Home The 𝑛𝑝-Chart with 3-𝜎 Limits and the ARL-Unbiased 𝑛𝑝-Chart Revisited
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The 𝑛𝑝-Chart with 3-𝜎 Limits and the ARL-Unbiased 𝑛𝑝-Chart Revisited

  • Manuel Cabral Morais ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Philipp Wittenberg ORCID logo and Camila Jeppesen Cruz
Published/Copyright: October 27, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the statistical process control literature, counts of nonconforming items are frequently assumed to be independent and have a binomial distribution with parameters ( n , p ) , where 𝑛 and 𝑝 represent the fixed sample size and the fraction nonconforming. In this paper, the traditional n ⁒ p -chart with 3-𝜎 control limits is reexamined. We show that, even if its lower control limit is positive and we are dealing with a small target value p 0 of the fraction nonconforming ( p ) , this chart average run length (ARL) function achieves a maximum to the left of p 0 . Moreover, the in-control ARL of this popular chart is also shown to vary considerably with the fixed sample size 𝑛. We also look closely at the ARL function of the ARL-unbiased n ⁒ p -chart proposed by Morais [An ARL-unbiased n ⁒ p -chart, Econ. Qual. Control 31 (2016), 1, 11–21], which attains a pre-specified maximum value in the in-control situation. This chart triggers a signal at sample 𝑑 with probability one if the observed number of nonconforming items, x t , is beyond the lower and upper control limits (𝐿 and π‘ˆ), probability Ξ³ L (resp. Ξ³ U ) if x t coincides with 𝐿 (resp. π‘ˆ). A graphical display for the ARL-unbiased n ⁒ p -chart is proposed, taking advantage of the qcc package for the statistical software R. Furthermore, as far as we have investigated, its control limits can be obtained using three different search algorithms; their computation times are thoroughly compared.

MSC 2010: 62P30

Award Identifier / Grant number: UIDB/04621/2020

Award Identifier / Grant number: UIDP/04621/2020

Funding statement: The first author acknowledges the financial support of the Portuguese FCT – FundaΓ§Γ£o para a CiΓͺncia e a Tecnologia, through the projects UIDB/04621/2020 and UIDP/04621/2020 of CEMAT/IST-ID (Center for Computational and Stochastic Mathematics), Instituto Superior TΓ©cnico, Universidade de Lisboa.

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to the referee(s) who selflessly devoted his/her(their) time to review our work.

References

[1] C. A. Acosta-MejΓ­a, Improved p-charts to monitor process quality, IIE Trans. 31 (1999), 509–516. 10.1080/07408179908969854Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. A. Argoti and A. C. GarcΓ­a, A novel approach for estimating the ARL-bias severity of Shewhart p-charts, Int. J. Qual. Res. 12 (2018), 209–226. Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. J. Cruz, Cartas com ARL sem viΓ©s para processos i.i.d. e AR(1) com marginais binomiais (On ARL-unbiased charts for i.i.d. and AR(1) binomial counts), Master’s thesis, Department of Mathematics, Instituto Superior TΓ©cnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. J. Geyer and G. D. Meeden, ump: An r package for ump and umpu tests, 2004, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ump. Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. J. Geyer and G. D. Meeden, Fuzzy and randomized confidence intervals and 𝑃-values, Statist. Sci. 20 (2005), no. 4, 358–387. 10.1214/088342305000000340Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. J. Geyer and G. D. Meeden, Design of the ump package, 2017, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ump/vignettes/design.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. L. Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1959. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. C. Morais, An ARL-unbiased n ⁒ p -chart, Econ. Qual. Control 31 (2016), no. 1, 11–21. 10.1515/eqc-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

[9] F. Pascual, EWMA charts for the Weibull shape parameter, J. Qual. Technol. 42 (2010), 400–416. 10.1080/00224065.2010.11917836Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Paulino, M. C. Morais and S. Knoth, An ARL-unbiased c-chart, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 32 (2016), 2847–2858. 10.1002/qre.1969Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Paulino, M. C. Morais and S. Knoth, On ARL-unbiased c-charts for INAR(1) Poisson counts, Statist. Papers 60 (2019), no. 4, 1021–1038. 10.1007/s00362-016-0861-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. J. Pignatiello, Jr., C. A. Acosta and B. V. Rao, The performance of control charts for monitoring process dispersion, 4th Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, Peachtree Corners (1995), 320–328. Search in Google Scholar

[13] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R foundation for statistical computing, 2022, Vienna, https://www.R-project.org/. Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. P. Ryan, Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989. Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. P. Ryan, Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011. 10.1002/9781118058114Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. P. Ryan and N. C. Schwertman, Optimal limits for attribute control charts, J. Qual. Technol. 29 (1997), 86–98. 10.1080/00224065.1997.11979728Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. Scrucca, qcc: an R package for quality control charting and statistical process control, R News 4 (2004), 11–17. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-01
Accepted: 2022-10-02
Published Online: 2022-10-27
Published in Print: 2022-12-01

Β© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eqc-2022-0032/pdf
Scroll to top button