Home Hedging devices in applied linguistics research papers: Do gender and nativeness matter?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hedging devices in applied linguistics research papers: Do gender and nativeness matter?

  • Hiwa Weisi EMAIL logo and Ahmad Asakereh
Published/Copyright: August 21, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present study aims at investigating the impact of gender and being native and non-native on the use of hedging devices in the discussion part of Applied Linguistics research papers written by native English/non-native (Iranian) male and female research writers. To this end, 60 Applied Linguistic research papers (15 for each group of research writers) were investigated based on Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 149–170 taxonomy. The results of Chi-square analyses indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between male and female research writers in terms of the frequency of use of hedging devices adopted in the discussion part of the research papers in the realm of Applied Linguistics. Moreover, the results of the study showed that the discussion parts of Applied Linguistics research papers written by male and female native English research writers were more hedged than those written by their Iranian counterparts. The pedagogical and implications of the findings are dealt with in the discussion and conclusion sections of the study.


Corresponding author: Hiwa Weisi, Applied Linguistics, Razi University, Kermashan, Iran, E-mail:

References

Aboulalaei, Mir Habib. 2013. Exploring the differences between Iranian women and men academic article writings according to mood and modality. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 18(5). 668–674. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.18.5.11757.Search in Google Scholar

Afshar, Hassan Soodmand, Mohamad Moradi & Raouf Hamzavi. 2014. Frequency and type of hedging devices used in the research articles of humanities, basic sciences and agriculture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.290.Search in Google Scholar

Anh, Nguyen Tuan. 2018. The use of hedging devices in applied linguistics academic discourse: The case of reading in a Foreign Language and English language research articles. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies 34(5). 12–24. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4298.Search in Google Scholar

Asfina, Rida, Effendi Kadarisman & Utari Praba. 2018. Hedges used by Indonesian EFL students in written and spoken discourses. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(3). 650–658.10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9815Search in Google Scholar

Azarbad, Elham & Vahid Ghahraman. 2018. A comparative study on the English to Persian translation of hedges in the abstracts of M.A. Theses in English translation studies. Journal of Language and Translation 8(3). 59–69.Search in Google Scholar

Baalen, Irene Van. 2001. Male and female language: Growing together? HSL/SHL 1. Available in: https://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/van%20Baalen.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Bonyadi, Alireza, Javad Gholami & Sina Nasiri. 2012. A contrastive study of hedging in environmental sciences research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3(6). 1186–1193. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1186-1193.Search in Google Scholar

Brouwer, Dédé, Marinel Gerritsen & Dorian De Haan. 1979. Speech differences between women and men on the wrong track?. Language in Society 8(1). 33–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4167038.10.1017/S0047404500005935Search in Google Scholar

Carli, Linda L. 1990. Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(5). 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Becky, Jocelyn Robson & Barbara Read. 2001. Analysis of undergraduate writing styles in the context of gender and achievement. Studies in Higher Education 26(3). 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076282.Search in Google Scholar

GranqvistPettersson, Kristina. 2013. Hedges, boosters and tag questions in the Big Bang theory: A Gender perspective (BA thesis). Retrieved from: https://edoqs.com/using-hedges-and-boosters.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Jalilifar, Ali Reza. 2012. World of attitudes in research article discussion sections: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Technology Education 5(3). 177–186.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Zhijun & Jinfen Xu. 2020. Reflexive metadiscourse in Chinese and English sociology research article introductions and discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 159. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Loi, Chek Kim & Jason Miin-Hwa Lim. 2019. Hedging in the discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 19(1). https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-03.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Paul. 1997. Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In R. Markkanen & H. Schroder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic text, 21–41. New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110807332.21Search in Google Scholar

Nasiri, Sina. 2012a. Hedging devices by native and non-native psychology researchers. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications 3(2). 151–154.Search in Google Scholar

Nasiri, Sina. 2012b. Utilization of hedging devices by American and Iranian researchers in the field of civil engineering. International Journal of Linguistics 4(2). 124–133. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1494.Search in Google Scholar

Nemati, Azadeh & Jennifer Marie Bayer. 2007. Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: A comparison study of Persian and English. Language in India 7(1). Retrieved from: https://www.languageinindia.com/sep2007/genderstudy.html.Search in Google Scholar

Reid, Scott A., Natasha Keerie & Nicholas A. Palomares. 2013. Language, gender salience and social influence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(2). 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x03252281.Search in Google Scholar

Rounds, Patricia. 1982. Hedging in written academic discourse: Precision and flexibility. Michigan: The University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2.Search in Google Scholar

Schmied, Josef. 2010. Gender and hedging in academic writing: A comparison of gender-preferential usage of hedges in ESL learners’ magister theses (BA thesis). Retrieved from: www.tu-chemnitz.de/…/BA-Arbeit_Mode.Search in Google Scholar

Serholt, Sofia. 2012. Hedges and boosters in academic writing: A study of gender differences in essays written by Swedish advanced learners of English. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/29526.Search in Google Scholar

Shafqat, Asmara, Rafique Ahmed Memon & Huma Akhtar. 2019. Cross-cultural analysis of the use of hedges in European and Pakistani English newspaper: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics 9(5). 126–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p126.Search in Google Scholar

Tafaroji Yeganeh, Maryam & Seyedeh Marzieh Ghoreyshi. 2015. Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 192. 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.104.Search in Google Scholar

Tajik, Leila & Ameneh Ramezani. 2018. Hedging in Iranian English language teachers’ spoken language: Any differential effect for gender?. Open Linguistics. 4(1). 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Wen, Angeline H. H. 2009. A linguistic and non-linguistic analysis of gender difference in writing style in adolescent blogs (BA thesis). Retrieved from: symposia.unimas.my/iii/cpro/app?id=1775291286774795.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-08-21

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/glot-2020-2013/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button