Home Almost graded multiplication and almost graded comultiplication modules
Article Open Access

Almost graded multiplication and almost graded comultiplication modules

  • Malik Bataineh EMAIL logo , Rashid Abu-Dawwas and Jenan Shtayat
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Let G be a group with identity e, R be a G-graded commutative ring with a nonzero unity 1 and M be a G-graded R-module. In this article, we introduce and study the concept of almost graded multiplication modules as a generalization of graded multiplication modules; a graded R-module M is said to be almost graded multiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then (0:Ma)={0}. Also, we introduce and study the concept of almost graded comultiplication modules as a generalization of graded comultiplication modules; a graded R-module M is said to be almost graded comultiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then aM=M. We investigate several properties of these classes of graded modules.

MSC 2010: 16W50; 13A02

1 Introduction

Throughout this article, G will be a group with identity e and R a commutative ring with a nonzero unity 1. R is said to be G-graded if R=gGRg with RgRhRgh for all g,hG, where Rg is an additive subgroup of R for all gG. The elements of Rg are called homogeneous of degree g. If xR, then x can be written as gGxg, where xg is the component of x in Rg. Also, we set h(R)=gGRg. Moreover, it has been proved in [1] that Re is a subring of R and 1Re. Let I be an ideal of a graded ring R. Then I is said to be graded ideal if I=gG(IRg), i.e., for xI, x=gGxg, where xgI for all gG. An ideal of a graded ring need not be graded; see the following example:

Example 1.1

Consider R=Z[i] and G=Z2. Then R is G-graded by R0=Z and R1=iZ. Now, I=1+i is an ideal of R with 1+iI. If I is G-graded, then 1I, so 1=a(1+i) for some aR, i.e., 1=(x+iy)(1+i) for some x,yZ. Thus, 1=xy and 0=x+y, i.e., 2x=1 and hence x=12 a contradiction. So, I is not G-graded.

Let R be a G-graded ring and I be a graded ideal of R. Then R/I is G-graded by (R/I)g=(Rg+I)/I for all gG.

Assume that M is an R-module. Then M is said to be G-graded if M=gGMg with RgMhMgh for all g,hG, where Mg is an additive subgroup of M for all gG. The elements of Mg are called homogeneous of degree g. It is clear that Mg is an Re-submodule of M for all gG. Moreover, we set h(M)=gGMg. Let N be an R-submodule of a graded R-module M. Then N is said to be graded R-submodule if N=gG(NMg), i.e., for xN, x=gGxg, where xgN for all gG. An R-submodule of a graded R-module need not be graded. Let M be a G-graded R-module and N be a graded R-submodule of M. Then M/N is a graded R-module by (M/N)g=(Mg+N)/N for all gG.

Lemma 1.2

[2, Lemma 2.1] Let R be a G-graded ring and M be a G-graded R-module.

  1. If N and K are graded R-submodules of M, thenN+KandNKare graded R-submodules of M.

  2. If N is a graded R-submodule of M,rh(R), xh(M)and I is a graded ideal of R, then Rx, IN and rN are graded R-submodules of M. Moreover,(N:RM)={rR:rMN}is a graded ideal of R.

A graded R-module M is said to be graded multiplication if for every graded R-submodule N of M, N=IM for some graded deal I of R. In this case, it is known that I=(N:RM). Graded multiplication modules were first introduced and studied by Escoriza and Torrecillas in [3], and further results were obtained by several authors, see for example [4]. In [5], Atani introduced the concept of graded prime submodules; a proper graded R-submodule N of a graded R-module M is said to be graded prime if whenever rh(R) and mh(M) such that rmN, then either r(N:M) or mN. A graded R-module M is said to be graded prime if {0} is a graded prime R-submodule of M. The set of all graded prime submodules of M is denoted by GSpec(M). In [6], a graded R-module M is said to be graded weak multiplication if GSpec(M)=ϕ or for every graded prime R-submodule N of M, N=IM for some graded deal I of R.

Graded semiprime submodules have been introduced by Lee and Varmazyar in [7]. A proper graded R-submodule N of M is said to be graded semiprime if whenever I is a graded ideal of R and K is a graded R-submodule of M such that InKN for some positive integer n, then IKN. A graded R-module M is said to be graded semiprime if {0} is a graded semiprime R-submodule of M. Graded semiprime submodules are also studied in [8]. The set of all graded semiprime R-submodules of M is denoted by GSSpec(M). Motivated from the concepts of graded multiplication modules in [3] and graded weak multiplication modules in [6], a new class of graded R-modules has been introduced in [9], called graded semiprime multiplication modules. A graded R-module M is said to be graded semiprime multiplication if GSSpec(M)= or for every graded semiprime R-submodule N of M, N=IM for some graded ideal I of R.

In [10], Atani introduced the concept of graded weakly prime submodules over graded commutative rings; where a graded proper R-submodule N of a graded R-module M is said to be graded weakly prime R-submodule of M if whenever rh(R) and mh(M) such that 0rmN, then either mN or r(N:RM). One can easily see that every graded prime submodule is graded weakly prime. However, the converse is not true in general; for example, {0} is graded weakly prime submodule by definition but {0} need not be graded prime submodule. In [11], several results on graded weakly prime submodules have been proved and investigated to introduce the concept of graded quasi multiplication modules; a graded R-module M is said to be graded quasi multiplication if for every graded weakly prime R-submodule N of M, N=IM for some graded ideal I of R.

A proper graded R-submodule N of a graded R-module M is said to be graded 2-absorbing if whenever a,bh(R) and mh(M) such that abmN, then amN or bmN or ab(N:RM). The set of all graded 2-absorbing R-submodules of M is denoted by GABSpec(M). This concept has been first introduced and studied in [12], and then generalized into graded n-absorbing submodules in [13]. In [11], a parallel study given in [9] has been followed to investigate the new class of graded absorbing multiplication modules, by first providing many interesting results on graded 2-absorbing submodules. A graded R-module M is said to be graded absorbing multiplication if GABSpec(M)=ϕ or for every graded 2-absorbing R-submodule N of M, N=IM for some graded deal I of R.

So, most of all generalizations for graded multiplication modules were fixing on changing the graded R-submodule N from a general graded submodule to graded prime, graded semiprime, graded weakly prime or graded 2-absorbing submodule. In [14], an R-module M is said to be a quasi multiplication module if whenever AnnR(rM)=AnnR(M) for each rR, then (0:Mr)={0}. In this article, we follow [14] to explore another technique to generalize the concept of graded multiplication modules. First, we need to introduce the following:

Proposition 1.3

Let M be a G-graded R-module and N a graded R-submodule of M. If I is a graded ideal of R, then(N:MI)={mM:ImN}is a graded R-submodule of M.

Proof

Clearly, (N:MI) is an R-submodule of M. Let m(N:MI). Then ImN. Now, m=gGmg, where mgMg for all gG. Let xI. Then xgI for all gG since I is graded. Assume that hG. Then xhmgMhgh(M) for all gG such that gGxhmg=xhgGmg=xhmN. Since N is graded, xhmgN for all gG which implies that hGxhmgN for all gG, and then xmgN for all gG. So, ImgN for all gG, and hence mg(N:MI) for all gG. Therefore, (N:MI) is a graded R-submodule of M.□

Similarly, one can prove the following:

Proposition 1.4

Let M be a G-graded R-module andah(R). Then(0:Ma)={mM:am=0}is a graded R-submodule of M.

In this article, we introduce and study the concept of almost graded multiplication modules; a graded R-module M is said to be almost graded multiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then (0:Ma)={0}.

Graded comultiplication modules have been introduced by Toroghy and Farshadifar in [15]; a graded R-module M is said to be graded comultiplication if for every graded R-submodule N of M, N=(0:MI) for some graded ideal I of R, or equivalently, N=(0:MAnnR(N)). A generalization for graded comultiplication modules has been introduced and studied in [16]; a graded R-module M is said to be graded weak comultiplication if for every graded prime R-submodule N of M, N=(0:MI) for some graded ideal I of R. In [14], an R-module M is said to be a quasi comultiplication module if whenever AnnR(rM)=AnnR(M) for each rR, then rM=M. In this article, we follow [14] to introduce and study the concept of almost graded comultiplication modules; a graded R-module M is said to be almost graded comultiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then aM=M.

2 Almost graded multiplication modules

In this section, we introduce and study the concept of almost graded multiplication modules as a generalization of graded multiplication modules.

Definition 2.1

A graded R-module M is said to be almost graded multiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then (0:Ma)={0}.

Proposition 2.2

Every graded multiplication module is almost graded multiplication.

Proof

Let M be a graded multiplication R-module. Suppose that ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Then (0:Ma) is a graded R-submodule of M, and then there exists a graded ideal I of R such that (0:Ma)=IM. It follows that IAnnR(aM). So, IAnnR(M) and hence (0:Ma)={0}. Thus, M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.□

The next example shows that the converse of Proposition 2.2 is not true in general.

Example 2.3

Consider R=Z, M=(Z2Z2)[i] and G=Z2. Then R is trivially G-graded by R0=R and R1={0}. Also, M is G-graded by M0=Z2Z2 and M1=i(Z2Z2). Clearly, AnnR(M)=2Z. Let ah(R). If a is even, then AnnR(aM)=AnnR({0})=R=ZAnnR(M). If a is odd, then AnnR(aM)=2Z=AnnR(M), and (0:Ma)={0}. Hence, M is almost graded multiplication. On the other hand, N=Z2{0} is a graded R-submodule of M such that (N:RM)M={0}N, so M is not graded multiplication.

Proposition 2.4

Let M be a graded R-module. If(0:Ma)=((0:Ma):RM)Mfor eachah(R), then M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Then (0:Ma)=((0:Ma):RM)M=AnnR(aM)M=AnnR(M)M={0}. Therefore, M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.□

Proposition 2.5

Let M be a graded R-module. If(Rx:RM)=AnnR(M)impliesRx={0}for everyxh(M), then M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Suppose that x(0:Ma). Then xg(0:Ma) for all gG since (0:Ma) is graded. Let gG. Then (Rxg:RM)((0:Ma):RM)=AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Thus, (Rxg:RM)=AnnR(M) as the reverse inclusion is obvious. Now by assumption, Rxg={0}, which implies that xg=0 for all gG as 1R. So, x=gGxg=0. Hence, (0:Ma)={0}, so M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.□

Let M be a G-graded R-module. Then the set of all homogeneous zero divisors of M is given by

ZG(M)={mh(M):rm=0forsomenonzerorh(R)}.

The dual notion of ZG(M) is given by

WG(M)={ah(R):aMM}.

Let M and S be two G-graded R-modules. An R-homomorphism f:MS is said to be graded R-homomorphism if f(Mg)Sg for all gG. In [17], a graded R-module M is said to be graded Hopfian (resp. graded co-Hopfian) if every surjective (resp. injective) graded R-endomorphism of M is a graded R-isomorphism.

Proposition 2.6

Let M be a G-graded R-module. If M is graded co-Hopfian, thenWG(M)=ZG(R/AnnR(M))if and only if M is almost graded multiplication.

Proof

Suppose that WG(M)=ZG(R/AnnR(M)). Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). If aMM, then aWG(M), and then by assumption, there exists bh(R)AnnR(M) such that abAnnR(M). Hence, bAnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), which is a contradiction. So, aM=M, and then (0:Ma)={0} as M is graded co-Hopfian. Therefore, M is almost graded multiplication. Conversely, certainly, ZG(R/AnnR(M))WG(M). Let aWG(M). Then ah(R) such that aMM. Now, as M is graded co-Hopfian, (0:Ma){0}. So, by assumption, we can choose bAnnR(aM)AnnR(M). It follows that aZG(R/AnnR(M)), as needed.□

Proposition 2.7

Let M be a G-graded R-module. Ifbh(R)WG(M)such that bM is an almost graded multiplication R-module, then M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Then abh(R) such that AnnR(bM)=AnnR(abM), and then by assumption, we have that (0:bMa)={0}. Let x(0:Ma). Then ax=0. Since bWG(M), bM=M, and then x=by for some yM. Hence, aby=0, which implies that by(0:bMa)={0}. Therefore, x=by=0, and hence (0:Ma)={0}. Thus, M is an almost graded multiplication R-module.□

Proposition 2.8

Every graded prime R-module is an almost graded multiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Suppose that x(0:Ma). Then ax=0. Since {0} is a graded prime R-submodule of M, either x=0 or a(0:RM). If a(0:RM), then aM={0}, and then AnnR(M)=AnnR(aM)=AnnR({0})=R, which means that RM={0}. Again since {0} is a graded prime R-submodule of M, either M={0} or R(0:RM). If R(0:RM), then R=(0:RM) which is impossible since (0:RM) is a graded prime ideal of R by [5, Lemma 2.1]. So, x=0, as needed.□

Remark 2.9

The converse of Proposition 2.8 is not true in general, because if it is true, then by Proposition 2.2, we have that every graded multiplication module is graded prime which is not true, as {0} is a graded multiplication module which is not a graded prime module.

