Home Chow rings of stacks of prestable curves II
Article Open Access

Chow rings of stacks of prestable curves II

  • Younghan Bae ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Johannes Schmitt ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: April 29, 2023

Abstract

We continue the study of the Chow ring of the moduli stack 𝔐 g , n of prestable curves begun in [Y. Bae and J. Schmitt, Chow rings of stacks of prestable curves I, Forum Math. Sigma 10 2022, Paper No. e28]. In genus 0, we show that the Chow ring of 𝔐 0 , n coincides with the tautological ring and give a complete description in terms of (additive) generators and relations. This generalizes earlier results by Keel and by Kontsevich and Manin for the spaces of stable curves. Our argument uses the boundary stratification of the moduli stack together with the study of the first higher Chow groups of the strata, in particular providing a new proof of the results of Kontsevich and Manin.

1 Introduction

The tautological ring of the moduli stack of prestable curves

Let 𝔐 g , n be the moduli stack of prestable curves of genus g with n markings. It is a natural extension of the Deligne–Mumford space ¯ g , n of stable curves. In the paper [5], we studied the rational Chow ring CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) , for ( g , n ) different from ( 1 , 0 ) , and its subring

R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) CH * ( 𝔐 g , n )

of tautological classes, naturally extending the corresponding notion on ¯ g , n .

To describe the elements of R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) , let

π : g , n 𝔐 g , n

be the universal curve and let ω π be the relative dualizing sheaf. Let

σ i : 𝔐 g , n g , n

be the i-th universal section and let 𝔖 i g , n be the corresponding divisor. We define ψ and κ-classes: given 1 i n we set

(1.1) ψ i = c 1 ( σ i * ω π ) CH 1 ( 𝔐 g , n ) ,

and for given m 0 we set

(1.2) κ m = π * ( c 1 ( ω π ( i = 1 n 𝔖 i ) ) m + 1 ) CH m ( 𝔐 g , n ) .

Let Γ be a prestable[1] graph in genus g with n markings. Each prestable graph defines a gluing map

ξ Γ : 𝔐 Γ = v V ( Γ ) 𝔐 g ( v ) , n ( v ) 𝔐 g , n

(see e.g. [5, Section 2.1]). Given any prestable graph Γ, consider the products

(1.3) α = v V ( i H ( v ) ψ v , i a i a = 1 m v κ v , a b v , a ) CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) .

of ψ and κ-classes on the space 𝔐 Γ above. Then we define the decorated stratum class [ Γ , α ] as the pushforward

[ Γ , α ] = ( ξ Γ ) * α R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) .

Definition 1.1.

The tautological ring R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) is the -subspace of CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) additively generated by decorated strata classes.[2]

The paper [5] then develops a calculus of decorated stratum classes. Below, such results from [5] are frequently referred.

In full generality, a description of the tautological ring R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) is hard to approach. In this paper we specialize our attention to the moduli space of genus zero prestable curves.

The tautological ring in genus zero

In Section 2, we give a complete description of the Chow groups of 𝔐 0 , n in terms of explicit generators and relations.

For the moduli spaces ¯ 0 , n of stable curves, Keel [22] proved that the tautological ring of ¯ 0 , n coincides with the Chow ring. Moreover, he showed that this ring is generated as an algebra by the boundary divisors of ¯ 0 , n and that the ideal of relations is generated by the WDVV relations, the pullbacks of the relations

(1.4)

in CH 1 ( ¯ 0 , 4 ) under the forgetful maps ¯ 0 , n ¯ 0 , 4 , together with the relations D 1 D 2 = 0 for D 1 , D 2 disjoint boundary divisors.

Later, Kontsevich and Manin [26, 27] showed that the Chow groups of ¯ 0 , n are generated as a -vector space by the classes of the closures of boundary strata of ¯ 0 , n . Moreover, the set of linear relations between such strata classes are generated by the pushforwards of WDVV relations under boundary gluing maps. Our treatment of the Chow groups of 𝔐 0 , n will be closer in spirit to the one by Kontsevich and Manin, since we provide additive generators and relations.

Generators

A first new phenomenon we see for 𝔐 0 , n is that its Chow group is no longer generated by boundary strata. This comes from the fact that for n = 0 , 1 , 2 , the loci 𝔐 0 , n sm 𝔐 0 , n of smooth curves already have nontrivial Chow groups. They are given by polynomial algebras

(1.5) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 0 sm ) = [ κ 2 ] , CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 1 sm ) = [ ψ 1 ] , CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 2 sm ) = [ ψ 1 ]

generated by the class κ 2 on 𝔐 0 , 0 and the classes ψ 1 on 𝔐 0 , 1 and 𝔐 0 , 2 .[3] So we see that the Chow group can no longer be generated by boundary strata because all strata contained in the boundary restrict to zero on the locus 𝔐 0 , n sm of smooth curves. For n 3 , the complement 𝔐 0 , n 𝔐 0 , n sm contains strata of the form 𝔐 0 , 1 sm × 𝔐 0 , n sm . Then one can combine the excision sequence for 𝔐 0 , n sm 𝔐 0 , n , and the description of the Chow group of 𝔐 0 , 1 sm to show that CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) is not generated as a vector space by the boundary strata.[4]

Instead, we prove that CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) is generated by strata of 𝔐 0 , n decorated by κ- and ψ-classes. More precisely, the generators are indexed by the data [ Γ , α ] , where Γ is a prestable graph (describing the shape of the generic curve inside the boundary stratum) and α is a product of ψ-classes at vertices of Γ with 1 or 2 outgoing half-edges (or Γ is the trivial graph for 𝔐 0 , 0 and α = κ 2 a ). We call such a class [ Γ , α ] a decorated stratum class in normal form. The allowed decorations α precisely reflect the nontrivial Chow groups (1.5) above. We illustrate some of the generators that appear in Figure 1, for the precise construction of the corresponding classes [ Γ , α ] CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) see [5, Definition 3.3].

Figure 1

Some decorated strata classes [ Γ , α ] in normal form, giving generators of CH 10 ( 𝔐 0 , 0 )

In particular, since all such classes are contained in the tautological ring, we generalize Keel’s result that all Chow classes on ¯ 0 , n are tautological.

Theorem 1.2.

For n 0 we have the equality CH * ( M 0 , n ) = R * ( M 0 , n ) .

The idea of proof for this first theorem is easy to describe: consider the excision sequence of Chow groups for the open substack 𝔐 0 , n sm 𝔐 0 , n with complement 𝔐 0 , n :

(1.6) CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) 0 .

From (1.5) for n = 0 , 1 , 2 and the classical statement

(1.7) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) = CH * ( 0 , n ) = [ 0 , n ] for  n 3

we see that all classes in CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) have tautological representatives. It follows that it suffices to prove that all classes supported on 𝔐 0 , n are tautological. But 𝔐 0 , n is parameterized (via the union of finitely many gluing morphisms) by products of spaces 𝔐 0 , n i . This allows us to set up a recursive proof.

One thing to verify in this last part of the argument is that the Chow group of a product of spaces 𝔐 0 , n i is generated by cycles coming from the factors 𝔐 0 , n i . In fact, we can show more, namely that the stacks of prestable curves in genus 0 satisfy a certain Chow–Künneth property. To formulate it, we need to introduce two technical properties of locally finite-type stacks Y: we say that Y has a good filtration by finite-type stacks if Y is the union of an increasing sequence ( 𝒰 j ) j of finite-type open substacks such that the codimension of the complement of 𝒰 j becomes arbitrarily large as j increases. We say that Y has a stratification by quotient stacks if there exists a stratification of Y by locally closed substacks which are each isomorphic to a global quotient of an algebraic space by a linear algebraic group. All stacks 𝔐 g , n for ( g , n ) ( 1 , 0 ) satisfy both of these properties.

Proposition 1.3 (Proposition 2.6, Corollary 2.22).

Consider the stack M 0 , n (for n 0 ) and let Y be a locally finite-type stack. Then the map[5]

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH * ( Y ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n × Y ) , α β α × β

is surjective if Y has a good filtration by finite-type stacks and a stratification by quotient stacks. The map is an isomorphism if Y is a quotient stack.

In the proposition above, the technical conditions (like Y being a quotient stack or having a stratification by quotient stacks) are currently needed since some of the results we cite in our proof have them as assumptions. We expect that these conditions can be relaxed, but do not pursue this since Proposition 1.3 is sufficient for the purpose of our paper.

Relations

Returning to the stacks 𝔐 0 , n themselves, we also give a full description of the set of linear relations between the generators [ Γ , α ] above. An important example is the degree one relation

(1.8)

on 𝔐 0 , 2 . What we can show is that all tautological relations in genus 0 are implied by relation (1.8) together with the natural extension of relation (1.4) to CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , 4 ) .

Theorem 1.4 (informal version, see Theorems 2.31 and 2.33).

For n 0 , the system of all linear relations in CH * ( M 0 , n ) between the decorated strata classes [ Γ , α ] in normal form is generated by the WDVV relation (1.4) on M 0 , 4 and relation (1.8) on M 0 , 2 .

We give a precise description of what we mean by the system of relations “generated” by (1.4) and (1.8) in Definition 2.27, but roughly the allowed operations are as follows:

  1. For n 4 we can pull back the WDVV relation (1.4) under the morphism 𝔐 0 , n 𝔐 0 , 4 forgetting n - 4 of the marked points.

  2. We can multiply relation (1.8) by an arbitrary polynomial in ψ 1 , ψ 2 .

  3. Given a decorated stratum [ Γ 0 , α 0 ] in normal form, a vertex v V ( Γ 0 ) at which α 0 is the trivial decoration and a known relation R 0 in the Chow group CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) ) associated to the vertex v, we can create a new relation by gluing R 0 into the vertex v of [ Γ , α ] . In other words, for π v : 𝔐 Γ 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) the projection on the factor associated to v, the new relation is given by

    [ Γ , α ] = ( ξ Γ 0 ) * ( α 0 π v * R 0 ) = 0 CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) .

    See Example 2.28 for an illustration.

Again, our proof strategy for Theorem 1.4 begins by looking at the excision sequence (1.6), but now extended on the left using the first higher Chow group of 𝔐 0 , n sm , again defined by the work of [28]

(1.9) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm , 1 ) CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) 0 .

To illustrate how we can compute tautological relations using this sequence, consider the set of prestable graphs Γ i with exactly one edge. The associated decorated strata classes [ Γ i ] = [ Γ i , 1 ] are supported on 𝔐 0 , n and in fact form a basis of CH 0 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) . Then from (1.9) we see that the linear relations between the classes [ Γ i ] CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) are exactly determined by the image of .

For this purpose, we compute the first higher Chow groups of the space 𝔐 0 , 0 sm and finite products of spaces 𝔐 0 , n i sm ( n i 1 ), which parametrize strata in the boundary of 𝔐 0 , n . The corresponding results are given in Propositions 2.14 and 2.16. The proof of Theorem 1.4 then proceeds by an inductive argument using, again, the stratification of 𝔐 0 , n according to dual graphs.

Restricting our argument to the moduli spaces ¯ 0 , n of stable curves, our approach to tautological relations via higher Chow groups gives a new proof that the relations between classes of strata are additively generated by boundary pushforwards of WDVV relations. As mentioned before, this result was originally stated by Kontsevich and Manin in [26, Theorem 7.3] together with a sketch of proof which was expanded in [27].

The proof relied on Keel’s result [22] that the WDVV relations generate the ideal of relations multiplicatively and thus required an explicit combinatorial analysis of the product structure of CH * ( ¯ 0 , n ) . In turn, the original proof by Keel proceeded by constructing ¯ 0 , n as an iterated blowup of ( 1 ) n - 3 , carefully keeping track how the Chow group changes in each step.

In comparison, our proof is more conceptual, since we can trace each WDVV-relation on ¯ 0 , n to a generator of a higher Chow group CH * ( Γ , 1 ) of some stratum Γ ¯ 0 , n of the moduli space. A very similar approach appears in [40], where Petersen used the mixed Hodge structure of 0 , n and the spectral sequence associated to stratification of ¯ 0 , n to reproduce [22, 26, 27].

A nontrivial consequence of our proof is the following result, stating that in codimension at least two the Chow groups of ¯ 0 , n agree with the Chow groups of its boundary ¯ 0 , n (up to a degree shift).

Corollary 1.5 (see Corollary 2.37).

Let n 4 . Then the inclusion

ι : ¯ 0 , n ¯ 0 , n

of the boundary of M ¯ 0 , n induces an isomorphism

ι * : CH ( ¯ 0 , n ) CH + 1 ( ¯ 0 , n )

for > 0 .

This result follows easily using higher Chow groups: we have the exact sequence

CH + 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) CH ( ¯ 0 , n ) ι * CH + 1 ( ¯ 0 , n ) 0 .

Using that 0 , n can be seen as a hyperplane complement in 𝔸 n - 3 , it is easy to show that the group CH + 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) vanishes for > 0 . Thus for > 0 the map ι * is an isomorphism by the exact sequence. In Remark 2.38 we explain how, alternatively, the corollary follows from the results [26, 27] of Kontsevich and Manin.

Relation to other work

Gromov–Witten theory

Gromov–Witten theory studies intersection numbers on the moduli spaces ¯ g , n ( X , β ) of stable maps to a nonsingular projective variety X. Since the spaces of stable maps admit forgetful morphisms

(1.10) ¯ g , n ( X , β ) 𝔐 g , n , ( f : ( C , p 1 , , p n ) X ) ( C , p 1 , , p n ) ,

results about the Chow groups of 𝔐 g , n can often be translated to results about Gromov–Witten invariants of arbitrary target varieties X.[6]

As an example, in [17] Gathmann used the pullback formula of ψ-classes along the stabilization morphism st : 𝔐 g , 1 ¯ g , 1 to prove certain properties of the Gromov–Witten potential. Similarly, the paper [32] proved degree one relations on the moduli space ¯ 0 , n ( N , d ) of stable maps to a projective space and used them to reduce two pointed genus 0 potentials to one pointed genus 0 potentials. As we explain in Example 2.40, the relations used in [32] are the pullback of the tautological relation (1.8) on 𝔐 0 , 2 and a similar relation on 𝔐 0 , 3 under forgetful morphisms (1.10).

Chow rings of open substacks of 𝔐 0 , n

Several people have studied Chow rings with rational coefficients of open substacks of 𝔐 0 , n , and we explain how their results relate to ours.

In [36], Oesinghaus computed the Chow rings of the loci 𝔐 0 , 2 ss and 𝔐 0 , 3 ss of semistable curves in 𝔐 0 , 2 and 𝔐 0 , 3 . His proof identified the rings in terms of the known algebra of quasi-symmetric functions QSym (see [33] for an overview). However, for many generators of QSym it remained unclear which (geometric) cycle classes on 𝔐 0 , 2 ss and 𝔐 0 , 3 ss they corresponded to. In [5] we answered this question, identifying an additive basis of QSym with explicit decorated strata classes in the tautological rings of 𝔐 0 , 2 ss and 𝔐 0 , 3 ss . In Example 2.42 below we continue this argument by showing how Theorems 1.2 and 1.4 can be used to give a new proof of Oesinghaus’ results, showing that the decorated strata classes above are indeed linearly independent generators of the Chow group.

On the other hand, in [15, 13, 14] Fulghesu gave a computation of the Chow ring CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 3 3 ) of the locus 𝔐 0 , 0 3 of curves with at most three nodes inside 𝔐 0 , 0 . Using a computer program, we compare his results to ours and find that our results almost agree, except for the fact that in [14] there is a missing tautological relation in the final step of the proof. This is explained in detail in Example 2.43.

Outlook and open questions

We want to finish the introduction with a discussion of some conjectures and questions about the Chow groups of 𝔐 g , n .

The first concerns the relation to the Chow groups of the moduli spaces ¯ g , n of stable curves. Since ¯ g , n is an open substack of 𝔐 g , n , the Chow groups of 𝔐 g , n determine those of ¯ g , n . The following conjecture would imply that the converse holds as well.

Conjecture (Conjecture 3.1).

Let ( g , n ) ( 1 , 0 ) . Then for a fixed d 0 there exists m 0 0 such that for any m m 0 , the forgetful morphism[7]

F m : ¯ g , n + m 𝔐 g , n , ( C , p 1 , , p n , p n + 1 , , p n + m ) ( C , p 1 , , p n )

satisfies that the pullback

F m * : CH d ( 𝔐 g , n ) CH d ( ¯ g , n + m )

is injective.

It is easy to see that the system of morphisms ( F m ) m 0 forms an atlas of 𝔐 g , n and that the complement of the image of F m has arbitrarily large codimension as m increases. Thus for a fixed degree d, the Chow groups CH d ( F m ( ¯ g , n + m ) ) converge to CH d ( 𝔐 g , n ) , but it remains to verify that the pullback by F m indeed becomes injective. In Section 3.1 we provide some additional motivation and a number of cases ( n , d ) in genus zero where the conjecture holds.

Since the map F m * sends tautological classes on 𝔐 g , n to tautological classes in ¯ g , n + m , the conjecture would also imply that knowing all tautological rings of moduli spaces of stable curves would uniquely determine the tautological rings of the stacks of prestable curves. In [41], Pixton proposed a set of relations between tautological classes on the moduli spaces of stable curves, proven to hold in cohomology [38] and in Chow [20], and he conjectured that these are all tautological relations. Combined with the conjecture above, this would then determine all tautological rings of the stacks 𝔐 g , n . It is an interesting question if Pixton’s set of relations can also be generalized directly to the stacks of prestable curves to give a conjecturally complete set of relations.

Finally, recall that Theorems 1.2 and 1.4 completely determine the Chow rings of 𝔐 0 , n . Given an open substack U 𝔐 0 , n which is a union of strata, it is easy to see that CH * ( U ) is the quotient of CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) by the span of all tautological classes supported on the complement of U, so the Chow rings of such U are likewise determined.

For such open substacks U we can ask some more refined questions. The first concerns the structure of CH * ( U ) as an algebra.

Question 1 (Question 2.44).

Is it true that for U 𝔐 0 , n an open substack of finite type which is a union of strata, the Chow ring CH * ( U ) is a finitely generated -algebra?

Supporting evidence for this question is that it has an affirmative answer for all stacks 𝔐 0 , n sm by (1.5) and (1.7), and by the computations in [14] also for the substacks U = 𝔐 0 , 0 e , e = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , of unmarked rational curves with at most e nodes. Similar to the proof technique in [14], a possible approach to Question 1 for arbitrary U is to gradually enlarge U, adding one stratum of the moduli stack 𝔐 0 , n at a time and showing in each step that only finitely many additional generators are necessary.

Note that for U not of finite type, Question 1 will have a negative answer in general: from [36] it is easy to see that the Chow ring CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 2 ss ) of the semistable locus in 𝔐 0 , 2 is not finitely generated as an algebra.

Our second question concerns the Hilbert series

H U = d 0 dim CH d ( U ) t d

of the Chow ring of U.

Question 2 (Question 2.45).

Is it true that for U 𝔐 0 , n any open substack which is a union of strata, the Hilbert series H U is the expansion of a rational function at t = 0 ?

First note that a positive answer to Question 1 would imply Question 2 for all finite-type substacks U 𝔐 0 , n , since the Hilbert series of a finitely generated graded algebra is a rational function, all of whose poles are at roots of unity ([34, Theorem 13.2]). However, Question 2 also has a positive answer for the non-finite-type stacks U = 𝔐 0 , 2 ss and 𝔐 0 , 3 ss studied in [36]. In Table 1 we collect some examples of Hilbert series for different U, computed in Example 2.43 and Section 2.6. Note how for U = 𝔐 0 , 2 ss or 𝔐 0 , 3 ss the rational function H U has poles at 1 2 , which is not a root of unity (thus giving one way to see that the Chow rings are not finitely generated).

Table 1

The Hilbert series of the Chow rings of open substacks U of 𝔐 0 , n .

U H U
𝔐 0 0 1 1 - t 2
𝔐 0 1 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t )
𝔐 0 2 t 4 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t )
𝔐 0 3 t 6 + t 5 + 2 t 4 + t 3 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t ) ( 1 - t 3 )
𝔐 0 , 2 ss 1 1 - 2 t
𝔐 0 , 3 ss ( 1 - t ) 3 ( 1 - 2 t ) 3

Structure of the paper

In Section 2 we treat the Chow groups of the stacks 𝔐 0 , n of prestable curves of genus zero. We start in Section 2.1 by computing the Chow groups of the loci 𝔐 0 , n sm of smooth curves and explaining how (most) κ- and ψ-classes on 𝔐 0 , n can be expressed in terms of cycles supported on the boundary. In Section 2.2 we show that every class in the Chow ring of 𝔐 0 , n is tautological. In Section 2.3 we compute the first higher Chow groups of the strata of 𝔐 0 , n and use this in Section 2.4 to classify the tautological relations on 𝔐 0 , n . We finish this part of the paper by discussing the relation to earlier work in Section 2.5 and including some observations and questions about Chow groups of open substacks of 𝔐 0 , n in Section 2.6.

In Section 3 we compare the Chow rings of the stacks 𝔐 g , n of prestable curves and the stacks ¯ g , n of stable curves. We present a conjectural relation between these in Section 3.1. We extend the known results about divisor classes on ¯ g , n to 𝔐 g , n in Section 3.2 and discuss how the study of zero cycles extends in Section 3.3.

Finally, Appendix A summarizes a construction of a Gysin pullback for higher Chow groups following [9, 24].

Notations and conventions

We work over an arbitrary base field k. For the convenience of the reader, we provide an overview of notations used in the paper in Table 2.

Table 2

Notations

𝔐 g , n moduli space of prestable curves
𝔐 g , n , a moduli space of prestable curves with values in a semigroup
𝔐 Γ v V ( Γ ) 𝔐 g ( v ) , n ( v ) , where Γ is a prestable graph
𝔐 Γ moduli space of curves with dual graph precisely Γ
WDVV set of WDVV relations
κ , ψ set of ψ and κ relations

2 The Chow ring in genus 0

In this section we prove Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4. These results completely describe the rational Chow group of 𝔐 0 , n .

2.1 ψ and κ classes in genus 0

In [26, 27], Kontsevich and Manin described the Chow groups of ¯ 0 , n via generators given by boundary strata and additive relations, called the WDVV relations. Their approach relies on the fact that every class on ¯ 0 , n can be represented by boundary classes without ψ or κ classes. This is because the locus of smooth n pointed rational curves 0 , n has a trivial Chow group for n 3 .

However the Chow group of the locus of smooth curves 𝔐 0 , n sm is no longer trivial when n = 0 , 1 , 2 and hence not all tautological classes on 𝔐 0 , n can be represented by boundary classes. We first summarize what is known about the Chow groups of 𝔐 0 , n sm . For a smooth group scheme G over k we write B G := [ Spec k / G ] for the classifying stack of G, whose S-points are G-torsors over S.

Lemma 2.1.

For the moduli spaces of prestable curves in genus 0 we have

  1. 𝔐 0 , 0 sm = B PGL 2 and CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 0 sm ) = [ κ 2 ] ,

  2. 𝔐 0 , 1 sm = B 𝕌 for

    𝕌 = { [ a b 0 d ] PGL 2 } 𝔾 a 𝔾 m

    and CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 1 sm ) = [ ψ 1 ] ,

  3. 𝔐 0 , 2 sm B 𝔾 m and CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 2 sm ) = [ ψ 1 ] ,

  4. 𝔐 0 , n sm = 0 , n and CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) = [ 𝔐 0 , n sm ] for n 3 .

Proof.

The first three statements are proved in [13]. The last statement comes from the fact that 0 , n is an open subscheme of 𝔸 n - 3 . ∎

Note that for part (a) of the lemma above, it is important that we work with -coefficients. Indeed, the Chow groups with integral coefficients of B PGL 2 B SO ( 3 ) have been computed in [37] as

CH * ( B PGL 2 ) = [ c 1 , c 2 , c 3 ] / ( c 1 , 2 c 3 ) ,

so we see that there exists a nontrivial 2-torsion element in codimension 3.

By Lemma 2.1 we know that any monomial in κ- and ψ-classes on 𝔐 0 , n can be written as a multiple of our preferred generators above (a power of κ 2 for n = 0 or a power of ψ 1 for n = 1 , 2 ) plus a contribution from the boundary. Next we give explicit formulas how to do this.

We start with the ψ-classes. For n = 0 there is no marking and for n = 1 the class ψ 1 is our preferred generator. For n = 2 we have the following useful tautological relation.

Lemma 2.2.

There is a codimension one relation

(2.1)

in CH 1 ( M 0 , 2 ) .

Proof.

Consider the 𝔾 m -action on 1 given by

t . [ x 0 : x 1 ] = [ t x 0 : x 1 ]  for  t 𝔾 m ( k ) .

For the identification 𝔐 0 , 2 sm B 𝔾 m = [ Spec k / 𝔾 m ] , the universal family over 𝔐 0 , 2 sm is given by

We have that - ψ 1 , - ψ 2 are the first Chern classes of the normal bundles of p 1 , p 2 . We have ψ 1 + ψ 2 = 0 in CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , 2 sm ) because the 𝔾 m -action on 1 has opposite weights at 0 , . Thus, from the excision sequence

CH 0 ( 𝔐 0 , 2 ) CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , 2 ) CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , 2 sm ) 0 ,

it follows that ψ 1 + ψ 2 can be written as a linear combination of fundamental class of two boundary strata

Consider the morphism F 3 : ¯ 0 , 5 𝔐 0 , 2 forgetting the last three markings. We denote by D ( A | B ) the boundary divisor with markings splitting to the two vertices as A B (see below for an illustration). It follows from [5, Section 3.2] that

F 3 * ψ i = ψ i ,
F 3 * D ( { 1 } | { 2 } ) = I 1 I 2 = { 3 , 4 , 5 } | I 1 | , | I 2 | 1 D ( { 1 } I 1 | { 2 } I 2 ) ,
F 3 * D ( | { 1 , 2 } ) = I 1 I 2 = { 3 , 4 , 5 } | I 1 | 2 D ( I 1 | { 1 , 2 } I 2 ) .

On ¯ 0 , 5 there is a unique linear relation between the pullbacks of ψ 1 + ψ 2 , D ( { 1 } | { 2 } ) and D ( | { 1 , 2 } ) under F 3 , from which the coefficients a , b can be read off as a = 1 , b = 0 . ∎

For n = 2 we can express ψ 2 as the multiple - ψ 1 of our preferred generator plus a term supported in the boundary.

Now let n 3 . For { 1 , , n } = I 1 I 2 , we denote by

the class of the boundary divisor in CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) associated to the splitting I 1 I 2 of the marked points. The following lemma shows how to write ψ-classes on 𝔐 0 , n via boundary strata.

Lemma 2.3.

For n 3 and 1 i n , we have

ψ i = I 1 I 2 = { 1 , , n } i I 1 ; j , I 2 D ( I 1 I 2 )

in CH 1 ( M 0 , n ) for any choice of 1 j , i n .

Proof.

When n = 3 , we have CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , 3 sm ) = 0 , so ψ i can be written as a linear combination of the four boundary divisors of 𝔐 0 , 3 . Again, the coefficients can be determined via the pullback under F 2 : ¯ 0 , 5 𝔐 0 , 3 . The relation for n 4 follows by pulling back the relation on 𝔐 0 , 3 via the morphism F : 𝔐 0 , n 𝔐 0 , 3 forgetting all markings except { i , j , } . This pullback can be computed as

F * ψ m = ψ m

and

F * D ( I | J ) = I J = { 4 , , n } D ( I I | J J ) for  I J = { 1 , 2 , 3 }

via [5, Corollary 3.9]. ∎

For the κ-classes on 𝔐 0 , n we have the following boundary expressions.

Lemma 2.4.

Let a be a nonnegative integer and consider κ a CH a ( M 0 , n ) .

  1. When n 1 , the class κ a can be written as a linear combination of monomials in ψ - classes and boundary classes [ Γ i , α i ] for nontrivial prestable graphs Γ i .

  2. When n = 0 , the class κ a can be written as a linear combination of monomials in κ 2 and ψ - classes and boundary classes [ Γ i , α i ] for nontrivial prestable graphs Γ i .

In the calculation below, we use the notion of tautological classes on the moduli stack 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 of 𝒜 -valued prestable curves when 𝒜 is a semigroup with two elements { 𝟘 , 𝟙 } so that 𝟙 + 𝟙 = 𝟙 . This stack parametrizes prestable curves

( C , p 1 , , p n , ( a v ) v V ( Γ ( C ) ) )

with additional decoration of a v 𝒜 at each component C v of C, with v V ( Γ ( C ) ) a v = 𝟙 . They must satisfy the stability condition that any component C v with fewer than three special points must have a v = 𝟙 . The reason why this stack is useful is that unlike the moduli space of stable curves ¯ g , n , the space 𝔐 g , n + 1 is not the universal curve of 𝔐 g , n . On the other hand, for moduli spaces 𝒜 -valued prestable curves, the map 𝔐 g , n + 1 , 𝟙 𝔐 g , n , 𝟙 which forgets the last marked point and contracts the component C v containing it if it becomes unstable, is the universal curve. Since 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 contains 𝔐 0 , n as the locus of 𝒜 -valued curves satisfying a v = 𝟙 for all v, it is useful to develop the theory of tautological classes on the space 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 and then simply restrict to 𝔐 0 , n in the end. We refer to [5, Section 2.2] for details.

Proof.

It is enough to prove the corresponding statement on 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 because the restriction to the open substack 𝔐 0 , n 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 does not create additional κ classes.

(a) Consider the universal curve

π : 𝔐 0 , n + 1 , 𝟙 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙

so that κ a = π * ( ψ n + 1 a + 1 ) . We prove the claim by induction on a, where the induction start a = 0 is trivial since κ 0 = n - 2 . In the computation, we repeatedly use the formula for π * proven in [5, Proposition 3.11].

If n 2 and a 1 , we claim that ψ n + 1 CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n + 1 , 𝟙 ) can be written as a sum of boundary divisors. Indeed, by Lemma 2.3 this is true for ψ n + 1 CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n + 1 ) and so the statement on 𝔐 0 , n + 1 , 𝟙 follows by pulling back under the forgetful map

F 𝒜 : 𝔐 0 , n + 1 , 𝟙 𝔐 0 , n + 1

of 𝒜 -values using [5, Proposition 3.12]. Thus replacing one of the factors ψ n + 1 in ψ n + 1 a + 1 with this boundary expression, we get a sum of boundary divisors in 𝔐 0 , n + 1 , 𝟙 decorated with ψ n + 1 a . After pushing forward to 𝔐 0 , n , 𝟙 , this class can be written as a tautological class without κ classes by the induction hypothesis.

When n = 1 , we also conclude by induction on a. Pulling back the relations of Lemma 2.1 along the morphism 𝔐 0 , 2 , 𝟙 𝔐 0 , 2 forgetting 𝒜 -values, we have

where implicitly we sum over all 𝒜 -valued graphs where the sum of degrees is equal to 𝟙 . By [5, Proposition 3.10] we have

Using the projection formula, the expression [5, Proposition 3.11] for the pushforward π * and the induction hypothesis we get the result.

(b) When a is an odd number, this statement follows from the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch computation in [12, Proposition 1]. Namely,

0 = ch 2 a - 1 ( π * ω π ) = B 2 a ( 2 a ) ! ( κ 2 a - 1 + 1 2 Γ i = 0 2 a - 2 ( - 1 ) i ψ h i ψ h 2 a - a - i [ Γ ] ) ,

where the sum is over 𝒜 -valued graphs Γ with one edge e = ( h , h ) and degree 𝟙 . Here B 2 a is the 2 a -th Bernoulli number.

We prove the statement for κ 2 a by the induction on a. Consider the forgetful morphism

π 2 : 𝔐 0 , 2 , 𝟙 𝔐 0 , 0 , 𝟙 .

which is a composition of two forgetful maps 𝔐 0 , 2 , 𝟙 π 1 𝔐 0 , 1 , 𝟙 π 0 𝔐 0 , 0 , 𝟙 . By the projection formula and [5, Proposition 3.10], one computes

π 2 * ( ψ 1 3 ψ 2 2 a + 1 ) = π 0 * π 1 * ( ψ 2 2 a + 1 ( π 1 * ψ 1 + D 1 , 2 ) 3 )
= π 0 * π 1 * ( ψ 2 2 a + 1 π 1 * ψ 1 3 )
= π 0 * ( ψ 1 3 κ 2 a ) = π 0 * ( ψ 1 3 π 0 * κ 2 a + ψ 1 2 a + 3 ) = κ 2 a + 2 + κ 2 κ 2 a ,

where D 1 , 2 is the divisor class on 𝔐 0 , 2 , 𝟙 which is the image of the universal section of π 1 associated to the first marking, which satisfies ψ 2 D 1 , 2 = 0 . On the other hand,

by Lemma 2.1. By the induction hypothesis, comparing the two equalities ends the proof. ∎

2.2 Generators of CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n )

The goal of this subsection is to prove Theorem 1.2. The basic idea is simple: by Lemma 2.1 we know that classes on the smooth locus of 𝔐 0 , n have tautological representatives. By an excision argument, it suffices to show that classes supported on the boundary are tautological. But the boundary is parametrized under the gluing maps by products of 𝔐 0 , n i . Then we want to conclude using an inductive argument.

The two main technical steps to complete are as follows:

  1. The boundary of 𝔐 0 , n is covered by a finite union of boundary gluing maps, which are proper and representable. We want to show that the direct sum of pushforwards by the gluing maps is surjective on the Chow group of the boundary.

  2. Knowing that classes on 𝔐 0 , n 1 and 𝔐 0 , n 2 are tautological up to a certain degree d, we want to conclude that classes of degree at most d on the product 𝔐 0 , n 1 × 𝔐 0 , n 2 are tensor products of tautological classes.

The first issue is resolved by the fact that the pushforward along a proper surjective morphism of relative Deligne–Mumford type is surjective on the rational Chow group. We prove this statement in [5, Appendix B.4].

We now turn to the second issue, understanding the Chow group of products of spaces 𝔐 0 , n i . We make the following general definition, extended from [36, Definition 6].

Definition 2.5.

Let X , Y be algebraic stacks with X locally of finite type over k and Y of finite type over k. We say that X has the Chow Künneth generation property (CKgP) for Y if the natural morphism

(2.2) CH * ( X ) CH * ( Y ) CH * ( X × Y )

is surjective, and we say that it has the Chow Künneth property (CKP) for Y if the map (2.2) is an isomorphism. Similarly, we define that X has the CKgP (or CKP) if it has the CKgP (or CKP) for all algebraic stacks Y of finite type over k.

Recall that a locally of finite-type stack X has a good filtration by finite-type stacks if X is the union of an increasing sequence ( 𝒰 j ) j of finite-type open substacks such that the codimension of the complement of 𝒰 j becomes arbitrarily large as j increases. It is immediate that if X has the CKgP (or the CKP) and in addition has a good filtration, then the map (2.2) is surjective (or an isomorphism) for all Y locally finite-type over k admitting a good filtration. The additional assumption of the good filtration is added since in general tensor products and right exact sequences are not compatible with inverse limits.

We now turn to showing the following result, resolving the second issue mentioned at the beginning of the section.

Proposition 2.6.

For all n 0 , the stacks M 0 , n have the CKgP for finite-type stacks Y having a stratification by quotient stacks.

For the proof we start with the smooth part of 𝔐 0 , n .

Proposition 2.7.

For all n 0 , the stacks M 0 , n sm have the CKP.

Proof.

Starting with the easy cases, for n = 2 we have 𝔐 0 , 2 sm B 𝔾 m by Lemma 2.1 and it was shown in [36, Lemma 2] that this satisfies the CKP. On the other hand, for n 3 we have 𝔐 0 , n sm = 0 , n , which is an open subset of 𝔸 n - 3 . Then for any finite-type stack Y we have CH * ( 0 , n ) CH * ( Y ) CH * ( Y ) and the map (2.2) is just the pullback under the projection 0 , n × Y Y . Combining [28, Corollary 2.5.7] and the excision sequence, we see that this pullback is surjective. On the other hand, composing it with the Gysin pullback by an inclusion

Y { C 0 } × Y 0 , n × Y

for some C 0 0 , n we obtain the identity on CH * ( Y ) , so it is also injective.

Next we consider the case n = 1 . By Lemma 2.1 we have

𝔐 0 , 1 sm B 𝕌

for 𝕌 = 𝔾 a 𝔾 m . The group 𝕌 contains 𝔾 m as a subgroup and we claim that the natural map B 𝔾 m B 𝕌 is an affine bundle with fibre 𝔸 1 . Indeed, the fibres are 𝕌 / 𝔾 m 𝔸 1 and the structure group is 𝕌 = Aff ( 1 ) acting by affine transformations on 𝔸 1 . Of course also for any finite-type stack Y it is still true that Y × B 𝔾 m Y × B 𝕌 is an affine bundle. Then by [28, Corollary 2.5.7] we have that the two vertical maps in the diagram

induced by pullback of the affine bundles are isomorphisms. The top arrow in the diagram is also an isomorphism since, as seen above, B 𝔾 m has the CKP. Thus the bottom arrow is an isomorphism as well.

We are left with the case n = 0 . The forgetful map

(2.3) π : 𝔐 0 , 1 sm 𝔐 0 , 0 sm

gives the universal curve over 𝔐 0 , 0 sm . The map (2.3) can be thought of as the morphism between quotient stacks

π : [ 1 / PGL 2 ] [ Spec k / PGL 2 ]

induced by the PGL 2 -equivariant map 1 Spec k . By [5, Remark B.20], the map π is projective and the line bundle 𝒪 1 ( 2 ) on 1 descends to a π-relatively ample line bundle on [ 1 / PGL 2 ] .

