Abstract
This paper investigates alternative critical insights into the conflict of religion and queerness in Canadian constitutional law, through the tools offered by Queer Theories. In Canada, this implies the adoption of a critical phenomenology of pluralism as the object of Queer Theory. Adjudicating pluralism becomes a sovereign performance, and publicness a zone of national intimacy. The conflict of rights produces a typology of queer religious bodies as constitutional strangers through a range of capacities that a body can or cannot do. Will be argued that the norm of religious citizenship is heteronormativity, and the norm of queer citizenship deciphers the ascendency of male whiteness.
Bibliography
Abrams, K. 2000. Afterword: Critical Strategy and the Judicial Evasion of Difference. Cornell Law Review85:1426–1445.Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Other in Post-Coloniality. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2007a. Queer Phenomenology. Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822388074Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. 2007b. A Phenomenology of Whiteness. Feminist Theory8(2):149–168.10.1177/1464700107078139Search in Google Scholar
Beckton, Clare F. 1987. Section 27 and Section 15 of the Charter. In Multiculturalism and the Charter: A Legal Perspective, edited by Canadian Human Rights Foundation, 1–13. Vancouver, BC: Carswell.Search in Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren G. 1991. The Anatomy of National Fantasy: Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren G. 2005. The Epistemology of State Emotion. In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by AustinSarat, 46–78. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren G. 2012. Desire/Love. Brooklyn, NY: Puncton Books.Search in Google Scholar
Bhabha, F. 2009. Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism. McGill Law Journal54(1):45–90.10.7202/038178arSearch in Google Scholar
Bhamra, Meena K. 2011. The Challenges of Justice in Diverse Societies. Constitutionalism and Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Blache, P. 2000. Le Droit à l’égalité: Interface entre Droits Individuels et Droits Collectifs. The Canadian Bar Review79(2):1–26.Search in Google Scholar
Blevins, John. 2012. Becoming Undone and Becoming Human. Sexual and Religious Selves in the Thought of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler. In Queer Religion. Vol. II: LGBT Movements and Queering Religion, edited by Donald L.Boisvert and Jay EmersonJohnson, 1–20. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Boisvert, Donald L., and JayEmerson Johnson. 2012. Introducing Queer Religion. In Queer Religion. Vol. I: Homosexuality in Modern Religious History, edited by Donald L.Boisvert and Jay EmersonJohnson, IX–XX. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Bram, Christopher. 2012. Eminent Outlaws. The Gay Writers Who Changed America. New York, NY: Twelve.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, D. M. 2000. Freedom from of Freedom For?: Religion as a Case Study in Defining the Content of Charter Rights. University of British Columbia Law Review33(3):551–615.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2002. Suffering the Paradoxes of Rights. In Left Legalism/Left Critique, edited by WendyBrown and JanetHalley, 420–434. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11hpn4c.15Search in Google Scholar
Brown, D. M. 2004. Reconciling Equality and Other Rights: Paradigm Lost?National Journal of Constitutional Law15(1):1–33.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York, NY: Zone.10.2307/j.ctv14gpj55Search in Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society. The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2002a. La Vie Psychique du Pouvoir. Paris: Léo Scheer.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2002b. Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual? In Left Legalism/Left Critique, edited by WendyBrown and JanetHalley, 229–258. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11hpn4c.10Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Le Récit de Soi. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and DonKulick. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cobb, Michael. 2006. God Hates Fags: The Rhetorics of Religious Violence. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, D. 2000. And You Can’t Find It Nowhere’: Relocating Identity and Structure Within Equality Jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Society27(2):249–272.10.1111/1467-6478.00153Search in Google Scholar
Corriveau, Patrice. 2011. Judging Homosexuals. A History of Gay Persecution in Quebec and France. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cossman, B. 1997. Turning the Gaze Back on Itself: Comparative Law, Feminist Legal Studies, and the Postcolonial Project. Utah Law Review2:525–544.Search in Google Scholar
Cossman, B. 2002. Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Osgoode Hall Law Journal40(3–4):223–248.Search in Google Scholar
Cossman, B. 2004. Sexuality, Queer Theory, and Feminism After: Reading and Rereading the Sexual Subject. McGill Law Journal49:847–876.Search in Google Scholar
