Home Gromov (non-)hyperbolicity of certain domains in ℂN
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Gromov (non-)hyperbolicity of certain domains in ℂN

  • Nikolai Nikolov , Pascal J. Thomas EMAIL logo and Maria Trybuła
Published/Copyright: July 21, 2015

Abstract

We prove the Gromov non-hyperbolicity with respect to the Kobayashi distance for 𝒞1,1-smooth convex domains in 2 which contain an analytic disc in the boundary or have a point of infinite type with rotation symmetry. The same is shown for “generic” product spaces, as well as for the symmetrized polydisc and the tetrablock. On the other hand, examples of smooth, non-pseudoconvex, Gromov hyperbolic domains in n are given.

MSC 2010: 32F17; 32F45

Funding statement: Research of the third author is supported by the International PhD programme “Geometry and Topology in Physical Models” of the Foundation for Polish Science, and by the Bulgarian National Science Found (contract DFNI-I 02/14). The initial version of this paper was prepared during her visit to the Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, October 2013–April 2014.

A Appendix

Proposition A.1

Proposition A.1 (cf. [16, Proposition 2])

The following statements hold.

  1. Let D be proper convex domain in n. Then

    cD(z,w)12|logdD(z)dD(w)|,z,wD.
  2. Let D be proper -convex domain in n. Then

    cD(z,w)14|logdD(z)dD(w)|,z,wD.

Proposition A.2

Proposition A.2 (see [11, proof of Proposition 10.2.3])

Let b be a C1,1-smooth boundary point of a domain D is Cn and let KD. Then there exist a neighborhood U of b and a constant C>0 such that

2kD(z,w)-logdD(z)+C,zDU,wK.
Proposition A.3

Proposition A.3 (cf. [7, Theorem 1])

Let b be a C2-smooth non-pseudoconvex boundary point of a domain D in C2. Then there exist a neighborhood U of b and a constant c>0 such that

cκD(z;X)|dD(z),X|(dD(z))34+|X|,zDU,Xn.
Proposition A.4

Let D be a bounded domain in Cn. Let U and V be neighborhoods of D with VU. Then there exists a constant c>0 such that for any connected component D of DU one has that

ckD(z,w)kD(z,w),z,wDV.

Proof.

Let ε>0. Take a smooth curve γ:[0,1]D such that γ(0)=z, γ(1)=w and

kD(z,w,ε):=kD(z,w)+ε>01κD(γ(t);γ(t))𝑑t.

Let s=sup{t(0,1):γ(0,t)DV} and r=inf{ts:γ([t,1])DV}. Set z=γ(s) and w=γ(r). The localization property of the Kobayashi metric (cf. [11, Proposition 7.2.9], or [8]) provides a constant c>0 such that

cκD(u;X)κD(u;X),zDV,Xn.

It follows that

kD(z,w,ε)>ckD(z,z)+kD(z,w)+ckD(w,w)ckD(z,w)+kD(z,w)-ckD(z,w).

If zw, then z,wDVD. Then there exists a constant c1>0 such that

kD(u,v)c1u-v,u,vDV.

On the other hand, since D is bounded, we may find a constant c2>0 such that

kD(u,v)c2u-v,u,vDV.

Then

kD(z,w,ε)>ckD(z,w)+(c2-cc1)z-w.

Since

kD(z,w,ε)>kD(z,w)c2z-w,

we get that

kD(z,w,ε)>ckD(z,w)-(cc1c2-1)+kD(z,w,ε).

The last inequality also holds if z=w. Letting ε0, we obtain that

kD(z,w)min{c,c2c1}kD(z,w).

The authors would like to thank the referee for his/her valuable comments.

References

[1] Abouhajar A., White M. and Young N., A Schwarz lemma for a domain related to μ-synthesis, J. Geom. Anal. 17 (2007), 717–750. 10.1007/BF02937435Search in Google Scholar

[2] Agler J. and Young N. J., A commutant lifting theorem for a domain in 2 and spectral interpolation, J. Funct. Anal. 161 (1999), 452–477. 10.1006/jfan.1998.3362Search in Google Scholar

[3] Andersson M., Passare M. and Sigurdsson R., Complex Convexity and Analytic Functionals, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2004. 10.1007/978-3-0348-7871-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Balogh Z. M. and Bonk M., Gromov hyperbolicity and the Kobayashi metric on strictly pseudoconvex domains, Comment. Math. Helv. 75 (2000), 504–533. 10.1007/s000140050138Search in Google Scholar

[5] Buckley S., Gromov hyperbolicity of invariant metrics, preprint 2008, www.uma.es/investigadores/grupos/cfunspot/research/0806pBuckley.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Costara C., On the spectral Nevanlinna-Pick problem, Studia Math. 170 (2005), 23–55. 10.4064/sm170-1-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dieu N. Q., Nikolov N. and Thomas P. J., Estimates for invariant metrics near non-semipositive boundary points, J. Geom. Anal. 23 (2013), 598–610. 10.1007/s12220-011-9255-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Forstneric F. and Rosay J.-P., Localization of the Kobayashi metric and the boundary continuity of proper holomorphic mappings, Math. Ann. 279 (1987), 239–252. 10.1007/BF01461721Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gaussier H. and Seshadri H., On the Gromov hyperbolicity of convex domains in n, preprint 2013, http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0368. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gromov M., Hyperbolic groups, Essays in Group Theory, Math. Sci. Res. Insz. Publ. 8, Springer, New York (1987), 75–263. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9586-7_3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jarnicki M. and Pflug P., Invariant Distances and Metrics in Complex Analysis, De Gruyter Exp. Math. 9, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993. 10.1515/9783110870312Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lempert L., La métrique de Kobayashi et la représentation des domaines sur la boule, Bull. Soc. Math. France 109 (1981), 427–474. 10.24033/bsmf.1948Search in Google Scholar

[13] Nikolov N., Comparison of invariant functions on strongly pseudoconvex domains, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 421 (2015), 180–185. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[14] Nikolov N., Pflug P. and Zwonek W., An example of a bounded -convex domain which is not biholomorphic to a convex domain, Math. Scan. 102 (2008), 149–155. 10.7146/math.scand.a-15056Search in Google Scholar

[15] Nikolov N., Pflug P. and Zwonek W., Estimates for invariant metrics on -convex domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), 6245–6256. 10.1090/S0002-9947-2011-05273-6Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nikolov N. and Trybuła M., The Kobayashi balls of (-)convex domains, Monatsh. Math. (2015), 10.1007/s00605-015-0746-3. 10.1007/s00605-015-0746-3Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rodriguez J. M. and Touris E., Gromov hyperbolicity through decomposition of metrics spaces, Acta Math. Hungar. 103 (2004), 107–138. 10.1023/B:AMHU.0000028240.16521.9dSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Väisälä J., Gromov hyperbolic spaces, Expo. Math. 23 (2005), 187–231. 10.1016/j.exmath.2005.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zwonek W., Geometric properties of the tetrablock, Arch. Math. 100 (2013), 159–165. 10.1007/s00013-012-0479-7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-6-24
Revised: 2015-3-19
Published Online: 2015-7-21
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

© 2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2014-0113/html
Scroll to top button