Abstract
This research article explores the critical role of architecture in space colonisation, focusing on the Mars X-House project, which won NASA’s Phase 3 Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitats on Mars. The study emphasises architectural innovation, resource utilisation, and self-sufficiency. Key architectural considerations include robust materials, effective radiation shielding, advanced life support systems, and renewable energy sources. The Mars X-House project demonstrated success in sustainability, self-sufficiency, and psychological well-being. Future directions highlight the importance of synergetic ecosystems, 3D printing, in situ resource utilisation, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality in space habitat design. The findings offer valuable insights for creating secure, sustainable, and habitable environments for humans in space, reducing reliance on Earth by 50% and enhancing habitat durability by 40%.
1 Introduction
Search for space colonisation is one of the most impressive human intentions. It is associated with a range of issues concerning the human species’ future. More comprehensively, while pondering over the future and looking beyond our planet, the realisation and the settlement of other celestial bodies, Mars in particular, have taken a special place in our lives. Space colonisation presupposed extending human beings all around the Earth, eliminating existential risks, and providing major opportunities and resources for the achievement of this space task [1]. However, there can be the only thing that can stop human beings on their way to space: this is the challenge. The challenges in this way are truly multiple [2]. They range from the severe environment to absolutely specific conditions that turn the possible existence of human beings in space. The solution to these problems is associated with the creation of something new. One of the most important solutions in this area should be related to the architectural design which can provide a sound basis for the development of proper habitats in space [3].
The aim of the present article is to discover and clarify key architectural aspects essential for successful space colonisation. To this end, the design of the Mars X-House, which won the first place in NASA’s Phase 3 Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat competition, is explored in the context of relevant factors of the Martian environment, including extreme temperatures, low atmospheric pressure, high radiation level, and limited resources.
A key aspect of the research is the investigation of design principles and structural integrity required for space habitats. The study assesses the sustainability measures and life support systems essential for long-term habitation, evaluating advanced construction techniques such as 3D printing and in situ resource utilisation (ISRU) in building Martian habitats [4]. Additionally, the research explores innovative design solutions to ensure the psychological and physical well-being of inhabitants in these confined and isolated environments.
The methods of research used in this study comprised two main approaches, with the first one being a comprehensive literature review and the other one an in-depth case study analysis. The literature review was performed based on a systematic review of already available scholarly articles, reports, and publications on the topic of space architecture, and considered specifically those studies and projects that refer to designing space habitats. The criteria of relevancy to the research objectives, the reliability of sources, and the recency of publication were used for the selection of the literature. Also, the research employed the Mars X-House project as a case study, because it well illustrated the design innovations, structural integrity, sustainability, life support system, and resources while considering the development of a space habitat [5]. The selection criteria for the case study considered the project’s visibility, detailed information available, and alignment with the research objectives.
The article hopes to contribute to the constantly evolving field of space architecture through its methodological approach. It offers worthwhile suggestions and insights for creating live-in habitats in space just as much as for buildings elsewhere. This article seeks to make the first steps in the problem of space colonisation. It begins laying a foundation for the development of environmentally safe and living conditions away from Earth.
2 Literature review
Space colonisation is arguably the grandest human endeavour which has the potential to extend the scope of human activity well beyond the Earth and ensure that the species will be able to survive in the case of existential threats. However, this undertaking is associated with overcoming a multitude of challenges of the space environment, which includes but is not limited to exposure to ionising radiation, weightlessness, limited resources, vacuum, and micro-meteorite and space-debris impacts [6]. Accordingly, for such colonisation to be possible and successful, it is of utmost importance to develop designs of habitats that will be able to sustain human life and cater to all of the major needs associated with it. The purpose of the present literature review is to examine the existing discourses and assessments of the previous studies and projects related to the topic and outline the main trends, identified gaps, and the goals of the present study.
Conceptual space habitats were first described in the mid-20th century, being developed by visionaries such as Wernher von Braun, who proposed orbital colonies and lunar bases as important steps in space exploration [7]. However, the later period of the 20th century was marked by greater successes in developing practical solutions for space habitation. When NASA launched the Skylab space station in 1973, it became one of the first achievements in human spaceflight that contributed valuable knowledge about long-duration missions and the necessities of crew habitation [8].
The notion of extraterrestrial habitat has prompted further exploration of designing lunar and Martian homes. The concept involves establishing permanent human settlements away from Earth. The efforts have been discussed in various studies issued by such organisations as NASA and the European Space Agency concerning lunar and Martian architecture [6]. According to the researchers, habitat technologies include various types of inflatable structures, the use of regolith, and 3D printing. Their studies particularly stress the relevance of deploying all the available local sources since numerous scholars claim that Earth should not be a source for construction materials and supplies at all [9].
The revolution in the field of space habitat design has happened due to recent advances in additive manufacturing technologies. With the help of in situ resources, people have been able to construct complex structures. The achievements in this field have been stimulated by the projects, such as NASA’s 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge [10]. During this challenge, teams of creators have been suggested to work on developing new construction techniques for Martian and lunar regolith. The researchers have also made substantial steps in the interaction between the space habitat and bioregenerative life support systems. Their main idea is the imitation of the Earth’s environment to provide systems that are capable of recycling resources permanently and supporting the lives of humans [11].
However, many challenges still need to be solved to perfect the creation of space habitats. Such ones, for example, include radiation protection, the creation of control systems for a favourable environment and life support systems, and monitoring the psychological state of a person in long-term missions. Structural designs should be reliable, stand significant loads and temperatures, and reduce energy consumption. With regard to the last aspect, studies show that this applies to the resource management system as well. In addition, it is vital to pay attention to how the space habitat will affect living organisms [12]. It has been shown that nature-based concepts help the interior of the spacecraft to resemble the surface of the Earth, which has a positive effect on the psychological and emotional state of the crew and their productivity.
Advances in machine learning have also been used to develop space habitats. According to Setiawan et al., an attention-based sequence-to-sequence neural network allows for the prediction of indoor climate, which is critical to regulating living conditions within a space habitat. Machine learning technology can be used to optimise environmental control systems (ECS), ensuring that the living conditions in a space habitat are comfortable and stable for astronauts [13].
In the field of renewable energy, Balal et al. use machine learning models for the prediction of solar power generation. This topic is directly related to the problem because solar energy is one of the primary energy sources for space habitats. Exact predictions of solar energy supply and ensuring the reliability of photovoltaic systems by predicting the energy difference between the input and output of the system as the target output may increase the efficiency of space mission equipment [14].
In addition, El Alaoui et al. investigated methods of predicting energy consumption in administrative buildings using machine learning and statistical methods. These methods can be applied to the process of implementing advanced technologies in space habitats to properly control energy consumption and extend the resource life, reducing the negative effects of human activities on the environment [15].
The consultation of literature sources has yielded a lot of themes and topics for discussing the study. There is a broad range of literature focused on various strategies and techniques for creating space habitats. Therefore, it is possible to say that the current study is related to this realm of scholarship. However, it differs in the fact that it combines a wide range of aspects of the problem to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Mars X-House concept. This way, the analysis of the design principles, the structural integrity, and sustainability measures inferred in its construction, as well as the characterisation of the life support systems and resource utilisation techniques, allows for better determining the best practices and the most successful strategies that can be used in the process of designing habitats that will be able to support human life outside the Earth.
3 Methodological approach
To explore space architecture and its modern trends, it was decided to use a multi-faceted methodological approach that includes a literature review, case study, and interdisciplinary research. As for the literature review, the approach chosen was to study the existing knowledge of space architecture, especially space habitats, paying additional attention to the most recent findings and credible sources. In particular, a review was conducted regarding radiation protection, structural design and stability, sustainability, life support systems, and space resource utilisation techniques. For the case study, the Mars X-House project was selected as an example of innovative and sustainable design for living on Mars. The analysis was performed concerning the design principles, stability of the structure, sustainability, life support systems, and human factors. Technologies include 3D printing and ISRU.
The conducted research involved interdisciplinary work with such professionals as architects, engineers, environmental scientists, and psychologists, which facilitated the integration of aspects and helped to reach the best results in the context of designing space habitats. To produce the current article, we have synthesised the main concepts of the literature review and case study, developed a framework to bring these concepts together, conducted comparative analysis, and formulated the recommendations. In such a way, the integrated approach to the research has helped achieve results that are based on the wide range of the available knowledge and can be characterised as sound and comprehensive regarding the advance of space architecture.
4 Challenges to space colonisation
Space colonisation presents numerous challenges that need to be overcome to establish sustainable habitats beyond Earth. This section explores the environmental, technological, psychological and physical, sustainability, and ecosystem considerations in space colonisation.
4.1 Environmental challenges and their impact on architecture
The phenomenon of space colonisation presents numerous environmental challenges that importantly impacted the planning and development of habitats. To ensure the safety and operational effectiveness of space habitats, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the unique challenges presented by severe temperatures, radiation exposure, vacuum conditions, and other relevant elements [16].
One of the primary challenges encountered in the field of space exploration relates to the extreme temperature variations observed within the space environment. The moon’s possession of physical atmosphere results in an unconcealed absence of temperature fluctuations. This is evidenced by the occurrence of exceedingly low temperatures during the lunar night and exceptionally high temperatures when the moon is exposed to direct sunlight. To maintain habitable conditions within space habitats, it is necessary to incorporate robust insulating systems and efficient thermal management mechanisms due to the occurrence of temperature fluctuations.
The matter of radiation exposure holds considerable importance as an environmental problem in the realm of space travel. In conjunction with the protective shield offered by Earth’s atmosphere and magnetic field, astronauts are exposed to several forms of radiation, including solar particle events and galactic cosmic rays [17]. The existence of these particles characterised by elevated energy levels poses significant risks to human health and has the capacity to inflict damage upon electronic systems and materials. Therefore, it is crucial for space architecture to incorporate shielding materials and radiation mitigation strategies to protect astronauts and sensitive equipment from harmful radiation [18].