Cossman, Brenda. 2007. Sexual Citizens. The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503624788Search in Google Scholar
Cossman, B., and B.Ryder. 1996. Custom Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case. Constitutional Forum7(4):103–112.Search in Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1992. Nomos and Narrative. In Narrative, Violence, and the Law. the Essays of Robert Cover, edited by MarthaMinow, RyanMichael and AustinSarat, 95–172. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cruz-Malavé, Arnaldo, and Martin F.Manalansan, ed. 2002. Queer Globalizations: Citizenship and the Afterlife of Colonialism. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dauvergne, C. 2007. Citizenship as a Vengeance. Theoretical Inquiries in Law8(2):489–508.10.2202/1565-3404.1158Search in Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. 2004. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eaton, M. 1994. Patently Confused: Complex Inequality, and Canada v. Mossop. Review of Constitutional Studies1(2):203–245.Search in Google Scholar
Eng, D.L., JHalberstam, and J. E.Muñoz. 2005. What’s Queer About Queer Studies Now?Social Text23(3–4):1–17.Search in Google Scholar
Esau, Alvin. 2008. Living by Different Law: Legal Pluralism, Freedom of Religion, and Illiberal Religious Groups. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by RichardMoon, 110–139. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eskridge, W. N. Jr. 1994. Gay Legal Narratives. Stanford Law Review46:607–646.10.2307/1229103Search in Google Scholar
Eskridge, W. N. Jr. 1996–1997. A Jurisprudence of “Coming Out”: Religion, Homosexuality and Collisions of Liberty and Equality in American Public Law. Yale Law Journal106:2411–2474.Search in Google Scholar
Faraday, Fay, Margaret A.Denike, and M.Kate Stephenson. 2009. Introduction. In Pursuit of Substantive Equality. In Making Equality Rights Real. Securing Substantive Equality under the Charter, edited by FayFaraday, Margaret A.Denike and M. KateStephenson, 9–30. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2001. Sexualité et Solitude. In Dits et Écrits II, edited by DanielDefert and FrançoisEwald, 987–997. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Fournier, Pascale. 2010. Muslim Marriage in Western Courts. Lost in Transplantation. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Fournier, P. 2012. Calculating Claims: Jewish and Muslim Women Navigating Religion, Economics, and Law in Canada. International Journal of Law in Context8(1):47–72.10.1017/S1744552311000395Search in Google Scholar
Gaudreault-Desbiens, Jean-François, ed. 2009. Le Droit, la Religion et le “Raisonnable”.Le Fait Religieux entre Monisme Étatique et Pluralisme Juridique. Montreal, QC: Thémis.Search in Google Scholar
Gaudreault-Desbiens, Jean-François. 2010. The State Management of Legal and Cultural Diversity in Canada. In Cultural Diversity and Law. State Responses from Around the World, edited by Marie-ClaireFoblets, Jean-FrançoisGaudreault-Desbiens and Alison DundesRentelm, 195–234. Brussels: Bruylant.Search in Google Scholar
Gaudreault-Desbiens, J.-F., and DPinard. 2003–2004. Les Minorités en Droit Public Canadien. Revue de Droit de l’université de Sherbrooke34:197–228.10.17118/11143/12283Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. 2003. Time to Regroup: Rethinking Section 15 of the Charter. McGill Law Journal43:627–649.Search in Google Scholar
Gotell, L. 2002. Queering Law: Not by Vriend. Canadian Journal of Law and Society17(1):89–113.10.1017/S0829320100007018Search in Google Scholar
Greschner, D. 1997–1998. The Right to Belong: The Promise of Vriend. National Journal of Constitutional Law9:417–440.Search in Google Scholar
Greschner, D. 2001–2002. The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights. Review of Constitutional Studies6(2):291–323.Search in Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place. Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11sn283Search in Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. 1998. Gay Rights and Identity Imitation: Issues in the Ethics of Representation. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critic. 3rd ed., edited by DavidKairys, 115–146. New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 2003. The Normalization of Queer Studies. Journal of Homosexuality45(2–4):339–343.10.1300/J082v45n02_17Search in Google Scholar
Halperin, David M. 2012. How to Be Gay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674067516Search in Google Scholar
Heger, Heinz. 1994. The Men with the Pink Triangle. The True Life-and-Death Story of Homosexuals in the Nazi Death Camps. New York, NY: Alyson Books.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, D. 1990. Are We Family?: Lesbian Rights and Women’s Liberation. Osgoode Hall Law Journal28(4):789–815.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, Didi. 1994. Rights of Passage. Struggles for Gay and Lesbian Legal Equality. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W. 2010. Constitutional Law of Canada, 2010 Student Edition. Toronto, ON: Carswell.Search in Google Scholar
