Abstract
Background: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently a fatal disease. The clinical presentation of PE is variable and frequently nonspecific, and there is commonly a diagnostic delay. We aimed to investigate factors associated with the delay in the diagnosis of PE.
Methods: Data from patients with PE were collected from January 2011 to December 2013 in an acute care teaching hospital. Time-to-diagnosis, evaluated by obtaining a diagnostic computed tomography scan, was then analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model for examining factors associated with time to the diagnosis of PE. Independent variables included age, gender, activities of daily living, means of transport to the hospital, body temperature, hypoxemia, typical symptoms for PE, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, infiltration on chest radiograph, Wells score, classification of patients with PE based on early mortality risk, patients referred from other specialties, daytime versus nighttime arrival, diagnosed by an emergency physician, and diagnosed by a medical resident.
Results: Sixty patients were included. The time to diagnosis was significantly delayed in low-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2–4.1) and in patients who did not use an ambulance (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0–3.7). In an analysis of the latter subgroup, higher serum CRP concentrations were associated with a delayed diagnosis (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0–1.2).
Conclusion: The time to the diagnosis of PE was delayed in low-risk patients and in patients who attended the hospital by means other than an ambulance. In such patients, a delayed diagnosis was associated with higher serum CRP concentrations.
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585–93.10.1001/archinte.158.6.585Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Smith SB, Geske JB, Maguire JM, Zane NA, Carter RE, Morgenthaler TI. Early anticoagulation is associated with reduced mortality for acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2010;137:1382–90.10.1378/chest.09-0959Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Elliott CG, Goldhaber SZ, Jensen RL. Delays in diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Chest 2005;128:3372–6.10.1378/chest.128.5.3372Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Bulbul Y, Ozsu S, Kosucu P, Oztuna F, Ozlu T, Topbaş M. Time delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis in pulmonary thromboembolism. Respiration 2009;78:36–41.10.1159/000167409Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:416–20.10.1055/s-0037-1613830Search in Google Scholar
6. Aydogdu M, Dogan NO, Sinanoglu NT, Oğuzülgen İK, Demircan A, Bildik F, et al. Delay in diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism in emergency department: is it still a problem? Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2013;19:402–9.10.1177/1076029612440164Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Alonso-Martinez JL, Sanchez FJ, Echezarreta MA. Delay and misdiagnosis in sub-massive and non-massive acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Intern Med 2010;21:278–82.10.1016/j.ejim.2010.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Kline JA, Hernandez-Nino J, Jones AE, Rose GA, Norton HJ, Camargo CA Jr. Prospective study of the clinical features and outcomes of emergency department patients with delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:592–8.10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.1356Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Torres-Macho J, Mancebo-Plaza AB, Crespo-Gimenez A, Sanz de Barros MR, Bibiano-Guillén C, Fallos-Martí R, et al. Clinical features of patients inappropriately undiagnosed of pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:1646–50.10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, Palevsky HI, Saltzman HA, Thompson BT, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991;100:598–603.10.1378/chest.100.3.598Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2014;35:3033–73.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Wynants M, Vengethasamy L, Ronisz A, Meyns B, Delcroix M, Quarck R. NF-kappaB pathway is involved in CRP-induced effects on pulmonary arterial endothelial cells in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013;305:L934–42.10.1152/ajplung.00034.2013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Crop MJ, Siemes C, Berendes P, van der Straaten F, Willemsen S, Levin MD. Influence of C-reactive protein levels and age on the value of D-dimer in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Eur J Haematol 2014;92:147–55.10.1111/ejh.12218Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Methodologies for evaluating strategies to reduce diagnostic error: report from the research summit at the 7th International Diagnostic Error in Medicine Conference
- Mini Review
- Evaluation of DSM-5 and IWG-2 criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies
- Opinion Paper
- The Choosing Wisely campaign – don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater
- Original Articles
- Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care
- Disagreement between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis: mortality and morbidity
- Is Ara h 2 indeed the best predictor for peanut allergy in Dutch children?
- Factors associated with a delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Methodologies for evaluating strategies to reduce diagnostic error: report from the research summit at the 7th International Diagnostic Error in Medicine Conference
- Mini Review
- Evaluation of DSM-5 and IWG-2 criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies
- Opinion Paper
- The Choosing Wisely campaign – don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater
- Original Articles
- Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care
- Disagreement between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis: mortality and morbidity
- Is Ara h 2 indeed the best predictor for peanut allergy in Dutch children?
- Factors associated with a delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism