Home Pre-analytical errors in coagulation testing: a case series
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Pre-analytical errors in coagulation testing: a case series

  • Mala Mahto , Visesh Kumar , Ayan Banerjee , Sushil Kumar and Anurag Kumar ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Prevention of pre-analytical issues in coagulation testing is of paramount importance for good laboratory performance. In addition to common issues like hemolysed, icteric, or lipemic samples, some specific pre-analytical errors of coagulation testing include clotted specimens, improper blood-to-anticoagulant ratio, contamination with other anticoagulants, etc. Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are very commonly affected tests due to pre-analytical variables. The impact these parameters possess on surgical decision-making and various life-saving interventions are substantial therefore we cannot afford laxity and casual mistakes in carrying out these critical investigations at all.

Case presentation

In this case series, a total of 4 cases of unexpectedly deranged coagulation profiles have been described which were reported incorrectly due to the overall casual approach towards these critical investigations. We have also mentioned how the treating clinician and lab physician retrospectively accessed relevant information in the nick of time to bring back reassurance.

Conclusions

Like every other critical investigation, analytical errors can occur in coagulation parameters due to various avoidable pre-analytical variables. The release of spurious results for coagulation parameters sets alarm bells ringing causing much agony to the treating doctor and patient. Only a disciplined and careful approach taken by hospital and lab staff towards each sample regardless of its criticality can negate these stressful errors to a large extent.


Corresponding author: Dr. Anurag Kumar, Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India, Phone: 91 9811332395, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the doctors, technical staff of the laboratory, and the treating physicians, nursing officers, and patients for their role in bringing to light the small errors that go a big way in improvising diagnostic services. We are also thankful for the dedicated efforts of all healthcare workers during the difficult times brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

  1. Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review. Only spuriously reported laboratory reports are dealt with in this case series with no involvement of human or animal subjects, approval of the institute’s ethical committee was not required.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards. The authors have complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects and/or animals.

  3. Author contributions: V.K. ran the samples identified the problem and collected the data. S.K., A.B., A.K., and MM conceived the idea behind the case study, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. All authors reviewed the final draft and approved the final manuscript.

  4. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  5. Research funding: No funding was received for the above-submitted work.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Plebani, M. Diagnostic errors and laboratory medicine – causes and strategies. EJIFCC 2015;26:7–14.Search in Google Scholar

2. De la Salle, B. Pre- and postanalytical errors in haematology. Int J Lab Hematol 2019;41:170–6, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Plebani, M. Laboratory errors: how to improve pre- and post-analytical phases? Biochem Med 2007;17:5–9, https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2007.001.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ratzinger, F, Lang, M, Belik, S, Schmetterer, KG, Haslacher, H, Perkmann, T, et al.. The effect of 3.2 % and 3.8 % sodium citrate on specialized coagulation tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:992–7, https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2017-0200-oa.Search in Google Scholar

5. Lima-Oliveira, G, Lippi, G, Salvagno, GL, Picheth, G, Guidi, GC. Laboratory diagnostics and quality of blood collection. J Med Biochem 2015;34:288–94, https://doi.org/10.2478/jomb-2014-0043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Lima-Oliveira, G, Salvagno, GL, Danese, E, Favaloro, EJ, Guidi, GC, Lippi, G. Sodium citrate blood contamination by K2-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA): impact on routine coagulation testing. Int J Lab Hematol 2015;37:403–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12301.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Cornes, M, van Dongen-Lases, E, Grankvist, K, Ibarz, M, Kristensen, G, Lippi, G, et al.. Order of blood draw: opinion paper by the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:27–31, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0426.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Magnette, A, Chatelain, M, Chatelain, B, Ten Cate, H, Mullier, F. Pre-analytical issues in the haemostasis laboratory: guidance for the clinical laboratories. Thromb J 2016;14:49, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-016-0123-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Favaloro, EJ, Adcock, Funk, DM, Lippi, G. Pre-analytical variables in coagulation testing associated with diagnostic errors in hemostasis. Lab Med 2012;43:1–10.10.1309/LM749BQETKYPYPVMSearch in Google Scholar

10. Hirsh, J, Anand, SS, Halperin, JL, Fuster, V, American Heart Association. Guide to anticoagulant therapy: heparin: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001;103:2994–3018, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2994.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Rasmussen, KL, Philips, M, Tripodi, A, Goetze, JP. Unexpected, isolated activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation: a practical mini-review. Eur J Haematol 2020;104:519–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13394.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Brown, JM, Dimeski, G. Contamination of coagulation tests with heparin from blood gas samples. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:628–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.4.628.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Solomon, HM, Randall, JR, Simmons, VL. Heparin-induced increase in the international normalized ratio. Responses of 10 commercial thromboplastin reagents. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:735–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/103.6.735.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Chadwick, K, Whitehead, SJ, Ford, C, Gama, R. kEDTA sample contamination: a reappraisal. J Appl Lab Med 2019;3:925–35, https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2018.027920.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241599221.Search in Google Scholar

16. Randell, EW, Yenice, S. Delta checks in the clinical laboratory. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2019;56:75–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2018.1540536.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-08-24
Accepted: 2023-12-11
Published Online: 2024-01-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. The physical exam and telehealth: between past and future
  4. Review
  5. Features and functions of decision support systems for appropriate diagnostic imaging: a scoping review
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. The PRIDx framework to engage payers in reducing diagnostic errors in healthcare
  8. Tumor heterogeneity: how could we use it to achieve better clinical outcomes?
  9. Original Articles
  10. Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy among intensive care unit clinicians – an observational study
  11. Prevalence of atypical presentations among outpatients and associations with diagnostic error
  12. Preferred language and diagnostic errors in the pediatric emergency department
  13. Diurnal temperature variation and the implications for diagnosis and infectious disease screening: a population-based study
  14. What’s going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process
  15. Assessing clinical reasoning skills following a virtual patient dizziness curriculum
  16. Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for optimal immunometabolic profiling of the lifestyle-related cardiorenal risk
  17. Effect of syringe underfilling on the quality of venous blood gas analysis
  18. Short Communications
  19. How do patients and care partners describe diagnostic uncertainty in an emergency department or urgent care setting?
  20. Enhancing clinical reasoning with Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer: a practical guide
  21. Letters to the Editor
  22. How to overcome hurdles in holding mortality and morbidity conferences on diagnostic error cases in Japan
  23. Medical history-taking by highlighting the time course: PODCAST approach
  24. Journal Reputation Factor
  25. Case Report
  26. Pre-analytical errors in coagulation testing: a case series
  27. Acknowledgement
  28. Acknowledgement
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2023-0110/pdf
Scroll to top button