Abstract
Monocyclopentadienyl titanium complexes of the type Cp*TiX2 L (Cp*=C5 Me5, 1: L=C6 F5 S, X=OMe; 2: L=C6 F5 S, X=Cl; 3: L=2, 6-Me2-C6 H3 S, X=OMe) have been synthesized with high yields. These complexes are used as the catalysts for the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. High catalytic activity is observed, and a polymer with high molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distribution is obtained. It is concluded that not only the sulfur-containing donor ligand but also the anion ligand strongly affects the polymerization activity and the molecular weight of the resultant polymer.
1 Introduction
Syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) is a novel synthetic material with the characteristics of low specific gravity, low dielectric constant, high modulus of elasticity and excellent resistance to water and chemicals (1). Since Ishihara succeeded in the synthesis of sPS with a half-titanocene catalyst (Cp′TiX3) (2, 3), many efforts were devoted to the development of suitable catalytic systems for the synthesis of sPS (4–8). As the importance of Cp′ ligand on the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene was fully realized, the influence of X ligand was also taken into account. For example, the half-titanocene fluoride exhibited higher activity than the half-titanocene chloride, resulting in an sPS with higher molecular weight (9, 10). A series of reports showed that the complex of the type Cp′TiX2 L (L=donor ligand, e.g., phenoxy, amido) is a promising catalyst for olefin polymerization (11, 12). The catalyst is also efficient for the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. It has been concluded that the structure of donor ligand strongly affects not only the catalytic activity but also the molecular weight of the resulting sPS (13–18).
The synthesis of the half-metallocene complex containing a sulfide has been well described in previous researches (19, 20), and the use of this type of compound as a catalyst for ethylene polymerization is patented (21). Herein, we present our design of a series of sulfur-containing half-titanocenes and the preliminary studies on the syndiospecific styrene polymerization.
2 Experimental
2.1 General procedure
All experiments were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere using the standard Schlenk techniques unless otherwise specified. Toluene was distilled in the presence of sodium and benzophenone under a nitrogen atmosphere and was stored in a Schlenk tube in a dry box over molecular sieves. Styrene (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) was distilled in the presence of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) under reduced pressure before use. Methylaluminoxane solution (MAO, 10 wt% Al in toluene) was purchased from Albemarle (LA, USA) and used as received. Other chemicals were used as received. Molecular weights and molecular weight distributions (MWDs) for the polymers were measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with a polystyrene gel column at 140°C using o-dichlorobenzene (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) as the eluent. The molecular weight was calculated by a standard procedure based on the calibration with standard polystyrene samples.
2.2 Syntheses
Syntheses of the half-titanocene complexes are illustrated in Scheme 1.
Synthesis of complex 1: In a 250-ml three-neck flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar under a nitrogen atmosphere, 1.80 g of pentamethylcyclopentadienyltitanium trimethoxide (Strem, MA, USA) [Cp*Ti(OCH3)3, 6.52 mmol], 50 ml of toluene and 1.30 g of pentafluorobenzenethiol (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) (C6 F5 SH, 6.52 mmol) were introduced in this sequence. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. A yellow powder (2.1 g) was obtained with a yield of 72%. Some of this product was dissolved in a small amount of toluene. After freezing, a yellow prism crystallized. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 25°C): δ=2.12(15H), 3.96(6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 25°C): δ=162, 148, 140, 1 37, 105[C5(CH3)5 and C6 F5], 38[OCH3), 13(C5(CH3)5]. Elemental analysis: calcd. C 48.66, H, 4.76; found C 48.68, H 4.81.
Synthesis of complex 2: In a 50-ml Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar under a nitrogen atmosphere, 0.75 g of complex 1 was dissolved in 5 ml of toluene, and 0.7 ml of chlorotrimethylsilane (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) was added to the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 days at room temperature, and the reaction was allowed to proceed at 70°C for 4 h. The solvent was removed in vacuum, and the residue was dissolved with a mixture of toluene/hexane. After freezing, orange crystals were obtained with a yield of 82%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 25°C): δ=2.28. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 25°C): δ=161, 148, 140, 134, 105[C5(CH3)5 and C6 F5], 14[C5(CH3)5].
Synthesis of complex 3: In a 250-ml three-neck flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar under a nitrogen atmosphere, 1.0 g of pentamethylcyclopentadienyltitanium trimethoxide [Cp*Ti(OCH3)3, 3.62 mmol], 50 ml of toluene, and 0.50 g of 2,6-dimethylbenzenethiol (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) (2,6-Me2-C6 H3 SH, 3.62 mmol) were introduced. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. A yellow powder (1.33 g) was obtained with a yield of 96%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 25°C): δ=2.10(15H), 2.31(6H), 3.77(6H), 6.88–7.02(3H).

Syntheses of the complexes.
All NMR spectra of the complexes are available in the Supplementary Material.
2.3 Polymerization
Styrene polymerization was carried out in a 250-ml glass reactor equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. Calculated amounts of toluene, styrene and MAO solution were charged in the reactor under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated to the predetermined temperature in an oil bath. The polymerization reaction started after the catalyst solution was injected. After the needed polymerization time, the reaction was terminated by adding approximately 200 ml of acidified ethanol. The polymer was isolated after the mixture was stirred for 6 h and dried in vacuum at 60°C. The dried polymer was treated in boiling butanone for 2 h to remove the atactic polystyrene produced by MAO. The hot mixture was filtered to isolate the polymer. The polymer was dried in vacuum at 60°C for at least 24 h to obtain sPS.
13C NMR experiments for some typical polymer samples were performed on a Bruker AVANCE III 400-MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) using d2-1,1,2,2,-tetrachloroethane as the solvent at 125°C, δ=43.3, 46.5, 127.6, 129.9, 147.5. The 13C NMR spectrum of polymer sample 7 is shown in Figure 1.

13C NMR spectrum of sample 7.
The melting temperature and the glass transition temperature of polymer were determined on a TAQ 100 (TA, DE, USA). Approximately 2 mg of polymer sample was heated from room temperature to 300°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere. After keeping the temperature for 1 min, the sample was cooled down to room temperature, and the temperature was again kept for 1 min. Then, the sample was heated to 300°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min and the data were recorded.
The molecular weight was determined by GPC on a Waters Alliance GPCV2000 (Waters, MA, USA) at 150°C with 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene as the eluent. GPC curves of some selected polymer samples are shown in the Supplementary Material.
3 Results and discussion
The complexes were easily synthesized using the procedures shown in Scheme 1, with high yields. The complexes Cp*Ti(C6 F5 S)(OCH3)2 (1), Cp*Ti(C6 F5 S)Cl2 (2) and Cp*Ti(2,6-Me2 C6 H3 S) (OCH3)2 (3) were used as the catalysts combined with MAO for styrene polymerization and the results are collected in Table 1.