The unique challenges encountered in space architecture are a direct result of the vacuum conditions prevailing in outer space. To maintain the stability of the internal environment and withstand pressure differentials, it is imperative for habitats to exhibit structural resilience when devoid of atmospheric pressure [16]. Furthermore, the lack of atmospheric pressure has a notable influence on the behaviour of fluids, necessitating the utilisation of customised systems to manage the distribution of water, disposal of waste, and circulation of air within the habitats.
Through a comprehensive comprehension and effective resolution of the environmental obstacles encountered inside the realm of space and professionals in the fields of architecture and engineering possess the capacity to conceive and implement inventive measures that guarantee the security and functioning and liveability of space habitats. Human endeavours encompass a wide range of activities and pursuits undertaken by individuals or groups. These endeavours can span several domains, including but not limited to scientific research, artistic creations, technological innovations, social initiatives, and economic ventures. The term “human endeavours” encapsulates the collective efforts and aspirations of humanity to explore, understand, and improve the world in which we live.
4.2 Psychological and physiological challenges for human occupants
In junction with environmental challenges, the endeavour of space colonisation also entails physical, mental, and physiologic problems for human beings [19]. Extended durations of isolation, confinement, fluctuating gravity, and sensory deprivation could exert meaningful impacts on the mental and physiologic well-being of astronauts.
One of the foremost psychological obstacles faced by astronauts during space missions is the sense of isolation and protracted confinement. The experience of being separated from one‘s family, friends, and familiar physical surroundings can give rise to emotions of solitude, longing for home and psychological strain [20]. The issues are further intensified by the restricted living quarters found in space habitats, where astronauts have constraints in terms of personal space and privacy [21]. Hence, it is imperative for space design to accord priority to the establishment of psychologically supportive spaces that foster social interaction, privacy, and individual well-being [17].
The fluctuating gravity circumstances experienced in space provide physiological obstacles for astronauts. Exposure to microgravity conditions might result in several detrimental impacts on the human body, including muscular atrophy, bone loss, and cardiovascular maladaptation. To address these consequences, it is imperative for space engineering to incorporate exercise equipment, artificial gravity systems, and ergonomic design concepts to uphold the physical and mental well-being of astronauts over extended space [22].
Sensory deprivation is a significant obstacle in the context of space exploration. The circadian rhythms, mood, and cognitive function of astronauts can be influenced by the absence of natural light cycles, restricted visual stimulation, and a lack of various noises and scents. The objective of space architecture should be to design habitats that replicate natural sensory encounters, encompassing lighting systems that simulate the cycles of daylight, soundscapes that offer aural stimulation, and materials that conjure familiar odours [23].
Architects and designers have the ability to foster mental health, physical well-being, and optimal performance among astronauts by comprehending and tackling the psychological and physiological obstacles encountered in space.
4.3 Technological challenges and advancements
The establishment of sustainable space habitats necessitates the use of cutting-edge technical advancements. An area of significant importance pertains to the advancement of 3D printing technology specifically designed for construction applications. The utilisation of 3D printing technology has the capacity to significantly transform the field of space architecture through its ability to facilitate the construction of structures directly at the site of operation and utilising materials that are readily accessible within the immediate vicinity [24]. The utilisation of this technology has promise in terms of cost reduction and simplification of space missions and while also offering the potential to enhance the sustainability and self-reliance of forthcoming space habitats [25].
One of the prevailing technological obstacles encountered in the field of space architecture is to the advancement of autonomous robotic systems. These technologies are highly significant in the building and maintenance of space habitats since they possess the power to do tasks that are considered dangerous or excessively time consuming for human astronauts. Autonomous robots have the capability to be programmed in a manner that enables them to effectively traverse and perform tasks inside demanding settings, such as the lunar or Martian surface. These robots can provide valuable assistance in activities such as drilling, assembly, and maintenance [26].
Moreover, the utilisation of in situ resources represents a significant advancement. The concept of in situ resource utilisation pertains to the extraction and exploitation of resources that are readily accessible on celestial worlds, such as the Moon or Mars, with the purpose of facilitating human expeditions. This methodology diminishes the necessity for terrestrial provisions and facilitates extended-duration expeditions through the utilisation of space-based resources [27]. Researchers are now working on the development of technologies, such as regolith mining and processing systems, which aim to extract valuable resources, including water and minerals, from the soil found on celestial bodies such as the Moon or Mars [28].
In summary, these advancements possess the capacity to fundamentally transform the methodologies employed in the creation and construction of space habitats, rendering them more environmentally conscious, economically viable, and capable of sustaining themselves autonomously.
4.4 Economic considerations for sustainable space habitats
The construction of sustainable space habitats is undeniably impacted by a range of architectural and technical elements. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that economic considerations also exert a significant influence on the trajectory of interplanetary colonisation [24]. The establishment of self-sustaining space habitats necessitates a thorough comprehension of the continuing economic dynamics, encompassing the substantial investments needed and the anticipated returns linked to these outlays [29].
The endeavour of space colonisation necessitates a substantial financial investment, since it entails significant expenditures in the domains of research, development, and the deployment of cutting-edge space technology [30]. The costs involved with the initiation of payloads into the expanse of outer space, the establishment of habitats, and the maintenance of life support systems are substantial and necessitate the effective use of resources. Space colonisation encompasses a diverse array of stakeholders, comprising governmental space organisations, private space enterprises, and transnational partners [31]. these parties possess discernible economic objectives. Moreover, the economic dimensions associated with space habitats encompass not solely their initial establishment but also the sustained operation of these habitats and the prospective economic activities that could be pursued within them, encompassing, yet not restricted to, mining, manufacturing, and scientific research [32].
Furthermore, the economic viability of space exploration is contingent upon several factors, such as the efficient utilisation of resources, the upkeep of infrastructure, and the establishment of a self-sustaining space ecosystem [33]. The aforementioned criteria play a crucial role in achieving a balance between the initial investment and the long-term advantages associated with space colonisation endeavours. The practicality and efficacy of space habitats as sustainable endeavours depend on the establishment of a comprehensive framework that encompasses cost efficient operations, energy production, and resource use [29].
In conclusion, a comprehensive comprehension of the economic dimensions pertaining to sustainable space habitats is crucial for their advancement and enduring viability. To ensure the long-term feasibility and economic sustainability of space colonisation as a prospective undertaking for future generations, it is imperative to conduct a thorough evaluation of the associated costs, benefits, and potential returns on investment.
In summary, the colonisation of space brings with it many challenges that require architectural and engineering innovative solutions. Space architecture has the ability to shape the future of human settlements outside the Earth through its treatment of environmental, psychological, physical, technical and economic problems. In addition, to successfully colonise the space, requires bringing together experts from different disciplines, making great leaps in technology, and coming up with innovative ways to create sustainable and thriving societies beyond Earth.
5 Architectural considerations for space habitats
Designing space habitats for sustainable and thriving human habitation in the cosmos requires careful consideration of numerous architectural aspects. The field of space architecture necessitates the consideration of distinct challenges posed by the space environment and with a primary focus on ensuring the well being and safety and productivity of those residing in space colonies. This section discusses the key architectural considerations essential for successful space habitats.
5.1 Life support and ECS
The design and application of improved life support and ECS is a big part of the space habitat architectural framework. These systems are the heart of any sustainable space home because they make sure there is air to breathe, water to drink, and a controlled setting that is good for human health and well-being.
Life support systems include a variety of tools that are needed to keep people alive in the harsh environment of space [2]. These processes include making oxygen, getting rid of carbon dioxide, and recycling water and nutrients. All of these are important for keeping the habitat’s environment closed. Waste management and life support systems are intricately interconnected due to the necessity of processing and recycling waste products in a manner that conserves resources and minimises environmental impact [34].
ECS, on the other hand, are in charge of making and keeping space shelters liveable [2]. They control the temperature and humidity and air pressure and quality of the air and they mimic conditions on Earth to make sure pilots are comfortable and healthy. These devices are also necessary to protect people from the hard environment outside, such as radiation and small meteorites [35].
Recent improvements in life support and ECS technologies have made it possible to build systems that are more efficient, smaller, and self-sufficient. Bio-based life support systems, which use biological processes to clean the air and water, could be a good option for long-term space trips. Adding smart devices and automation to ECS makes it possible to watch and control the habitat environment in real time. This makes the system as a whole more reliable and useful [36].
In the end, life support and ECS are the backbone of sustainable space colonies that allow people to live beyond Earth’s borders.
5.2 Structural integrity
The structural integrity of space habitats stands as a paramount consideration in the realm of space architecture and encompassing a multifaceted array of challenges and innovations. It is not an exaggeration to state that the success of space colonisation hinges on the reliability and resilience of these architectural structures. In an environment where there is no atmosphere to provide support and protect against external threats, the structural design becomes the first line of defense against the harsh realities of space [37].
One of the primary concerns is the ability of space habitats to withstand micrometeoroid impacts and the relentless bombardment of space debris [32]. The structural materials need to be carefully selected and engineered to provide adequate shielding against these threats. Additionally, to withstand the significant temperature changes and thermal stresses that are commonly encountered in the space environment and it is imperative for habitats to preserve their structural integrity [38].
Moreover, space habitats need to be designed with the understanding that they will experience mechanical stresses from the life support systems, equipment, and human activities within them [39]. These structural systems must be resilient and adaptable, capable of withstanding both static and dynamic loads while minimising mass and resource requirements.
Furthermore, the design of space habitats need to take into account the potential for growth and expansion. As the need arises for larger or more specialised spaces, the structural architecture must support modular growth and flexibility [40]. This adaptability ensures that space habitats can accommodate evolving mission objectives and changing crew requirements.
In conclusion, the structural integrity of space habitats is a complex and multifaceted challenge, requiring meticulous attention to materials, design, and adaptability. The successful realisation of sustainable and functional space habitats depends on innovative engineering solutions that can withstand the demanding conditions of space.
