Does Ranked Choice Voting Promote Legislative Bipartisanship? Using Maine as a Policy Laboratory

References

Alvarez, R., and B. Sinclair. 2012. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 544–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911411098.Search in Google Scholar

Amy, D. J. 2000. Behind the Ballot Box: A Citizen’s Guide to Voting Systems. Westport: Praeger Publishers.10.5040/9798400617362Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S., D. Butler, and L. Harbridge-Yong. 2020. Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108768375Search in Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, S., J. Snyder, and C. Stewart. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 136–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669364.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, R. 2022. “The Primary Threat: How the Surge of Ideological Challengers Is Exacerbating Partisan Polarization.” https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211065400 (Accessed February 23, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Bean, C. 1997. “Australia’s Experience with the Alternative Vote.” Representation 34 (2): 106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344899708522996.Search in Google Scholar

Bol, D., A. Dellis, and M. Oak. 2016. “Endogenous Candidacy in Plurality Rule Elections: Some Explanations of the Number of Candidates and Their Polarization.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2704859 (Accessed November 5, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Bordignon, M., T. Nannicini, and G. Tabellini. 2017. “Single Round vs. Runoff Elections under Plurality Rule: A Theoretical Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 49: 123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Brady, D., and C. Volden. 1998. Resolving Gridlock. Boulder: Westview.Search in Google Scholar

Cook Political Report. 2023. “2023 Cook PVI: District Map and List (118th Congress).” https://www.cookpolitical.com/cook-pvi/2023-partisan-voting-index/118-district-map-and-list (Accessed July 10, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Cox, G., and M. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cox, G., and M. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791123Search in Google Scholar

Dellis, A., A. Gauthier-Belzile, and M. Oak. 2016. “Policy Polarization and Strategic Candidacy in Elections under the Alternative Vote Rule.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567560 (Accessed November 5, 2020).10.2139/ssrn.2567560Search in Google Scholar

Donovan, T., C. Tolbert, and K. Gracey. 2016. “Campaign Civility under Preferential and Plurality Voting.” Electoral Studies 42: 157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897.Search in Google Scholar

Drutman, L. 2020. Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190913854.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Drutman, L. 2021. What We Know about Congressional Primaries and Congressional Primary Reform. https://www.newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/what-we-know-about-congressional-primaries-and-congressional-primary-reform/ (Accessed January 4, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Duverger, M. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, M. 2013. “The Case for Transcending Partisanship.” Dædalus 142 (2): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00205.Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, R., and G. Wright. 1997. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered. 6th ed., edited by L. Dodd, and B. Oppenheimer. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Search in Google Scholar

FairVote. 2022. “Monopoly Politics 2022 Report.”. https://fairvote.org/report/monopoly-politics-2022-report/ (Accessed: October 21, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. 1974. Representatives, Roll-Calls, and Constituencies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gehl, K., and M. Porter. 2020. The Politics Industry: How Political Innovation Can Break Partisan Gridlock and Save Our Democracy. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, J., and S. L. Wilson. 2022. “Measuring Congressional Partisanship and its Consequences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47: 225–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12331.Search in Google Scholar

GovTrack. 2022. Members of Congress. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members (Accessed October 7, 20221).Search in Google Scholar

Graham, B. D. 1962. “The Choice of Voting Methods in Federal Politics, 1902–1918.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 8 (2): 164–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1962.tb01039.x.Search in Google Scholar

Grofman, B., and S. Feld. 2004. “If You Like the Alternative Vote (a.k.a. The Instant Runoff), Then You Ought to Know about the Coombs Rule.” Electoral Studies 23: 641–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2003.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Harbridge, L. 2010. “Congressional Agenda Control and the Decline of Bipartisan Cooperation”. In Conference: Northwestern Institute for Policy Research Working Paper, January. Northwestern University.Search in Google Scholar

Harbridge, L. 2011. “Strategic Partisanship: Party Priorities, Agenda Control, and Bipartisan Cooperation in Congress”. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1900834 (Accessed November 24, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Harbridge, L. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139942324Search in Google Scholar

Harbridge, L., and N. Malhotra. 2012. “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00517.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hare, C., and K. Poole. 2014. “The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics.” Polity 46 (3): 411–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2014.10.Search in Google Scholar

Hix, S. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56 (2): 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0012. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054255.Search in Google Scholar

Huntington, S. 1950. “A Revised Theory of American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 44: 669–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950805.Search in Google Scholar