Styrene polymerization by complexes 1, 2 and 3.a
Run | Cat. | Al/Ti | t (min) | T (°C) | sPS (g) | Activityb | Mw (104)c | MWDc | Tm (°C) | Tg (°C)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 500 | 20 | 70 | 0.12 | 0.72 | 18.59 | 1.99 | 271 | 98 |
2 | 1 | 1000 | 20 | 70 | 0.28 | 1.68 | 25.14 | 2.05 | 271 | 101 |
3 | 1 | 2000 | 20 | 70 | 0.34 | 2.04 | 28.77 | 2.23 | 271 | 100 |
4 | 1 | 3000 | 20 | 70 | 0.29 | 1.74 | 29.57 | 2.19 | 271 | 98 |
5 | 1 | 2000 | 10 | 70 | 0.21 | 2.52 | 13.13 | 2.29 | 271 | 99 |
6 | 1 | 2000 | 30 | 70 | 0.69 | 2.76 | 21.41 | 2.09 | 270 | 101 |
7 | 1 | 2000 | 20 | 90 | 0.98 | 5.88 | 21.94 | 1.93 | 270 | 99 |
8 | 2 | 1000 | 20 | 70 | 0.13 | 0.78 | 16.74 | 1.65 | 267 | 85 |
9 | 2 | 2000 | 20 | 70 | 0.29 | 1.74 | 21.52 | 1.57 | 268 | 88 |
10 | 2 | 2000 | 20 | 90 | 0.57 | 3.42 | 16.01 | 2.32 | 270 | 96 |
11 | 3 | 2000 | 20 | 70 | 0.41 | 2.46 | 25.79 | 2.14 | 270 | 99 |
12 | 3 | 1000 | 20 | 70 | 0.57 | 3.42 | 31.59 | 2.03 | 270 | 100 |
13 | 3 | 2000 | 20 | 90 | 1.01 | 6.06 | 19.91 | 2.01 | 270 | 100 |
aPolymerization conditions: catalyst 5.0 μmol, MAO cocatalyst, in toluene, styrene 7.0 ml, total volume 15.0 ml.
bActivity in 105 g sPS/mol Ti per hour.
cGPC data.
dDSC data.
All polymerization runs showed high activities for styrene syndiospecific polymerization when complexes 1, 2 and 3 were used as catalysts combined with MAO, resulting in polymer samples with high molecular weight and narrow MWD. The effects of Al/Ti ratio, polymerization temperature and polymerization time on the activities and molecular weight were investigated.
It was found that the Al/Ti ratio highly affected the activities when complexes 1 and 2 were used as the catalysts. When the Al/Ti ratio increased from 500 to 2000, the activity of complex 1 was enhanced almost three times (run 1 vs. 3: from 0.72×105 to 2.04×105 g sPS/mol Ti per hour). Further increase in Al/Ti ratio gave a decreased activity (run 4: 1.74×105 g sPS/mol Ti per hour). Similar results were observed in the polymerization runs with complex 2 (run 8 vs. 9). However, when complex 3 was used as the catalyst, higher activity was observed at lower Al/Ti ratio (run 11 vs. 12). The results seem to be unusual. In studies on the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene by CpTiCl2 X (X=OR) catalyst, similar results were obtained. The probable reason is that anionic OR participates in the formation of the active center, and under the condition of the low concentration of MAO, the function of the alkoxyl group is much stronger than that of the high MAO concentration (22).
Higher activity was achieved at a higher polymerization temperature for all catalyst systems (complex 1: runs 3 and 7; complex 2: runs 9 and 10; complex 3: runs 12 and 13). The activities with different polymerization times were observed as changing a little for complex 1 (runs 5, 3 and 6), indicating that the catalytic species remain stable under these conditions.
Under the same polymerization conditions, complex 3 exhibited the highest activities regardless of the Al/Ti ratios and polymerization temperatures used. Complex 2 gave the lowest activities under any conditions. The reason for this observation still remains unclear, but it could be concluded that both the donor ligand (complex 1 vs. 3) and the anion ligand (complex 1 vs. 2) affect the polymerization activity.
MWDs of the polymer samples were observed from 1.57 to 2.32, which indicated the nature of the single-site catalyst. High molecular weight of the resultant polymer was obtained at high Al/Ti ratio and low polymerization temperature, which may indicate that β-H elimination is the main transfer reaction rather than the transfer reaction to aluminum. Polymer synthesized by complexes 1 and 3 showed higher molecular weight than that by complex 2, indicating the influence of catalyst structure on the molecular weight. It should be noted that the molecular weight of a polymer sample obtained under the polymerization time of 20 min by complex 1 (run 3) is almost double that of the sample obtained with half polymerization time (run 5). It is a pity that the continuous increase of the molecular weight under a longer polymerization time was not observed (run 6), and all the MWDs were exhibited to be approximately 2.
