Home Discussion: The local practice of “Global Chinese”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Discussion: The local practice of “Global Chinese”

  • Jackie Jia Lou EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 28, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This special issue provides a timely and valuable contribution to our understanding of the emergence of Chinese as a global language and the entanglement of language ideologies and practice with economic incentives, political ideologies, and cultural identities behind it. Taking us from Kathmandu, Nepal, to Taiwan, and to Vancouver, Canada, each of the papers situates the discussion in diverse geopolitical contexts and offers concrete analysis of how the shift in the political and economic landscape of nation-states on the macro level impacts individual decisions and practices on the micro level. Drawing upon a range of key concepts and themes in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, this special issue also prompts us to reflect upon the parallels and divergences between Chinese as an emerging global language and the status quo of English. In this discussion, I attempt to bring together these diverse perspectives and approaches through the lens of Bourdieu’s social theory of practice, focussing particularly on the concepts of cultural capital, field, and habitus.

References

Adams, Matthew. 2006. Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity?. Sociology 40(3). 511–528. doi:10.1177/003803850663672Search in Google Scholar

Bodycott, Peter. 2009. Choosing a higher education study abroad destination: What Mainland Chinese parents and students rate as important. Journal of Research in International Education 8(3). 349–373. doi:10.1177/1475240909345818Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley. 2006. Chinese Englishes: A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley & David Graddol. 2012. English in China today. English Today 28(3). 3–9. doi:10.1017/S0266078412000223Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The forms of capital. In John G. Richardson (eds.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 241–258. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Ding, Sheng & Robert A. Saunders. 2006. Talking up China: An analysis of China’s rising cultural power and global Promotion of the Chinese Language. East Asia 23(2). 3–33. doi:10.1007/s12140-006-0021-2Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Shuang. 2012. The biggest English Corner in China: How the town of Yangshuo has become famous for educational tourism and English-language learning. English Today 28(3). 34–39. doi:10.1017/S0266078412000296Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Yang. 2016. Fiction as reality: Chinese youths watching American Television. Poetics 54(Supplement C). 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2015.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, David, Dennis Looney & Natalia Lusin. 2015. Enrolments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, Fall 2013. New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Search in Google Scholar

Graddol, David. 2006. English Next: Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. London, British Council.Search in Google Scholar

Guttenplan, D.D. 2012. Critics worry about influence of Chinese Institutes on U.S. Campuses. The New York Times, March 4, 2012, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/us/critics-worry-about-influence-of-chinese-institutes-on-us-campuses.html.Search in Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, Lauren A. & Alan A Lew. 2014. Speaking heritage. in Alan A. Lew, C. Michael Hall & Allan M. Williams (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to tourism, 336–348. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118474648.ch27/summary10.1002/9781118474648.ch27Search in Google Scholar

Holborow, Marnie. 2015. Language and neoliberalism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315718163Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. 1989. When talk isn’t cheap: language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2). 248–267.10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam & Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Language and the globalizing habitus of tourism: Toward a sociolinguistics of fleeting relationships. In Nikolas Coupland (eds.), The Handbook of language and globalization, 255–286. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444324068.ch11/summary10.1002/9781444324068.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Lai, Mee-Ling. 2001. Hong Kong students’ attitudes towards Cantonese, Putonghua and English after the change of sovereignty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 22(2). 112–133. doi:10.1080/01434630108666428Search in Google Scholar

Li Wei. 1994. Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family: Language Choice and Language Shift in a Chinese Community in Britain. Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Li Wei. 2013. Negotiating funds of knowledge and symbolic competence in the complementary school classrooms. Language and Education 28(2). 161–180. doi:10.1080/09500782.2013.800549.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, Jon. 2013. West’s universities reconsider China-Funded Confucius Institutes. Times Higher Education (THE), April 4, 2013. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/wests-universities-reconsider-china-funded-confucius-institutes/2002870.article.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, Natalie. 2017. China sees 11 % growth of international student enrolments – MoE. The PIE News: News and Business Analysis for Professionals in International Education, March 28, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

McKay, Sandra L., and Wong, Cynthia S. 1996. Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-langauge learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Education Review 66(3). 577–603.10.17763/haer.66.3.n47r06u264944865Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The cultural politics of English as an international language. Abingdon: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. London: OUP Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Poudel, Tikaram. 2016. English in Nepal: From colonial legacy to professionalism. ELT CHOUTARI (blog). January 1, 2016. http://eltchoutari.com/2016/01/english-in-nepal-from-colonial-legacy-to-professionalism/.Search in Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. China U. The Nation, October 30, 2013. https://www.thenation.com/article/china-u/.Search in Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27. 53–83.10.1017/S0047404500019722Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzie. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203694343Search in Google Scholar

Semple, Kirk. 2009. Mandarin eclipses Cantonese, changing the sound of Chinatown – NYTimes.com. 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/nyregion/22chinese.html?pagewanted=all.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Bal Krishna & Prem Phyak. 2017. Neoliberalism, linguistic commodification, and ethnolinguistic identity in multilingual Nepal. Language in Society 46(2). 231–256. doi:10.1017/S0047404517000045Search in Google Scholar

Simons, Gary F., & Fennig, Charles D., eds. 2017. Ethnologue: Languages of Asia. 20th ed. edition. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Academic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining (Tony) & Jinzhi Su. 2012. The statistics of English in China: An analysis of the best available data from government sources. English Today.10.1017/S0266078412000235Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Hua & Li Wei. 2014. Geopolitics and the changing hierarchies of the Chinese language: Implications for policy and practice of Chinese language teaching in Britain. The Modern Language Journal 98(1). 326–339. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12064.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-3-28
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/glochi-2018-0005/html
Scroll to top button