Abstract
The increase in the number of space activities in recent decades has led to a concomitant increase in space debris in orbit around Earth. Space debris pose a risk not just for specific satellites, but also on a systemic level, as a collision cascade can result in the near-Earth orbits becoming unusable. In turn, this would entail a loss of the services currently provided through satellites. The international community has recognised this risk. Despite this, states are reluctant to negotiate and conclude international legal rules to address the proliferation of space debris. This article explores a root cause of this discrepancy. It argues that while law is typically seen as the regulator of uncertainty, international law’s regulation of outer space – under the interests of global capital investors – is directed by principles that support processes of commodification (i.e., the freedom of use), rather than principles that manage the risks associated with the proliferation of space debris as these would constrain (or are perceived to constrain) the expansion of capital (e.g., the precautionary principle). Therefore, international law – at the level of principles – is a co-producer of uncertainty. This conclusion is reached by exploring the proliferation of space debris through Ulrich Beck’s world risk society and by incorporating capital and economic power into his work. This inclusion reveals (i) that it is the accumulation of capital that generates risks and (ii) that capital exploits the socially constructed nature of risk to legitimise its expansion. International law – as both a regulator and co-producer of uncertainty – plays an essential role in legitimising these processes.
References
Adam, Barbara, and Joost van Loon. 2000. “Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory.” In The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, edited by Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck, and Joost van Loon. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446219539Search in Google Scholar
Ailor, William. 2020. “Evolution of Space Traffic and Space Traffic Management.” In Handbook of Space Security: Policies, Applications and Programs, edited by Kai-Uwe Schrogl, Maarten Adriaensen, Christina Giannopapa, Peter Hays, Jana Robinson, and Ntorina Antoni, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8_88Search in Google Scholar
Ambrus, Mónika, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner. 2017. “Risk and International Law.” In Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law, edited by Mónika Ambrus, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795896.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Balch, Michael S., Ryan Martin, and Ferson Scott. 2019. “Satellite Conjunction Analysis and the False Confidence Theorem.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 475 (2227): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0565.Search in Google Scholar
Barboza, Julio. 2011. The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1163/ej.9789004188785.i-204Search in Google Scholar
Baum, Seth D. 2015. “Risk and Resilience for Unknown, Unquantifiable, Systemic, and Unlikely/Catastrophic Threats.” Environment Systems and Decisions 35: 229–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9551-8.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Translated by Amos Weisz. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2000. “Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes.” In The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, edited by Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck, and Joost van Loon. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446219539.n12Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2005. Power in the Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2009. World at Risk. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beery, Jason. 2016. “Unearthing Global Natures: Outer Space and Scalar Politics.” Political Geography 55: 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.04.003.Search in Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2003. “Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development.” Utilitas 15: 308–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820800004076.Search in Google Scholar
Burwell, Jennifer. 2019. “Imagining the Beyond: The Social and Political Fashioning of Outer Space.” Space Policy 48: 41–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.10.002.Search in Google Scholar
Campling, Liam, and Alejandro Colás. 2021. Capitalism and the Sea. London/New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Collis, Christy. 2017. “Territories Beyond Possession? Antarctica and Outer Space.” The Polar Journal 7 (2): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896x.2017.1373912.Search in Google Scholar
Corson, Catherine, and Kenneth Iain MacDonald. 2012. “Enclosing the Global Commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and Green Grabbing.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 263–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.664138.Search in Google Scholar
Craven, Matt. 2019. ““Other Spaces”: Constructing the Legal Architecture of a Cold War Commons and the Scientific-Technical Imaginary of Outer Space.” European Journal of International Law 30 (2): 547–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz024.Search in Google Scholar
Curran, Dean. 2016. “Risk Society and Marxism: Beyond Simple Antagonism.” Journal of Classical Sociology 16 (3): 280–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x15600929.Search in Google Scholar
Dennerley, Joel A. 2022. “Managing the Risks Associated with Space Debris.” In Risk Management in Outer Space Activities: An Australian and New Zealand Perspective, edited by Maria A Pozza, and Joel A Dennerley. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-4756-7_5Search in Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier. 2018. “From Eroding to Enabling the Commons: The Dual Movements in International Law.” In The Commons and A New Global Governance, edited by Samuel Cogolati, and Jan Wouters. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788118514.00021Search in Google Scholar
Dickens, Peter, and James S. Ormrod. 2007. Cosmic Society: Towards a Sociology of the Universe. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203941508Search in Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2017. “Regulating Capitalism’s Processes of Destruction.” In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, 761, edited by Drahos Peter. Acton: Australian National University Press.10.22459/RT.02.2017.43Search in Google Scholar
Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne. 2017. “Prevention in International Environmental Law and the Anticipation of Risk(s).” In Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law, edited by Mónika Ambrus, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eberle, Caitlyn, Jack O’Connor, Liliana Narvaez, Melisa Mena Benavides, and Zita Sebesvari. 2023. Interconnected Disaster Risks: Risk Tipping Points’. Bonn: United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security.Search in Google Scholar
Edenhofer, Ottmar, Christian Flachsland, Michael Jakob, and Kai Lessmann. 2015. “The Atmosphere as a Global Commons.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming, edited by Lucas Barnard, and Willi Semmler. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
van Eijk, Cristian. 2022. “Unstealing the Sky: Third World Equity in the Orbital Commons.” Air and Space Law 47 (1): 25. https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2022002.Search in Google Scholar
ESA Space Debris Office. 2022. ESA’s Annual Space Environment Report. GEN-DB-LOG-00288-OPS-SD.Search in Google Scholar
ESA Space Debris Office. 2023. ESA’s Annual Space Environment Report. GEN-DB-LOG-00288-OPS-SD.Search in Google Scholar
Feltman, Rachel. 2016. “A Bit of Debris Chipped the International Space Station. That’s Just One Piece of a Much Bigger Problem.” Washington Post. 12 May 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/05/12/a-bit-of-debris-chipped-the-international-space-station-thats-just-one-piece-of-a-much-bigger-problem/.Search in Google Scholar
Finkleman, David. 2023. “Letter | Steer Clear of “Collision Avoidance”.” Space News. 10 February 2023. https://spacenews.com/letter-steer-clear-of-collision-avoidance/.Search in Google Scholar
Fleurke, Floor M. 2017. “Catastrophic Climate Change, Precaution, and the Risk/Risk Dilemma.” In Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law, edited by Mónika Ambrus, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795896.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Haines, Fiona. 2017. “Regulation and Risk.” In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, 181, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton: Australian National University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2020. The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles, edited by Jordan T. Camp, and Chris Caruso. London: Pluto Press.10.2307/j.ctv17ppcd0Search in Google Scholar
Howell, Elizabeth. 2023. “How Often Does the International Space Station Have to Dodge Space Debris?” Space.Com. 13 March 2023. https://www.space.com/international-space-station-space-dodge-debris-how-often.Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1992. Climate Change: The 1990 and 1992 IPCC Assessments. Geneva: IPCC.Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report – Summary for Policymakers, 1–34. Geneva: IPCC.10.1017/CBO9780511546013.003Search in Google Scholar
ISA Council. 2019. Draft Regulation on Exploitation of Mineral Resources in the Area. ISBA/25/C/WP.1. Kingston: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar
Jaeckel, Aline. 2017. “Conceptions of Risk in an Institutional Context.” In Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law, edited by Mónika Ambrus, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795896.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Kasperson, Roger E. 2008. “Coping with Deep Uncertainty: Challenges for Environmental Assessment and Decision-Making.” In Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Gabriele Bammer, and Michael Smithson. London/Sterling: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver. 2011. “The Same as It Never Was? Uncertainty and the Changing Contours of International Law.” Review of International Studies 37: 2163–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210511000386.Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, Donald J., and Burton G. Cour-Palais. 1978. “Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt.” Journal of Geophysical Research 83 (A6): 2637. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja083ia06p02637.Search in Google Scholar
Klinkrad, H., P. Beltrami, S. Hauptmann, C. Martin, H. Sdunnus, H. Stokes, R. Walker, and J. Wilkinson. 2004. “The ESA Space Debris Mitigation Handbook 2002.” Advances in Space Research 34: 1251–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.018.Search in Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2006. “The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law.” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 247–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi163.Search in Google Scholar
Le May, Samantha. 2021. “Connecting Diverse Data to Address Emerging Space Sector Challenges.” In Commercial and Military Uses of Outer Space, edited by Melissa de Zwart, and Stacey Henderson. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-8924-9_9Search in Google Scholar
Lemmens, Stijn, and Francesca Letizia. 2020. “Space Traffic Management Through Environment Capacity.” In Handbook of Space Security: Policies, Applications and Programs, edited by Kai-Uwe Schrogl. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8_109Search in Google Scholar
Levitas, Ruth. 2000. “Discourses of Risk and Utopia.” In The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, edited by Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck, and Joost van Loon. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446219539.n11Search in Google Scholar
Liou, J.-C., A. K. Anilkumar, B. Bastida Virgili, T. Hanada, H. Krag, H. Lewis, M. X. J. Raj, M. M. Rao, A. Rossi, and R. K. Sharma. 2013. “Stability of the Future LEO Environment – An IADC Comparison Study.” In Presented at the 6th European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany, April 22–25.Search in Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. 2003. The Accumulation of Capital. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Martinez, Peter. 2021. “The UN COPUOS Guidelines for the Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities.” Journal of Space Safety Engineering 8: 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2021.02.003.Search in Google Scholar
Martinez, Peter. 2023. “Implementing the Long-Term Sustainability Guidelines: What’s Next?’” Air and Space Law 48: 41. https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2023030.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse. Translated by Martin Nicolaus. London/New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Matten, Dirk. 2004. “The Impact of the Risk Society Thesis on Environmental Politics and Management in a Globalizing Economy – Principles, Proficiency, Perspectives.” Journal of Risk Research 7 (4): 377–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000208338.Search in Google Scholar
Matten, Dirk. 2014. “The Risk Society Thesis in Environmental Politics and Management: A Global Perspective.” In Ulrich Beck: Pioneer in Cosmopolitan Sociology and Risk Society, edited by Ulrich Beck. Cham: Ulrich Beck. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-04990-8_4Search in Google Scholar
Mendenhall, Elizabeth. 2018. “Treating Outer Space Like a Place: A Case for Rejecting Other Domain Analogies.” Astropolitics 16 (2): 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2018.1484650.Search in Google Scholar
Milman, Oliver. 2023. “State Farm Stopped Insuring California Homes Due to Climate Risks. But it Shares Lobbyists with Big Oil.” Guardian. 5 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/05/state-farm-stopped-insuring-california-homes-due-to-climate-risks-but-it-shares-lobbyists-with-big-oil.Search in Google Scholar
Morin, Jean-Frédéric, and Benjamin Richard. 2021. “Astro-Environmentalism: Towards a Polycentric Governance of Space Debris.” Global Policy 12 (4): 568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12950.Search in Google Scholar
Mythen, Gabe. 2004. Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. London: Pluto Press.Search in Google Scholar
NASA. n.d. Frequently Asked Questions. https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/faq/ (Accessed May 17, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Oltrogge, Daniel L., and Salvatore Alfano. 2019. “The Technical Challenges of Better Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic Management.” The Journal of Space Safety Engineering 6: 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2019.05.004.Search in Google Scholar
Oltrogge, Dan, and James Cooper. 2021. “Space Situational Awareness & Space Traffic Management.” In Space Debris Peril: Pathways to Opportunities, edited by Matteo Madi, and Olga Sokolova. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9781003033899-4Search in Google Scholar
O’Malley, Pat. 2004. Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London/Portland: Glasshouse Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ormrod, James S. 2013. “Beyond World Risk Society? A Critique of Ulrich Beck’s World Risk Society Thesis as a Framework for Understanding Risk Associated with Human Activity in Outer Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 727–44. https://doi.org/10.1068/d16511.Search in Google Scholar
Ormrod, James S. 2020. “Outer Space and New Frontiers to Environmental Imaginations.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by Katharine Legun, Julie Keller, Michael Bell, and Michael Carolan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108554510.017Search in Google Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline. 2010. Science and Risk Regulation in International Law. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ranganathan, Surabhi. 2021. “Decolonization and International Law: Putting the Ocean on the Map.” Journal of the History of International Law 23: 161. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-12340168.Search in Google Scholar
Rasborg, Klaus. 2021. Ulrich Beck: Theorising World Risk Society and Cosmopolitanism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-89201-2Search in Google Scholar
Rayfuse, Rosemary. 2016. “Public International Law and the Regulation of Emerging Technologies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.22Search in Google Scholar
Rosa, Eugene A., Ortwin Renn, and Aaron M. McCright. 2014. The Risk Society Revisited: Social Theory and Governance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, Allen J. 2001. “Capitalism, Cities, and the Production of Symbolic Forms.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (1): 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00003.Search in Google Scholar
Shammas, Victor L., and Tomas B. Holen. 2019. “One Giant Leap for Capitalistkind: Private Enterprise in Outer Space.” Palgrave Communications 5: 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0218-9.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley Jane, and Armel Kerrest. 2013. “Article III (Fault Liability).” In Cologne Commentary on Space Law, II, edited by Stephan Hobe, Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd, and Kai-Uwe Schrogl. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Sørensen, Mads P., and Allan Christiansen. 2013. Ulrich Beck: An Introduction to the Theory of Second Modernity and the Risk Society. Abingdon: Routledge.10.1007/978-3-319-04990-8_2Search in Google Scholar
Sundahl, Mark J. 2000. “Unidentified Orbital Debris: The Case for a Market-Share Liability Regime.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 24: 125.Search in Google Scholar
UNCOPUOS. 2021. “Note Verbale Dated 3 December 2021 from the Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations (Vienna) Addressed to the Secretary-General.” UN Doc A/AC.105/1262.Search in Google Scholar
UNCOPUOS. 2022. “Note Verbale Dated 28 January 2022 from the Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations (Vienna) Addressed to the Secretary-General.” UN Doc A/AC.105/1265.Search in Google Scholar
Urueña, René. 2008. “Risk and Randomness in International Legal Argumentation.” Leiden Journal of International Law 21: 787–822. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156508005396.Search in Google Scholar
Viikari, Lotta. 2008. The Environmental Element in Space Law: Assessing the Present and Charting the Future. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1163/ej.9789004167445.i-396Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Ting. 2016. “A Liability and Insurance Regime for Space Debris Mitigation.” Science and Global Security 24 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2016.1127036.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Colin C. 2002. “A Critical Evaluation of the Commodification Thesis.” The Sociological Review 50 (4): 525–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/003802610205000404.Search in Google Scholar
Zastrow, Mark. 2022. “SpaceX Defends Starlink over Collision Concerns.” Astronomy. 25 February 2022. https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/spacex-defends-starlink-over-collision-concerns/.Search in Google Scholar
Zinn, Jens O. 2008. “Risk Society and Reflexive Modernization.” In Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction, edited by Jens O. Zinn. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444301489Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Law, Commodification, and the Distribution of Resources
- Patriarcapitalism? Towards an Intertwined History of Inheritance law and Capitalism from the Middle Ages to the Industrial Revolution (c. 1350–1850)
- Capitalising on Uncertainty: Exploring the Failure of International Law to Address the Risk Generated by the Proliferation of Space Debris
- Data as a Contested Commodity
- The New Law of the European Data Markets: Demystifying the European Data Strategy
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Law, Commodification, and the Distribution of Resources
- Patriarcapitalism? Towards an Intertwined History of Inheritance law and Capitalism from the Middle Ages to the Industrial Revolution (c. 1350–1850)
- Capitalising on Uncertainty: Exploring the Failure of International Law to Address the Risk Generated by the Proliferation of Space Debris
- Data as a Contested Commodity
- The New Law of the European Data Markets: Demystifying the European Data Strategy