Abstract
The major problem in analyzing control charts is to work with autocorrelated data. This problem can be solved by fitting a suitable model to the data and using the control chart for the residuals. The problem becomes very important, when the distribution of observation is nonnormal, in addition to being autocorrelated. Much recent research has focused on the development of appropriate statistical process control techniques for the autocorrelated data or nonnormal distribution, but few studies have considered monitoring the process mean of both nonnormal and autocorrelated data. In this paper, a simulation study is conducted to compare the performances of the control chart based on the median absolute deviation method (MAD) with those of existing control charts for the skew normal distribution. Simulation results indicate considerable improvement over existing control charts for nonnormal data can be achieved when the control charts with control limits based on the MAD method are used to monitor the process mean of nonnormal autocorrelated data.
References
[1] M. O. A. Abu-Shawiesh, A simple robust control chart based on MAD, J. Math. Stat. 4 (2008), no. 2, 102–107. 10.3844/jmssp.2008.102.107Search in Google Scholar
[2] K. S. Adekeye and P. I. Azubuike, Derivation of the limits for control chart using the median absolute deviation for monitoring non-normal process, J. Math. Stat. 8 (2012), 37–41. 10.3844/jmssp.2012.37.41Search in Google Scholar
[3] L. C. Alwan and H. V. Roberts, Time series modeling for statistical process control, J. Business Econ. Stat. 6 (1998), 87–95. Search in Google Scholar
[4] D. S. Bai and I. S. Choi, X and R control charts for skewed populations, Korea Adv. Inst. Sci. Technol. 27 (1995), 120–131. Search in Google Scholar
[5] I. W. Burr, The effect of non-normality on constants for X and R charts, Indust. Qual. Control 23 (1967), 563–568. Search in Google Scholar
[6]
L. K. Chan and H. J. Cui,
Skewness correction
[7] F. Choobineh and J. L. Ballard, Control limits of QC charts for skewed distribution using weighted-variance, IEEE Trans. Reliability 36 (1987), 473–477. 10.1109/TR.1987.5222442Search in Google Scholar
[8] F. Choobineh and D. Branting, A simple approximation for semivariance, European J. Oper. Res. 27 (1986), no. 3, 364–370. 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90332-2Search in Google Scholar
[9] T. J. Harris and W. H. Ross, Statistical process control procedures for correlated observations, Canad. J. Chem. Eng. 69 (1991), 48–57. 10.1002/cjce.5450690106Search in Google Scholar
[10] W. S. Lin and B. M. Adams, Combined control chart for forecast based monitoring schemes, J. Qual. Technol. 28 (1996), no. 3, 289–301. 10.1080/00224065.1996.11979679Search in Google Scholar
[11] D. C. Montgomery and C. M. Mastrangelo, Some statistical process control methods for autocorrelated data, J. Qual. Technol. 23 (1991), no. 3, 179–193. 10.1080/00224065.1991.11979321Search in Google Scholar
[12]
E. G. Schilling and P. R. Nelson,
Effect of non-normality on the control limits of
[13] W. Schmid, On the run length of a Shewhart chart for correlated data, Statist. Papers 36 (1995), no. 2, 111–130. 10.1007/BF02926025Search in Google Scholar
[14] A. V. Vasilopoulos and A. P. Stamboulis, Modification of control chart limits in the presence of data correlation, J. Qual. Technol. 10 (1978), no. 1, 20–30. 10.1080/00224065.1978.11980809Search in Google Scholar
[15] J. E. Wieringa, Statistical process control for serially correlated data, Ph.D. thesis, University of Labyrint Publication, 1999. Search in Google Scholar
[16]
C. Wu, Y. Zhao and Z. Wang,
The median absolute deviations and their applications to Shewhart
[17] S. A. Yourstone and W. J. Zimmer, Non-normality and the design of control charts for averages, Decision Sci. 23 (1992), no. 5, 1099–1113. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1992.tb00437.xSearch in Google Scholar
[18] N. F. Zhang, A statistical control chart for stationary process data, Technometrics 40 (1998), no. 1, 24–38. 10.1080/00401706.1998.10485479Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston