Home The Enduring Relevance of National Presidential Nominating Conventions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Enduring Relevance of National Presidential Nominating Conventions

  • Costas Panagopoulos

    Costas Panagopoulos is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy and the graduate program in Elections and Campaign Management at Fordham University.

    EMAIL logo
    and Kyle Endres

    Kyle Endres is research fellow at the Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy at Fordham University and Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Government at The University of Texas at Austin.

Published/Copyright: February 24, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Some contend the relevance of presidential nominating conventions has faded in recent decades as fewer voters watch and reach voting decisions during the conventions. We evaluate these trends empirically and consider the historical evolution of conventions to argue that, while they do not garner the attention they once did, conventions can still have a consequential effect on the outcomes of presidential elections, especially in competitive cycles.


Corresponding author: Costas Panagopoulos, Department of Political Science, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Rd. Bronx, NY 10458, E-mail:

About the authors

Costas Panagopoulos

Costas Panagopoulos is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy and the graduate program in Elections and Campaign Management at Fordham University.

Kyle Endres

Kyle Endres is research fellow at the Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy at Fordham University and Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Government at The University of Texas at Austin.

Published Online: 2016-2-24
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 2.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2015-0039/html
Scroll to top button