Support strategies for student engagement in live online classes: exploring teacher-student and student–student interactions

References

Alexander, Robin. J. 2020. A dialogic teaching companion. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781351040143Suche in Google Scholar

Alhih, Mohammed, Ebba Ossiannilsson & Muhammet Berigel. 2017. Levels of interaction provided by online distance education models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13(6). 2733–2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a.Suche in Google Scholar

Annamalai, Nagaletchimee. 2018. A case study of the online interactions among ESL students to complete their narrative writing task. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 6(1). 1–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Blaine, Andrew M. 2019. Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended advanced placement courses. Computers and Education 132. 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Brock, Cynthia A. 1986. The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. Tesol Quarterly 20(1). 47–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586388.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Butnaru, Gina Ionela, Valentin Nită, Alexandru Anichiti & Geanina Brînză. 2021. The effectiveness of online education during Covid 19 pandemic – A comparative analysis between the perceptions of academic students and high school students from Romania. Sustainability 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095311.Suche in Google Scholar

Cannady, Rachel E. 2015. Under the microscope: Looking at libraries and online orientations. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 9(4). 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2015.1095266.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, Philip. 2012. A sociocultural account of the role of imitation in instructed second language learning. JLLT 3(1). 61–91.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaudron, Craig. 1988. Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524469Suche in Google Scholar

Croxton, Rebecca A. 2014. The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(2). 314.Suche in Google Scholar

Dawes, Lyn & Claire Sams. 2004. The capacity to collaborate. In Karen Littleton, Dorothy Miell & Dorothy Faulkner (eds.), Learning to collaborate, collaborating to learn: Understanding and promoting educationally productive collaborative work. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Ding, Meixia, Xiaobao Li, Diana Piccolo & Gerald Kulm. 2007. Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. The Journal of Educational Research 100(3). 162–175. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.3.162-175.Suche in Google Scholar

Djiwandono, Patrisius Istiarto. 2019. Scaffolding moves by learners in online interactions. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research 7(27). 29–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauzia. 2016. Promoting interaction among students in the English second language (ESL) learning through interactive tasks. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature 4(1). 100–105.10.20431/2347-3134.0401013Suche in Google Scholar

Fisher, Douglas B. & Nancy Frey. 2010. Guided instruction: How to develop confident and successful learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Suche in Google Scholar

Gagné, Nathalie & Susun Parks. 2013. Cooperative learning tasks in a grade 6 intensive ESL class: Role of scaffolding. Language Teaching Research 17(2). 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812460818.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Pauline. 2003. Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. Tesol Quarterly 37(2). 247–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504.Suche in Google Scholar

Golonka, Ewa M., Medha Tare & Carrie Bonilla. 2017. Peer interaction in text chat: Qualitative analysis of chat transcripts. Language, Learning and Technology 21(2). 157–178.10.64152/10125/44616Suche in Google Scholar

Guerrero, Maria C. M. D. E. & Olga S. Villamil. 2000. Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 84(i). 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052.Suche in Google Scholar

Guest, Greg, Kathleen M. Macqueen & Emily E. Namey. 2012. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.10.4135/9781483384436Suche in Google Scholar

Hammond, Jennifer & Pauline Gibbons. 2001. What is scaffolding. In Jennifer Hammond (ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education, 1–14. Newtown, N.S.W.: PETA.Suche in Google Scholar

Hammond, Jennifer & Pauline Gibbons. 2005. Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect 20(1), 6–30.Suche in Google Scholar

Hennessy, Sara, Christine Howe, Neil Mercer & Maria Vrikki1. 2020. Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 25. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404.Suche in Google Scholar

Hermkes, Rico, Hanna Mach & Gerhard Minnameier. 2018. Interaction-based coding of scaffolding processes. Learning and Instruction 54. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Jadallah, May, Richard C. Anderson, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel, Brian W. Miller, Il-Hee Kim, Li-Jen Kuo, Ting Dong & Xiaoying Wu. 2011. Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal 48(1). 194–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210371498.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Sally, Martin Monk & Julian Swain. 2000. Constraints on development and change to science teachers’ practices in Egyptian classrooms. Journal of Education for Teaching 26(1). 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470050007101.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Richard D., Steven Hornik & Eduardo Salas. 2008. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(5), 365–369.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Renee & Jessalyn I. Vallade. 2021. Online student perceptions of their communication preparedness. E-Learning and Digital Media 18(1). 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020950873.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitade, Keiko. 2000. L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning 13(2). 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143.10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143Suche in Google Scholar

Kusuma, Putri Candra, Muhammad Reza Pahlevi & Hilmansyah Saefullah. 2021. EFL teachers’ perception towards online classroom interaction during covid-19 pandemic. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal) 12(2). 68–79. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v12i2.9211.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Joyce, JoAnn Carter-Wells, Barbara Glaeser, Karen Ivers & Chris Street. 2006. Facilitating the development of a learning community in an online graduate program. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 7(1). 13–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, Tzu-Jung, May Jadallah, Richard C. Anderson, Amanda R. Baker, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel, Il-Hee Kim, Li-Jen Kuo, Brian W. Miller, Ting Dong & Xiaoying Wu. 2015. Less is more: Teachers’ influence during peer collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(2). 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037758.Suche in Google Scholar

Littleton, Karen & Neil Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203809433Suche in Google Scholar