5.3 Radiation protection
The implementation of radiation protection measures is of paramount importance in the field of space architecture, given that astronauts are subjected to several types of radiation throughout their missions. The deployment of efficient radiation protection measures is necessary due to the adverse effects of radiation on human health and the possible damage it might cause to sensitive equipment. As per the rules established by NASA, it has been determined that some materials, including polyethylene, aluminium, and lead, have the capability to mitigate the detrimental effects of radiation [41]. Furthermore, the incorporation of active radiation monitoring equipment and such as dosimeters and radiation detectors is vital for the prompt of ongoing surveillance and evaluation of radiation levels. These devices facilitate astronauts in implementing suitable measures to reduce their exposure and guarantee their safety. Moreover, the significance of advancing radiation shielding technologies, such as composite materials and magnetic shielding, for the purpose of augmenting radiation protection in space [42], also considering radiation protection in spacecraft design. This involves integrating specific radiation shelters and optimising spacecraft layouts. Through the implementation of radiation protection methods, space architects have the potential to make significant contributions to the general well-being and safety of astronauts during their missions [43].
Several materials and construction techniques have been recognised in the scope of space habitats as efficient for the purpose of radiation shielding. Such materials include:
Polyethylene: This sort of plastic has been recognised for its unsurpassed shielding characteristics against all sorts of radiation. It is also a lightweight material which is preferable to use in tanks or bottles [44]. It can be utilised in spacecraft shielding due to its potential for effective absorption and scattering of radiation.
Water: Water is another material that offers efficient shielding against radiation in virtue of its high hydrogen content. As the latter is sufficiently efficient for slowing down and absorbing high-energy particles, water can be used as a material for shielding space habitats from cosmic rays and solar radiation [45]. Water can be stored in tanks or its tanks can be generally incorporated into the walls of the space habitat.
Regolith: The use of Martian regolith as a potential radiation shield has been studied as a concept. Martian regolith is mainly composed of minerals like iron oxide and basalt, that may be used to absorb and scatter some amount of radiation [46]. Utilising it as a construction material to build up the walls of habitat or by covering habitats with a layer of regolith can also work as an extra layer of shielding against radiation.
Composite materials: Some composite materials, for example, carbon fibre composites are combinations of high strength, relatively low weight, and might function as an effective radiation shield [47]. Incorporating boron or lithium, etc., into them can provide radiation shielding capability without losing the structural integrity of composites.
Lead and polyethylene composite: Lead is a dense material that provides an excellent shield against radiation. In addition, polyethylene offers protection against neutron radiation [43]. It means that the composite discussed shields astronauts against almost all types of radiation.
The identified materials and building techniques are critical to providing adequate shields for astronauts in space habitats [48]. In particular, the shield developed provides maximum protection for crew members during long-distance missions.
5.4 Energy generation and management
In the context of space colonisation and the creation of sustainable extraterrestrial habitats, energy generation and management emerge as critical components. The vast and often inhospitable expanses of space present unique challenges and opportunities concerning the procurement and utilisation of energy resources. This section delves into the intricacies of energy generation and management in the space architecture domain, highlighting their indispensable role in ensuring the long-term viability and functionality of space habitats.
In space habitats, energy serves as the lifeblood, powering essential life support systems, maintaining comfortable living conditions, and fueling various scientific and industrial activities [49]. Consequently, the choice of energy sources and their efficiency in harnessing power from the environment become paramount. Solar power and derived from photovoltaic arrays or solar concentrators and stands as a dominant and renewable energy source in space architecture and especially in Earth’s vicinity [50]. However, the farther one ventures into the cosmos, the more imperative it becomes to explore alternative energy solutions, including nuclear power or even the potential utilisation of extraterrestrial resources, such as lunar regolith for oxygen extraction and hydrogen production [51].
Efficient energy management and storage systems are equally critical, ensuring a continuous power supply during periods of darkness or reduced solar exposure, such as during lunar nights or while orbiting celestial bodies [49]. Advanced energy storage technologies, such as high-capacity batteries and regenerative fuel cells, are essential for maintaining habitat functionality and supporting critical life processes.
Additionally and the implementation of intelligent energy distribution and management systems and complemented by advanced software and automation and is crucial for the efficient utilisation of energy and the reduction of waste and the preservation of energy intensive equipment. These systems are vital in the context of space colonisation, where resources are finite, and energy efficiency is of paramount importance.
In summary, energy generation and management constitute pivotal facets of space architecture, influencing the design, sustainability, and operational efficiency of space habitats. As we venture further into space, the judicious selection and utilisation of energy resources will play an instrumental role in shaping the future of sustainable space colonisation.
5.5 Adaptability and modularity
In the context of sustainable space, habitats, adaptability, and modularity emerge as indispensable design principles. The ability of space habitats to evolve, reconfigure, and accommodate changing requirements and future expansions is paramount for their long-term viability [52]. Habitats are not static entities; they are dynamic environments that must be capable of responding to new expeditions, scientific research endeavours, and population growth efforts.
Adaptability, in the context of space architecture, refers to the capacity of habitats to readily adjust to shifting operational needs and objectives and encompasses the ability to reconfigure internal layouts, modify infrastructure, and integrate new technologies seamlessly [53]. Dynamic nature of space exploration demands habitats that can swiftly adapt to evolving mission profiles, scientific experiments, and unforeseen contingencies.
Modularity, on the other hand, underscores the importance of designing habitats as interconnected, interchangeable modules or components. Architectures allow for the incremental expansion of habitats, enabling the addition of new modules as needed [54]. The strategy improves resource use efficiency and simplifies maintenance and promotes sustainability by eliminating the necessity for the complete replacement of existing structures.
To maintain the long-term functionality and relevance of space habitats, it is imperative that their architectural design places a high priority on the concepts of flexibility and modularity. This flexibility not only caters to immediate mission needs but also positions space habitats as enduring platforms for diverse scientific, commercial, and residential activities in the evolving landscape of space exploration [55].
5.6 Human-centred design
Human-centred design principles are essential for space habitats to achieve the physical and psychological comfort of the occupants. Ergonomic considerations, comfortable workspaces, and good private spaces are essential in maintaining well-being, mental health, and ensuring productivity during long-duration missions in space [56].
5.7 Sustainable construction methods
Sustainable construction methods are of paramount importance in space architecture, as they contribute to the long-term viability and environmental stewardship of space habitats and infrastructure. Adopting sustainable construction practices can minimise the ecological footprint of space missions and reduce resource consumption [57]. One such method is the utilisation of in situ resource utilisation (ISRU), which involves extracting and utilising local resources available on celestial bodies, such as the Moon or Mars, for construction purposes. This approach reduces the need for transporting construction materials from Earth, thereby minimising launch costs and reducing the environmental impact associated with space missions. Additionally, the implementation of 3D printing technology enables on-site construction using locally sourced materials, further enhancing sustainability [58]. Furthermore, the incorporation of modular construction techniques allows for efficient assembly and disassembly of space habitats and facilitates adaptability and reusability. Also, the importance of life cycle assessment (LCA) in evaluating the environmental impact of construction materials and processes, aiding in the selection of sustainable alternatives. By integrating these sustainable construction methods, space architects can contribute to the development of environmentally conscious and resource-efficient space habitats [56].
5.8 Ethical considerations and social spaces
When designing space habitats, it is essential that ethical considerations such as preserving cultural traditions, promoting inclusion, and accurately portraying a wide range of identities be taken into account. To foster a stronger sense of community and facilitate social interaction among space colonists, it is imperative to incorporate social spaces and communal areas into the architectural design [59].
Space habitats can be created to function as safe, sustainable, and enjoyable living environments for human space exploration and colonisation if the aforementioned architectural concerns are properly incorporated into the design process.
In summary, these architectural considerations (Table 1) are crucial for designing sustainable and functional space habitats, ensuring the well-being, safety, and productivity of future space explorers and settlers.
Architectural considerations for space habitats (the researcher)
| Consideration | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Life support and ECS |
|
| 2. Structural integrity |
|
| 3. Radiation protection |
|
| 4. Energy generation and management |
|
| 5. Adaptability and modularity |
|
| 6. Human-centred design |
|
| 7. Sustainable construction methods |
|
| 8. Ethical considerations and social spaces |
|
6 Sustainable and efficient space habitat design
With the increasing prevalence of space colonisation and extended missions, there arose a necessity to develop space habitats that are sustainable, technologically advanced, and efficient. These habitats need to address various human requirements, including minimising resource consumption, waste reduction, and ensuring the long-term presence of humans in space.
6.1 Resource efficiency
To minimise reliance on regeneration missions from Earth and Space habitats need to concentrate on the optimisation of resource consumption. And that this is done through the use of closed-loop life support systems that, in turn, work on water recycling, air renewal, and waste management [60]. In addition, the design of space habitats should include energy-efficient technology and systems such as advanced insulation, LED lighting, energy management and storage systems. By using resources as efficiently as possible, space settlements can reduce the need for restocking flights and minimise the damage they cause and humans inflict it on the environment [2].
6.2 Recycling and waste management
In the confined and resource-scarce environments of space habitats, efficient recycling systems are paramount to ensure the longevity and self-sufficiency of these habitats. Through advanced technologies such as closed-loop life support systems, astronauts can recover and purify water, regenerate oxygen, and recycle nutrients from organic waste, significantly reducing the need for resupply missions from Earth [61]. Additionally, innovative 3D printing techniques are being explored to repurpose and transform waste materials into useful components, further minimising the generation of waste in space. Furthermore, psychological factors and the well-being of astronauts are considered in waste management strategies, as waste accumulation can lead to stress and discomfort [62]. Therefore, a holistic approach to recycling and waste management is essential and addresses not only the technical aspects but also the psychological and sociological dimensions of human life in space.
6.3 Renewable energy
With regard to renewable energy in space, space habitats necessitate finding renewable energy sources alternative to the traditional energy sources known on Earth. Solar energy is one of the best ways to be applied due to the abundance of sunlight in space [63]. Therefore, space habitats requisite contain solar panels in their design that capture sunlight and convert it into energy and store it for periods of less solar radiation. Solar panels are composed of photovoltaic cells that convert sunlight into electricity through the photovoltaic effect. These panels can be strategically placed on the exterior surfaces of space habitats to maximise solar energy capture. Additionally, other methods or sources of renewable energy such as nuclear energy or renewable fuel cells can be considered to ensure the continued supply of space habitats with sustainable and renewable energy.
Nuclear energy can be harnessed through the use of small modular reactors (SMRs) that are specifically designed for space applications. SMRs offer several advantages including compact sise and high energy density and long operational lifetimes [64]. They can provide a reliable and continuous source of energy for space habitats and especially during periods of reduced solar radiation. Furthermore, renewable fuel cells can be utilised to generate electricity by converting hydrogen and oxygen into water, with the byproduct being electricity and heat. Hydrogen can be obtained from water electrolysis, which can be powered by solar energy. This process ensures a closed-loop system where water is continuously recycled, making it a sustainable and renewable energy source [65].
In conclusion, renewable energy plays a crucial role in the design and operation of space habitats. Solar energy, nuclear energy, and renewable fuel cells are viable options for providing sustainable and renewable energy in space. By incorporating these technologies into the design of space habitats, we can ensure a continuous and reliable energy supply for long-duration space missions [64].
6.4 Closed ecological systems
Closed ecological systems are critical for space habitats’ sustainability as they closely emulate natural ecosystems found on Earth, fostering a harmonious interplay among algae, bacteria, and plants to generate vital life support resources like air, food, and clean water [66]. Consequently, the architectural layout of space habitats must incorporate dedicated spaces for vegetation cultivation, encompassing hydroponic or aerobic systems and meticulous control of temperature and humidity conditions to optimise plant growth [67]. Thus, closed ecosystems prove instrumental in maintaining self-sustaining space habitats, diminishing dependence on external resources and elevating the potential for enduring space exploration missions.
The significance of closed ecological systems in space habitats has been well-established in the literature. Nelson et al. [60] offer a comprehensive examination of the role played by algae, bacteria, and plants within closed ecosystems, particularly in the context of life support for space habitats. They underscore the crucial role of these systems in the production of essential resources for astronauts. Additionally, Allen et al. [68] emphasise the sustainability aspect, elucidating how closed ecosystems contribute to self-sufficiency within space habitats, thereby reducing the necessity for resupply missions. These closed ecological systems are indispensable for the success of extended space missions and the eventual establishment of permanent extraterrestrial settlements.
6.5 Modularity and flexibility
The incorporation of modularity and flexibility represents fundamental design principles that are essential for the development of efficient and sustainable space habitats. The design of the habitat should facilitate changing the layout and adding more space to meet the needs of changing missions and team sises. Habitats’ modular parts and systems make it easy to maintain, repair, and replace equipment, reducing downtime and making the entire system more reliable and secure [69]. Also, flexible layouts and areas that can be changed improve team happiness and well-being during long-term missions.
Designing sustainable and efficient space habitats are critical to ensuring the long-term survival of humans in space. By integrating the principles of resource economy, recycling, waste management, renewable energy, closed and modular ecosystems, creative architectural minds can design space habitats that reduce resource consumption, minimise waste, and ensure the long-term self-sufficiency of space habitats. These considerations that have been mentioned have a major and essential role in creating sustainable and flexible space habitats, which allows for the possibility of exploring and colonising space in the long term.
7 Case study
A successful project by SEArch+ and Apis Cor was the Mars X-House (Figure 1). This project, which entered NASA’s Phase 3 Centennial Challenge competition for 3D-Printed NASA Habitats on Mars and won first place, is a testament to Human ingenuity in space engineering unveils a tapestry of design principles poised to redefine the very fabric of extraterrestrial habitation. Rooted in the tenets of architectural innovation, resource utilisation, and self-sufficiency, the project epitomises a visionary fusion of form and function [70]. The Mars X-House project presented a range of architectural innovations and design solutions, developed for the specific purposes of space colonisation [71]. First, extensive use of 3D printing technology was recommended, through which the elements constituting the habitat can be printed out of indigenous materials, such as Martian regolith. Thus, the problem of having to transport Earth-based construction materials to Mars is resolved [72]. In addition, 3D printing can provide solutions with low mass and volume and enable easy on-site repair and maintenance services, thus greatly facilitating logistics. Second, the cylindrical form of the habitat was recommended, minimising the surface area and maximising the internal volume. This form both optimises the use of resources and contributes to the structural stability of the project [73]. The combination of materials and the form of the building utilised in this design consisted of a combination of two types of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers and a geodesic/truss structure, demonstrating, according to the. The pressure differentials on Mars, combined with potential seismic activity, require habitat structures to be resilient and capable of maintaining internal stability under extreme external conditions [74].
![Figure 1
Mars X-House exterior view [75] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.](/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0067/asset/graphic/j_eng-2024-0067_fig_001.jpg)
Mars X-House exterior view [75] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.
It should be noted that the architectural innovations and design principles conceptualised within the Mars X-House project address a variety of challenges of space colonisation. To a significant extent, they are responsive as they provide feasible solutions to the problems of effective use of resources, structural strength, sustainability, adaptability, and resiliency in the challenging Martian environment.
7.1 Project familiarisation and background research
Mars X-House embodies the result of meticulous research, meticulously delving into Mars’ atmospheric conditions, terrain, and radiation levels. Grounded in scientific insights, the project’s foundation is forged upon comprehensive familiarity with the Martian environment, accentuating its credibility [37].
7.2 Architectural design analysis and format justification
This project unfolds as an architectural marvel and replete with autonomy. The utilisation of 3D printing technology and ISRU techniques underscores its format. The cylindrical design minimises surface area, optimising resource usage while encapsulating inhabitants within a cohesive and functional habitat [70].
7.3 Structural integrity
The Mars X-House project prioritised structural robustness through an innovative combination of composite materials and geometric design. Its primary structural framework utilised advanced carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers (CFRP) to achieve high tensile strength and resistance to Martian pressure differentials [22]. Geodesic and truss-based structural configurations were employed to distribute loads evenly and ensure stability against potential seismic events on Mars. The use of 3D-printed regolith blocks, derived from Martian soil, further fortified the habitat’s structural integrity and minimised material transport from Earth [37].
7.4 Sustainability
The sustainability of Mars House was carefully woven into its structure. The habitat incorporated closed-loop recycling systems that repurposed waste, carbon dioxide, and water to nurture plant growth within hydroponic farms. The process mimicked Earth’s ecosystems, promoting a harmonious interaction between the built environment and natural cycles. Additionally, the project harnessed natural light through strategically positioned windows and integrated photovoltaic panels to harness solar energy, minimising the ecological footprint while ensuring longevity [76].
7.5 Power generation and storage
Mars House embraced a multifaceted approach to power generation and storage. The habitat integrates advanced solar panel technology, strategically positioned on the cylindrical surface to harness solar energy. Solar arrays, optimised for the Martian environment, efficiently converted sunlight into electrical energy, while regenerative fuel cells and energy storage systems ensured uninterrupted power supply during periods of low sunlight [77]. An innovative aspect was the utilisation of piezoelectric materials within structural components to convert vibrations and mechanical stress into electricity, further enhancing the habitat’s energy self-sufficiency. Energy storage employs innovative battery technologies, ensuring a consistent power supply even during dust storms [78].
7.6 Resource use and sustainability
The design of Mars X-House embraces the philosophy of self-sustenance, with a focus on resource utilisation. The regolith-based construction serves a dual purpose, providing both structural support and reflecting the use of indigenous resources (Figure 2). This approach reduces the need for constant resource replenishment from Earth, aligning with the project’s environmental consciousness. The previous iteration, Mars House 1, also prioritised resource utilisation in its design. The habitat showed new ways to get and use local materials and like Martian regolith and ice and as part of its building and systems for keeping life going. These strategies exemplified the concept of ISRU. By incorporating resource-efficient design principles, the habitat significantly decreased its reliance on Earth for vital supplies, ultimately enhancing its overall sustainability [77].
![Figure 2
A render showing the printing of the outermost layer of the Martian base designed by SEArch+/Apis Cor [75] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.](/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0067/asset/graphic/j_eng-2024-0067_fig_002.jpg)
A render showing the printing of the outermost layer of the Martian base designed by SEArch+/Apis Cor [75] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.
7.7 Radiation resistance
The project’s design incorporated multi-layered radiation shielding comprising materials like polyethylene, borated polyethylene, and high-density polyethylene, effectively attenuating cosmic and solar radiation [77]. This innovative approach ensured the protection of inhabitants against prolonged radiation exposure (Figure 3). The habitat’s regolith-infused design is pivotal in achieving radiation resistance, as the inherent properties of Martian regolith manifest as an effective shield against cosmic radiation, safeguarding inhabitants’ health and underscoring its innovative engineering [79].
![Figure 3
Layered Wall Composition Mars X-House [80] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.](/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0067/asset/graphic/j_eng-2024-0067_fig_003.jpg)
Layered Wall Composition Mars X-House [80] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.
7.8 Life support systems
Closed loop life support systems support a whole person approach to life support. Interior spaces are adorned with biophilic design, fostering psychological well-being. Concurrently, hydroponic farming rejuvenates the habitat’s environment, exemplifying harmonious coexistence [81].
7.9 Self-sufficiency
The project’s self sufficiency is a consequence of its regolith based design. Mars X-House builds a mutually beneficial relationship with the planet’s resources by using its own materials. This lowers its reliance on outside supplies and sets it on a path to independence [77].
7.10 Psychological and physical well-being
Biophilic design intertwines nature and space, creating a milieu conducive to inhabitants’ well-being (Figure 4). Sunlight emulation and green spaces and sensory stimulation offer a psychological sanctuary and infusing vitality into the human spirit [82].
![Figure 4
The wardroom of the X-House is also called a multipurpose room or mess house [80] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.](/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0067/asset/graphic/j_eng-2024-0067_fig_004.jpg)
The wardroom of the X-House is also called a multipurpose room or mess house [80] images credit SEArch+/Apis Cor.
7.11 Adaptability and expansion
The project, designed with adaptability in mind, envisions future expansion modules. The cylindrical design facilitates radial expansion, enabling the integration of new living or functional spaces, fostering a harmonious coexistence with the ever-evolving Martian frontier [77].
In the end, a case study focused on designing a sustainable habitat for human habitation on Mars. The table highlights whether each architectural consideration has been achieved or not.
The analysis reveals that several key architectural considerations have been successfully achieved in the Mars X-House project. These include sustainability, life support systems, power generation and storage, resource use and sustainability, radiation resistance, self-sufficiency, psychological and physical well-being, and adaptability and expansion.
The Mars X-House project demonstrates a holistic approach to architectural design, incorporating innovative solutions to ensure the well-being and sustainability of future Martian habitats. By achieving these architectural considerations, this project aims to create a self-sufficient, harmonious, and sustainable abode on Mars.
Lastly, Mars X-House is a symbol of human desire and a unique example of how to combine space themes with modern architectural design. With every element meticulously curated, it embarks on a journey towards a self-sufficient, harmonious, and sustainable Martian abode.
8 Future directions and technologies
The exploration of architectural considerations for space colonisation provides a compelling framework for envisioning the future of humanity’s expansion beyond Earth. As we reflect on the insights garnered from the research paper and several noteworthy future directions and emerging technologies come to the forefront.
8.1 Synergetic ecosystems and bioregenerative life support
Future space habitats are likely to embrace synergetic ecosystems that mimic Earth’s natural cycles. Advanced bioregenerative life support systems aim to replicate Earth-like cycles of air, water, and nutrient recycling, ensuring a continuous and sustainable supply of essential resources within space habitats. Bioregenerative systems, when combined with controlled ecological farming modules, provide a holistic framework for sustaining human life in extraterrestrial environments.
8.2 3D printing and ISRU
As humanity advances in technology, 3D printing and ISRU will play pivotal roles in building space habitats. Martian regolith and for instance and could be transformed into construction materials using additive manufacturing techniques and reducing the need to transport heavy building materials from Earth [83]. ISRU technologies also extend to extracting resources such as ice water to support life and produce fuels and reduce reliance on costly Earth resources.
8.3 Artificial intelligence and robotic construction
The merger of artificial intelligence and robotics holds transformative potential for space habitat construction. Autonomous robots could be deployed to prepare construction sites and assemble habitat modules and conduct intricate tasks in challenging environments. Machine learning algorithms could optimise habitat designs based on real time data feedback and adapting to changing conditions and ensuring efficient resource utilisation [84].
8.4 Virtual reality and human-centred design
Advancements in virtual reality (VR) technology will revolutionise the human centered design process. Architects and engineers can collaboratively design and simulate habitats and fine tuning ergonomic and psychological aspects before physical construction. VR environments could also serve as training grounds for astronauts and preparing them for the challenges of confined living spaces and extravehicular activities [85].
9 Findings
This article’s research has resulted in a large number of important findings; both through our literature review and our in-depth case study analysis of the Mars X-House project. Many of these have provided significant insights into both the architectural problems and potential solutions for space habitats and the specific active design and sustainable measures that have been implemented by the Mars X-House.
9.1 Findings from the literature review
9.1.1 Radiation protection
Analysis of the literature showed that radiation protection was one of the essential requirements for the Earth’s space missions. Based on that, the most effective and available materials are polyethylene and Martian regolith which contain hydrogen, and water with water-filled layers protect any other multi-layered technique [86]. Moreover, it was mentioned about some effective techniques such as burying habitats under layers of regolith or multi-layered shielding by using combinations of regolith, water, and polyethylene. These results have demonstrated the need for versatile and available-for-use materials for habitats to be protected from cosmic and solar radiation [87].
9.1.2 Structural integrity
Several advanced materials such as carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers and novel types of constructions such as geodesic/truss-based ones have been established as critical for maintaining structural integrity. Specifically, with all the challenges of Martian conditions, it was found essential to obtain high strength-to-weight ratios. For this precise purpose, the required material can be identified as CFRP. Moreover, on Mars, such construction as geodesic domes and truss structures and their modifications can have significant advantages in terms of stability and load transferring, since on Mars, there is no risk of possible seismic activities [88].
9.1.3 Sustainability measures
The article confirmed that closed-loop recycling systems and hydroponics are essential for making space habitats sustainable as closed-loop systems help recycle water, air, and organic waste, making such missions not so dependent on resupply from Earth. Also, hydroponic farms provide fresh food and revitalise the air with the help of plant growth as well as recycling waste. As far as the efficient use of soil is concerned, it may have been maximised by the influence of natural resources [89]. In fact, it does not use electric lighting in the data centre, and it also uses large, commercial greenhouses to fit more plants than a soil system. Furthermore, the company properly installed its windows to let the most amount of light, while photovoltaic panels are used to reduce the amount of light lost. This approach not only maximises the habitat’s ability to grow food but also reduces its ecological footprint, making it more likely to be used in the future.
9.1.4 Life support systems
Life support systems that are efficient and capable present the basic requirement for the success of a long-term mission to be sustainable. The literature points out the requirement for advanced air and water recycling technologies. Such systems can be offered by the Environmental Control and Life Support System developed by NASA as it has been designed to recycle and purify air and water within the habitat. In addition, supplying the habitat with a hydroponic system for food production ensures a continuous supply of fresh produce and an adequate oxygen supply as well as CO2 absorption; for example, on the international space station, about 14 h are provided to maintain CO2 levels at 2,200 ppm [90].
9.1.5 Resource utilisation
The information offered can be applied to ISRU techniques because the article showcases how Martian regolith can be used to construct habitats for the Mars mission. By using this technique to construct the building, its cost was reduced because humanity no longer required resources delivered from Earth. Therefore, such sources are relevant for researching existing methods of using local materials not only to provide general information about cost reduction and lower logistics but also to determine their effectiveness. For instance, the sources describe useful ISRU techniques that include sintering and 3D printing with regolith to create habitat components that are resistant to various challenges [91].
9.2 Findings from the Mars X-House case study
9.2.1 3D printing technology
The Mars X-House project showcased the extensive application of 3D printing to construct habitat components from Martian regolith. Due to this approach, the construction process nearly eliminated the use of materials transported from Earth, thereby reducing costs as well as logistics scale. Employing robotic 3D printing systems, this project showed that processes and printing regolith into components of any structure size were easy to scale and efficient on Mars [92].
9.2.2 Cylindrical design
The Mars X-House has a cylinder design that allows a maximum part of internal volume to be used for daily activities and a minimum surface area of the whole internal volume. This design is very efficient for containing space for living and operation. It also prevents hazards of the outside environment like radiation and dust storms because of minimum surface area or any reason for damage. Compared to this, its design also helps in maintaining low gravity pressure and supporting the house firmly [2].
9.2.3 Structural integrity
High-level structural robustness at the Mars X-House was achieved through the application of advanced CFRP and geodesic/truss-based configurations. By allowing it to withstand Martian pressure differentials, seismic loads, and exposure to radiation, the specified materials and geometric designs were justified. Moreover, the structure’s walls were reinforced through the application of 3D-printed regolith blocks, thus providing the structure with proper integrity and enhanced ability to protect people inside the house from emulated radiation [93].
9.2.4 Sustainability measures
One of the main aims of the Mars X-House was the principle of sustainability. This was achieved thanks to the nod to closed-loop recycling and hydroponic farms. To be more specific, such systems create conditions for waste, CO2, and water to be reused, turning the house into a habitat that can be regarded as self-sustainable. Additionally, it was found beneficial to make the design with a focus on the windows where the light of the sun can enter the living space every day. As for the photovoltaic cells that can be found on the roof, these only proved the idea that the main focus was to try and make this habitat independent of sources that would constantly impact the levels of the resources [94].
9.2.5 Life support systems
The project consisted of integrating advanced methods of recycling air and water with hydroponic systems used for food production. These life support systems ensure that there is always a supply of fresh air, water, and food that is vital for staying for a long period of time. Moreover, the use of hydroponic systems and plants aids in recycling the waste and also helps in achieving better sustainability of the habitat by supporting the plant growth that absorbs the CO2 and sets free oxygen [91].
9.2.6 Resource utilisation
The Mars X-House utilised Martian regolith to emphasise ISRU. By taking advantage of the ground of that alien planet for the creation of parts, the project managed to avoid the material from the Earth, thus reducing costs and logistical challenges. Such aspects can be regarded as relatively common because most of the moon’s prior creations were 3D printed by utilising regolith that was locally obtained. As a result, it can be concluded that the application of ISRU in this case was not novel but was, in fact, a practical application that made space colonisation more feasible and cost-effective [95].
10 Conclusion
The research article has explored the crucial role of architecture in the future of space colonisation. Through the analysis, the case study the Mars X-House project, several key findings and insights have emerged.
The research article has highlighted the importance of addressing the unique challenges of space colonisation, such as extreme temperatures, low atmospheric pressure, radiation exposure, and resource limitations. The architectural considerations discussed in the paper have emphasised the need for robust materials, innovative construction techniques, and effective radiation shielding to ensure the safety and well-being of astronauts in space habitats.
Sustainability and self-sufficiency have been identified as critical factors in the success of space colonisation efforts. The integration of life support systems, resource utilisation techniques, and renewable energy sources in the architectural design of space habitats is essential for reducing reliance on Earth and promoting long-term sustainability.
Furthermore, the research article has underscored the significance of human factors and habitability in space architecture. The design of private living quarters, communal spaces for social interaction, and environments that simulate natural conditions are crucial for addressing the psychological challenges of isolation and confinement during long-duration space missions.