Huffer, Lynne. 2010. Mad for Foucault. Rethinking the Foundations of Queer Theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Isin, Engin F. 2002. Being Political. Genealogies of Citizenship. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Iyer, N. 1993. Categorical Denials: Equality Rights and the Shaping of Social Identity. Queen’s Law Journal12:179–207.Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark D. 2011. Recruiting Young Love. How Christians Talk About Homosexuality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. 2006. Sexuality and Sovereignty: The Global Limits and Possibilities of a Lawrence. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal14(4):1429–1492.Search in Google Scholar
Kendall, Chistopher N. 2004. Gay Male Pornography. An Issue of Sex Discrimination. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kimmel, D., and D. J.Robinson. 2001. Sex, Crime, Pathology: Homosexuality and Criminal Code Reform in Canada, 1949–1969. Canadian Journal of Law and Society16(1):147–165.10.1017/S082932010000661XSearch in Google Scholar
Kislowicz, Howard. Freedom of Religion and Canada’s Commitment to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-Based Approach. LL.M’s thesis, University of Toronto, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Kislowicz, H. 2011. Judging the Rules of Belonging. University of British Columbia Law Review44(2):287–329.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror. An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S.Roudiez. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kropp, D. 1997. Categorial’ Failure: Canada’s Equality Jurisprudence – Changing Notions of Identity and the Legal Subject. Queen’s Law Journal23(1):201–230.Search in Google Scholar
Lahey, Kathleen A. 1999. Are We “Persons” Yet? Law and Sexuality in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442670952Search in Google Scholar
Lenon, S. J. 2005. Marrying Citizens! Raced Subjects? Re-Thinking the Terrain of Equal Marriage Discourse. Canadian Journal of Women and Law17(2):405–421.Search in Google Scholar
Lenon, S. J. 2008. What’s so Civil about Marriage? The Racial Pedagogy of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada. Darkmatter Journal3:26–36.Search in Google Scholar
Lenon, S. J. 2011. “Why Is Our Love an Issue?”: Same-Sex Marriage and the Racial Politics of the Ordinary. Social Identities17(3):351–372.10.1080/13504630.2011.570975Search in Google Scholar
Levine, R. J., and J. W.Penney. 2005. The Evolving Approach to Section 15(1): Diminished Rights or Bolder Communities?Supreme Court Law Review (2d)29:137–168.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, Jonathan. 2012. Islam Through Western Eyes. From the Crusades to the War on Terrorism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacDougall, Bruce. 2000. Queer Judgments. Homosexuality, Expression, and the Courts in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442678941Search in Google Scholar
MacDougall, B. 2006. Refusing to Officiate at Same-Sex Civil Marriages. Saskatchewan Law Review69:351–373.Search in Google Scholar
Mackling, A. 2007. Who Is the Citizen’s Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship. Theoretical Inquiries in Law8(2):333–366.Search in Google Scholar
Magnet, Joseph E. 2005. Multiculturalism and Collective Rights: Approaches to Section 27. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 4th ed., edited by Gerald-A.Beaudoin and ErrolMendes, 1261–1316. Toronto, ON: Lexis Nexis.Search in Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2012. Politics of Piety. The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Revised ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400839919Search in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by ColinSmith. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203994610Search in Google Scholar
Michel, H. R. 1987. The Case for the Black Family. Harvard BlackLetter Journal4:21–24.Search in Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference. Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moon, R. 2003. Sexual Orientation Equality and Religious Freedom in the Public Schools: A Comment on TWU v. BCCT, and Chamberlain v. Surrey. Review of Constitutional Studies8(2):228–284.Search in Google Scholar
Moon, Richard. 2008. Introduction: Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by RichardMoon, 1–20. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moon, Richard. 2011. The Supreme Court of Canada’s Attempt to Reconcile Freedom of Religion and Sexual Orientation Equality in the Public Schools. In Faith, Politics and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States, edited by DavidRayside and ClydeWilcox,321–338. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moon, R. 2012. Freedom of Religion under the Charter of Rights: The Limits of State Neutrality. University of British Columbia Law Review45(2):497–550.Search in Google Scholar
Morissette, Y.-M. 2000. Quelques Points de Repères sur l’égalité dans une Société Diversifiée. The Canadian Bar Review79(no. 2):81–98.Search in Google Scholar