Littleton, Karen, Neil Mercer, Lyn Dawes, Rupert Wegerif, Denise Rowe & Claire Sams. 2005. Talking and thinking together at key stage 1. Early Years 25(2). 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140500128129.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 1983. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5(2). 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004848.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie & Tej K. B. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, 413–468. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Suche in Google Scholar

López-Barrios, Mario, Maria Gimena San Martín & Elba Villanueva de Debat. 2021. EFL vocabulary teaching beliefs and practices: The case of two teachers in Argentina. TESOL Journal 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.533.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2002. Negotiation in immersion teacher–student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research 37(3). 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00003-X.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1). 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263197001034.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Florence & Doris U. Bolliger. 2018. Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks JALN 22(1). 205. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Florence, Chuang Wang & Ayesha Sadaf. 2018. Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education 37. 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Meloth, Michael S. & Paul D. Deering. 1999. The role of the teacher in peer learning. In Angela M. O’Donnell & Alison King (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, 235–256. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil. 2002. Developing dialogues. In Gordon Wells & Guy Claxton (eds.), Learning for life in the C21st: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education, 141–153. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753545.ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer, Debra. 2021. Schools can’t just ‘go back to normal’. Elmhurst University Available at: https://www.elmhurst.edu/blog/back-to-normal/.Suche in Google Scholar

Misty So-Sum Wai, Cook. 2021. Students’ perceptions of interactions from instructor presence, cognitive presence, and social presence in online lessons. International Journal of TESOL Studies 3(1). 134–161. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.03.03.Suche in Google Scholar

Mongendre, Lalita. 2021. The role of teacher and peer interaction in online learning. Lessons from Global Classrooms 1. 58–79.Suche in Google Scholar

Moore, Michael G. 1989. Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659.Suche in Google Scholar

Muilenburg, Lin Y. & Zane L. Berge. 2005. Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education 26(1). 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269.Suche in Google Scholar

Muthuprasad, Thiyaharajan, S. Aiswarya, K. S. Aditya & Girish K. Jha. 2021. Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 3(1). 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101.Suche in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein & Jun Tian. 2010. Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research 14(4). 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364.Suche in Google Scholar

Nystrand, Martin, Lawrence L. Wu, Adam Gamoran, Susie Zeiser & Daniel A. Long. 2003. Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes 35(2). 135–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, Ji-Hye & Hee Jun Choi. 2009. Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learniing. Educational Technology & Society 12(4). 207–217.Suche in Google Scholar

Pica, Teresa. 1991. Classroom interaction, negotiation, and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System (Linköping) 19(4). 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(91)90024-J.Suche in Google Scholar

Robert, Tim S. & Joanne M. McInnerney. 2007. Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society 10(4). 257–268.Suche in Google Scholar

Safa, Mohammad Ahmadi & Fatemeh Rozati. 2017. The impact of scaffolding and nonscaffolding strategies on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research 110(5). 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118004.Suche in Google Scholar

Shi, Leimin, Amadar Baker & Honglin Chen. 2019. Chinese EFL teachers’ cognition about the effectiveness of genre pedagogy: A case study. RELC Journal 50(2). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217716506.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy & Richard Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Staines, Zoe & Mark Lauchs. 2013. Students’ engagement with Facebook in a university undergraduate policing unit. Australasoam Journal of Educational Technology 29(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.270. https://doi.org/192-805.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1). 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2007. Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research 11(2). 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074600.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal 82. 320–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/329959.Suche in Google Scholar

Tan, Kim Hua, Poh Phui Chan & Nur-Ehsan Mohd Said. 2021. Higher education students’ online instruction perceptions: A quality virtual learning environment. Sustainability 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910840.Suche in Google Scholar

Tarazi, Ayat & Raúl Ruiz-Cecilia. 2023. Students’ perceptions towards the role of online teaching platforms in enhancing online engagement and academic performance levels in palestinian higher education institutions. Education Sciences 13(449). 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050449.Suche in Google Scholar

Tudini, Vincenza A. C. 2010. Online second language acquisition: Conversation analysis of online chat. London, New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

van de Pol, Janneke, Monique Volman & Jos Beishuizen. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review 22(3). 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.Suche in Google Scholar

van de Pol, Janneke, Monique Volman, Frabs Oort & Jos Beishuizen. 2014. Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 23(4). 600–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.805300.Suche in Google Scholar

van de Pol, Janneke, Neil Mercer & Monique Volman. 2019. Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences 28. 206–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258.Suche in Google Scholar

van Lier, Leo. 1991. Inside the classroom: Learning processes and teaching procedures. Applied Language Learning 2(2). 29–68.Suche in Google Scholar

Vrikki, Maria, Lisa Wheatley, Christine Howe, Sara Hennessy & Neil Mercer. 2019. Dialogic practices in primary school classrooms. Language and Education 33(1). 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988.Suche in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, Noreen M. 2009. The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79(1). 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772.Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, Noreen M., Kariane Mari Nemer & Marsha Ing. 2006. Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15(1). 63–119. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8.Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, Noreen M., Megan L. Franke, Marsha Ing, Angela Chan, Tondra De, Deanna Freund & Dan Battey. 2008. The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(3). 360–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605895Suche in Google Scholar

Wells, Gordon & Rebeca Mejia Arauz. 2006. Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15(3). 379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Wertsch, James V. 1993. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action, 1st edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674045101Suche in Google Scholar

Witze, Alexandra. 2020. Universities will never be the same after the coronavirus crisis. Nature 582(7811). 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01518-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner & Gail Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17(2). 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, Gang. 2017. Collaborative dialogue in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication. ReCALL 29(3). 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000118.Suche in Google Scholar