figures S1–S5). The electron-transferred numbers (n) of different catalysts are clearly drawn (Figure 5D) in terms of the results of K-L plots shown in Figure 5C, which are 1.82, 2.67, 3.42, 3.12, 3.48 and 3.69 corresponding to free Co3O4, C3N4, CDots, Co3O4-C3N4, Co3O4-CDots and Co3O4- C/C3N4 sheets, respectively.

3.2.3 Methanol-tolerant capability and stability of Co3O4-C/C3N4

The promising ORR catalysts could exhibit a high catalytic selectivity for cathode reaction against the oxidation of methanol because of the possible crossover effect of methanol through the polymer electrolyte membrane from anode to cathode in direct methanol fuel cells [31]. To examine the tolerance of the Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalyst to the methanol crossover effects, CV curves were carried out in an O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution with and without the addition of 0.5 m methanol, respectively. It should be noted the volume ratio of KOH/methanol is 5. It was found that the Co3O4-C/C3N4catalyst exhibited a strong ability to avoid methanol crossover effects (Figure 6A). In contrast, for the Pt/C catalyst, after the addition of 0.5 m methanol into the O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH electrolyte, the typical methanol oxidation peak at about -0.1 V was observed, while the cathodic peak for ORR disappeared (Figure 6B), indicating the competitive reaction between oxygen reduction and methanol oxidation.

Figure 6: (A, B) Cyclic voltammograms of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and Pt/C (20%) in O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH with or without 0.5 m methanol. (C) Current-time (i-t) curves of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and 20% Pt/C catalysts at -0.4 V (vs. SCE) in an O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution for 10 h.
Figure 6:

(A, B) Cyclic voltammograms of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and Pt/C (20%) in O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH with or without 0.5 m methanol. (C) Current-time (i-t) curves of Co3O4-C/C3N4 and 20% Pt/C catalysts at -0.4 V (vs. SCE) in an O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH solution for 10 h.

Moreover, the long-term durability of the Co3O4- C/C3N4 sheet is considered to be another important factor to evaluate ORR performance. To evaluate the durability of Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts, chronoamperometric (i-t) measurement was performed in O2-saturated 0.1 m KOH electrolyte compared to that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst. As shown in Figure 6C, the continuous ORR process caused tardy attenuation (8.8%) of current for the Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalyst over 10 h, but the commercial Pt/C exhibited significant decline of stability within the same time, which merely kept 62.1% of the original current.

All of the above electrochemical results indicate that Co3O4-C/C3N4 catalysts display good catalytic ability compared to commercial Pt/C (20%), superior stability and outperformed methanol tolerance in an alkaline solution.

4 Conclusions

A novel flexible Co3O4-C/C3N4 composite sheet has been developed by a solvothermal process using Co(Ac)2, g-C3N4 and CDots as the starting materials.

The nitrogen transfer in g-C3N4 and in situ formation of Co3O4 nanoparticles in freestanding sheets simultaneously occur in the solvothermal process. Co3O4-C/C3N4 exhibits a remarkably enhanced ORR electrocatalytic activity because of the introduction of Co and CDots into the g-C3N4 sheet, under which condition more active sites and better conductivity could be obtained toward ORR compared to the single introduction of Co or CDots into the g-C3N4 sheet. The electron-transferred number of Co3O4-C/C3N4 for ORR is calculated to be about 3.69, suggesting a desirable four-electron pathway. Furthermore, the obtained catalyst shows better durability and tolerance to methanol crossover effects than the commercial Pt/C catalyst. The present work provides a feasible route for the design and large-scale synthesis of a freestanding electrocatalyst with high activity for ORR under mild conditions, which can be further extended to produce hybrid materials with broad applications in other energy storage and conversion systems.


Corresponding authors: Zhenhui Kang, Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China, e-mail: ; and Deyong Wang, School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China, e-mail:

About the authors

Huihua Wang

Huihua Wang obtained her doctoral degree at Northeastern University, China. Currently, she works in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. She mainly engages in development of novel materials used in the environmentally friendly field.

Yanmei Yang

Yanmei Yang is pursuing her Master’s degree in the Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. Now, her primary research interests involve the development of catalysts applied in ORR and OER.

Tianpeng Qu

Tianpeng Qu is an Associate Professor in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University. He mainly engages in evaluation and multipurpose utilization of metal-based composite material.

Zhenhui Kang

Zhenhui Kang works in the Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Suzhou, China. He is a known expert in the development and application of carbon-based catalyst materials.

Deyong Wang

Deyong Wang works in the School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Su Zhou, China. He mainly engages in recovery and recycle of second resources such as technological progress toward the environmentally friendly treatment of waste water and waste slag.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices, and the Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51422207, 51444007, 51132006 and 21471106), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK20140346). Their supports enabled us to perform the present investigation.