Now for any finite-type stack Y consider a commutative diagram

induced by the projective pushforward π * . Note that the map ( id × π ) * is surjective. Indeed, a small computation[8] shows that for α CH * ( Y × B PGL 2 ) we have

( id × π ) * ( 1 2 c 1 ( 𝒪 1 ( 2 ) ) ( id × π ) * α ) = α .

Then the surjectivity of the top arrow follows.

To prove injectivity of the top arrow consider the diagram

induced by the flat pullback π * . Similar to above, we see that for α CH * ( B PGL 2 ) we have

π * ( 1 2 c 1 ( 𝒪 1 ( 2 ) ) π * α ) = α .

Thus the map id π * is injective and thus the top arrow must be injective as well, finishing the proof. ∎

For the next results, we say that an equidimensional, locally finite-type stack X has the Chow Künneth generation property up to codimension d if (2.2) is surjective in all codimensions up to d.

Lemma 2.8.

Let X , X be equidimensional algebraic stacks, locally of finite type over k and admitting good filtrations. Then for X , X having the CKgP (up to codimension d), also X × X has the CKgP (up to codimension d).

Proof.

Fixing d 0 and U X a finite-type open substack with complement of codimension at least d + 1 , one has

CH d ( X ) CH d ( U ) ,

and similarly

CH d ( X × Y ) CH d ( U × Y )

for any finite-type algebraic stack Y. This follows from the definition of the Chow groups as a limit (see the discussion above [5, Proposition A.5]). Using this we can reduce the proof of the lemma to the case where X (and similarly X ) are of finite type over k, where it then follows from simple diagram chasing. ∎

Lemma 2.9.

Let Z be an algebraic stack, locally finite type over k, stratified by quotient stacks and with a good filtration by finite-type substacks. Let Z ^ Z be a proper, surjective map representable by Deligne–Mumford stacks such that Z ^ has the CKgP. Then Z has the CKgP for stacks Y stratified by quotient stacks.

If both Z and Z ^ are equidimensional with dim Z ^ - dim Z = e 0 , then if Z ^ has the CKgP up to codimension d, Z has the CKgP (for stacks Y stratified by quotient stacks) up to codimension d - e .

Proof.

Let Y be an algebraic stack of finite type over k, stratified by quotient stacks. Then in the diagram

the top arrow is surjective by [5, Proposition B.19] (and [5, Remark B.21]) applied to the map Z ^ × Y Z × Y and the left arrow is surjective since Z ^ has the CKgP. It follows that

CH * ( Z ) CH * ( Y ) CH * ( Z × Y )

is surjective, so Z has the CKgP for stacks Y stratified by quotient stacks.

The statement with bounds on codimensions follows by looking at the correct graded parts of the above diagram and noting that codimension d cycles on Z ^ push forward to codimension d - e cycles on Z. ∎

Proposition 2.10.

Let X be an algebraic stack over k with a good filtration by finite-type substacks and let U X be an open substack with complement Z = X U such that U and Z have the CKgP. Then X has the CKgP.

If X is equidimensional and Z has pure codimension e, U has the CKgP up to codimension d and Z has the CKgP up to codimension d - e , then X has the CKgP up to codimension d.

Proof.

For Y a finite-type stack, using excision exact sequences on X and X × Y we obtain a commutative diagram

with exact rows. The vertical arrows for U , Z are surjective since U , Z have the CKgP. By the four lemma, the middle arrow is surjective as well, so X has the CKgP. Again, the variant with bounds on the codimension follows by looking at the correct graded parts of the above diagram, noting that codimension d cycles on Z push forward to codimension d + e cycles on X. ∎

Combining these ingredients, we are now ready to prove Proposition 2.6.

Proof of Proposition 2.6.

We will show that for all d 0 , all spaces 𝔐 0 , n have the CKgP for finite-type stacks Y having a stratification by quotient stacks up to codimension d by induction on d. Every stack has the CKgP up to codimension d = 0 , so the induction start is fine. Let now d 1 , then we want to apply Proposition 2.10 for X = 𝔐 0 , n with U = 𝔐 0 , n sm . Then U has the CKgP by Proposition 2.7. Its complement Z = 𝔐 0 , n admits a proper, surjective, representable cover

(2.4) Z ^ = I { 1 , , n } 𝔐 0 , I { p } × 𝔐 0 , I c { p } Z = 𝔐 0 , n 𝔐 0 , n

by gluing maps. Note that Z ^ and Z are both equidimensional of the same dimension. By induction the spaces 𝔐 0 , I { p } and 𝔐 0 , I c { p } have the CKgP up to codimension d - 1 (note that they both have at least one marking). So by Lemma 2.8 their product has the CKgP up to codimension d - 1 . The stabilizer group of each geometric points of Z = 𝔐 0 , n is affine and hence by [28, Proposition 3.5.9] the stack Z is stratified by quotient stacks. By Lemma 2.9 we have that Z has the CKgP up to codimension d - 1 . This is sufficient to apply Proposition 2.10 to conclude that 𝔐 0 , n has the CKgP for finite-type stacks Y having a stratification by quotient stacks up to codimension d as desired. ∎

Proof of Theorem 1.2.

We show CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) = R d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) (for all n 0 ) by induction on d 0 . The induction start d = 0 is trivial. So let d 1 and assume the statement holds in codimensions up to d - 1 . By excision we have an exact sequence

CH d - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) 0 .

By Lemma 2.1 all elements of CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) have tautological representatives, so it suffices to show that this is also true for elements coming from CH d - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) . Using the parametrization (2.4) it suffices to show that codimension d - 1 classes on products 𝔐 0 , n 1 × 𝔐 0 , n 2 are tautological (where n 1 , n 2 1 ). By Proposition 2.6 we have a surjection

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n 2 ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 × 𝔐 0 , n 2 )

and by the induction hypothesis, all classes on the left side are (tensor products of) tautological classes up to degree d - 1 . Since tensor products of tautological classes map to tautological classes under gluing maps, this finishes the proof. ∎

2.3 Higher Chow–Künneth property

The goal of this subsection is to give a background to compute the higher Chow group of 𝔐 Γ sm for prestable graphs Γ. Computing higher Chow groups of 𝔐 0 , n sm has two different flavors. When n = 0 , 1 , 2 or 3, we use the projective bundle formula and its consequences. When n 4 , 𝔐 0 , n sm is a hyperplane complement inside affine space and we use the motivic decomposition from [8].

Below we study the Chow–Künneth property for higher Chow groups. Unlike the Chow–Künneth property for Chow groups, formulating the Chow–Künneth property for higher Chow groups in general is rather complicated, see [44, Theorem 7.2]. Below, we focus on the case of the first higher Chow group CH * ( X , 1 ) defined in [28][9]. To simplify the notation, we write CH * ( k , ) := CH * ( Spec k , ) .

Definition 2.11.

A quotient stack X over k is said to have the higher Chow Künneth property (hCKP) if for all algebraic stacks Y of finite type over k the natural morphism

(2.5) CH * ( X , ) CH * ( k , ) CH * ( Y , ) CH * ( X × Y , )

is an isomorphism in total degree = 1 . A quotient stack X over k is said to have the higher Chow Künneth generating property (hCKgP) if the above morphism is surjective.

Expanding this definition slightly, the degree = 1 part of the left-hand side of (2.5) is given by the quotient

(2.6) ( CH * ( X , 1 ) CH * ( Y , 0 ) ) ( CH * ( X , 0 ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) ) CH * ( k , 1 ) CH * ( X , 0 ) CH * ( Y , 0 ) ,

where

α β X β Y CH * ( k , 1 ) CH * ( X , 0 ) CH * ( Y , 0 )

maps to

( ( α β X ) β Y , - β X ( α β Y ) )

in the numerator of (2.6). The cokernel of the following map

CH 1 ( k , 1 ) CH * - 1 ( X ) CH * ( X , 1 )

is called the indecomposable part CH ¯ * ( X , 1 ) of CH * ( X , 1 ) . For example CH ¯ 1 ( Spec k , 1 ) = 0 .

We summarize some properties for higher Chow groups of quotient stacks X = [ U / G ] . In this case, the definition of the first higher Chow group of X from [28] coincides with the definition using Bloch’s cycle complex of the finite approximation of U G = U × G E G from [11]. For the properties of higher Chow groups presented below, many of the proofs follow from this presentation.

Lemma 2.12.

Let X be a quotient stack and E X be a vector bundle of rank r + 1 , and let π : P ( E ) X be the projectivization. Let O ( 1 ) be the hyperplane line bundle on P ( E ) . Then the map

θ E ( ) : i = 0 r CH * + i ( X , 1 ) CH * + r ( ( E ) , 1 )

given by

( α 0 , , α r ) i = 0 r c 1 ( 𝒪 ( 1 ) ) i π * α i

is an isomorphism.

Proof.

Let X = [ U / G ] be a quotient stack. Choose a G-representation V and an open subspace W V on which G acts freely. We can take a representation V so that the codimension of V W in V has arbitrary large codimension. By [11, Section 2.7], the group CH * ( X , 1 ) is isomorphic to CH * ( U × W / G , 1 ) and the similar formula holds for CH * ( ( E ) , 1 ) . Now the property follows from the projective bundle formula [6, Theorem 7.1].[10]

An affine bundle of rank r over X is a morphism B X such that locally (in the smooth topology) on X, B is a trivial affine r plane over X [28, Section 2.5]. We assume that the structure group of an affine bundle of rank r is the group of affine transformations Aff ( r ) in GL ( r + 1 ) . Therefore there exists an associated vector bundle E of rank r + 1 and an exact sequence of vector bundles

0 F E 𝒪 X 0 .

The complement of ( F ) ( E ) is the affine bundle B.

We have a homotopy invariance property of higher Chow groups for affine bundles (see also [31, Proposition 2.3]).

Corollary 2.13.

Let X be a quotient stack and φ : B X be an affine bundle of rank r. Then

φ * : CH * ( X , 1 ) CH * + r ( B , 1 )

is an isomorphism.

Proof.

Let p and q be projections from ( E ) and ( F ) to X respectively. There exists an excision sequence

CH * ( ( F ) , 1 ) i * CH * ( ( E ) , 1 ) j * CH * ( B , 1 ) CH * ( ( F ) ) i * CH * ( ( E ) )

because all stacks are quotient stacks [11]. Since ( F ) is the vanishing locus of the canonical section of 𝒪 ( E ) ( 1 ) , we have

i * q * α = c 1 ( 𝒪 ( E ) ( 1 ) ) p * α  for  α CH * ( X )

by [16, Lemma 3.3]. As α runs through a basis of CH * ( X ) , the classes

c 1 ( 𝒪 ( F ) ( 1 ) ) q * α  for  0 r - 1

run through a basis of CH * ( ( F ) ) by Lemma 2.12. Pushing them forward via i, the classes

(2.7) i * ( c 1 ( 𝒪 ( F ) ( 1 ) ) q * α ) = c 1 ( 𝒪 ( E ) ( 1 ) ) + 1 p * α for  0 r - 1 , α

form part of a basis of CH * ( ( E ) ) . In particular, the map i * : CH * ( ( F ) ) CH * ( ( E ) ) is injective and furthermore, we see that

(2.8) p * : CH * ( X , 1 ) CH * ( ( E ) , 1 ) / CH * ( ( F ) , 1 )

gives an isomorphism.

The injectivity of i * implies (via the excision sequence above) that j * is surjective. Using Lemma A.2, formula (2.7) holds verbatim for higher Chow classes α CH * ( X , 1 ) so i * : CH * ( ( F ) , 1 ) CH * ( ( E ) , 1 ) is injective. Thus the excision sequence implies that j * induces an isomorphism

(2.9) j * : CH * ( ( E ) , 1 ) / CH * ( ( F ) , 1 ) CH * ( B , 1 ) .

But since φ * = j * p * , we know that φ is an isomorphism as the composition of the two isomorphisms (2.9) and (2.8). ∎

Proposition 2.14.

For n = 0 , 1 , 2 or 3, the stacks X = M 0 , n sm satisfy the hCKP for quotient stacks Y. Moreover, we have CH ¯ * ( X , 1 ) = 0 and the natural morphism

(2.10) CH * ( X ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) CH * ( X × Y , 1 )

is an isomorphism. In particular, setting Y = Spec k , we find

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm , 1 ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) CH * ( k , 1 ) .

Proof.

When n = 3 , 𝔐 0 , 3 sm = Spec k , so there is nothing to prove.

When n = 2 , we use finite-dimensional approximation of B 𝔾 m via projective spaces N , similar to the proof of [36, Lemma 2]. Indeed, for the vector bundle [ 𝔸 N + 1 / 𝔾 m ] B 𝔾 m , pullback induces an isomorphism of Chow groups and [ 𝔸 N + 1 / 𝔾 m ] is isomorphic to N away from codimension N + 1 . This shows the known identity

CH ( B 𝔾 m ) CH ( N ) for  N .

Similarly, for Y a quotient stack, [ 𝔸 N + 1 × Y / 𝔾 m ] is a vector bundle over B 𝔾 m × Y . By [11, Proposition 5], the higher Chow group of [ 𝔸 N + 1 × Y / 𝔾 m ] and N × Y is isomorphic up to degree N . One can use the homotopy invariance of higher Chow groups proven in [28, Proposition 4.3.1] to show that we have

CH ( B 𝔾 m × Y , 1 ) CH ( N × Y , 1 ) for  N .

On the other hand, the natural morphism

CH * ( N ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) CH * ( N × Y , 1 )

is an isomorphism by Lemma 2.12. Combining with the equalities above, this shows that the map

(2.11) CH * ( B 𝔾 m ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) CH * ( B 𝔾 m × Y , 1 )

is an isomorphism. This shows the hCKP of B 𝔾 m .

When n = 1 , we have 𝔐 0 , 1 sm B 𝕌 for 𝕌 = 𝔾 a 𝔾 m by Lemma 2.1. We already saw that for any finite-type stack Y the map B 𝔾 m × Y B 𝕌 × Y is an affine bundle. By Corollary 2.13 we have the homotopy invariance

CH * ( B 𝕌 × Y , 1 ) CH * ( B 𝔾 m × Y , 1 )

for all quotient stacks Y. Then the hCKP and the vanishing CH ¯ * ( B 𝕌 , 1 ) = 0 for B 𝕌 follow from the corresponding properties of B 𝔾 m proven above.

We are left with the case n = 0 . For any quotient stack Y consider a commutative diagram

induced by the projective pushforward π * . We start by proving surjectivity of ( id × π ) * . By [5, Remark B.20] the morphism id × π can be factorized as

where E is a rank 3 vector bundle E on B PGL 2 associated to H 0 ( 1 , 𝒪 1 ( 2 ) ) . Let

ξ = c 1 ( 𝒪 ( E ) ( 1 ) )

be the relative hyperplane class. For any class α in CH ( Y × B PGL 2 , 1 ) , we have

( id × π ) * ( ( i * ξ ) ( id × π ) * α ) = p * i * ( ( i * ξ ) i * p * α )
= p * ( ξ i * ( i * ( p * α ) ) )
= 2 p * ( ξ 2 p * α )
= 2 α ,

where the first equality comes from the functoriality of pushforward and Gysin pullback for higher Chow groups and the second equality is the projection formula (A.3) from Appendix A. The third equality comes from Lemma A.2 and the factor of two comes from the fact that the map B 𝕌 ( E ) is the second Veronese embedding of fiberwise degree two. The fourth equality comes from [30, Proposition 4.6]. Therefore ( id × π ) * is surjective.

