Abstract
Even if Plato never claimed to be a ‘historian of philosophy’, there are in his dialogues many references to previous philosophers. Apart from his works on the Sophists, which do not claim to faithfully expose the ‘philosophy’ of their authors, we find in Plato’s dialogues comments and sometimes quotations from the Presocratics, from Thales to Philolaos. In some cases, Plato adds the name of the quoted philosopher, but sometimes he leaves to the reader the task of finding out who the commented or quoted author is. This is the case with Melissos in a passage of the Sophist (244b), where his name is not quoted, but an anonymous monistic philosopher expounds a literal quotation of the philosopher: ἓν μόνον ἔστιν (fr. B 8.1 DK).
Bibliographie
Baltussen, H. 2008. Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1979. “Parmenides and the Eleatic One.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1979.61.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
Bels, J. 1986. “Platon et les Présocratiques: Introduction a la double qualification du Phédon.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 70 (2): 217–35.Search in Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2019. “Afirmar negando: compuestos negativos en Parménides.” In Parmenide: tra linguistica, letteratura e filosofia (Eleatica 7), edited by B. Berruecos Frank, and S. Giombini, 95–113. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.10.5771/9783896658081-47Search in Google Scholar
Brémond, M. 2017. Lectures de Mélissos. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110545609Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. L. 1987. “Simplicius et l’école éléate.” In Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, edited by I. Hadot, 166–82. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. L. 1991. “L’invention de l’école éléatique (Platon, Soph. 242d).” In Études sur le Sophiste de Platon, edited by P. Aubenque, 91–124. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. L. 1993. Platon. Le Sophiste, trad. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. L. 2000. “Los Atomistas y los celos de Platón.” Méthexis 13: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000351.Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. L. 2014. “Jenófanes; invitado a Elea por H. Diels (Diógenes Laercio 9.18).” In Dos Homens e suas Ideias. Estudos sobre as Vidas de Diógenes Laércio, edited by D. Leao, G. Cornelli, and M. C. Peixoto, 101–8. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press.10.14195/978-989-721-042-6_7Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. 20042. The Legacy of Parmenides. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M., and A. Brancacci, eds. 2002. Platon, source des Présocratiques. Exploration. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Hadot, I. ed. 1987. Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110862041Search in Google Scholar
Olivieri, F. J. 1994. “Meliso de Samos.” In Los filósofos presocráticos, II, edited by N. L. Cordero, F. J. Olivieri, E. La Croce, and C. Eggers Lan, 67–125. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. 1999. Plato’s Reception of Parmenides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238003.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Search in Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1950. Platon. Oeuvres Complètes, II. Paris: La Pléiade.Search in Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. 2004. “Plato on the Pre-socratics.” In Uses and Abuses on the Classics, edited by J. J. E. Gracia, and J. Yu, 11–35. Buffalo: State University of New York.10.4324/9781351143486-2Search in Google Scholar
Sonna, V. 2017. “Ouk éstin antilégein. Antístenes tras la máscara de Parménides en el Sofista de Platón.” Eidos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte 27: 15–37.10.14482/eidos.27.9066Search in Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1965. Parmenides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tardieu, M. 1987. “Les calendriers en usage à Harrân d’après les sources arabes et le Commentaire de Simplicius à la Physique d’Aristote.” In Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, edited by I. Hadot, 40–57. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
CONVIVIUM, association loi de 1901 for this journal.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Un commento di età imperiale al libro secondo dell’Etica Nicomachea. Traduzione con introduzione e note
- On Plato’s Precosmos (Ti. 52d2–53c3)
- Per una spiegazione causale delle differenze tra gli animali: Aristotele, Historia animalium I 1
- Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Active Intellect as Final Cause
- L’interprétation astrologique de la philosophie naturelle d’Aristote selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Bardesane le Syrien
- L’articulation des chapitres 19 et 20 du traité VI, 2 [43] de Plotin. La priorité du genre sur ses espèces
- Notes
- Une citation littérale de Mélissos dans le Sophiste de Platon
- Notes on Prior Analytics II 22.68a16–21
- Reviews
- Vera Calchi: The Theology of the Epinomis
- Vincenzo Damiani: La Kompendienliteratur nella scuola di Epicuro. Forme, funzioni, contesto
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Un commento di età imperiale al libro secondo dell’Etica Nicomachea. Traduzione con introduzione e note
- On Plato’s Precosmos (Ti. 52d2–53c3)
- Per una spiegazione causale delle differenze tra gli animali: Aristotele, Historia animalium I 1
- Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Active Intellect as Final Cause
- L’interprétation astrologique de la philosophie naturelle d’Aristote selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Bardesane le Syrien
- L’articulation des chapitres 19 et 20 du traité VI, 2 [43] de Plotin. La priorité du genre sur ses espèces
- Notes
- Une citation littérale de Mélissos dans le Sophiste de Platon
- Notes on Prior Analytics II 22.68a16–21
- Reviews
- Vera Calchi: The Theology of the Epinomis
- Vincenzo Damiani: La Kompendienliteratur nella scuola di Epicuro. Forme, funzioni, contesto