References

[1] Gewirth AA, Thorum MS. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 3557–3566.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Liang YY, Li YG, Wang HL, Dai HJ. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 780–786.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Li H, Liu H, Jong Z, Qu W, Geng DS, Sun XL, Wang HJ. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2011, 36, 2258–2265.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Li SS, Cong HP, Wang P, Yu SH. NanoScale 2014, 6, 7534–7541.10.1039/C4NR02101KSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Jin Z, Nie H, Yang Z, Zhang J, Liu Z, Xu X, Huang S. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 6455–6460.10.1039/c2nr31858jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Ma X, Meng H, Cai M, Shen PK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1954–1957.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Xia X, Zhang F, Zhang X, Liang P, Huang X, Logan BE. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7862–7866.10.1021/am4018225Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Lefevre M, Proietti E, Jaouen F, Dodelet JP. Science 2009, 324, 71–74.10.1126/science.1170051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Bezerra CWB. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 4937–4951.10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gong K, Du F, Xia Z, Durstock M, Dai L. Science 2009, 323, 760–764 .10.1126/science.1168049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Liu R, Wu D, Feng X, Muellen K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2565–2569.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Qu L, Liu Y, Baek JB, Dai L. ACS Nano. 2010, 4, 1321–1326.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gorlin Y, Jaramillo TF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13612–13614.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liang J, Zheng Y, Chen J, Liu J, Denisa H J, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3892–3896.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Liu J, Liu Y, Liu N Y, Han YZ, Zhang X, Huang H, Lifshitz Y, Lee ST, Zhong J, Kang ZH. Science, 2015, 347, 970–974.10.1126/science.aaa3145Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Zhang Y, Mori T, Ye J, Antonietti M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6294–6295.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hwang S, Lee S, Yu JS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 5656–5659.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lyth S M, Nabae Y, Moriya S, Kuroki S, Kakimoto M, Ozaki J, Miyat S, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20148–20151.10.1021/jp907928jSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Li HT, Kang ZH, Liu Y, Lee S-T. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24230–24233.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lu J, Yang JX, Wang JZ, Lim AL, Wang S, Loh KP. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 2367–2375.10.1021/nn900546bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Zhang CH, Fu L, Liu N, Liu MH, Wang YY, Liu ZF. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1020–1024.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Sun Z, Yan Z, Yao J, Beitler E, Zhu Y, Tour M. Nature 2010, 468, 549–552.10.1038/nature09579Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Zhai Y, Zhu C, Wang E, Dong S. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2964–2970.10.1039/c3nr05357aSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zettl A. Science 2000, 287, 1801–1804.10.1126/science.287.5459.1801Search in Google Scholar

[25] Geng D, Chen Y, Li Y, Li R, Sun X, Ye S, Knights S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 760–764.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Chen Z, Higgins D, Chen Z. Carbon 2010, 48, 3057–3065.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.038Search in Google Scholar

[27] Niwa H, Horiba K, Harada Y, Oshima M, Ikeda T, Terakura K, Ozaki J, Miyata S. J.Power Sources 2009, 187, 93–97.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.064Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ozaki JI, Kimura N, Anahara T, Oya A. Carbon 2007, 45, 1847–1853.10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.031Search in Google Scholar

[29] Feng L, Yan Y, Chen Y, Wang L. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1892–1899.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Yang YM, Liu J, Han YZ, Huang H, Kang ZH. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 25350–25357.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Arico A, Srinivasan S, Antonucci V. Fuel Cells 2001, 1, 133–161.10.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<133::AID-FUCE133>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/gps-2015-0049) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2015-7-1
Accepted: 2015-7-27
Published Online: 2015-9-15
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. NaMiBiTech Conference 2014
  4. NaMiBiTech Conference 2014
  5. Scale-up of an RF heated micro trickle bed reactor to a kg/day production scale
  6. Low temperature steam reforming of ethanol over advanced carbon nanotube-based catalysts
  7. Heterogeneously catalyzed reactive extraction for biomass valorization into chemicals and fuels
  8. Facile solvothermal synthesis of bimetallic CoMoS2 and NiMoS2 nanospheres
  9. Original articles
  10. The new green catalysts derived from waste razor and surf clam shells for biodiesel production in a continuous reactor
  11. Kinetics of green solid-liquid extraction of andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata: effects of particle size and solid-liquid ratio
  12. Co3O4 and CDots nanocrystals on g-C3N4 as a synergetic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction
  13. Optimization of tribological behavior of Pongamia oil blends as an engine lubricant additive
  14. Project profile
  15. BIOGO: contributing to the transformation of the petrochemical industry through advances in nanocatalysts and reactor design
  16. Organization profile
  17. Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology (UMSICHT)
  18. Conference announcements
  19. 6th International Conference of the Flow Chemistry Society (Cambridge, UK, February 16–18, 2016)
  20. International MicroNanoConference 2015 (Passenger Terminal, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 8–9, 2015)
  21. Conferences 2015–2017
  22. Book reviews
  23. Process intensification for sustainable energy conversion
  24. Green extraction of natural products: theory and practice
Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2015-0049/html
Scroll to top button