The next proposition shows that the converse of Proposition 2.8 will be true if R is integral domain and M is faithful.

Proposition 2.10

Let M be an almost graded multiplication R-module. If R is an integral domain and M is faithful, then M is a graded prime R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that (0:Ma)M. Clearly, AnnR(M)AnnR(aM). Now, let bAnnR(aM). Then baAnnR(M)={0}. Since R is an integral domain and (0:Ma)M, we have that bAnnR(M). So, AnnR(aM)AnnR(M). Thus, AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Hence, (0:Ma)={0} since M is almost graded multiplication. Therefore, M is a graded prime R-module.□

Graded second modules have been introduced by Ansari-Toroghy and Farshadifar in [18]; a graded R-module M is said to be graded second if M{0} and for each ah(R), the graded R-homomorphism f:MM defined by f(x)=ax is either surjective or zero. Graded second submodules have been wonderfully studied by Çeken and Alkan in [19]. The next proposition shows that the converse of Proposition 2.8 will be true if M is a graded second R-module.

Proposition 2.11

Let M be an almost graded multiplication R-module. If M is graded second, then M is a graded prime R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R). Then by assumption, aM={0} or AnnR(M)=AnnR(M/(0:Ma))=AnnR(aM). Hence, aM={0} or (0:Ma)={0}, as needed.□

3 Almost graded comultiplication modules

In this section, we introduce and study the concept of almost graded comultiplication modules as a generalization of graded comultiplication modules.

Definition 3.1

A graded R-module M is said to be almost graded comultiplication if whenever ah(R) satisfies AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), then aM=M.

Proposition 3.2

Every graded comultiplication module is almost graded comultiplication.

Proof

Let M be a graded comultiplication R-module. Assume that ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Now, aM is a graded R-submodule of M, so as M is graded comultiplication, we have that aM=(0:MI) for some graded ideal of R, and then IaM={0}, which means that IAnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Let xM. Then Ix={0}, and then x(0:MI)=aM. So, MaM, but clearly, aMM, so aM=M. Hence, M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.□

The next example shows that the converse of Proposition 3.2 is not true in general.

Example 3.3

Consider the details of Example 2.3. Similarly, one can prove that M is almost graded comultiplication. On the other hand, N=Z2{0} is a graded R-submodule of M such that (0:MAnnR(N))=MN, so M is not graded comultiplication.

The next two examples prove that the concepts of almost graded multiplication modules and almost graded comultiplication modules are totally different. The next example shows that not every almost graded multiplication module is almost graded comultiplication.

Example 3.4

Consider R=Z, M=(ZZ)[i] and G=Z2. Then R is trivially G-graded by R0=R and R1={0}. Also, M is G-graded by M0=ZZ and M1=i(ZZ). Now, for each ah(R), AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M)={0} and (0:Ma)={0}, so we have M is an almost graded multiplication R-module. On the other hand, a=2h(R) such that aMM, which implies that M is not an almost graded comultiplication R-module.

The next example shows that not every almost graded comultiplication module is almost graded multiplication.

Example 3.5

Consider R=Z, M=(ZpZp)[i] and G=Z2. Then R is trivially G-graded by R0=R and R1={0}. Also, M is G-graded by M0=ZpZp and M1=i(ZpZp). Now, for each ah(R), AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M)={0} and aM=M, so we have M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module. On the other hand, ph(R) such that (0:Mp){0}, which implies that M is not an almost graded multiplication R-module.

Proposition 3.6

Let M be a graded R-module. IfaM=(0:MAnnR(aM))for eachah(R), then M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Then we have aM=(0:MAnnR(aM))=(0:MAnnR(M))=M. Hence, M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.□

The next corollary gives another proof for Proposition 3.2.

Corollary 3.7

Every graded comultiplication module is almost graded comultiplication.

Proof

Let M be a graded comultiplication R-module. Then as aM is a graded R-submodule of M for all ah(R), we have aM=(0:MAnnR(aM)) for each ah(R), and then by Proposition 3.6, M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.□

In [20], a proper Z-graded R-submodule N of M is said to be graded completely irreducible if whenever N=kΔNk where {Nk}kΔ is a family of Z-graded R-submodules of M, then N=Nk for some kΔ. In [21], the concept of graded completely irreducible submodules has been extended into G-graded case, for any group G. It has been proved that every graded R-submodule of M is an intersection of graded completely irreducible R-submodules of M. In many instances, we use the following basic fact without further discussion.

Remark 3.8

Let N and L be two graded R-submodules of M. To prove that NL, it is enough to prove that if K is a graded completely irreducible R-submodule of M such that LK, then NK.

Proposition 3.9

Let M be a graded R-module. IfAnnR(K)=AnnR(M)implies thatK=Mfor every graded completely irreducible R-submodule K of M, then M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M). Let K be a graded completely irreducible R-submodule of M such that aMK. Then AnnR(K)AnnR(aM)=AnnR(M), and then AnnR(K)=AnnR(M). So, by assumption, K=M. Therefore, aM=M by Remark 3.8. Thus, M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.□

Proposition 3.10

Let M be a graded R-module. Ifbh(R)ZG(M)such that bM is an almost graded comultiplication R-module, then M is an almost graded comultiplication R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that AnnR(M)=AnnR(aM). Then AnnR(aM)=AnnR(abM). So, by assumption, bM=abM. Now, let xM. Then bx=aby for some yM. So, b(xay)=0. Since bZG(M), x=ay and so MaM, as required.□

Proposition 3.11

Let M be an almost graded comultiplication R-module. If R is an integral domain and M is faithful, then M is a graded second R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that aM{0}. Since R is an integral domain and M is faithful, we have AnnR(aM)=AnnR(Ra)=AnnR(M)={0}, which implies that aM=M as M is almost graded comultiplication.□

Proposition 3.12

Let M be an almost graded comultiplication R-module. If M is graded prime, then M is a graded second R-module.

Proof

Let ah(R) such that aM{0}. Then AnnR(M)=AnnR(aM), and then M=aM, as needed.□

References

[1] C. Nastasescu and F. van Oystaeyen, Methods of Graded Rings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1836, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.10.1007/b94904Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. Farzalipour and P. Ghiasvand, On the union of graded prime submodules, Thai J. Math. 9 (2011), no. 1, 49–55.Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Escoriza and B. Torrecillas, Multiplication objects in commutative Grothendieck category, Comm. Algebra 26 (1998), 1867–1883.10.1080/00927879808826244Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. Khaksari and F. R. Jahromi, Multiplication graded modules, Internat. J. Algebra 7 (2013), no. 1, 17–24.10.12988/ija.2013.13003Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. E. Atani, On graded prime submodules, Chiang Mai J. Sci. 33 (2006), no. 1, 3–7.Search in Google Scholar

[6] F. Farzalipour and P. Ghiasvand, On graded weak multiplication modules, Tamkang J. Math. 43 (2012), no. 2, 171–177.10.5556/j.tkjm.43.2012.712Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. C. Lee and R. Varmazyar, Semiprime submodules of graded multiplication modules, J. Korean Math. Soc. 49 (2012), no. 2, 435–447.10.4134/JKMS.2012.49.2.435Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Farzalipour and P. Ghiasvand, On graded semiprime submodules, Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Electr. Comp. Eng. 6 (2012), no. 8, 1169–1172.Search in Google Scholar

[9] R. Abu-Dawwas, Graded semiprime multiplication modules, Bol. Soc. Parana. Mat., (accepted).10.5269/bspm.40197Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. E. Atani, On graded weakly prime submodules, Int. Math. Forum 1 (2006), no. 2, 61–66.10.12988/imf.2006.06007Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Abu-Dawwas, H. Saber, T. Alraqad, and R. Jaradat, On generalizations of graded multiplication modules, Bol. Soc. Parana. Mat., (accepted). 10.5269/bspm.51241.Search in Google Scholar

[12] K. Al-Zoubi and R. Abu-Dawwas, On graded 2-absorbing and weakly graded 2-absorbing submodules, J. Math. Sci. Adv. Appl. 28 (2014), 45–60.Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Hamoda and A. E. Ashour, On graded n-absorbing submodules, Le Matematiche LXX (2015), 243–254.Search in Google Scholar

[14] F. Farshadifar and H. Ansari-Toroghy, Quasi-multiplication and quasi-comultiplication modules, Jordan J. Math. Stat. 13 (2020), no. 1, 125–137.Search in Google Scholar

[15] H. Ansari-Toroghy and F. Farshadifar, Graded comultiplication modules, Chiang Mai J. Sci. 38 (2011), no. 3, 311–320.Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Abu-Dawwas, M. Bataineh and A. Da’keek, Graded weak comultiplication modules, Hokkaido Math. J. 48 (2019), 253–261.10.14492/hokmj/1562810507Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. A. Balde, M. F. Maaouia and A. O. Chbih, Hopfian and cohopfian objects in the categories of Gr(A–Mod) and Comp(Gr(A–Mod)), J. Math. Res. 12 (2020), no. 2, 17–27.10.5539/jmr.v12n2p17Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Ansari-Toroghy and F. Farshadifar, On graded second modules, Tamkang J. Math. 43 (2012), no. 4, 499–505.10.5556/j.tkjm.43.2012.1319Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Çeken and M. Alkan, On graded second and coprimary modules and graded second representations, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 38 (2015), no. 4, 1317–1330.10.1007/s40840-014-0097-6Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Chen and Y. Kim, Graded irreducible modules are irreducible, Comm. Algebra 45 (2017), no. 5, 1907–1913.10.1080/00927872.2016.1226864Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Meng, G-graded irreducibility and the index of reducibility, Comm. Algebra 48 (2020), no. 2, 826–832.10.1080/00927872.2019.1662914Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-14
Revised: 2020-09-23
Accepted: 2020-10-13
Published Online: 2020-12-31

© 2020 Malik Bataineh et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Stability of an additive-quadratic-quartic functional equation
  3. Two new forms of ordered soft separation axioms
  4. Coefficient inequalities for a subclass of Bazilevič functions
  5. Equivalence of the existence of best proximity points and best proximity pairs for cyclic and noncyclic nonexpansive mappings
  6. Generalized parabolic Marcinkiewicz integrals associated with polynomial compound curves with rough kernels
  7. Jordan centralizer maps on trivial extension algebras
  8. On soft pc-separation axioms
  9. Direct and strong converse inequalities for approximation with Fejér means
  10. On perturbed quadratic integral equations and initial value problem with nonlocal conditions in Orlicz spaces
  11. On θ-generalized demimetric mappings and monotone operators in Hadamard spaces
  12. On the domain of implicit functions in a projective limit setting without additional norm estimates
  13. Scalar linear impulsive Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with constant delay-explicit solutions and finite time stability
  14. The special atom space and Haar wavelets in higher dimensions
  15. A strong convergence theorem for a zero of the sum of a finite family of maximally monotone mappings
  16. Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for a fractional differential equation under Sturm-Liouville boundary conditions when the data function is of Lipschitzian type
  17. The new investigation of the stability of mixed type additive-quartic functional equations in non-Archimedean spaces
  18. Numerical approach to the controllability of fractional order impulsive differential equations
  19. Two modifications of the inertial Tseng extragradient method with self-adaptive step size for solving monotone variational inequality problems
  20. Further results on Ulam stability for a system of first-order nonsingular delay differential equations
  21. Existence results for nonlinear coupled system of integral equations of Urysohn Volterra-Chandrasekhar mixed type
  22. Structure of n-quasi left m-invertible and related classes of operators
  23. Hyers-Ulam stability of a nonautonomous semilinear equation with fractional diffusion
  24. Hasimoto surfaces for two classes of curve evolution in Minkowski 3-space
  25. Applications of some operators on supra topological spaces
  26. An iterative algorithm for the system of split mixed equilibrium problem
  27. Almost graded multiplication and almost graded comultiplication modules
  28. Strong convergence of an inertial extrapolation method for a split system of minimization problems
  29. On the non-hypercyclicity of scalar type spectral operators and collections of their exponentials
  30. Exponential spline method for singularly perturbed third-order boundary value problems
  31. Existence results of noninstantaneous impulsive fractional integro-differential equation
  32. Review Articles
  33. On a characterization of exponential, Pearson and Pareto distributions via covariance and pseudo-covariance
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2020-0023/html
Scroll to top button