Home Adsorption of organic chemicals on graphene coated biochars and its environmental implications
Article Open Access

Adsorption of organic chemicals on graphene coated biochars and its environmental implications

  • Abdul Ghaffar

    Abdul Ghaffar obtained his undergraduate degree in Textile Engineering at The College of Textile and Polymer Engineering (National Textile University), Karachi, Pakistan in July 2009. After graduating, he served as a technical engineer in a local textile processing group for 1.5 years. He then enrolled in MS Environmental Engineering at the Kunming University of Science and Technology, under the supervision of Dr. Pan Bo. He is currently working as MS research scholar in the same laboratory. His current research interests include biomaterials, carbon nanotubes, polymer synthesis and wastewater treatment.

    EMAIL logo
    and Muhammad Naeem Younis

    Muhammad Naeem Younis graduated from the University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan with a degree in Chemical Engineering, after which he went on to study for a Master’s degree in Chemical Engineering at the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) in 2012. While at KFUPM, his research focused on the development, characterization and evaluation of catalysts for petrochemicals and related processes.

Published/Copyright: November 26, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Biochar is a stabilized carbon-rich product, and has drawn scientists’ interest because of its specific properties and potential use in many environmental areas. It is emphasized that innovative technologies comprised of engineered nanoparticles in conventional biochar systems could ameliorate the functions of biochar to some extent, such as carbon sequestration, soil fertility and wastewater treatment. As a result, it enables an enhanced sorption of both inorganic and organic pollutants to their surfaces, reducing environmental fate and mobility. In this study, biochar and graphene-coated biochars were prepared by dip-coating of biomass by slow pyrolysis. Batch sorption experiments were performed on the resultant biochars to evaluate sorption ability. The graphene covering on biochar surface changes to increase the surface properties of the biochars, exhibiting the greatest surface area, pore volume and carbon content. Graphene-coated biochars had the ultimate sorption ability compared to their corresponding chars. The sorption data indicated that electrostatic attraction, π-π interaction between graphene sheets on the char surface and aromatic domain, was the controlling mechanism for the sorption of organic chemicals onto the chars. Graphene-coated biochars can thus be used as a stable, cheap sorbent, biomaterial for the removal of organic pollutants from aqueous media.

1 Introduction

Biochar is a stable, carbon-rich solid residue that is produced during incomplete oxidation/combustion of biomass such as wood, leaves or manure. The biochar has spurred significant applications such as carbon sequestration, waste management, enhance soil fertility (step-up soil nutrients), water holding capacity and energy production [1–4]. Recently, the use of biochar has been expanded as a universal, potential super-sorbent for heavy metals and organic contaminants from water. These biological residues are produced through complete or partial carbonization of biomass material, under low oxygen conditions with which they vary in final physicochemical properties obtained from their feedstock and pyrolysis temperature [heat treatment temperature (HTT)] [5]. The biomass undergoes different chemical transformations in accordance with temperature by which the transformation of the aromatic sheets structure comes after a progressive condensation to form large conjugated sheets from smaller aromatic units [6, 7]. Pyrolysis temperature and choice of precursor feedstock plays a vital role in changing the biochar properties and characteristics, such as surface structural changes and morphology for potential applications [8, 9]. It has been suggested by a variety of authors that chars are partially carbonized and have a low surface area, and hence show a distinct phase transition at about 350°C–400°C [10, 11]. The turbostratic crystallites are formed with an increased temperature and exhibit properties of extensive microporosity, suggesting a drastic and concomitant affect in sorbent features [12, 13]. The sorption properties of chars have been studied widely during the last decade, responding to the growing awareness to the overall adsorption potential. In addition to traditional biochars, nanotechnology and biotechnology have been used to promote and produce specific biochar-based materials to improve environmental performance [14–18].

