Abstract
Personalized medicine is best viewed from a broad perspective of trying to use information about a patient to improve care. While “personalized medicine” often emphasizes the value of genetic information, traditional clinical approaches to personalizing care based on patient phenotype, provider and system-level factors should not be neglected. As these diverse approaches to personalization are examined, tools such as cost-effectiveness analysis can provide important insights into the value of these approaches, strategies for their implementation and dissemination, and priorities for future research. Such analyses are likely to be most insightful if they recognize that patient and provider behaviors are essential determinants of the value of treatments and that patient factors in particular may have large effects on the value of treatments and the need for interventions to improve decision making. These comments suggest three major areas of opportunity for economic analyses of personalized medicine: (1) traditional clinical approaches to personalized medicine, (2) multi-perspective studies of the benefits and costs of personalized medicine, and (3) the role of behavior in the value of personalized medicine.
- 1
- 2
See, for example, the University of Chicago project on the use of Comprehensive Care Physicians, funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, http://www.uchospitals.edu/news/2012/20120710-innovation-grant.html.
References
Basu, A. and D. O. Meltzer (2007) “Value of Information on Preference Heterogeneity and Individualized Care,” Medical Decision Making, 27:112–127.10.1177/0272989X06297393Search in Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. O., E. Huang, L. Jin, M. Shook and M. Chin (2002) “Effects of Self-Selection on Medical Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Impact in Intensive Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among the Elderly,” Medical Decision Making, 22:535.Search in Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. O., T. Hoomans, J. W. Chung and A. Basu (2011) “Minimal Modeling Approaches to Value of Information Analysis for Health Research,” Medical Decision Making, 31:E1–E22.10.1177/0272989X11412975Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, G., J. Freeman, D. Zhang and J. S. Goodwin (2009) “Continuity of Care and Intensive Care Unit Use at the End of Life,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 169:81–86.10.1001/archinternmed.2008.514Search in Google Scholar
Wasson, J. H., A. E. Sauvigne, R. Mogielnicki, W. G. Frey, C. H. Sox, C. Gaudette and A. Rockwell (1984) “Continuity of Outpatient Medical Care in Elderly Men: A Randomized Trial,” Journal of The American Medical Association, 252:2413–2417.10.1001/jama.1984.03350170015011Search in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Economics of Personalized Health Care and Prevention: Introduction
- Opportunities in the Economics of Personalized Health Care and Prevention
- Economic Perspectives on Personalized Health Care and Prevention
- The Economics of Personalization in Prevention and Public Health
- Personalized Medicine in the Context of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- The Value of Diagnostic Testing in Personalized Medicine
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Economics of Personalized Health Care and Prevention: Introduction
- Opportunities in the Economics of Personalized Health Care and Prevention
- Economic Perspectives on Personalized Health Care and Prevention
- The Economics of Personalization in Prevention and Public Health
- Personalized Medicine in the Context of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- The Value of Diagnostic Testing in Personalized Medicine