Muñoz, José E. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer, and RogerHutchinson. 2008. Clashes of Principle, and the Possibility of Dialogue: A Case Study of Same-Sex Marriage in the United Church of Canada. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by RichardMoon, 41–64. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nejaime, D. 2009. Inclusion, Accommodation, and Recognition: Accounting for Differences Based on Religion, and Sexual Orientation. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender32:303–381.10.2139/ssrn.1441497Search in Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Margaret H. 2003. Religious Institutions and the Law in Canada. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Search in Google Scholar
Ontario Human Rights Commission. 2012 The Shadow of the Law: Surveying the Case Law Dealing with Competing Rights Claims. February, 2012. http://http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/shadow-law-surveying-case-law-dealing-competing-rights-claims.Search in Google Scholar
Onwuachi-Willig, A. 2006. Undercover Other. California Law Review94:873–906.10.2307/20439051Search in Google Scholar
Pitt, R. N. 2009. “Still Looking for My Jonathan”: Gay Black Men’s Management of Religious and Sexual Identity Conflicts. Journal of Homosexuality57(1):39–53.10.1080/00918360903285566Search in Google Scholar
Provencher, D. M. 2011. Coming Out à l’oriental: Maghrebi-French Performances of Gender, Sexuality, and Religion. Journal of Homosexuality58(6–7):812–833.Search in Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages. Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822390442Search in Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198248075.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Roden, Frederik, ed. 2009. Jewish/Christian/Queer – Crossroads and Identities. Fornham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488856Search in Google Scholar
Ruffolo, David V. 2009. Post-Queer Politics. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Ryder, Bruce. 2008. The Canadian Conception of Equal Religious Citizenship. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by RichardMoon, 87–109. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kosovfsky Sedgwick, Eve. 1991. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shachar, A. 2005. Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: New Modes of Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies. McGill Law Journal50:49–88.Search in Google Scholar
Shipley, Heather. 2009. The Religious Construction of Sexual Citizenship: The Role of Religious Ideologies in Canadian Law. PhD diss., University of Ottawa.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 1999. Lesbian and Gay Rights in Canada. Social Movements and Equality-Seeking, 1971–1995. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442676633Search in Google Scholar
Spinner-Halev, J. 2008. Liberalism and Religion: Against Congruence. Theoretical Inquiries in Law9:553–572.10.2202/1565-3404.1197Search in Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by CariNelson and LawrenceGrossberg, 271–316. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20Search in Google Scholar
Stringfellow, Roland. 2012. Soul Work. Developing a Black L.G.B.T. Theology. In Queer Religion. Vol. I: Homosexuality in Modern Religious History, edited by Donald L.Boisvert and Jay EmersonJohnson, 113–126. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Stychin, C. 1994. A Postmodern Constitutionalism: Equality Rights, Identity Politics, and the Canadian National Imagination. Dalhousie Law Journal17(1):61–82.Search in Google Scholar
Sullivan, Nikki. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tempelman, C. 1999. Constructions of Cultural Identity: Multiculturalism and Exclusion. Political StudiesXLVII:17–31.10.1111/1467-9248.00185Search in Google Scholar
Tremblay, Luc B. 2009. Religion, Tolérance et Laïcité: Le Tournant Multiculturel de la Cour Suprême. In Le Droit, la Religion et le “Raisonnable”. Le Fait Religieux entre Monisme Étatique et Pluralisme Juridique, edited by Jean-FrançoisGaudreault-Desbiens, 213–259. Montréal, QC: Thémis.Search in Google Scholar
Volpp, L. 2007. The Culture of Citizenship. Theoretical Inquiries in Law8(2):570–601.10.2202/1565-3404.1161Search in Google Scholar
Walton, G. 2006. “Fag Church”: Men Who Integrate Gay and Christian Identities. Journal of Homosexuality51(2):1–17.10.1300/J082v51n02_01Search in Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2005. Publics and Counterpublics. New York, NY: Zone.Search in Google Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1997. Families We Choose. Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. Revised ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2012. Object Lessons. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11312fbSearch in Google Scholar
Woehrling, J. 1998. L’obligation d’accommodement Raisonnable et l’adaptation de la Société à la Diversité Religieuse. McGill Law Journal43:325–401.Search in Google Scholar
Case Law/Legislation
Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982, 1982, c. 11 (U.K.) (The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms):Search in Google Scholar
Section 2 (a) (freedom of religion): “Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion.”Search in Google Scholar