Jared Golden for Congress. 2023. On the Issues. https://jaredgoldenforcongress.com/issues/ (Accessed July 10, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Kanthak, K., and B. Crisp. 2005. “Partisans, Collaborators, Loners and Compromisers: Cosponsorship Patterns as a Means of Challenger Deterrence.” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, April 22–25. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Koger, G. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 225–46. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298003x200872.Search in Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 906–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111662.Search in Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226452739.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Landsman, T., D. S. Penrose, and R. Richie. 2018. Ranked Choice Voting in 2018: A Mid-Year Report. Analysis of Turnout, Voter Experience, and Election Administration. https://fairvote.app.box.com/s/038bz15b80dlsc0mcsgtzxvs2yh4sfp7 (Accessed November 6, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, J., K. Poole, H. Rosenthal, A. Boche, A. Rudkin, and L. Sonnet. 2022. Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. Available at: https://voteview.com/.Search in Google Scholar

Lublin, D., and B. Reilly. 2023. “Encouraging Cooperation and Responsibility.” In APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Parties. More than Red and Blue: Political Parties and American Democracy. American Political Science Association and Protect Democracy.Search in Google Scholar

Lugar Center on Bipartisanship. 2022. https://www.thelugarcenter.org/ourwork-Bipartisan-Index.html#Overall1 (Accessed January 28, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Mayhew, D. 1974. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6 (3): 295–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/3233931.Search in Google Scholar

Melcher, J., and A. Fried. 2018. “The ‘Two Maines’ in a (Potentially) New Swing State.” In Presidential Swing States, edited by D. Schultz, and R. Jacob, 323–50. London: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Mellow, N., and P. Trubowitz. 2005. “Going Bipartisan: Politics by Other Means.” Political Science Quarterly 120 (3): 433–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165x.2005.tb00553.x.Search in Google Scholar

Merrill, S. 1998. Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mindich, R. 2020. How Ranked Choice Voting Rewards Ideological Centrism and Promotes Gender Balance: Lessons from Australia, 1993–2019. B.A. Thesis. Harvard College.Search in Google Scholar

Palfrey, T. 1984. “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” The Review of Economic Studies 51: 139–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297710.Search in Google Scholar

Persily, N. 2015. “Introduction.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, edited by N. Persily, 1–5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316091906Search in Google Scholar

Pildes, R. 2011. “Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America.” California Law Review 99 (2): 273–333.Search in Google Scholar

Poole, K., and H. Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, B. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491108Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, B. 2018. “Centripetalism and Electoral Moderation in Established Democracies.” Nationalism & Ethnic Politics 24 (2): 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2018.1457827.Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, B. 2021. “Ranked Choice Voting in Australia and America: Do Voters Follow Party Cues?.” Politics and Governance 9 (2): 271–9. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3889.Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, B., and J. Stewart. 2021. “Compulsory Preferential Voting, Social Media and ‘come-From-Behind’ Electoral Victories in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2021.1879010.Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, B., D. Lublin, and G. Wright. 2023. “Alaska’s New Electoral System: Countering Polarization or ‘Crooked as Hell.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.5070/p2cjpp15160081. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5k75w7xw.Search in Google Scholar

Richie, R. 2017. “National Implications of Maine Adoption of Ranked Choice Voting.” National Civic Review 106 (1).10.1002/ncr.21312Search in Google Scholar

Rippere, P. 2016. “Polarization Reconsidered: Bipartisan Cooperation through Bill Cosponsorship.” The Journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association 48 (2): 243–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2016.4.Search in Google Scholar

Rodden, J. 2015. “Geography and Gridlock in the United States.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, edited by N. Persily, 104–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316091906.007Search in Google Scholar

Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sharman, C., A. M. Sayers, and N. Miragliotta (2002) “Trading Party Preferences: The Australian Experience of Preferential Voting” Electoral Studies 21(4): 543–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3794(01)00012-9.Search in Google Scholar

Theriault, S. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790652Search in Google Scholar

Uslaner, E. 2000. “Is the Senate More Civil Than the House?.” In Esteemed Colleagues, edited by B. Loomis, 32–55. Washington: Brookings Institute.Search in Google Scholar

WAGM News. 2022. Political Profile Jared Golden. WAGM, 1 November. https://www.wagmtv.com/2022/11/01/political-profile-jared-golden/ (Accessed July 10, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Wallner, J., and E. Kamarck. 2018. “Primaries and Incumbent Behavior.” R Street Policy Study 156. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/GS_10292018_Primaries-and-Incumbent-Behavior.pdf (Accessed January 4, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Weber, S. 1992. “On Hierarchical Spatial Competition.” The Review of Economic Studies 59: 407–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297961.Search in Google Scholar

Westphal, D. 2004. “Moderates Lament Partisan Divide in Congress,” Scripps Howard News Service, 15 October.Search in Google Scholar