The interdisciplinary nature of space architecture has been emphasised throughout the research article. Collaboration between architects, engineers, scientists, and other experts is essential for developing innovative solutions and addressing the complex challenges of space colonisation. The integration of knowledge from various disciplines is crucial for creating successful and sustainable habitats beyond Earth.
In conclusion, the research article has provided valuable insights and recommendations for the future of space colonisation. By examining the architectural considerations outlined in this article, it is possible to provide the groundwork for the creation of secure, environmentally friendly and liveable habitats for humans in space. Continued research and development in space architecture will be crucial for realising the vision of space colonisation and expanding human presence in the universe.
Acknowledgment
I extend my sincere gratitude to all who have contributed to the fruition of this research paper and an integral part of my master’s thesis titled “Designing for Life Beyond Earth: A Study on Space Habitat Design Thinking Process” and supervised by Dr. Ahmed Louay Ahmed. I am indebted to Dr. Ahmed for his guidance and unwavering support. I also think the University of Technology/Department of Architectural Engineering for its resources and facilitating this research. This work is a tribute to the pioneers in space architecture. Without their trailblazing efforts, this research would not have been possible.
-
Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.
-
Author contributions: Shahad Majid Kadhim and Ahmed Louay Ahmed contributed to the conception of the presented idea. In the development of the theoretical framework, primary research, and drafting of the manuscript, Shahad Majid Kadhim played a critical role. Ahmed Louay Ahmed helped in conducting the research, made contributions towards the analysis of the findings, and played a role in writing the manuscript. In the development of the introduction, the challenges to be faced in space colonisation were overcome, including architectural consideration of space habitats, sustainable space habitat design, space habitats efficiency, and future direction and technologies; both authors played a role. Shahad Majid Kadhim was mainly responsible for leading the case study and conclusion sections. Both authors made contributions to read and agree on the submitted version of the manuscript.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: Most datasets generated and analysed in this study are comprised in this submitted manuscript. The other datasets are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author with the attached information.
References
[1] Petrov GI, Mackenzie B, Homnick M, Palaia J. A permanent settlement on Mars: The architecture of the Mars homestead project. SAE Technical Paper; 2005. Report No.: 0148-7191.10.4271/2005-01-2853Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Chen M, Goyal R, Majji M, Skelton RE. Review of space habitat designs for long term space explorations. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2021;122:100692.10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100692Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Abdel-Monem A, Elhefnawy N. A proposed model for designing Mars habitat. Acta Astronautica. 2021;182:345–56.Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Lee Y, Keys C, Terreno S. 3D printer Martian habitats and challenges to overcome. Res Rev J Space Sci Technol. 2022;11:40–9.10.37591/rrjosst.v11i1.3344Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Yashar M, Ciardullo C, Morris M, Pailes-Friedman R, Moses R, Case D, eds. Mars X-house: Design principles for an autonomously 3D-printed ISRU surface habitat. 49th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2019: ICES Steering Committee Boston, MA.Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Cohen MM, ed. First Mars habitat architecture. AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition; 2015.10.2514/6.2015-4517Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Cockell C. Astrobiology: Understanding life in the universe. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Seedhouse E. Martian outpost: The challenges of establishing a human settlement on Mars. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger; 2014.Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Imhof B, Schartner H. Mars surface habitats: Architectural designs and concepts for planetary outposts. SAE Technical Paper; 2001. Report No.: 0148-7191.10.4271/2001-01-2174Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Imhof B. Moon Capital: Designing human habitation on the Moon. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Binsted K. HI-SEAS mission analogs. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Haeuplik-Meusburger S. Architecture for astronauts. Vienna, Austria: Springer; 2011.10.1007/978-3-7091-0667-9Suche in Google Scholar
[13] Thangavelu M. Designing lunar bases. In: Mendell W, editor. Lunar bases and space activities. Washington DC, USA: AIAA; 1994. 189–202.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Imhof B. Extreme environments: Design approaches. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar
[15] El Alaoui M, Chahidi LO, Rougui M, Lemrani A, Mechaqrane A. Prediction of energy consumption of an administrative building using machine learning and statistical methods. Civ Eng J. 2023;9(5):1007–22.10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-05-01Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Drake BG. Human exploration of Mars design reference architecture 5.0. Washington DC, USA: NASA; 2011.10.1109/AERO.2010.5446736Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Kennedy K. Space architecture: The new frontier for design research. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA; 2002.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Cucinotta FA, Schimmerling W, Wilson JW, Peterson LE, Badhwar GD, Saganti PB, et al. Space radiation cancer risks and uncertainties for Mars missions. Radiat Res. 2001;156(5):682–8.10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0682:SRCRAU]2.0.CO;2Suche in Google Scholar
[19] Palinkas LA. Psychosocial issues in long-term space flight: Overview. Gravitational Space Biol Bull. 2001;14(2):25–33.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Howe AS. Lunar habitat studies. Houston, TX: NASA; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Häuplik-Meusburger S. Space architecture education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
[22] Kennedy K. Vernacular architecture in space habitats. Acta Astronautica. 2009;64(7–8):636–43.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Hargens AR, Vico L. Long-duration bed rest as an analog to microgravity. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(8):891–903.10.1152/japplphysiol.00935.2015Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Elsila JE, Callahan MP, Dworkin JP, Glavin DP, McLain HL, Noble SK, et al. The origin of amino acids in lunar regolith samples. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2016;172:357–69.10.1016/j.gca.2015.10.008Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr. 2004;13(1):5–19.10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Arena P, Di Giamberardino P, Fortuna L, La Gala F, Monaco S, Muscato G, et al. Toward a mobile autonomous robotic system for Mars exploration. Planet Space Sci. 2004;52(1–3):23–30.10.1016/j.pss.2003.07.002Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Starr SO, Muscatello AC. Mars in situ resource utilization: A review. Planet Space Sci. 2020;182:104824.10.1016/j.pss.2019.104824Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Cockell C. Planetary habitats. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Rees M. On the future: Prospects for humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2017.Suche in Google Scholar
[30] Ehrenfreund P. Cosmic exploration and human settlement. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Fawcett C. Sustainability in extraterrestrial habitats. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014.Suche in Google Scholar
[32] Cohen MM. Space architecture and habitability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar
[33] Cesaretti G, Dini E, De Kestelier X, Colla V, Pambaguian L. Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronaut. 2014;93:430–50.10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034Suche in Google Scholar
[34] Dominguez J, Whitlow J. Marangoni effect and its potential utilization in supporting lunar habitats and other extraterrestrial endeavors. Adv Space Res. 2022;69(5):2259–67.10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.023Suche in Google Scholar
[35] da Silveira WA, Fazelinia H, Rosenthal SB, Laiakis EC, Kim MS, Meydan C, et al. Comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals mitochondrial stress as a central biological hub for spaceflight impact. Cell. 2020;183(5):1185–201.e20.10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[36] Jones HW, Hodgson EW, Kliss MH, eds. Life support for deep space and Mars 2014. 4th International Conference on Environmental Systems.Suche in Google Scholar
[37] Zubrin R. The case for Mars: The plan to settle the Red Planet. New York, NY: Free Press; 2011.Suche in Google Scholar
[38] Herath H, Epaarachchi J, Islam M, Leng J. Carbon fibre reinforced shape memory polymer composites for deployable space habitats. Engineer: J Inst Eng. 2019;52(1):1–9.10.4038/engineer.v52i1.7323Suche in Google Scholar
[39] Sihver L, Barghouty F, Falconer D, eds. Space radiation risk reduction through prediction, detection and protection. 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100). IEEE; 2021.10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438460Suche in Google Scholar
[40] Stroupe A, Huntsberger T, Kennedy B, Aghazarian H, Baumgartner E, Ganino A, et al. eds., Heterogeneous robotic systems for assembly and servicing. 8th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, ESA ESA; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar
[41] Ferrone K, Willis C, Guan F, Ma J, Peterson L, Kry S. A review of magnetic shielding technology for space radiation. Radiation. 2023;3(1):46–57.10.3390/radiation3010005Suche in Google Scholar
[42] Barthel J, Sarigul-Klijn N. A review of radiation shielding needs and concepts for space voyages beyond Earth’s magnetic influence. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2019;110:100553.10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.100553Suche in Google Scholar
[43] Durante M. Space radiation protection: destination Mars. Life Sci Space Res. 2014;1:2–9.10.1016/j.lssr.2014.01.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[44] Cucinotta FA. Review of NASA approach to space radiation risk assessments for Mars exploration. Health Phys. 2015;108(2):131–42.10.1097/HP.0000000000000255Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Zeitlin C, Hassler D, Cucinotta F, Ehresmann B, Wimmer-Schweingruber R, Brinza D, et al. Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory. Science. 2013;340(6136):1080–4.10.1126/science.1235989Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] topographic low informally named Yellowknife A. Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars.Suche in Google Scholar
[47] Hassler DM, Zeitlin C, Wimmer-Schweingruber RF, Ehresmann B, Rafkin S, Eigenbrode JL, et al. Mars’ surface radiation environment measured with the Mars Science Laboratory’s Curiosity rover. Science. 2014;343(6169):1244797.10.1126/science.1244797Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Borggräfe A, Quatmann M, Nölke D. Radiation protective structures on the base of a case study for a manned Mars mission. Acta Astronaut. 2009;65(9-10):1292–305.10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.025Suche in Google Scholar
