Abstract
Based on the social network analysis theory and employing multivariate linear regression, this study empirically examines the effect of network location of independent directors in China’s listed companies on the efficiency of capital allocation of the enterprises, using a research sample of China’s A-share companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges over the period of 2013–2016. The research shows that the higher the network centrality of independent directors, the more it can improve the inefficient investment of enterprises and enhance the efficiency of capital allocation. Specifically, as the investment inefficiency is divided into under-investment and over-investment, the findings show that the more central the independent directors are in the director network, the better, which not only can suppress the over-investment of enterprises, but also can effectively alleviate the under-investment of enterprises. Based on the further study of nature of the enterprises’ property rights, in comparison with that of state-owned enterprises, the network centrality of independent directors of private-owned enterprises plays a more significant role in improving the efficiency of corporate investment.
References
Chen, Y. S. 2012a. “The Network Attributes of Independent Directors and Firm’s Agency Costs.” Business Management Journal 34 (10): 67–76.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Y. S. 2012b. “Network Centrality of Independent Directors and Firm’s Information Disclosure Quality.” Auditing Research 05: 92–100.Search in Google Scholar
Chhaochharia, V., and Y. Grinstein 2007. “Corporate Governance and Firm Value?: The Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules.” The Journal of Finance 62: 1789, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01257.xSearch in Google Scholar
Duan, H. Y. 2012. “Study on the Relationship Among Interlocking Directorates Organizational Slacks and Firm’s Innovation Performance.” Studies in Science of Science 30 (04): 631–40.Search in Google Scholar
Duchin, R., J. G. Matsusaka, and O. Ozbas. 2010. “When Are Outside Directors Effective?” Journal of Financial Economics 96 (2): 195–214, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004.10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004Search in Google Scholar
Fazzari, S. M., R. G. Hubbard, and B. C. Peterson. 1998. “Financing Constrains and Corporate Investment” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (1): 141–195, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004.10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004Search in Google Scholar
Forbes, D. P., F. J. Milliken. 1999. “Cognition and Corporate Governance. Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups.” Academy of Management Review 1999 (3): 496, http://doi.org/10.2307/259138.10.2307/259138Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Network: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Network 1 (3): 215–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7Search in Google Scholar
Fu, D. G., and C.Y. Xia. 2014. “Web Location Supervision Power of Independent Director and Quality of Earnings Information.” Audit & Economy Research 29 (02): 67–75+84, http://doi.org/10.1086/228311.10.1086/228311Search in Google Scholar
Gao, M. H., and Y.N. Tan. 2014. “Board Governance Ownership Nature of the Ultimate Controller and Agency Cost.” Research on Economics and Management 2: 5–13.Search in Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure. The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.10.1086/228311Search in Google Scholar
Helmers, C., M. Patnam, and P. R. Rau. 2017. “Do Board In⁃terlocks Increase Innovation? Evidence from a Corporate Governance Reform in India.” Journal of Banking & Finance 80: 51–70, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and S. N. Kaplan. 2003. “The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15 (3): 8–20.10.3386/w9613Search in Google Scholar
Leung, S., G. Richardson, and B. Jaggi. 2014. “Corporate Board and Board Committee Independence, Firm Performance, and Family Ownership Concentration: An Analysis Based on Hong Kong firms.” Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 10 (1): 16–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.002.10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Liang, T., and C. Y. Xia. 2014. “Theoretical Analysis on Independent Directors’ Governance Effect---Based on Perspective of Social Network.” Economist 3: 103–4.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, C. C., and S. H. Chen. 2009. “Reconstruction of Broken Links: Interlocking Directors and Their Organizational Functions.” Management World 5: 152–65.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 2006. “Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow.” Review of Accounting Studies 11 (2): 159–89, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1.10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1Search in Google Scholar
Schonlau, R., and P. V. Singh. 2009. Board Network and merger performance. University of Washington, Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar
Sha, H. W., and Y. Zeng. 2016. “Network Position and Investment Efficiency of Enterprise: Based on Perspective of Cross-shareholding.” Technology Economics 35 (01): 110–8.Search in Google Scholar
Stephen, C. V. 1994. “ The Cash Flow/Investment Relationship: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms.” Financial Management 23 (2): 2–20.10.2307/3665735Search in Google Scholar
Wan, L. Y., and J. Hu. 2014. “Network Position, Governance Roles of Independent Directors and M & A: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies.” Nankai Business Review 17 (02): 64–73.Search in Google Scholar
Wan, L. Y., L. Deng, and X. L. Zheng. 2014. “Network Position, Independent Directors’ Governance and Firm Violation.” Journal of Systems Science and Information 34 (12): 3091–102.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Y., and G. L Zhang. 2018. “Network of Directors and Enterprise Innovation: Attracting Investment and Wisdom.” Financial Research (6): 189–206.Search in Google Scholar
Xie, D. R., and Y. S. Chen. 2012. “Directorate Network: Definition.” Characteristics and Measurement Accounting Research 3: 44–51.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, N., and C. F. Cao. 2016. “Independent Directors’ Network and Chinese Listed Firms’ Cash.” Holding Nankai Economic Research 6: 106–25, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309082.10.2139/ssrn.2309082Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Opportunity Recognition: Conversational Foundations and Pathways Ahead
- The Mechanism of Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks on Innovative Startups’ Innovation Performance Considering the Moderating Effect of the Entrepreneurial Competence and Motivation
- The Impact of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Advances on Small Business Lending by Community Banks—2010–2016
- Learning, Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Performance: The Case of Entrepreneurial Firms in the South Korean Fashion Industry
- Uncovering the Cultural Beliefs in a Nascent Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
- Director Network, Governance of Independent Directors and Efficiency of Enterprise Capital Allocation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Opportunity Recognition: Conversational Foundations and Pathways Ahead
- The Mechanism of Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks on Innovative Startups’ Innovation Performance Considering the Moderating Effect of the Entrepreneurial Competence and Motivation
- The Impact of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Advances on Small Business Lending by Community Banks—2010–2016
- Learning, Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Performance: The Case of Entrepreneurial Firms in the South Korean Fashion Industry
- Uncovering the Cultural Beliefs in a Nascent Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
- Director Network, Governance of Independent Directors and Efficiency of Enterprise Capital Allocation