Home CA-125: What does that lab really mean?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

CA-125: What does that lab really mean?

  • Roma Patel ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Matthew Armfield and Andrew Olson
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2016

Abstract

Ovarian torsion is often a diagnosis of exclusion, and while less common in pre-pubertal females, it is on the differential for a pelvic mass. Tumor markers can be used to characterize a pelvic mass, with varying sensitivity and specificity. This is a case of a 10-year-old pre-pubertal female presenting with abdominal pain and found to have an ovarian mass. Her tumor markers demonstrated an elevated CA-125, increasing concern for neoplasm. This led to a delayed operative course and she was ultimately found to have an ovarian torsion. There is unclear utility of CA-125 in pediatrics and reliance on tumor markers during the work-up of an ovarian mass should be limited to avoid diagnostic error.


Corresponding author: Roma Patel, MPH, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 741, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA, Phone: 612-625-2290

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Taskinen S, Fagerholm R, Lohi J, Taskinen M. Pediatric ovarian neoplastic tumors: incidence, age at presentation, tumor markers and outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:425–9.10.1111/aogs.12598Search in Google Scholar

2. Papic JC, Finnell SM, Slaven JE, Billmire DF, Rescorla FJ, Leys CM. Predictors of ovarian malignancy in children: overcoming clinical barriers of ovarian preservation. J Pediatr Surg 2014;49:144–8.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.068Search in Google Scholar

3. Galinier P, Carfagna L, Delsol M, Ballouhey Q, Lemasson F, Le Mandat A, et al. Ovarian torsion. Management and ovarian prognosis: a report of 45 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:1759–65.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.11.058Search in Google Scholar

4. Spigland N, Ducharme JC, Yazbeck S. Adnexal torsion in children. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:974–6.10.1016/S0022-3468(89)80195-2Search in Google Scholar

5. Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Krissi H, Eitan R, Less S, Wiznitzer A, et al. Characteristics and management of ovarian torsion in premenarchal compared with postmenarchal patients. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:514–20.10.1097/AOG.0000000000000995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Chang Y-J, Yan D-C, Kong M-S, Wu C-T, Chao H-C, Luo C-C, et al. Adnexal torsion in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008;24:534–7.10.1097/PEC.0b013e318180fd8bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Oltmann SC, Fischer A, Barber R, Huang R, Hicks B, Garcia N. Cannot exclude torsion-a 15-year review. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:1212–7.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. McCarthy JD, Erickson KM, Smith YR, Quint EH. Premenarchal ovarian torsion and elevated CA-125. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010;23:e47–50.10.1016/j.jpag.2009.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Miralles C, Orea M, España P, Provencio M, Sánchez a, Cantos B, et al. Cancer antigen 125 associated with multiple benign and malignant pathologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:150–4.10.1245/ASO.2003.05.015Search in Google Scholar

10. Moss EL, Hollingworth J, Reynolds TM. The role of CA125 in clinical practice. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:308–12.10.1136/jcp.2004.018077Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Romagnolo C, Leon AE, Fabricio AS, Taborelli M, Polesel J, Del L, et al. Gynecologic oncology HE4, CA125 and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm ( ROMA) as diagnostic tools for ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass: an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 2016;141:303–11.10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-2-19
Accepted: 2016-4-13
Published Online: 2016-5-16
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2016-0007/html
Scroll to top button