Law versus Cybercrime
-
José Grabiel Luis Cordova
,
Pascual Felipe Correa Álvarez
Abstract
Nowadays, Cybercrime is one of the most dangerous and harmful of crimes. States must improve their fighting strategies against this phenomenon in order to protect society and its own integrity. This research, entitled “Law vs Cybercrime” aims to systematize the proceedings for confronting Cybercrime in modern legal systems and to analyze the Cuban legal framework for Cybercrime. This essay analyzes the theoretical and definitional foundations of Cybercrime, the challenges with controlling cybercrime-related acts presents to legal systems, attempts to systematize the proceedings for confronting Cybercrime in modern states legal systems as well as the international legal systems, and finally, analyzes the current Cuban legal regulations against Cybercrime. At the end of the essay can be found the conclusions according to the objectives of this investigation.
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- How Judges Can Think: The Use of Expert’s Knowledge as Proof in Civil Proceedings
- “Transfiguration” and Actual Relevance of the Common Constitutional Traditions: Past, Present and Future
- Season 3: Product Governance. Rethinking Retail Customer Protection in the EU Insurance Market
- Current Developments in Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the United States: Federalism’s Influence in State and National Regulatory Law and Policy
- Not-So-Big and Big Credit Data Between Traditional Consumer Finance, FinTechs, and the Banking Union: Old and New Challenges in an Enduring EU Policy and Legal Conundrum
- Internet Governance and Terrorism in the Context of the Chinese Compression of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
- Law versus Cybercrime
- (Non) Compliance with the International Health Regulations of the WHO from the Perspective of the Law of International Responsibility
- An Overview of the DDR Process Established in the Aftermath of the Revised Peace Agreement between the Colombian Government and the FARC: Finally on the Right Track?
- The Ethical and Legal Case Against Autonomy in Weapons Systems
Articles in the same Issue
- How Judges Can Think: The Use of Expert’s Knowledge as Proof in Civil Proceedings
- “Transfiguration” and Actual Relevance of the Common Constitutional Traditions: Past, Present and Future
- Season 3: Product Governance. Rethinking Retail Customer Protection in the EU Insurance Market
- Current Developments in Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the United States: Federalism’s Influence in State and National Regulatory Law and Policy
- Not-So-Big and Big Credit Data Between Traditional Consumer Finance, FinTechs, and the Banking Union: Old and New Challenges in an Enduring EU Policy and Legal Conundrum
- Internet Governance and Terrorism in the Context of the Chinese Compression of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
- Law versus Cybercrime
- (Non) Compliance with the International Health Regulations of the WHO from the Perspective of the Law of International Responsibility
- An Overview of the DDR Process Established in the Aftermath of the Revised Peace Agreement between the Colombian Government and the FARC: Finally on the Right Track?
- The Ethical and Legal Case Against Autonomy in Weapons Systems
