Comparing Hecke eigenvalues of Siegel eigenforms

References

[1] L. Chiriac, Comparing Hecke eigenvalues of newforms, Arch. Math. (Basel) 109 (2017), no. 3, 223–229. 10.1007/s00013-017-1072-xSearch in Google Scholar

[2] L. Chiriac, On the number of dominating Fourier coefficients of two newforms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2018), no. 10, 4221–4224. 10.1090/proc/14145Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Das, On the natural densities of eigenvalues of a Siegel cusp form of degree 2, Int. J. Number Theory 9 (2013), no. 1, 9–15. 10.1142/S1793042112501217Search in Google Scholar

[4] P. Erdős, On the difference of consecutive terms of sequences defined by divisibility properties, Acta Arith 12 (1966/1967), 175–182. 10.4064/aa-12-2-175-182Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Harris, Galois representations, automorphic forms, and the Sato–Tate conjecture, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (2014), no. 5, 707–746. 10.1007/s13226-014-0085-4Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. Kowalski, Y.-K. Lau, K. Soundararajan and J. Wu, On modular signs, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 149 (2010), no. 3, 389–411. 10.1017/S030500411000040XSearch in Google Scholar

[7] E. Kowalski, O. Robert and J. Wu, Small gaps in coefficients of L-functions and 𝔅 -free numbers in short intervals, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 23 (2007), no. 1, 281–326. 10.4171/rmi/496Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Kumar, J. Meher and K. D. Shankhadhar, Strong multiplicity one for Siegel cusp forms of degree two, Forum Math. 33 (2021), no. 5, 1157–1167. 10.1515/forum-2020-0336Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Kumar, J. Meher and K. D. Shankhadhar, On signs of Hecke eigenvalues of Siegel eigenforms, Mathematika 68 (2022), no. 4, 1030–1044. 10.1112/mtk.12154Search in Google Scholar

[10] N. Kurokawa, On Siegel eigenforms, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 57 (1981), no. 1, 47–50. 10.3792/pjaa.57.47Search in Google Scholar

[11] K. Matomäki, On signs of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 152 (2012), no. 2, 207–222. 10.1017/S030500411100034XSearch in Google Scholar

[12] M. R. Murty and S. Pujahari, Distinguishing Hecke eigenforms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 5, 1899–1904. 10.1090/proc/13446Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Pitale, Siegel Modular Forms. A Classical and Representation-Theoretic Approach, Lecture Notes in Math. 2240, Springer, Cham, 2019. 10.1007/978-3-030-15675-6Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Pitale, A. Saha and R. Schmidt, Transfer of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 232 (2014), no. 1090. Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. S. Rajan, On strong multiplicity one for l-adic representations, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (1998), no. 3, 161–172. Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. Royer, J. Sengupta and J. Wu, Non-vanishing and sign changes of Hecke eigenvalues for Siegel cusp forms of genus two. With an appendix by E. Kowalski and A. Saha, Ramanujan J. 39 (2016), no. 1, 179–199. 10.1007/s11139-014-9667-3Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Schmidt, Packet structure and paramodular forms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no. 5, 3085–3112. 10.1090/tran/7028Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Weissauer, Endoscopy for GSp ⁢ ( 4 ) and the Cohomology of Siegel Modular Threefolds, Lecture Notes in Math. 1968, Springer, Berlin, 2009. 10.1007/978-3-540-89306-6Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Wu and Y. Ye, Hypothesis H and the prime number theorem for automorphic representations, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 37 (2007), no. 2, 461–471. 10.7169/facm/1229619665Search in Google Scholar