Abstract
The Health and Retirement Study is an amazing resource for those studying aging in the United States, and a fantastic model for other countries who have created similar longitudinal studies. The raw amount of information, from data on income, wealth, and use of health services to employment, retirement, and family connections on to the collection of clinical biomarkers can be both empowering and overwhelming to a researcher. Luckily through the process of engagement with the research community and constant improvement, these reams of data are not only consistently growing in a thoughtful and focused direction, they are also explained and summarized to increase the ease of use for all. One of the very useful areas of the HRS is the Contextual Data File (CDF), which is the focus of this review. The CDF provides access to easy-to-use helpful community-level data in a secure environment that has allowed researchers to answer questions that would have otherwise been difficult or impossible to tackle. The current CDF includes data in six categories (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. 2017. HRS Data Book: The Health and Retirement Study: Aging in the 21st Century, Challenges and Opportunities for Americans. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Also available at https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book, 17): 1. Socio-economic Status and Demographic Structure 2. Psychosocial Stressors 3. Health Care 4. Physical Hazards 5. Amenities 6. Land Use and the Built Environment. Each of these areas have allowed researchers to answer interesting questions such as what is the impact of air pollution on cognition in older adults (Ailshire, J., and K. M. Walsemann. 2021. “Education Differences in the Adverse Impact of PM 2.5 on Incident Cognitive Impairment Among U.S. Older Adults.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 79 (2): 615–25), the impact of neighborhood characteristics on obesity in older adults (Grafova, I. B., V. A. Freedman, R. Kumar, and J. Rogowski. 2008. “Neighborhoods and Obesity in Later Life.” American Journal of Public Health 98: 2065–71), or even what do we gain from introducing contextual data to a survey analysis (Wilkinson, L. R., K. F. Ferraro, and B. R. Kemp. 2017. “Contextualization of Survey Data: What Do We Gain and Does it Matter?” Research in Human Development 14 (3): 234–52)? My review focuses on the potential to expand contextual data in a few of these areas. From new data sets developed and released by the U.S. Census Bureau, to improved measurements of climate and environmental risk, there are numerous new data sources that would be a boon to the research community if they were joined together with the HRS. The following section begins by breaking down the opportunity provided by community or place-based data before moving on to specific recommendations for new data that could be included in the HRS contextual data file.
Funding source: National Institute on Aging
References
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2021. CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index. Also available at https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html.Search in Google Scholar
Ailshire, J., and K. M. Walsemann. 2021. “Education Differences in the Adverse Impact of PM 2.5 on Incident Cognitive Impairment Among U.S. Older Adults.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 79 (2): 615–25, https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200765.Search in Google Scholar
Al-rousan, T. M., L. M. Rubenstein, and R. B. Wallace. 2014. “Preparedness for Natural Disasters Among Older US Adults: A Nationwide Survey.” American Journal of Public Health 104 (3): 506–11, https://doi.org/10.d2105/AJPH.2013.301559.10.2105/AJPH.2013.301559Search in Google Scholar
City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department. 2019. The Harvey Data Project: City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department. Also available at https://www.civisanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CityOfHoston_Report_Website-1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Climate Check. n.d. How We Calculate Risk. San Francisco, CA. https://climatecheck.com/our-methodologies (accessed November 1, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Cox, K., and B. R. Kim. 2018. “Race and Income Disparities in Disaster Preparedness in Old Age.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 61 (7): 719–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1489929.Search in Google Scholar
Eviction Lab. 2018. Eviction Lab: Methodology Report. Also available at https://evictionlab.org/docs/Eviction%20Lab%20Methodology%20Report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Eviction Lab. 2021. Eviction Tracking System Methodology. Princeton, NJ. https://evictionlab.org/eviction-tracking/methods/ (last modified August 25, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
First Street Foundation. n.d. First Street Foundation Research Lab. New York, NY. https://firststreet.org/research-lab/ (accessed November 1, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
First Street Foundation. 2020. First Street Foundation Flood Model: Technical Methodology Document. New York, NY. Also available at https://assets.firststreet.org/uploads/2020/06/FSF_Flood_Model_Technical_Documentation.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
First Street Foundation. 2021. Press Release: First Street Partners with Pyregence Consortium to Build First Property Specific, Climate Adjusted Fire Risk Model. New York, NY. https://firststreet.org/press/press-release-2021-pyregence-partnership/ (accessed November 1, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, E. M., J. N. Houle, K. A. Cagney, M. E. Slaughter, and R. A. Shih. 2021. “The Foreclosure Crisis, Community Change, and the Cognitive Health of Older Adults.” The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 76 (5): 956–67, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa047.Search in Google Scholar
Grafova, I. B., V. A. Freedman, R. Kumar, and J. Rogowski. 2008. “Neighborhoods and Obesity in Later Life.” American Journal of Public Health 98: 2065–71, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.127712.Search in Google Scholar
Mawhorter, S., E. M. Crimmins, and J. A. Ailshire. 2021. “Housing and Cardiometabolic Risk Among Older Renters and Homeowners.” Housing Studies June: 1–23, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1941792.Search in Google Scholar
National Flood Insurance Program. 2021. Risk Rating 2.0 Methodology and Data Sources. Also available at https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_risk-rating-2.0-methodology-data-sources_4-21.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Shih, R. A., J. D. Acosta, E. K. Chen, E. G. Carbone, L. Xenakis, D. M. Adamson, and A. Chandra. 2018. Improving Disaster Resilience Among Older Adults: Insights from Public Health Departments and Aging-in-Place Efforts. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Also available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2313.html.10.7249/RB10001Search in Google Scholar
Shin, S. H., and H. Ji. 2021. “Health Risks of Natural Hazards and Resilience Resources: Evidence from a U.S. Nationwide Longitudinal Study.” Social Science & Medicine 281: 114110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114110.Search in Google Scholar
University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. 2017. HRS Data Book: The Health and Retirement Study: Aging in the 21st Century, Challenges and Opportunities for Americans. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Also available at https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book.Search in Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 2020. Community Resilience Estimates: Quick Guide. Also available at https://www2.census.gov/data/experimental-data-products/community-resilience-estimates/2020/technical-document.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 2021. 2019 Community Resilience Estimates: Quick Guide. Also available at https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/technical-documentation/community-resilience/2019/cre_quickguide_2019.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. R., K. F. Ferraro, and B. R. Kemp. 2017. “Contextualization of Survey Data: What Do We Gain and Does it Matter?” Research in Human Development 14 (3): 234–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1340049.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Preface: Expert Advice to Enhance Aging Research and the Health and Retirement Study
- Future Directions for the HRS Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol
- The Health and Retirement Study: Contextual Data Augmentation
- Reducing Nonresponse and Data Linkage Consent Bias in Large-Scale Panel Surveys
- Enhancing the Utility of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to Identify Drivers of Rising Mortality Rates in the United States
- Using the Health and Retirement Study for Research on the Impact of the Working Conditions on the Individual Life Course
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Preface: Expert Advice to Enhance Aging Research and the Health and Retirement Study
- Future Directions for the HRS Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol
- The Health and Retirement Study: Contextual Data Augmentation
- Reducing Nonresponse and Data Linkage Consent Bias in Large-Scale Panel Surveys
- Enhancing the Utility of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to Identify Drivers of Rising Mortality Rates in the United States
- Using the Health and Retirement Study for Research on the Impact of the Working Conditions on the Individual Life Course