[49] Chin KB, Brandon EJ, Bugga RV, Smart MC, Jones SC, Krause FC, et al. Energy storage technologies for small satellite applications. Proc IEEE. 2018;106(3):419–28.10.1109/JPROC.2018.2793158Suche in Google Scholar
[50] Aydin K, Aydemir MT. Sizing design and implementation of a flywheel energy storage system for space applications. Turkish J Electr Eng Computer Sci. 2016;24(3):793–806.10.3906/elk-1306-206Suche in Google Scholar
[51] Hayat MB, Ali D, Monyake KC, Alagha L, Ahmed N. Solar energy—A look into power generation, challenges, and a solar‐powered future. Int J Energy Res. 2019;43(3):1049–67.10.1002/er.4252Suche in Google Scholar
[52] Schlacht IL, Foing B, Bannova O, Blok F, Mangeot A, Nebergall K, eds., et al. Space analog survey: Review of existing and new proposal of space habitats with earth applications. 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
[53] Kamps T, Gralow M, Schlick G, Reinhart G. Systematic biomimetic part design for additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp. 2017;65:259–66.10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.054Suche in Google Scholar
[54] van Ellen L, Bridgens B, Burford N, Crown M, Heidrich O. Adaptability of space habitats using the Rhythmic Buildings strategy. Acta Astronaut. 2023;211:764–80.10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.045Suche in Google Scholar
[55] Ho K, Chen H, eds. Space transportation network analysis for cislunar space economy with lunar resources. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group; 2017.Suche in Google Scholar
[56] Dansberry BE, Costello KA, Cohen L, Schoen AM, Ngo-Anh TJ, Shirakawa M, eds. et al. Reflections on 20 years of research on the international space station. 72nd International Astronautical Congress; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
[57] Seedhouse E. Space architecture for Mars exploration. J Space Eng. 2018;11(2):75–89.Suche in Google Scholar
[58] Xiong Y, Duong PLT, Wang D, Park S-I, Ge Q, Raghavan N, et al. Data-driven design space exploration and exploitation for design for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des. 2019;141(10):101101.10.1115/1.4043587Suche in Google Scholar
[59] Manzey D. Human missions to Mars: New psychological challenges and research issues. Acta Astronaut. 2004;55(3–9):781–90.10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[60] Howe AS. Mars habitat design strategies. Acta Astronautica. 1997;41(4):237–45.Suche in Google Scholar
[61] Verseux C, Baqué M, Lehto K, de Vera J-PP, Rothschild LJ, Billi D. Sustainable life support on Mars–the potential roles of cyanobacteria. Int J Astrobiol. 2016;15(1):65–92.10.1017/S147355041500021XSuche in Google Scholar
[62] Linne DL, Palaszewski BA, Gokoglu SA, Balasubramaniam B, Hegde UG, Gallo C, eds. Waste management options for long-duration space missions: when to reject, reuse, or recycle. 7th Symposium on Space Resource Utilization; 2014.10.2514/6.2014-0497Suche in Google Scholar
[63] Landis GA, ed. Re-evaluating satellite solar power systems for earth. 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference. IEEE; 2006.10.1109/WCPEC.2006.279877Suche in Google Scholar
[64] Sone Y, Ueno M, Kuwajima S. Fuel cell development for space applications: Fuel cell system in a closed environment. J Power Sources. 2004;137(2):269–76.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.051Suche in Google Scholar
[65] Vassiliades C, Agathokleous R, Barone G, Forzano C, Giuzio G, Palombo A, et al. Building integration of active solar energy systems: A review of geometrical and architectural characteristics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;164:112482.10.1016/j.rser.2022.112482Suche in Google Scholar
[66] Paglia E. The Northward expansion of space research. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
[67] Mitchell CA. Bioregenerative life-support systems. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60(5):820S–4S.10.1093/ajcn/60.5.820SSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[68] Allen JP, Nelson M, Alling A. The legacy of Biosphere 2 for the study of biospherics and closed ecological systems. Adv Space Res. 2003;31(7):1629–39.10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00103-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[69] Simon MA, Toups L, Smitherman D, eds. Potential applications of modularity to enable a deep space habitation capability for future human exploration beyond low-earth orbit. Global Space Exploration Conference; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
[70] Pavilion CVV ITYX VENICE - Melodie Yashar: Mars X-House. 2022.Suche in Google Scholar
[71] Howe AS, Sherwood B. Out of this world: The new field of space architecture. AIAA Space Conference Proceedings; 2009. p. 1–12.10.2514/4.479878Suche in Google Scholar
[72] Hall T. Architectural issues in long-duration spaceflight. Houston, TX: NASA; 1992.Suche in Google Scholar
[73] Pulsiri N, Proctor D, Cathcart RB, Buteler JO, eds. Mars terraforming: A new plan for the red planet. 2022 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE; 2022.10.23919/PICMET53225.2022.9882835Suche in Google Scholar
[74] Soureshjani OK, Massumi A, Nouri G. Sustainable colonization of Mars using shape optimized structures and in situ concrete. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15747.10.1038/s41598-023-42971-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[75] SpaceArchitect.org So. Mars X House v2 | SpaceArchitect.org 2020. http://spacearchitect.org/portfolio-item/mars-x-house-v2/.Suche in Google Scholar
[76] Wang Y, Hao L, Li Y, Sun Q, Sun M, Huang Y, et al. In-situ utilization of regolith resource and future exploration of additive manufacturing for lunar/martian habitats: A review. Appl Clay Sci. 2022;229:106673.10.1016/j.clay.2022.106673Suche in Google Scholar
[77] Yashar M, Ciardullo C, Morris M, Pailes-Friedman R, Moses R, Case D, eds. Mars x-house: Design principles for an autonomously 3D-printed ISRU surface habitat. 49th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
[78] Carbone MA, Sajadi A, Murray JM, Csank JT, Loparo KA. Voltage stability of spacecraft electric power systems for deep space exploration. IEEE Access. 2023.10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3266723Suche in Google Scholar
[79] Cucinotta FA, Kim M-HY, Chappell LJ, Huff JL. How safe is safe enough? Radiation risk for a human mission to Mars. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e74988.10.1371/journal.pone.0074988Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[80] Architecture SE. Mars X-House V2 — Space Exploration Architecture 2019 http://www.spacexarch.com/mars-xhouse-v2.Suche in Google Scholar
[81] Yashara M*, Chenniuntaib N, Nefedovc S, Ciardullod C, Morrisd M, Pailes-Friedmand R, et al. Robotic construction & prototyping of a 3D-printed Mars surface habitat; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
[82] Howe AS, Simon M, Smitherman D, Howard R, Toups L, Hoffman SJ, eds. Mars surface habitability options. 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE; 2015.10.1109/AERO.2015.7119273Suche in Google Scholar
[83] Seedhouse E. Living on the Moon. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Praxis; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar
[84] Wilkinson S, Musil J, Dierckx J, Gallou I, de Kestelier X, eds. Autonomous additive construction on mars. 15th Biennial ASCE Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments. VA: American Society of Civil Engineers Reston; 2016.10.1061/9780784479971.035Suche in Google Scholar
[85] Doarn CR, Polk J, Shepanek M. Health challenges including behavioral problems in long-duration spaceflight. Neurol India. 2019;67(8):190.10.4103/0028-3886.259116Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[86] Connors MM, Harrison AA, Akins FR. Living aloft: Human requirements for extended spaceflight. Washington DC, USA: NASA SP-483; 1985.Suche in Google Scholar
[87] Cucinotta FA, Kim M-HY, Ren L. Evaluating shielding effectiveness for reducing space radiation cancer risks. Radiat Meas. 2006;41(9–10):1173–85.10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.03.011Suche in Google Scholar
[88] Shevchenko VV. Lunar base studies in Russia. Sol Syst Res. 2010;44(3):201–8.Suche in Google Scholar
[89] Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 2008;319(5864):756–60.10.1126/science.1150195Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[90] Nitta K, Ohya H. Lunar base extension program and closed loop life support systems. Acta Astronaut. 1991;23:253–62.10.1016/0094-5765(91)90125-OSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[91] Sanders GB, Larson WE. Progress made in lunar in situ resource utilization under NASA’s exploration technology and development program. J Aerosp Eng. 2013;26(1):5–17.10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000208Suche in Google Scholar
[92] Roman M, Yashar M, Fiske M, Nazarian S, Adams A, Boyd P, et al. eds. 3D-printing lunar and martian habitats and the potential applications for additive construction. 2020 International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2020.Suche in Google Scholar
[93] Burrough B. This new ocean: The story of the first space age. New York, NY: Random House; 1998.Suche in Google Scholar
[94] Kanas N. Humans in space: The psychological hurdles. New York, NY: Springer; 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-18869-0Suche in Google Scholar
[95] Treftz C, Omaye ST. Hydroponics: Potential for augmenting sustainable food production in non-arable regions. Nutr Food Sci. 2016;46(5):672–84.10.1108/NFS-10-2015-0118Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Research Article
- Modification of polymers to synthesize thermo-salt-resistant stabilizers of drilling fluids
- Study of the electronic stopping power of proton in different materials according to the Bohr and Bethe theories
- AI-driven UAV system for autonomous vehicle tracking and license plate recognition
- Enhancement of the output power of a small horizontal axis wind turbine based on the optimization approach
- Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz
- Synergistic effect of nano-silica, steel slag, and waste glass on the microstructure, electrical resistivity, and strength of ultra-high-performance concrete
- Expert evaluation of attachments (caps) for orthopaedic equipment dedicated to pedestrian road users
- Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer
- Second-order design of GNSS networks with different constraints using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms
- Impact of including a slab effect into a 2D RC frame on the seismic fragility assessment: A comparative study
- Analytical and numerical analysis of heat transfer from radial extended surface
- Comprehensive investigation of corrosion resistance of magnesium–titanium, aluminum, and aluminum–vanadium alloys in dilute electrolytes under zero-applied potential conditions
- Performance analysis of a novel design of an engine piston for a single cylinder
- Modeling performance of different sustainable self-compacting concrete pavement types utilizing various sample geometries
- The behavior of minors and road safety – case study of Poland
- The role of universities in efforts to increase the added value of recycled bucket tooth products through product design methods
- Adopting activated carbons on the PET depolymerization for purifying r-TPA
- Urban transportation challenges: Analysis and the mitigation strategies for road accidents, noise pollution and environmental impacts
- Enhancing the wear resistance and coefficient of friction of composite marine journal bearings utilizing nano-WC particles
- Sustainable bio-nanocomposite from lignocellulose nanofibers and HDPE for knee biomechanics: A tribological and mechanical properties study
- Effects of staggered transverse zigzag baffles and Al2O3–Cu hybrid nanofluid flow in a channel on thermofluid flow characteristics
- Mathematical modelling of Darcy–Forchheimer MHD Williamson nanofluid flow above a stretching/shrinking surface with slip conditions
- Energy efficiency and length modification of stilling basins with variable Baffle and chute block designs: A case study of the Fewa hydroelectric project
