Home Rashes and reflection: a novel curriculum using clinical reasoning to teach ambulatory dermatology to internal medicine residents
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rashes and reflection: a novel curriculum using clinical reasoning to teach ambulatory dermatology to internal medicine residents

  • Anne Richardson EMAIL logo , Katherine Gavinski , Lauryn Falcone , Scott Rothenberger , Kwonho Jeong and Tanya Nikiforova
Published/Copyright: September 16, 2025
Diagnosis
From the journal Diagnosis

Abstract

Objectives

Internists do not feel competent in diagnosing and treating common dermatologic conditions. Teaching clinical reasoning principles in graduate medical education can improve trainees’ diagnostic accuracy, but previously published dermatology curricula did not emphasize these skills. We developed a novel curriculum applying clinical reasoning concepts to teach internal medicine (IM) residents how to describe dermatologic lesions, develop differential diagnoses, and use deliberate reflection to improve diagnostic accuracy for four common dermatologic complaints.

Methods

Five asynchronous, interactive 10-min online modules were developed and administered to all 152 IM residents at a large academic residency program in 2023. Residents were evaluated for their ability to describe dermatologic lesions, their diagnostic accuracy, and their deliberate reflection skills. Residents completed this novel assessment before, immediately after, and four months after the curriculum. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to assess changes in assessment scores over time.

Results

One hundred eleven of 152 residents (73 %) participated in the study. Total assessment scores improved between pre-test and post-test (mean difference 0.98, 95 % CI [0.32, 1.64], p=0.004), but not between pre-test and delayed post-test. Residents who completed 4 or 5 modules improved from pre-test to post-test in the description component (mean difference 0.46, 95 % CI [0.01, 0.91], p=0.043) and the final diagnosis/treatment component (mean difference 0.69, 95 % CI [0.22, 1.17] p=0.004), but not the deliberate reflection component.

Conclusions

An interactive, asynchronous clinical reasoning-based dermatology curriculum can improve IM resident knowledge of common dermatologic complaints, particularly immediately after participation and if most modules are completed.


Corresponding author Anne Richardson, MD, Internal Medicine Chief Resident, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street 9 South Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board reviewed and determined the above referenced study meets the regulatory requirements for exempt research under 45 CFR 46.104(d)(1).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Hansra, NK, O’Sullivan, P, Chen, CL, Berger, TG. Medical school dermatology curriculum: are we adequately preparing primary care physicians? J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:23–9.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.912.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Stern, RS, Nelson, C. The diminishing role of the dermatologist in the office-based care of cutaneous diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;29:773–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622-93-70243-m.Search in Google Scholar

3. Lowell, BA, Froelich, CW, Federman, DG, Kirsner, RS. Dermatology in primary care: prevalence and patient disposition. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:250–5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.114598.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Wilmer, EN, Gustafson, CJ, Ahn, CS, Davis, SA, Feldman, SR, Huang, WW. Most common dermatologic conditions encountered by dermatologists and nondermatologists. Cutis 2014;94:285–92.Search in Google Scholar

5. Shi, CR, Katz, JT, Vleugels, RA, Nambudiri, VE. Dermatology education in internal medicine residency programs: a nationwide survey of program directors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021;85:482–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Cayce, R, Bergstresser, P, Hesterman, K, Condie, D. Dermatology curriculum for internal medicine residents: a randomized trial. J Grad Med Educ 2014;6:296–300. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-13-00272.1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. American Academy of Dermatology. Medical student core curriculum. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.aad.org/education-and-quality-care/medical-student-core-curriculum.Search in Google Scholar

8. Regan, PA, Sciacca Kirby, J. Optimizing medical student dermatology education with the American Academy of dermatology’s basic dermatology curriculum. J of Skin 2019;3:443–6. https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.3.6.15.Search in Google Scholar

9. McCleskey, PE. Clinic teaching made easy: a prospective study of the American Academy of Dermatology core curriculum in primary care learners. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:273–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.12.955.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Mamede, S, Schmidt, HG, Penaforte, JC. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Med Educ 2008;42:468–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03030.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Costa Filho, GB, Moura, AS, Brandão, PR, Schmidt, HG, Mamede, S. Effects of deliberate reflection on diagnostic accuracy, confidence and diagnostic calibration in dermatology. Perspect Med Educ 2019;8:230–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0522-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Ware, E. Edpuzzle. J Med Libr Assoc 2021;109. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1202.Search in Google Scholar

13. Connor, MDR. UpToDate [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 19] UpToDate, Connor RF (Ed), Wolters Kluwer. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/index.Search in Google Scholar

14. Goldsmith, LA. VisualDx [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.visualdx.com/.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0076).


Received: 2025-05-30
Accepted: 2025-07-31
Published Online: 2025-09-16

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2025-0076/html
Scroll to top button