Home Let her rain, she’s snowing pretty good: The use of feminine pronouns with weather verbs in colloquial English
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Let her rain, she’s snowing pretty good: The use of feminine pronouns with weather verbs in colloquial English

  • Laure Gardelle EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 10, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article investigates a phenomenon which, though marginal, is important to linguistic theory: the use of feminine pronouns with weather verbs in contemporary colloquial English (e.g. She’s snowing pretty good). Such uses, mentioned in a few studies only, with examples mostly drawn from fiction, have never been analysed in detail, despite a wide literature on the use of he/she for inanimate reference. The aim of the study is first to get a better understanding of the phenomenon, based on non-fictional utterances. It is shown that the data must be divided into two subsets: cases of anaphora, in which she signals personification, and less referential uses, in which the feminine pronoun emphasizes emotional involvement. This latter set is particularly important for gender research: it confirms that this emotional value of the feminine pronoun, which has been noted for inanimate reference, exists even when there is no clearly identifiable referent. The article then looks into the motivations behind the use of animate pronouns with weather verbs, taking into account the long-standing debate over the status of it in the same contexts in more formal registers. It proposes that in a number of cases in which she does not have a textual antecedent, the pronoun does not have an actual referent, but that owing to three converging factors, a slight degree of referentiality is projected on it.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Philip Miller, Hubert Cuyckens and the anonymous reviewers for their most helpful comments on this article.

References

Barnes, William. 1863. A glossary of the Dorset dialect, with the history, outspreading, and bearings of South-Western English. Berlin: Asher & co.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Brigitte. 2000. Archaic syntax in Indo-European: The spread of transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110825992Search in Google Scholar

Bayer Krenz, Madie Barbara. 2007. Memories of my bygone days. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.Search in Google Scholar

Bex, Tony & Richard J. Watts (eds.). 1999. Standard English: The widening debate. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203263013Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 1999. Anaphora, discourse, and understanding: Evidence from French and English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale: Une introduction typologique. Vol. 1, Catégories et constructions. Paris: Lavoisier.Search in Google Scholar

Curme, George O. 1931. A grammar of the English language in three volumes. Vol. 3, Syntax. Boston: D.C. Heath and co.Search in Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486913Search in Google Scholar

Darden, Bill J. 1973. What rains? Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 523–526.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2004–. BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/ (accessed 5 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (accessed 5 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2011–. Google Books Corpus (Based on Google Books n-grams). http://googlebooks.byu.edu/Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. http://corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/(accessed 5 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Elworthy, Frederic Thomas. 1877. An outline of the grammar of the dialect of West Somerset, illustrated by examples of the common phrases and modes of speech now in use among the people. London: Trübner & co.Search in Google Scholar

Eriksen, Pål, Seppo Kittilä & Leena Kolehmainen 2010. Linguistics of weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language 34(3). 565–601.10.1075/sl.34.3.03eriSearch in Google Scholar

Gardelle, Laure. 2006. Le genre en anglais moderne (XVIe siècle à nos jours): Le système des pronoms. Paris: University of Paris IV-Sorbonne PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Ihalainen, Ossi. 1985. Synchronic variation and linguistic change: Evidence from British English dialects. In Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem Koopman & Frederike von der Leek (eds.), Papers from the fourth international conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985, 61–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.41.08ihaSearch in Google Scholar

Joly, André. 1976. Towards a theory of gender in modern English. Essais de systématique énonciative. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Search in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam. 2007. Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33(1). 147–151.10.1162/coli.2007.33.1.147Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214369Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska (eds.). 2011. Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.124Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, William Humphrey. 1789. Provincialisms of the vale of Glocester. In William Humphrey Marshall (ed.), Rural economy of Glocestershire, Vol. 1, 323–332. London: Trübner. [Reproduced 1871, Publications of the English Dialect Society, Vol. 1.]10.1017/CBO9781139962674.041Search in Google Scholar

Mathiot, Madeleine & Marjorie Roberts. 1979. Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In Madeleine Mathiot (ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf revisited, 1–47. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110804157Search in Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster’s English dictionary online edition. 2012. http://www.merriam-webster.com (accessed 5 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Lori. 1991. Gender in modern English: The system and its uses. Québec: University of Laval PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Lori. 1997. The grammatical role of English pronominal gender. In Pierre Larrivée (ed.), La structuration conceptuelle du langage, 149–170. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Lori. 2000. The grammar of English gender. In Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds.), Between grammar and lexicon, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.183.14morSearch in Google Scholar

Ogura, Michiko. 1986. Old English ‘impersonal’ verbs and expressions. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English dictionary, online edition. 2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/(accessed 5 November 2013)Search in Google Scholar

Paddock, Harold. 1991. The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Peter Trudgill & J. K. Chambers (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in grammatical variation, 29–46. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315505459-5Search in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 2002. Using he and she for inanimate referents in English: Questions of grammar and world view. In Nick J. Enfield (ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture, 110–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266500.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Paykin, Katia. 2003. Noms et verbes météorologiques: Des matières aux événements. Lille: University of Lille 3 PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811319Search in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1997. Gender, grammar, and the space in between. In Helga Kotthoff & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Communicating gender in context, 51–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.42.05romSearch in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1993. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An international handbook of contemporary research, 646–686. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2002. Animate pronouns for inanimate objects: Pronominal gender in English regional varieties. In Dieter Kastovsky, Gunther Kaltenböck & Susanne Reichl (eds.), Anglistentag 2001 Wien – Proceedings, 19–34. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.10.4324/9780203455944Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2008. Pronominal gender in English: A study of English varieties from a cross-linguistic perspective. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John (ed.). 1992 [1990]. Collins Cobuild English grammar. London: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Stenroos, Merja. 2008. Order out of chaos? The English gender change in the Southwest Midlands as a process of semantically based reorganization. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 445–473.10.1017/S1360674308002712Search in Google Scholar

Svartengren, Torsten H. 1927. The feminine gender for inanimate things in Anglo-American. American Speech 3. 83–113.10.2307/451510Search in Google Scholar

Svartengren, Torsten H. 1928. The use of the personal gender for inanimate things. Dialect Notes 6. 7–56.Search in Google Scholar

Svartengren, Torsten H. 1954. The use of the feminine gender for inanimate things in American colloquial English. Moderna Sprak 48. 261–292.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne. 2003. Gender in English pronouns: Myth and reality. Freiburg: University of Freiburg PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne. 2005. Gender in English pronouns: Southwest England. In Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Herrmann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner (eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses, 211–367. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197518.211Search in Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn F. 1975. Language and history in Cornwall. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn F. 1986. The Southwest of England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.t5Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. 2002. Sexism in grammar: The semantics of gender in Australian English. Anthropological Linguistics 44(2). 143–177.Search in Google Scholar

Revised: 2014-2-9
Revised: 2015-2-25
Accepted: 2015-1-23
Accepted: 2015-5-14
Published Online: 2015-11-10
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2015-0013/html
Scroll to top button