The potential use of biochar has been expanded to include use as a sorbent for heavy metals and organic contaminants [19, 20]. The sorption mechanism by biochars has been studied widely during the last few decades, due to multifunctional surface groups such as O-containing carboxyl, hydroxyl and phenolic surface functional groups, which make them a very effective environmental sorbent for inorganic and organic contaminants [14, 21, 22]. It has been established in recent studies that chemical and structural properties of charred biomass clearly influence the sorption behavior (i.e., hydrophobicity, molecular planarity and molecular weight), it also relies on specific surface area, pore size distribution, functionality and polarity of the charcoal sorbent [23–25]. The organic pollutants show a great affinity towards biochar having a higher surface area and/or hydrophobicity, resulting in increased sorption capacity [26]. Therefore, the interactions between organic contaminants and chars are of special interest. Generally, biochar belongs to organic and mineral phases, which are both affected by the preparation conditions.

Graphene has attracted vast technological and scientific interest in recent years because of its specific properties such as mechanical strength, surface area (theoretically 2360 m2 g-1) and thermal conductivity [27–30]. Due to its extensive use, several studies suggested that graphene can be applied as a covering or wrapping agent to make novel nanocomposites with enhanced roles for various applications [31–34]. In this way, graphene provides a higher potential for use in large-scale environmental applications, such as environmental remediation and water treatment. So far, the coexistence of biochar and graphene could widely occur in the environment because of the ubiquity of graphene and the increasing use of biochar in different applications. Thus, the combination of conventional biochar technology with emerging drop-in nanotechnology to produce graphene-biochar composites has great capability for creating a new class of low-cost and environmentally friendly sorbents to deal with a variety of pollutants and contaminants. In order to determine the sorption ability of graphene-wrapped/coated chars, the batch sorption experiment was also performed with aqueous methylene blue and phenol. This study emphasizes that the sorption properties of suspended biochars were increased due to the existence of graphene on the surface of chars. The type of study will benefit graphene, biochar and their applications.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

All chemicals used in this work were of analytical grade. Synthetic graphite powder (particle size 20 mm), was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Peanut shell biomass was obtained from Dhahran, a local market in Saudi Arabia. All of the biomass feedstock was milled by a high speed rotary machine, to obtain a particle size in the range of 40–60 mesh and later dried at 383 K for 7 h to remove the moisture prior to pyrolysis. Two types of organic chemicals, phenol and methylene blue, were obtained from Sigma Aldrich Chemicals, with purity >90%. The physicochemical properties of selected chemicals are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Selected physicochemical properties of phenol and methylene blue dye.

PropertiesPhenolMethylene blue
IUPAC namePhenol3,7-bis(dimethylamino)-phenothiazin-5-ium chloride
Chemical structure
Molecular formulaC6H6OC16H18N3SCl
Molecular mass94.11 g mol-1319.85 g mol-1
Solubility83 g l-135.5 g l-1
pKa9.95
Wavelength510 nm665 nm

2.2 Preparation of graphene suspension

Synthetic graphite powder was used to prepare stable graphene suspension. Graphene suspensions were prepared by adding 2 g of graphite powder to 200 ml of deionized water. The graphene suspensions were sonicated in an ultrasonic homogenizer (Model 300 V/T, Biologics, Inc.) with an output frequency of 20 kHz for 1 h at pulse intervals of 12 min. The resulting suspensions were used for impregnation of biomass to achieve graphene-coated biochar.

2.3 Preparation of biochar

Milled peanut shell biomass (feedstock) was used for the preparation of biochars. For graphene-coated biochars, 40 g of the peanut shell biomass was dipped following a dip-coating procedure [14, 35] and rinsed for 1 h using a magnetic stirrer, after which dip-coated biomass was removed and oven dried at 105°C. The graphene-treated biomass was placed in a quartz tube inside a muffle furnace (MF 21GS, Jeio Tech, Seoul, Korea) to produce the graphene-coated biochar through slow pyrolysis in a N2 environment at temperatures of 300°C and 500°C for 2 h. In addition, corresponding untreated peanut shell biomass was also used as feedstock to produce biochar without graphene coating with the same pyrolysis conditions. The resulting biochar samples were washed with deionized water several times to remove impurities, oven dried and sealed in glass containers for further testing. The untreated and graphene-coated biochar samples are referred to as B300, GB300, B500 and GB500, respectively.