The melting temperature and the glass-transition temperature of polymer were determined and are listed in Table 1. Complexes 1 and 3 give polymers with similar Tm and Tg; at the same time, both the melting temperature and the glass transition temperature of polymer produced by complex 2 are lower. It may indicate that complexes 1 and 3 have stronger syndiospecifity than complex 2.
4 Conclusion
We have shown for the first time that monocyclopentadienyl titanium complexes containing a sulfide donor ligand are efficient catalysts for the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. Styrene polymerization catalyzed by these complexes exhibits high activity, affording a syndiotactic product with high molecular weight and narrow MWD. We also find the dependency of molecular weight of polymer on the polymerization time in some experiments; thus we have the interest to explore this in more detail in the future, and we will also focus on ethylene polymerization and copolymerization using this type of catalyst.
References
1. Tomotsu N, Ishihara N. Novel catalysts for syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. Catal Surv Jpn. 1997;1(1):89–110.10.1023/A:1019072829203Search in Google Scholar
2. Ishihara N, Seimiya T, Kuramoto M, Uoi M. Crystalline syndiotactic polystyrene. Macromolecules. 1986;19(9):2464–5.10.1021/ma00163a027Search in Google Scholar
3. Ready TE, Day RO, Chien JCW, Rausch MD. (η5-Indenyl)trichlorotitanium. An improved syndiotactic polymerization catalyst for styrene. Macromolecules. 1993;26(21):5822–3.10.1021/ma00073a046Search in Google Scholar
4. Hofman M. Carbonaceous materials modified with MAO employed as metallocene supports in syndiotactic polymerization of styrene. Catal Commun. 2010;12(1):30–5.10.1016/j.catcom.2010.07.016Search in Google Scholar
5. Kim J, Yoon S, Mun S, Kim S, Lee J, Chung Y, Kwon S, Lee K, Lee C, Kim YJ. Synthesis, X-ray structures, and syndiospecific polymerization behavior of styrene of new (pentamethylcyclopentadientyl) titanatranes containing modified tetradentate triethanolamine ligands. Organomet Chem. 2011;696(9): 1729–35.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.12.010Search in Google Scholar
6. Rahmani S, Entezami AA. Preparation of tethered half-titanocene complex on cross-linked polystyrene beads for using in syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. J Mol Catal Chem. 2010;320 (1–2):27–33.10.1016/j.molcata.2010.01.001Search in Google Scholar
7. Erben M, Merna J, Hylský O, Kredatusová J, Lyčka A, Dostál L, Padělková Z, Novotný M. Synthesis, characterization and styrene polymerization behavior of alkoxysilyl-substituted monocyclopentadienyltitanium(IV) complexes. J Organomet Chem. 2013;725: 5–10.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2012.11.040Search in Google Scholar
8. Kim S, Yoon S, Mun S, Lee H, Lee J, Kim Y. Tris(4-hydroxy-3,5-diisopropylbenzyl)amine as a new bridging ligand for novel trinuclear titanium complexes. Polyhedron. 2012;31(1):665–70.10.1016/j.poly.2011.10.021Search in Google Scholar
9. Kaminsky W, Lenk S, Scholz V, Roesky HW, Herzog A. Fluorinated half-sandwich complexes as catalysts in syndiospecific styrene polymerization. Macromolecules. 1997;30(25):7647–50.10.1021/ma970601jSearch in Google Scholar
10. Xu G, Ruckenstein E. Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene using fluorinated indenyltitanium complexes. J Polym Sci Polym Chem. 1999;37(14):2481–8.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990715)37:14<2481::AID-POLA22>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar
11. Nomura K, Liu J, Padmanabhan S, Kitiyanan B. Nonbridged half-metallocenes containing anionic ancillary donor ligands: New promising candidates as catalysts for precise olefin polymerization. J Mol Catal Chem. 2007;267(1–2):1–29 and the references therein.10.1016/j.molcata.2006.11.006Search in Google Scholar
12. Wang W, Zheng G. Olefin polymerization with half-metallocene catalyst systems. Prog Chem. 2009;21(4):677–86 and the references therein.Search in Google Scholar
13. Liu J, Ma H, Huang J, Qian Y. Syndiotactic polymerization of styrene with CpTiCl2(OR)/MAO system. Eur Polym J. 2000;36(9):2055–8.10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00249-9Search in Google Scholar
14. Ma H, Chen B, Huang J, Qian Y. Steric and electronic effects of the R in IndTiCl2(OR) catalysts on the syndiospecific polymerization of styrene. J Mol Catal Chem. 2001;170(1–2):67–73.10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00082-6Search in Google Scholar
15. Qian Y, Zhang H, Qian X, Chen B, Huang J. Syndiotactic polymerization of styrene by 1-(Me)IndTiCl2(OR)/MAO system. Eur Polym J. 2002;38(8):1613–8.10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00045-9Search in Google Scholar
16. Byun DJ, Fudo A, Tanaka A, Fujiki M, Nomura K. Effect of cyclopentadienyl and anionic ancillary ligand in syndiospecific styrene polymerization catalyzed by nonbridged half-titanocenes containing aryloxo, amide, and anilide ligands: cocatalyst systems. Macromolecules. 2004; 37(15):5520–30.10.1021/ma049549zSearch in Google Scholar
17. Nomura K, Fujita K, Fujiki M. Effects of cyclopentadienyl fragment in ethylene, 1-hexene, and styrene polymerizations catalyzed by half-titanocenes containing ketimide ligand of the type, Cp′TiCl2(N=CtBu2). Catal Commun. 2004;5(8):413–7.10.1016/j.catcom.2004.05.005Search in Google Scholar
18. Zhang H, Nomura K. Living copolymerization of ethylene with styrene catalyzed by (cyclopentadienyl)(ketimide)titanium(IV) complex-MAO catalyst system. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(26):9364–5.10.1021/ja052198zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Fenwick AE, Fanwick PE, Rothwell IP. Synthesis, characterization, and reduction chemistry of mixed-cyclopentadienyl/arylsulfide titanium dichlorides. Organometallics. 2003;22(3):535–40.10.1021/om020847zSearch in Google Scholar
20. Manz TA, Fenwick AE, Phomphrai K, Rothwell IP, Thomson KT. The nature of aryloxide and arylsulfide ligand bonding in dimethyltitanium complexes containing cyclopentadienyl ligation. Dalton Trans. 2005:668–74.10.1039/b412455cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Watanabe T, Katayama H, Imai A. JP Patent 95-13553 19950131, Jpn Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
22. Ma H, Zhang Y, Chen B, Huang J, Qian Y. Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene catalyzed by CpTiCl2(OR) complexes. J Polym Sci Chem Ed. 2001;18(11):1817–24.10.1002/pola.1159Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Editorial
- Editorial July 2014
- Review
- Sulfonated fluorinated-aromatic polymers as proton exchange membranes
- Full length articles
- Radiation-chemically modified PP/CNT composites
- Effect of annealed titania on dielectric and mechanical properties of ethylene propylene diene monomer-titania nanocomposites
- Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene by half-titanocene catalysts with the sulfur-containing donor ligand
- Toughening poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) with propylene carbonate plasticized poly(propylene carbonate)
- Effect of cross-link density and the healing efficiency of self-healing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Editorial
- Editorial July 2014
- Review
- Sulfonated fluorinated-aromatic polymers as proton exchange membranes
- Full length articles
- Radiation-chemically modified PP/CNT composites
- Effect of annealed titania on dielectric and mechanical properties of ethylene propylene diene monomer-titania nanocomposites
- Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene by half-titanocene catalysts with the sulfur-containing donor ligand
- Toughening poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) with propylene carbonate plasticized poly(propylene carbonate)
- Effect of cross-link density and the healing efficiency of self-healing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel