Formules de caractères pour l'induction automorphe
-
Guy Henniart
Abstract
Let E/F be a finite cyclic extension of p-adic fields, of degree d, and let κ be a character of F× with kernel NE/F (E×). Automorphic induction corresponds, via the Langlands correspondence, to inducing Galois representations from E to F. To a smooth irreducible representation τ of GLm(E) automorphic induction attaches a smooth irreducible representation π of GLmd(F) which is equivalent to (κ ○ det) ⊗ π. When π is generic the relation between τ and π is expressed by saying that a certain character function attached to τ is proportional to another character function attached to π and the choice of an intertwining operator A of (κ ○ det) ⊗ π onto π. Here we normalize A through Whittaker models so that the proportionality constant—we prove—does not depend on τ. This is used in current work of C. J. Bushnell and the first author to give an explicit description of the Langlands correspondence for cuspidal smooth irreducible representations of GLn(F) when n is prime to p. In the present paper we also give a proof of the fundamental lemma for automorphic induction when p is at most n, thus completing J.-L. Waldspurger's result when p > n.
© Walter de Gruyter Berlin · New York 2010
Articles in the same Issue
- La filtration de Harder-Narasimhan des schémas en groupes finis et plats
- Formules de caractères pour l'induction automorphe
- Duality theorems for slice hyperholomorphic functions
- Counting points of homogeneous varieties over finite fields
- Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature
- Free analysis questions II: The Grassmannian completion and the series expansions at the origin
Articles in the same Issue
- La filtration de Harder-Narasimhan des schémas en groupes finis et plats
- Formules de caractères pour l'induction automorphe
- Duality theorems for slice hyperholomorphic functions
- Counting points of homogeneous varieties over finite fields
- Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature
- Free analysis questions II: The Grassmannian completion and the series expansions at the origin