Operationalizing grammatical metaphor
-
Lise Fontaine
,
Miriam Taverniers
Abstract
Nominal grammatical metaphor (NGM), as theorised within systemic functional linguistics (SFL), typically refers to cases where a process is ‘metaphorically’ encoded through nominal resources, rather than its typical encoding through the clause. Previous approaches to the study of NGM have generally relied on the concepts of agnation and congruence, but these concepts can be quite subjective in nature, leading to an unstable account of the phenomenon. This paper evaluates the theoretical status and methodological implementation of NGMs. Our aim is to consider whether Aktionsart can offer a means of operationalizing NGM. We analyzed 492 nouns from a random selection of 200 sentences in the PopSci register of the CroCo corpus. The nouns were analyzed separately by different coders in terms of (i) grammatical metaphor status and (ii) their ontological status combined with an analysis of Aktionsart. Our statistical analysis shows that adopting an Aktionsart approach provides a more nuanced and anchored methodology for the analysis of NGMs as it not only provides a more consistent and robust analysis, but it also enables us to specify subtypes of nominal grammatical metaphor based on their subtler semantic characteristics.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
Barque, Lucie, Richard Huyghe, Anne Jugnet & Rafael Marín. 2009. Two types of deverbal activity nouns in French. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on generative approaches to the lexicon. 169–175. Pisa, Italy.Search in Google Scholar
Balvet, Antonio, Lucie Barque, Marie Hélène Condette, Pauline Haas, Richard Huyghe, Rafael Marin & Aurélie Merlo. 2011. Nomage: An electronic lexicon of French deverbal nouns based on a semantically annotated corpus. WoLeR 2011 at ESSLLI, international workshop on lexical resources, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 8–15.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret. 2019. The clause: An overview of the lexicogrammar. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 92–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.006Search in Google Scholar
Bloch-Trojnar, Maria & Anna Malicka-Kleparska. 2017. Aspect and valency in nominals. Boston: De Gruyter, Inc.10.1515/9781501505430Search in Google Scholar
Byrnes, Heidi. 2009. Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education 20. 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne. 1999. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 105–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Applied Linguistics).10.1017/CBO9781139524704.009Search in Google Scholar
Carr, Alex. 2023. An empirical investigation into the nature and degree of nominality. Cardiff: Cardiff University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Carr, Alex, Lucy Chrispin & Lise Fontaine. In press. An empirical investigation into the relationship between process type and situation type. In Jamie Williams (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics and the individual. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. In Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics vol. 7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0059.Search in Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase, vol. 1. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in montague’s ptq. Dordrecht, Holland; London: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar
Evert, Stephanie & The CWB Development Team. 2022. The IMS open corpus workbench (CWB) CQP query language tutorial. https://cwb.sourceforge.io/files/CQP_Manual.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Rafael Marín. 2012. The role of aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 35–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226711000351.Search in Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Katy Jones & David Schönthal. 2023. Referring in language, an integrated approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316534625Search in Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan. 2010. Testing the hypothesis. Objectivity and verification in usage-based cognitive semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 239–270. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423.239Search in Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott & Louise McNally. 2013. No ordered arguments needed for nouns. In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 123–130.Search in Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott & Louise McNally. 2022. Nominalization and natural language ontology. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-020110.Search in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1985. Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2002 [1981]. Text semantics and clause grammar: How is a text like a clause? In Jonathan Webster (ed.), On grammar, volume 1 of the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 219–260. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2003 [1990]. New ways of meaning. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), On language and linguistics, volume 3 of the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 139–176. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2006. Written language, standard language, global language. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru & Cecil L. Nelson (eds.), The handbook of world Englishes, 349–365. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405111850.2006.00024.xSearch in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2013. Meaning as choice. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’ Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 15–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139583077.003Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2006. Construing experience through meaning, A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick. 2013. Lexical analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, Stella Neumann & Erich Steiner. 2012. Cross-linguistic corpora for the study of translations: Insights from the language pair English-German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110260328Search in Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2010. The meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not’. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 267–306. London and New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110903706Search in Google Scholar
Huyghe, Richard, Lucie Barque, Pauline Haas & Delphine Tribout. 2017. The semantics of underived event nouns in French. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 117–142.Search in Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316676288Search in Google Scholar
Lukin, Alison, Annabelle Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Canzhong Wu. 2011. Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences. 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.187.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.59Search in Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian, Martin Lam & Kazuhiro Teruya. 2010. Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
McGrath, Darbi & Cassi Liardét. 2022. A corpus-assisted analysis of grammatical metaphors in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 56. 1–12.10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101090Search in Google Scholar
McGrath, Darbi & Cassi Liardét. 2023. Grammatical metaphor across disciplines: Variation, frequency, and dispersion. English for Specific Purposes 69. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Ritchie, David & Min Zhu. 2015. “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30. 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016837.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, Erich. 2004. Ideational grammatical metaphor: Exploring some implications for the overall model. Languages in Contrast 4(1). 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.4.1.07ste.Search in Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2006. Grammatical metaphor and lexical metaphor: Different perspectives on semantic variation. Neophilologus 90(2). 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-005-0531-y.Search in Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2011. The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics 43(4). 1100–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2017. Grammatical metaphor. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 354–371. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2019. Semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 55–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.005Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.10.4324/9780203785270Search in Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66. 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Search in Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah, David Butt & Jörg Cassens. 2008. Start making sense: Systemic-functional linguistics and ambient intelligence. Revue d‘Intelligence Artificielle 22(5). 629–645. https://doi.org/10.3166/ria.22.629-645.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
