Abstract
This paper investigates the economic sector choices of Mexican labor migrants who intended to cross the US border in 2011 using data from the EMIF Norte Border Survey. We identify migrants according to prior work experience and intended sector of work in an effort to determine what demographic and socioeconomic characteristics explain economic sector mobility. We begin by estimating a probit model with sample selection to identify migrant characteristics that explain differences between industry of employment at place of origin and the intended sector of work at their destination. We find that sector mobility is significantly more likely for migrants who are documented and those with higher educational attainment, specifically, spoken English skills. The probability that prior and intended sectors of work coincide is significantly higher for migrants who are male, married, from large households, have family in the USA and earned a higher wage prior to migration. We also estimate a multinomial probit of the choice of sector and find that work sector prior to migration is more likely to match intended sector in the agriculture, construction, transportation and trade industries and significantly less likely to match in the services sector relative to other occupational categories.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for helpful comments and suggestions from the participants at the Economics and Finance seminar at Utah Valley University in April 2013 and Western Economic Association International conference in Seattle, June 2013. Oliveira gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Woodbury School of Business at Utah Valley University in the summer of 2013.
References
Akresh, I. R.2006. “Occupational Mobility among Legal Immigrants to the United States.” International Migration Review40(4):854–84.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00046.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ambrosini, W., and G.Peri. 2012. “The Determinants and the Selection of Mexico-US Migrations.” The World Economy35(2):111–51.10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01425.xSearch in Google Scholar
Belot, M. V., and T. J.Hatton. 2008. “Immigrant Selection in the OECD.” Discussion Paper, Australian National University Centre for Economic Policy Research: 571.Search in Google Scholar
Bertoli, S., J.Fernández-Huertas Moraga, and F.Ortega. 2013. “Crossing the Border: Self-Selection, Earnings and Individual Migration Decisions.” Journal of Development Economics101(C):75–91.Search in Google Scholar
Borjas, G. J.1987. “Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.” American Economic Review77:531–53.10.3386/w2248Search in Google Scholar
Borjas, G. J., and L. F.Katz. 2007. “The Evolution of the Mexican-Born Workforce in the U.S. Labor Market.” In Mexican Immigration to the United States, edited by G. J.Borjas, 13–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226066684.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Bustamonte, J., J.Guillermina Jasso, E.Taylor, and P. T.Legarreta. 1998. “Characteristics of Migrants: Mexicans in the United States.” In Binational Study on Migration Between Mexico and the United States, edited by T.Loaeza, E. M.Carlos Planck, R.Gomez Arnau, S.Martin, B. L.Lowell, D. W.Meyers, 91–162. Mexico City and Washington, DC: Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and US Commission on Immigration Reform.Search in Google Scholar
Chiquiar, D., and G. H.Hanson. 2005. “International Migration, Self-Selection, and the Distribution of Wages: Evidence from Mexico and the United States.” Journal of Political Economy113(2):239–81.10.1086/427464Search in Google Scholar
Chiswick, B. R., Y. L.Lee, and P. W.Miller. 2005. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Immigrant Occupational Mobility: A Test of the Immigrant Assimilation Hypothesis.” International Migration Review39(2):332–53.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2005.tb00269.xSearch in Google Scholar
de Arce, R., and M.Ramon. 2012. “Have Migrants Bought a ‘Round Trip Ticket’? Determinants in Probability of Immigrants’ Return in Spain.” Global Economy Journal12(2):1–22.10.1515/1524-5861.1831Search in Google Scholar
Grogger, J., and G. H.Hanson. 2008. Income Maximization and the Selection and Sorting of International Migrants. NBER Working Paper 13821. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.10.3386/w13821Search in Google Scholar
Kaestner, R., and O.Malamud. 2014. “Self-Selection and International Migration: New Evidence from Mexico.” Review of Economics and Statistics96(1):78–91.10.1162/REST_a_00375Search in Google Scholar
Manski, C. F.2011. “Daniel McFadden and the Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics103(2):217–29.10.1111/1467-9442.00241Search in Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. J., and H.Rapoport2010. “Self-Selection Patterns in Mexico-U.S. Migration: The Role of Migration Networks.” The Review of Economics and Statistics92(4):811–21.10.1162/REST_a_00032Search in Google Scholar
Moraga, J. F.-H.2011. “New Evidence on Emigrant Selection.” The Review of Economics and Statistics93(1):72–96.10.1162/REST_a_00050Search in Google Scholar
Orrenius, P. M., and M.Zavodny. 2005. “Self-Selection among Undocumented Immigrants from Mexico.” Journal of Development Economics78:215–40.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Ortega, F., and G.Peri. 2009. The Causes and Effects of International Labor Mobility: Evidence from OECD Countries 1980–2005. NBER Working Paper 14833. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.10.3386/w14833Search in Google Scholar
Passel, J. S., D. ’Ve. raCohn, and A.Gonzalez-Barrera. 2012. Net Migration from Mexico Falls to Zero - and Perhaps Less. Pew Research Center Report. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Search in Google Scholar
Patel, K., and F.Vella. 2013. “Immigrant Networks and Their Implications for Occupational Choice and Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics95(4):1249–77.10.1162/REST_a_00327Search in Google Scholar
Peri, G.2012. “Rationalizing U.S. Immigration Policy: Reforms for Simplicity, Fairness, and Economic Growth.” Discussion Paper 2012–01, The Hamilton Project, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, D. M., P. A.Coomes, and A. I.Izyumov. 2005. “The Location Choice of Employment-Based Immigrants among U.S. Metro Areas.” Journal of Regional Science45(1):113–45.10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00366.xSearch in Google Scholar
SEGOB. 2012. Encuesta sobre Migración en la Frontera Norte de México, 2010. Mexico, D.F: Secretaría de Gobernación.Search in Google Scholar
Sjaastad, L. A.1962. “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration.” Journal of Political Economy70(1):80–93.10.1086/258726Search in Google Scholar
Van de Ven, W. P. M. M., and B. M. S.Van Praag. 1981. “The Demand for Deductibles in Private Health Insurance.” Journal of Econometrics17:229–52.10.1016/0304-4076(81)90028-2Search in Google Scholar
Warin, T., and A.Blakely. 2012. “Choice or Mimetism in the Decision to Migrate? A European Illustration.” Global Economy Journal12(2). doi:10.1515/1524-5861.1818Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Does Experience Matter for Patterns of Expansion by US Companies in Latin America and the Caribbean?
- Economic Sector Choices of Mexican Migrants to the USA: Evidence from the 2011 EMIF Border Survey
- Financial Openness, Capital Flows and Risk Sharing in Africa
- The Role of Time Preferences in Explaining the Long-Term Pattern of International Trade
- What’s News
- Using Stepping Stones to Enter Distant Export Markets
- Export Shares and Relative Export Affinities of Goods and Services of European OECD Countries, 2007
- Did the Agreement on Safeguards Nullify their Use?
- Export Expansion and Economic Growth in Tanzania
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Does Experience Matter for Patterns of Expansion by US Companies in Latin America and the Caribbean?
- Economic Sector Choices of Mexican Migrants to the USA: Evidence from the 2011 EMIF Border Survey
- Financial Openness, Capital Flows and Risk Sharing in Africa
- The Role of Time Preferences in Explaining the Long-Term Pattern of International Trade
- What’s News
- Using Stepping Stones to Enter Distant Export Markets
- Export Shares and Relative Export Affinities of Goods and Services of European OECD Countries, 2007
- Did the Agreement on Safeguards Nullify their Use?
- Export Expansion and Economic Growth in Tanzania