2.4 Adsorption experiment

Batch sorption techniques were used to determine the adsorption capacity of the chars by keeping them in phenol and methylene blue dye solutions. About exact weights of 1±3 mg each biochar were used in 4 ml glass vials at room temperature (23±1°C). The prepared samples and blank solutions (without prepared sorbate) in the controlled environment were mixed properly for 24 h on a reciprocating shaker.

Once the initial evaluation of experimentation was completed, further isotherm studies were carried out on unmodified biochar (B300 and B500) and graphene-coated biochar (GB300 and GB500) in the presence of organic chemicals. For this purpose, 4 ml of each biochar sample was mixed with chemical solutions of varying concentrations (1–50 mg l-1). To obtain the equilibrium and accuracy, samples were kept in the dark for 24 h in a rotary shaker. All samples were under observation during the mentioned time period and no apparent degradation was found. Later, all samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min and concentrations of the supernatants were evaluated on a UV-vis spectrophotometer.

2.5 Quantification of sorbate

The concentrations of sorbate in the supernatants were quantified using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-2401, Shimadzu, Japan) 510 nm for phenol and 665 nm for methylene blue dye, respectively. Sorbed amounts of phenol and methylene blue dye on tested biochars were calculated as the difference between the initial and final aqueous solution concentrations. Sorption experiments were conducted in duplicate. A difference of <3% was observed between the initial and final equilibrium concentrations of sorbate in blank solutions.

2.6 Data analysis

The adsorption capacity of tested biochars at the equilibrium state was calculated as follows:

(1)qe=(C0-Ce)×VW (1)

where qe (mg g-1) is the sorbate adsorption capacity, V (l) is the volume of solution, W (g) is the weight of biochar, C0 and Ce (mg l-1) are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of sorbate, respectively.

Adsorption isotherms were fitted using the Freundlich and Langmuir models with Sigma Plot 10.0.

(2)Freundlich model (FM)Qe=KFCen (2)
(3)Langmuir model (LM)Qe=KLQ0Ce(1+KLCe) (3)

where KF (l g-1)n is the Freundlich adsorption coefficient and n is an index of isotherm nonlinearity which is related to the heterogeneity of sorption sites. Qe (mg g-1) and Ce (mg l-1) are equilibrium solid-phase and aqueous-phase concentrations, respectively. KL (mg l-1) is the Langmuir model adsorption coefficient, and Q0 (mg g-1) is the Langmuir model adsorption capacity parameter.

Because the number of parameters used in the two models were not the same, the coefficient of determination (r2) could not be compared directly. The adjusted radj2 was calculated and compared:

(4)radj2=1-(m-1)(1-r2)m-p-1 (4)

where m is the number of data points and p is the number of parameters in the fitting equation.

The sorption coefficient K0 was defined as:

(5)K0=SeCe (5)

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of biochar

The surface and bulk elemental characterizations of biochars were determined by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and a CHN analyzer. A strong correlativity was determined between the calculated H/C and O/C ratios. H/C and O/C ratios, decreased at higher temperatures following decarboxylation, decarbonylation and dehydration during heat treatments (pyrolysis) [6]. The amount of hydrogen and oxygen atoms per carbon leads to a strong decline in reaction mechanisms. Surface elemental composition of biochars carbon, nitogen and oxygen, as suggested by XPS, also changed after graphene coating (Table 2). The yield, ash content, bulk and surface elemental composition, atomic ratio and surface area of untreated and graphene-coated biochar produced from peanut shell at two different temperatures (i.e., 300°C and 500°C) are listed in Table 2. The C content of the biochar increased with increasing temperature, while O and H contents decresed with increasing temperature, suggesting an enhanced degree of carbonization of chars following decarboxylation, dehydration and decarbonylation during pyrolysis [6]. The increase in temperature caused a decrease in biochar yield from 34% to 29% and 31% to 26%, for non-treated and treated biochars, respectively, which may be anticipated to be the decomposition of lignin and cellulosic contents in feedstock [9]. The reduction in weight loss was due to the removal of CO, CO2, H2O, H2 and CH4 from feedstock at >600°C [36]. Higher heat treatment temperature (HTT) could also result in loss of organic matter (OM). At higher HTT, ash content increases due to the distribution of OM and mineral combustion residues [37].

Table 2

Bulk and surface elemental characterization of biochars.

SampleYieldaBulk elemental composition (%)a,bAtomic ratiocSurface elemental composition (%)dBETe N2 SAPore volume
CHNOSAshfO/CH/C(N+O)/CCNOm2 g-1ml g-1
B30034.7962.753.121.6814.60.3017.490.170.590.2677.021.8421.06176.90.06
GB30031.5367.713.931.5017.70.248.820.190.690.2879.171.6718.73214.50.10
B50029.4769.722.451.299.380.2816.850.100.420.1588.431.449.542610.09
GB50026.1371.411.721.178.180.1817.300.080.280.1390.331.338.32468.20.19

aYields, elemental composition and atomic ratios are on water-free basis (105°C).

bElemental composition obtained from CHN analyzer.

cCalculated from atomic ratios of bulk elements.

dSurface elemental composition obtained from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis.

eBrunauer-Emmett-Teller method.

fAsh content was measured by heating the biochars at 750°C for 4 h.

Generally, the higher pyrolysis temperature increased the surface area in comparison to lower temperatures. The higher HTT biochar shows a greater surface area because of removal of O and H carrying functional groups of main aromatic -CO, ester C=O, aliphatic alkyl-CH2 and phenolic -OH groups during pyrolysis [38]. Additionally, the increase in surface area of chars at higher temperatures was mainly due to the dismissal of volatile matter, which results in increased micropore volume. There was an increase in pore volume of obtained biochars. A decrease in pore size, internal pores and an increase in porosity was mainly due to escape of volatiles during carbonization.

3.2 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis

Fourier transform infrared spectra of biochars and graphene-coated derived biochars are shown in Figure 1. The difference in surface functionality groups of biochars produced at two different temperatures and graphene-coated biochars can be observed by Fourier transform infrared spectra. The biochar properties were greatly influenced by HTT as suggested by characterization. According to Coates [39] spectral interpretations, the OH group of bonded water was assigned to the band at 3337 cm-1. The peaks at 1375 cm-1, 2854 cm-1 and 2922 cm-1 were related to -CH2, while the bands at 1506 cm-1, 1616 cm-1 and 1734 cm-1 were assigned to the C=C–C aromatic ring, C=C and C=O aromatic ring and C=O ester bond, respectively. There was an expansion in aromatic C-N and C-H bonds which was observed at 1024 cm-1 and 1242 cm-1. The band at 871 cm-1 indicates the existence of contiguous bond which were depicted as an aromatic C-H bond.

Figure 1 Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of biochars.
Figure 1

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of biochars.

There was a significant decrease in peaks at 1504–1630 cm-1 in biochars produced at 500°C due to a decrease in lignin content. The peak at 3337 cm-1 represented the effectual hydrogen bonding. However, the hydrogen bonds from B300 and GB300 became anemic and finally decreased in B500 and GB500. The absorption bands at 2854 cm-1 and 2922 cm-1 indicated the existence of long linear aliphatic chain -CH2 groups, which were decreased in B500 and GB500, and diminished in B300 and GB300. These consequences indicated a reduction in polar functional groups with an increase in pyrolysis temperature [38]. The band at 1616 cm-1 (aromatic C=C and C=O) continues in all of the biochars, and ultimately showed a decrease in B300 and GB300. The greatest loss was observed in C-O, -CH2 and -OH functional groups in biochar at 500°C, which was also obvious from their elemental composition. Relatively lower values of H, O and H/C in B500 and GB500 than those in B300 and GB300 revealed the significant elimination of polar functional groups of polar functional groups (C-O and -OH). Thermal demolition of lignin and cellulose in feedstock may conclude in hydroxyl -OH, aliphatic alkyl -CH2, aromatic C=O and ester C=O functional groups in biochars [38].