Section 15(1) (equality rights): “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”Search in Google Scholar
Partland v. Partland, [1960] O.J. No. 242.Search in Google Scholar
Caldwell v. Stuart, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 603.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. Edwards Books & Art Ltd, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 713.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. Holmes, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 914.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452.Search in Google Scholar
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813.Search in Google Scholar
Canada (P.G.) v. Mossop, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 554.Search in Google Scholar
Dagenais v. Société Radio-Canada, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835.Search in Google Scholar
Egan v. Canada, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 513.Search in Google Scholar
Chamberlain v. Surrey S.D. No. 36, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2923.Search in Google Scholar
M. v. H., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3.Search in Google Scholar
Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493.Search in Google Scholar
Law v. Canada (Ministère de l’emploi et de l’immigration), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 497.Search in Google Scholar
Chamberlain v. Surrey S.D. No. 36, [2000] B.C.J. No. 1875, 2000, BCCA 519.Search in Google Scholar
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Ministère de la Justice), [2000]2 S.C.R. 1120.Search in Google Scholar
Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission) (2001), 40 C.H.R.R. D/197.Search in Google Scholar
Trinity Western University v. B.C.C.T., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 772.Search in Google Scholar
Hall (Litigation Guardian of) v. Powers, [2002] O.J. No. 1803.Search in Google Scholar
Brokie v. Brillinger, [2002] O.J. No. 2375.Search in Google Scholar
Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission), 2002 SKQB 506.Search in Google Scholar
Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No.36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710.Search in Google Scholar
Halpern et al. v. Canada (A.-G.), [2003] O.J. 2268.Search in Google Scholar
Kempling v. British Columbia Board of Teachers, 2004 BCSC 133.Search in Google Scholar
Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 551Search in Google Scholar
Renvoi Relatif au mariage entre personnes du même sexe, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698.Search in Google Scholar
Smith and Chymyshyn v. Knights of Columbus, Sandra Hauser and Elmer Lazar, 2005 BCHRT 544.Search in Google Scholar
Kempling v. British Columbia Board of Teachers, 2005 BCCA 327.Search in Google Scholar
Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission), 2006 SKCA 41.10.1163/ej.9789004152410.i-164.24Search in Google Scholar
Heintz v. Christian Horizons, 2008 HRTO 22 (CanLII).Search in Google Scholar
Protection de la jeunesse – 082692, [2008] J.Q. No. 19742.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. Kapp, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 483.Search in Google Scholar
Nichols v. M.J., (2009) SKQB 299.Search in Google Scholar
Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2009] B.C.J. No. 2336, 2009 BCSC 1608.Search in Google Scholar
Alberta v. Hutterian Brethern of Wilson Colony, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567.Search in Google Scholar
Ontario Human Rights Commission et al. v. Christian Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105, 102 O.R. (3d) 267.Search in Google Scholar
Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2010] B.C.J. No. 2201, 2010 BCCA 506.Search in Google Scholar
R. v. N.S., 2010 ONCA 670 (CanLII).Search in Google Scholar
Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2011] S.C.R. 26.Search in Google Scholar
S.L. v. Commission scolaire des Chênes, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 235.Search in Google Scholar
Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 467.Search in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- The Law and Boundaries Project: Creating a Space for Dialogue and Innovative Thinking
- Research Articles
- The Public–Private Distinction, Autonomy and Free Movement: Unpacking the Assumptions
- Framing the Boundaries of European Human Rights Law
- Cynicism and Guilt in International Law after Rwanda
- Living on the Edge of Queer Theory and Canada’s Uncanny Pluralism: Queer Religious Bodies as Constitutional Strangers
- Ulpien D.1.1.1.2 et la distinction ius publicum – ius privatum
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- The Law and Boundaries Project: Creating a Space for Dialogue and Innovative Thinking
- Research Articles
- The Public–Private Distinction, Autonomy and Free Movement: Unpacking the Assumptions
- Framing the Boundaries of European Human Rights Law
- Cynicism and Guilt in International Law after Rwanda
- Living on the Edge of Queer Theory and Canada’s Uncanny Pluralism: Queer Religious Bodies as Constitutional Strangers
- Ulpien D.1.1.1.2 et la distinction ius publicum – ius privatum