- Renewable-integrated power conversion architecture for urban heavy rail systems using bidirectional VSC and MPPT-controlled PV arrays as an auxiliary power source
- Exploitation of landfill gas vs refuse-derived fuel with landfill gas for electrical power generation in Basrah City/South of Iraq
- Two-phase numerical simulations of motile microorganisms in a 3D non-Newtonian nanofluid flow induced by chemical processes
- Sustainable cocoon waste epoxy composite solutions: Novel approach based on the deformation model using finite element analysis to determine Poisson’s ratio
- Impact and abrasion behavior of roller compacted concrete reinforced with different types of fibers
- Architectural design and its impact on daylighting in Gayo highland traditional mosques
- Structural and functional enhancement of Ni–Ti–Cu shape memory alloys via combined powder metallurgy techniques
- Design of an operational matrix method based on Haar wavelets and evolutionary algorithm for time-fractional advection–diffusion equations
- Design and optimization of a modified straight-tapered Vivaldi antenna using ANN for GPR system
- Review Articles
- A modified adhesion evaluation method between asphalt and aggregate based on a pull off test and image processing
- Architectural practice process and artificial intelligence – an evolving practice
- Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part II
- The influence of storing mineral wool on its thermal conductivity in an open space
- Use of nondestructive test methods to determine the thickness and compressive strength of unilaterally accessible concrete components of building
- Use of modeling, BIM technology, and virtual reality in nondestructive testing and inventory, using the example of the Trzonolinowiec
- Tunable terahertz metasurface based on a modified Jerusalem cross for thin dielectric film evaluation
- Integration of SEM and acoustic emission methods in non-destructive evaluation of fiber–cement boards exposed to high temperatures
- Non-destructive method of characterizing nitrided layers in the 42CrMo4 steel using the amplitude-frequency technique of eddy currents
- Evaluation of braze welded joints using the ultrasonic method
- Analysis of the potential use of the passive magnetic method for detecting defects in welded joints made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 steel
- Analysis of the possibility of applying a residual magnetic field for lack of fusion detection in welded joints of S235JR steel
- Eddy current methodology in the non-direct measurement of martensite during plastic deformation of SS316L
- Methodology for diagnosing hydraulic oil in production machines with the additional use of microfiltration
- Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part II
- Enhancing communication with elderly and stroke patients based on sign-gesture translation via audio-visual avatars
- Optimizing wireless charging for electric vehicles via a novel coil design and artificial intelligence techniques
- Evaluation of moisture damage for warm mix asphalt (WMA) containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)
- Comparative CFD case study on forced convection: Analysis of constant vs variable air properties in channel flow
- Evaluating sustainable indicators for urban street network: Al-Najaf network as a case study
- Node failure in self-organized sensor networks
- Comprehensive assessment of side friction impacts on urban traffic flow: A case study of Hilla City, Iraq
- Design a system to transfer alternating electric current using six channels of laser as an embedding and transmitting source
- Security and surveillance application in 3D modeling of a smart city: Kirkuk city as a case study
- Modified biochar derived from sewage sludge for purification of lead-contaminated water
- The future of space colonisation: Architectural considerations
- Design of a Tri-band Reconfigurable Antenna Using Metamaterials for IoT Applications
- Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part II
- Experimental study on behavior of hybrid columns by using SIFCON under eccentric load
- Special Issue: ICESTA-2024 and ICCEEAS-2024
- A selective recovery of zinc and manganese from the spent primary battery black mass as zinc hydroxide and manganese carbonate
- Special Issue: REMO 2025 and BUDIN 2025
- Predictive modeling coupled with wireless sensor networks for sustainable marine ecosystem management using real-time remote monitoring of water quality
- Management strategies for refurbishment projects: A case study of an industrial heritage building
- Structural evaluation of historical masonry walls utilizing non-destructive techniques – Comprehensive analysis
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Research Article
- Modification of polymers to synthesize thermo-salt-resistant stabilizers of drilling fluids
- Study of the electronic stopping power of proton in different materials according to the Bohr and Bethe theories
- AI-driven UAV system for autonomous vehicle tracking and license plate recognition
- Enhancement of the output power of a small horizontal axis wind turbine based on the optimization approach
- Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz
- Synergistic effect of nano-silica, steel slag, and waste glass on the microstructure, electrical resistivity, and strength of ultra-high-performance concrete
- Expert evaluation of attachments (caps) for orthopaedic equipment dedicated to pedestrian road users
- Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer
- Second-order design of GNSS networks with different constraints using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms
- Impact of including a slab effect into a 2D RC frame on the seismic fragility assessment: A comparative study
- Analytical and numerical analysis of heat transfer from radial extended surface
- Comprehensive investigation of corrosion resistance of magnesium–titanium, aluminum, and aluminum–vanadium alloys in dilute electrolytes under zero-applied potential conditions
- Performance analysis of a novel design of an engine piston for a single cylinder
- Modeling performance of different sustainable self-compacting concrete pavement types utilizing various sample geometries
- The behavior of minors and road safety – case study of Poland
- The role of universities in efforts to increase the added value of recycled bucket tooth products through product design methods
- Adopting activated carbons on the PET depolymerization for purifying r-TPA
- Urban transportation challenges: Analysis and the mitigation strategies for road accidents, noise pollution and environmental impacts
- Enhancing the wear resistance and coefficient of friction of composite marine journal bearings utilizing nano-WC particles
- Sustainable bio-nanocomposite from lignocellulose nanofibers and HDPE for knee biomechanics: A tribological and mechanical properties study
- Effects of staggered transverse zigzag baffles and Al2O3–Cu hybrid nanofluid flow in a channel on thermofluid flow characteristics
- Mathematical modelling of Darcy–Forchheimer MHD Williamson nanofluid flow above a stretching/shrinking surface with slip conditions
- Energy efficiency and length modification of stilling basins with variable Baffle and chute block designs: A case study of the Fewa hydroelectric project
- Renewable-integrated power conversion architecture for urban heavy rail systems using bidirectional VSC and MPPT-controlled PV arrays as an auxiliary power source
- Exploitation of landfill gas vs refuse-derived fuel with landfill gas for electrical power generation in Basrah City/South of Iraq
- Two-phase numerical simulations of motile microorganisms in a 3D non-Newtonian nanofluid flow induced by chemical processes
- Sustainable cocoon waste epoxy composite solutions: Novel approach based on the deformation model using finite element analysis to determine Poisson’s ratio
- Impact and abrasion behavior of roller compacted concrete reinforced with different types of fibers
- Architectural design and its impact on daylighting in Gayo highland traditional mosques
- Structural and functional enhancement of Ni–Ti–Cu shape memory alloys via combined powder metallurgy techniques
- Design of an operational matrix method based on Haar wavelets and evolutionary algorithm for time-fractional advection–diffusion equations
- Design and optimization of a modified straight-tapered Vivaldi antenna using ANN for GPR system
- Review Articles
- A modified adhesion evaluation method between asphalt and aggregate based on a pull off test and image processing
- Architectural practice process and artificial intelligence – an evolving practice
- Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part II
- The influence of storing mineral wool on its thermal conductivity in an open space
- Use of nondestructive test methods to determine the thickness and compressive strength of unilaterally accessible concrete components of building
- Use of modeling, BIM technology, and virtual reality in nondestructive testing and inventory, using the example of the Trzonolinowiec
- Tunable terahertz metasurface based on a modified Jerusalem cross for thin dielectric film evaluation
- Integration of SEM and acoustic emission methods in non-destructive evaluation of fiber–cement boards exposed to high temperatures
- Non-destructive method of characterizing nitrided layers in the 42CrMo4 steel using the amplitude-frequency technique of eddy currents
- Evaluation of braze welded joints using the ultrasonic method
- Analysis of the potential use of the passive magnetic method for detecting defects in welded joints made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 steel
- Analysis of the possibility of applying a residual magnetic field for lack of fusion detection in welded joints of S235JR steel
- Eddy current methodology in the non-direct measurement of martensite during plastic deformation of SS316L
- Methodology for diagnosing hydraulic oil in production machines with the additional use of microfiltration
- Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part II
- Enhancing communication with elderly and stroke patients based on sign-gesture translation via audio-visual avatars
- Optimizing wireless charging for electric vehicles via a novel coil design and artificial intelligence techniques
- Evaluation of moisture damage for warm mix asphalt (WMA) containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)
- Comparative CFD case study on forced convection: Analysis of constant vs variable air properties in channel flow
- Evaluating sustainable indicators for urban street network: Al-Najaf network as a case study
- Node failure in self-organized sensor networks
- Comprehensive assessment of side friction impacts on urban traffic flow: A case study of Hilla City, Iraq
- Design a system to transfer alternating electric current using six channels of laser as an embedding and transmitting source
- Security and surveillance application in 3D modeling of a smart city: Kirkuk city as a case study
- Modified biochar derived from sewage sludge for purification of lead-contaminated water
- The future of space colonisation: Architectural considerations
- Design of a Tri-band Reconfigurable Antenna Using Metamaterials for IoT Applications
- Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part II
- Experimental study on behavior of hybrid columns by using SIFCON under eccentric load
- Special Issue: ICESTA-2024 and ICCEEAS-2024
- A selective recovery of zinc and manganese from the spent primary battery black mass as zinc hydroxide and manganese carbonate
- Special Issue: REMO 2025 and BUDIN 2025
- Predictive modeling coupled with wireless sensor networks for sustainable marine ecosystem management using real-time remote monitoring of water quality
- Management strategies for refurbishment projects: A case study of an industrial heritage building
- Structural evaluation of historical masonry walls utilizing non-destructive techniques – Comprehensive analysis