3.3 Graphene-coated biochar

The production of biochar engineered nanoparticles could improve biochar performance in wastewater treatment, carbon sequestration and soil fertility enhancement [14]. The graphene coating could be considered for the existence of some structural reformations or small residual amounts of oxygen-containing functional groups, as suggested by the slow pyrolysis [40]. The amount of coating on the biochar surface could not be quantified since it is a carbon based material. There was a greater increase in C content, which suggested that graphene coating was fabricated on the biochar surface smoothly and uniformly and so char kept the original morphological structure. A similar effect was obtained for coal and carbon nanotube products [41–44]. As shown from characterization, the physicochemical properties (e.g., proportions, porosity and surface area) of the biochars were increased with treatment of graphene. Elemental composition indicated an increase in C content of biochar. Graphene has a significant property of high thermal stability, which can be imply to biochar samples. Generally, char samples could be partitioned into three stages on the basis of thermal degradation. These are the reflecting loss of water in the 1st stage, i.e., in the range of 50°C–100°C, the degradation of surface functional groups, i.e., the 2nd stage in the range of 100°C–350°C and the final stage at temperatures higher than 350°C, when the carbon skeletons begin to vanish. Thus, the thermal stability of biochar could be protected by graphene coating. Carbon sequestration is often recommended to be an efficient way by means of land application; the enhanced stability and efficient way for carbon sequestration gives it an improved carbon sink for large scale applications to mitigate global warming.

3.4 Sorption of phenol

Figure 2 shows the adsorption isotherms obtained from different biochars with initial phenol concentrations from 1 mg l-1 to 50 mg l-1. Sorption capacities of GB300 and GB500 suggested via Langmuir isotherm modeling (36.63 mg g-1 and 46.2 mg g-1, respectively), were higher than those of their corresponding untreated biochars, (10.09 mg g-1 and 18.19 mg g-1, respectively). The F>Prob in ANOVA confirms that the adsorption of phenol was a significant factor. The sum of the squares used to estimate factors affect and Fisher’s F ratios (defined as the ratio of mean square effect and the mean square error) are also represented in Table 4. The determined sorption values were not relatively higher than those of some carbonaceous waste materials which have already been reported previously and additional work will be required to optimize the graphene-coated biochar nanocomposites and their synthesis in order to improve sorption capacities for organic chemicals. The graphene treatment enhanced the biochar sorption capacities, as well as their surface functional group contents and surface areas. Among all of the derived biochars, GB500 demonstrated a higher adsorption capacity due to its highest surface area (468 m2 g-1). Biochars obtained at HTT 300°C resulted in reduction of the sorption ability, and that was consistent with their surface areas 176 m2 g-1 and 214 m2 g-1. Hence, the decrease in sorption capacities could be linked to the temperature of pyrolysis and surface areas of biochars. In lower HTT biochars, reason for the smaller surface area could be the formation of some hydrophobic macromolecules that got over the surface of the char. It has been also suggested that adsorbents do not purely acquire homogenous sites of biochar, whereas sorption can occur at multi-region sites depending on functional groups at various sites of biochars. The fitting parameters of adsorption isotherms and ANOVA analysis are listed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.

Figure 2 Adsorption isotherms of phenol and methylene blue on biochars. The left side stands for untreated biochars and the right side stands for graphene-treated biochars.
Figure 2

Adsorption isotherms of phenol and methylene blue on biochars. The left side stands for untreated biochars and the right side stands for graphene-treated biochars.

Table 3

Fitting parameters of Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms.

SorbateSorbentsFreundlich modelLangmuir modelLog Kd (l g-1)
KF (l g-1) nnr2adjQ0 (mg g-1)KL (l g-1)r2adj0.01 Cs0.1 Cs
PhenolB30010.440.340.94010.093.710.9910.940.72
B50021.110.340.99818.194.190.8921.840.97
BG30020.700.270.97936.631.370.9342.101.23
BG50031.870.280.99746.201.790.8432.211.37
MBB3008.840.380.9635.647.350.9930.720.45
B50011.880.400.9707.827.700.9851.020.66
BG30017.480.320.93217.673.200.9791.130.91
BG50019.810.360.97116.114.960.9841.041.04
Table 4

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for adsorption of phenol and methylene blue.

SorbateSorbentsD FSum of squaresMean squareF valueProb>F
PhenolB300Regression11616.331616.331489.91<0.0001
Residual1213.011.08
Total131629.34125.33
B500Regression16140.246140.24108.94<0.0001
Residual12676.3556.36
Total136816.59524.35
BG300Regression13439.033439.03187.51<0.0001
Residual12220.0718.33
Total133659.11281.47
BG500Regression17998.997998.9971.27<0.0001
Residual121346.73112.22
Total139345.72718.9
MBB300Regression11369.961369.962039.29<0.0001
Residual127.850.65
Total131377.82105.98
B500Regression12896.082896.08856.88<0.0001
Residual1240.553.37
Total132936.64225.89
BG300Regression13044.543044.54612<0.0001
Residual1259.624.96
Total133104.16238.78
BG500Regression15860.885860.88798.2<0.0001
Residual1288.117.34
Total135948.99457.61

3.5 Sorption of methylene blue

When the sorption isotherms of methylene blue for GB300 and GB500 were compared to the original biochars, an increased sorption capability to methylene blue dye was observed, as indicated by the sorption constant, i.e., log Kd. Furthermore, ANOVA analysis to determine adsorption characteristics was found to have a significant effect as shown in Table 4. The sorption isotherms of GB300 and GB500 were somewhat higher than those of their corresponding non-coated biochars (17.67 mg g-1 and 16.11 mg g-1, respectively), suggesting the existence of graphene on the biochar surface, hence enhancing its sorption capability to adsorb dye molecules greatly. Sorption isotherms suggested the quicker uptake of methylene blue on the graphene coated biochars. This enhanced capability was the result of larger pore volumes of graphene coated biochars; as a result, the interaction time was increased to detain the initial dye uptake. This suggests a stronger affinity of organic molecules to the COOH functionality on coated biochars as compared to non-coated biochars. In this work, the sorption mechanism could be attributed to a) sorption onto high affinity binding sites or b) sorption to biochar itself as the graphene sites become filled. The increased adsorption of dye molecules by the graphene-coated biochar could be assigned to the strong interactions between the graphene sheets on the biochar surface and dye molecules through the π-π interactions [45].

3.6 Adsorption mechanisms

In particular, the sorption process corresponded with that of activated carbon adsorption. A chemical phenomenon between functional groups on char surfaces and organic molecules was an additional significant driving force for the sorption of organic molecules. The chars include many groups comprised of oxygen or nitrogen such as -OH, -NH2, C-O, C=O, etc. In the case of phenol adsorption, a Lewis acid, -NH2 is a kind of basic group on char surfaces, and consequently, phenol interacts with -NH2 through acid-base interaction. Other groups such as -OH, C-O and CO can act with organic chemicals via hydrogen bonds. In addition, the potent electron-donating ability of the -OH group stimulates the aromatic ring in organic molecules to be a π-electron rich system. Therefore, in the adsorption mechanism, the aromatic rings of organic molecules were likely to form π-π stacking. However, the fundamental interactions between the organic molecules and functional groups are more efficient to the enhancement of adsorption capacity.

4 Conclusion

High adsorption capacities by graphene-treated carbonaceous materials (biochars) were obtained. The surface properties, porosity, surface area and functional groups of biochars were increased with treatment of graphene. The GB500 char had the highest sorption capacity to phenol and methylene blue among all the sorbents, probably because it may have fixed more graphene sheets on the surface, suggested from its larger pore volume and higher surface area. The sorption studies showed that the electrostatic interaction was the controlling mechanism for the sorption of phenol and methylene blue onto the chars, whereas contribution of π-π bonding should not be ruled out in overall sorption mechanisms. Hydrogen bonding and complexness between functional groups of biochars and phenol were significant driving forces for increased adsorption capacity. Intra-pore diffusion was also likely to control the rate at which phenol and methylene blue molecules were sorbed from solution onto the biochar sorbents. Higher affinities of biochars would be advantageous and economical for remediation to reduce bioavailability of organic pollutants. The study aims to provide a basis for designing graphene finishing technology to open new alternatives in effective and innovative biochars for diverse environmental applications, and better functionality for water treatment and carbon sequestration.


Corresponding author: Abdul Ghaffar, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650600, China, e-mail:

About the authors

Abdul Ghaffar

Abdul Ghaffar obtained his undergraduate degree in Textile Engineering at The College of Textile and Polymer Engineering (National Textile University), Karachi, Pakistan in July 2009. After graduating, he served as a technical engineer in a local textile processing group for 1.5 years. He then enrolled in MS Environmental Engineering at the Kunming University of Science and Technology, under the supervision of Dr. Pan Bo. He is currently working as MS research scholar in the same laboratory. His current research interests include biomaterials, carbon nanotubes, polymer synthesis and wastewater treatment.

Muhammad Naeem Younis

Muhammad Naeem Younis graduated from the University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan with a degree in Chemical Engineering, after which he went on to study for a Master’s degree in Chemical Engineering at the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) in 2012. While at KFUPM, his research focused on the development, characterization and evaluation of catalysts for petrochemicals and related processes.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express thanks to Dr. Abdul Hannan, (SKMCH, Lahore) for his assistance during the drafting of the original manuscript. Also, we would like to thank the Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, for their help in XPS analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results.

Competing interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

References

[1] Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 3269–3282.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sohi S, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R. In Advances in Agronomy, Sparks D, Ed., 2010, Academic Press, Burlington, Vol. 105, p 47.10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] Harvey O, Kuo LJ, Zimmerman AR, Louchouarn P, Amonette JE, Herbert BE. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1415–1421.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kookana R. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2010, 48, 627–637.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sun K, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Pan Z, Xing B. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9897–9903.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1247–1253.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P. In Biochar for Environmental Management-Science and Technology, Lehmann, J, Joseph, S. Eds., Earthscan: Sterling, VA, USA, 2009, p. 13.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Preston C, Schmidt MWI. Biogeosci. 2006, 3, 397–420.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Novak JM, Lima I, Xing BS, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H. Ann. Environ. Sci. 2009, 3, 195–206.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou CT, Xing BS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 4649–4655.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Amonette J, Joseph S. In Biochar for Environmental Management-Science and Technology, Lehmann, J, Joseph, S. Eds., Earthscan: Sterling, VA, USA, 2009, p. 33.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Keiluweit M, Kleber M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3421–3429.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kercher AK, Nagle DC. Carbon 2003, 41, 15–27.10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00261-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] Inyang M, Gao B, Zimmerman A, Zhang M, Chen H. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 39–46.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Song Z, Lian F, Yu Z, Zhu L, Xing BS, Qiu W. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 36–42.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhou Y, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Fang J, Sun Y, Cao X. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 512–518.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman AR, Pullammanappallil P, Cao X. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 50–56.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ippolito JA, Laird DA, Busscher WJ. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 967–972.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3285–3291.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Yang Y, Sheng G. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 3635–3639.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Liu WJ, Zeng FX, Jiang H, Zhang XS. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8247–8252.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zhang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Inyang M. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 435–436, 567–572.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Cornelissen G, Gustafsson O, Bucheli TD, Jonker MTO, Koelmans AA, Van Noort, PCM. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6881–6895.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Wang X, Sato T, Xing BS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3267–3272.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chen J, Zhu D, Sun C. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2536–2541.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tsui L, Roy WR. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5673–5678.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 132–145.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Choi W, Lahiri I, Seelaboyina R, Kang YS. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2010, 35, 52–71.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Hu X, Mu L, Wen J, Zhou Q. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 213–214, 387–392.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Guo S, Dong S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2644–2672.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Chen JS, Wang Z, Dong XC, Chen P, Lou XW. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 2158–2161.10.1039/c1nr10162eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Mattevi C, Kim H, Chhowalla M. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3324–3334.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ju SA, Kim K, Kim JH, Lee SS. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2904–2911.10.1021/am200056tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Schoen DT, Schoen AP, Hu L. Kim HS, Heilshorn SC, Cui Y. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3628–3632.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Varhegyi G, Szabó P, Till F, Zelei B. Energy Fuels 1998, 12, 969–974.10.1021/ef9800359Search in Google Scholar

[37] Cao X, Harris W. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5222–5228.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5137–4143.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Coates J. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry-Applications, Theory and Instrumentation. Meyers, RA, Ed., John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2000, p. 10815.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Zhang M, Gao B. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 226, 286–292.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Silva L, Jasper A, Andrade ML, Sampaio CH, Dai S, Li X, Li T, Chen W, Wang X, Liu H, Zhao L, Hopps SG, Jewell RF, Hower JC. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 419, 250–264.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Quispe D, Pérez-López R, Silva L, Nieto JM. Fuel 2012, 94, 495–503.10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.034Search in Google Scholar

[43] Oliveira M, Ward CR, Izquierdo M, Sampaio CH, de Brum IAS, Kautzmann RM, Sabedot S, Querol X, Silva LF. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 430, 34–47.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Ribeiro J, Flores D, Ward CR, Silva LF. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 6032–6041.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Rochefort A, Wuest JD. Langmuir 2009, 25, 210–215.10.1021/la802284jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-9-25
Accepted: 2014-10-28
Published Online: 2014-11-26
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Editorial
  4. Science Woodstock and Nobel Prize: what remains in 50 years?
  5. GPE 2014
  6. 4th International Congress on Green Process Engineering (GPE2014) continued
  7. Beyond biofuels: economic opportunities, recent advances and challenges in property modeling for vegetable oils
  8. Greener route to 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexane 1,2-epoxide synthesis using batch and continuous reactors
  9. Intensification of waste cooking oil transformation by transesterification and esterification reactions in oscillatory baffled and microstructured reactors for biodiesel production
  10. One-step processes for in situ transesterification to biodiesel and lutein extraction from microalgae Phaeodactylum using instant controlled pressure drop (DIC)
  11. Hydrodeoxygenation of stearic acid for the production of “green” diesel
  12. Original articles
  13. Eco-friendly conjugate hydrocyanation of 2-aroyl α,β-unsaturated ketones with potassium hexacyanoferrate(II)
  14. Facile and green synthesis of Hantzsch derivatives in deep eutectic solvent
  15. Green synthesis of dual-surface nanocomposite films using Tollen’s method
  16. Optimized microemulsion production of biodiesel over lipase-catalyzed transesterification of soybean oil by response surface methodology
  17. Adsorption of organic chemicals on graphene coated biochars and its environmental implications
  18. Company profile
  19. iX-factory GmbH: development of a microfluidic chromatography chip
  20. Conference announcements
  21. International Workshop on Process Intensification 2015 (IWPI2015): Towards Sustainable Process Technologies in the 21st Century (Canik Basari University, Samsun, Turkey, April 27–30, 2015)
  22. Conferences 2015–2017
  23. Book review
  24. Domino reactions: concepts for efficient organic synthesis
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2014-0071/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button