To prove injectivity of the top arrow consider the diagram

induced by the flat pullback π * . As seen in the proof of Proposition 2.7, the map

π * : CH * ( B PGL 2 ) CH * ( B 𝕌 )

is injective and thus the left arrow of the above diagram is likewise injective. Hence the top arrow is an isomorphism, finishing the proof. ∎

The language of motives is a convenient way to state the higher Chow–Künneth property for 0 , n in the case n 4 . For simplicity, let k be a perfect field.[11] Let DM ( k ; ) be the Voevodsky’s triangulated category of motives over k with -coefficients. Let Sch / k be the category of separated schemes of finite type over k. Then there exists a functor

𝖬 : Sch / k DM ( k ; )

which sends a scheme to its motive. The category DM ( k ; ) is a tensor triangulated category, with a symmetric monoidal product and 𝖬 preserves the monoidal structure, namely 𝖬 ( X × k Y ) = 𝖬 ( X ) 𝖬 ( Y ) . See [35] for the basic theory of motives.

There is an invertible object, called the Tate motive

( 1 ) [ 2 ] DM ( k ; ) ,

and by taking its shifting and tensor product we have ( a ) [ n ] for any integers a and n. Define the motivic cohomology of a scheme X (in -coefficient) as

H i ( X , ( j ) ) = Hom DM ( k ; ) ( 𝖬 ( X ) , ( j ) [ i ] ) .

The motivic cohomology is a bi-graded module over the motivic cohomology of the base field k. The motivic cohomology of k is related to Milnor’s K-theory of fields.

In [45] Voevodsky proved that for any smooth scheme X over k, the higher Chow group and the motivic cohomology have the following comparison isomorphism:

(2.12) H i ( X , ( j ) ) CH j ( X , 2 j - i )

where the right-hand side is Bloch’s higher Chow group introduced in [6]. Bloch’s definition of higher Chow groups will be used to compute the connecting homomorphism of the localization sequence. When X is a smooth scheme over k, the higher Chow group and the motivic cohomology have product structure

CH a ( X , p ) CH b ( X , q ) CH a + b ( X , p + q )

and the comparison isomorphism (2.12) is a ring isomorphism ([25]).

Now we summarize results from [8]. For a hyperplane complement U 𝔸 N , there is a finite index set I and n i 0 such that

𝖬 ( U ) i I ( n i ) [ n i ] .

As a corollary, CH * ( U , ) is a finitely generated free module over CH * ( k , ) and

(2.13) CH ( U , 1 ) = { H 0 ( U , 𝒪 U × ) if  = 1 , 0 otherwise.

The isomorphism CH ( U , 1 ) H 1 ( U , ( 1 ) ) H 0 ( U , 𝒪 U × ) follows from [35, Corollary 4.2]. There exists an isomorphism

CH 1 ( U , 1 ) CH ¯ 1 ( U , 1 ) CH 1 ( k , 1 ) .

Example 2.15.

Let U = Spec k [ x , x - 1 ] be the complement of the origin in the affine line. Then

CH 1 ( U , 1 ) a k × x a k ×

and the element m CH 0 ( k ) = acts by x a x m a and λ CH 1 ( k , 1 ) = k × acts by x a λ x a . In fact, CH * ( U , ) is generated by the fundamental class and x over CH * ( k , ) .

Proposition 2.16.

Let U A N be a hyperplane complement as above. Then the hCKP holds for quotient stacks.

Proof.

Let Y be a quotient stack and hence Y × U is also a quotient stack. Note that Y admits a vector bundle E such that the vector bundle is represented by a scheme off a locus of arbitrarily high codimension. Since U is a scheme, the pullback of E to Y × U also satisfies the same property. For higher Chow groups of quotient stacks, the homotopy invariance for vector bundle and the extended localization sequence is proven in [30]. Therefore we may assume that Y is a scheme. When Y is a scheme, there exist isomorphisms

CH l ( Y × U , 1 ) = Hom ( 𝖬 ( Y × U ) , ( l ) [ 2 l - 1 ] )
= Hom ( 𝖬 ( Y ) 𝖬 ( U ) , ( l ) [ 2 l - 1 ] )
= Hom ( i I 𝖬 ( Y ) ( n i ) [ n i ] , ( l ) [ 2 l - 1 ] )
= i I Hom ( 𝖬 ( Y ) ( n i ) [ n i ] , ( l ) [ 2 l - 1 ] )
= i I Hom ( 𝖬 ( Y ) , ( l - n i ) [ 2 l - n i - 1 ] )
= i I CH l - n i ( Y , 1 - n i )
= n i 1 CH l - n i ( Y , 1 - n i ) ,

where the fifth equality comes from the cancellation theorem. In the proof of [8, Proposition 1.1], the index n i = 0 corresponds to CH 0 ( U , 0 ) and the indices n i = 1 corresponds to generators of CH ¯ 1 ( U , 1 ) over . Therefore we get the isomorphism. ∎

After identifying

0 , n = { ( x 1 , , x n ) 𝔸 n - 3 : x i x j  for  i j , x i 0 , x j 1 } 𝔸 n - 3 ,

Proposition 2.14 and 2.16 compute the higher Chow group of v V ( Γ ) 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm for any prestable graph Γ.

Now we revisit the CKP for the stack 𝔐 0 , n . We recall the definition of Bloch’s higher Chow groups [6]. Let

Δ m = Spec ( k [ t 0 , , t m ] / ( t 0 + + t m - 1 ) )

be the algebraic m simplex. For 0 i 1 < < i a m , the equation t i 1 = = t i a = 0 defines a face Δ m - a Δ n . Let X be an equidimensional quasi-projective scheme over k. Let z i ( X , m ) be the free abelian group generated by all codimension i subvarieties of X × Δ m which intersect all faces X × Δ l properly for all l < m . Taking the alternating sum of restriction maps to i + 1 faces of X × Δ i , we get a chain complex ( z * ( X , m ) , δ ) . The higher Chow group CH i ( X , m ) is the i-th cohomology of the complex z * ( X , m ) .

When m = 1 , the proper intersection is equivalent to saying that cycles are not contained in any of the (strict) faces. Let R = Δ 1 { [ 0 ] , [ 1 ] } . Then the group z * ( X , 1 ) is equal to z * ( X × R ) and the differential

z * ( X × R ) 𝛿 z * ( X ) 0

is given by specialization maps. If a i W i is a cycle in X × R ,

(2.14) δ ( a i W i ) = a i W i ¯ X × [ 0 ] - a i W i ¯ X × [ 1 ] ,

where W i ¯ is the closure of W i in X × Δ 1 . In the following, given a product X × Y and classes α CH * ( X , a ) , β CH * ( Y , b ) , we write α × β CH * ( X × Y , a + b ) for their exterior product.

Lemma 2.17.

Let X 1 and X 2 be algebraic stacks stratified by quotient stacks, and let j 1 : Z 1 X 1 and j 2 : Z 2 X 2 be closed substacks with complements

i 1 : U 1 = X 1 Z 1 X 1 , i 2 : U 2 = X 2 Z 2 X 2 ,

where U 1 , U 2 are quotient stacks. Let Z 12 = X 1 × X 2 U 1 × U 2 . Denote by

1 : CH * ( U 1 , 1 ) CH * ( Z 1 ) ,
2 : CH * ( U 2 , 1 ) CH * ( Z 2 ) ,
: CH * ( U 1 × U 2 , 1 ) CH * ( Z 12 )

the boundary maps for the inclusions U 1 X 1 , U 2 X 2 , U 1 × U 2 X 1 × X 2 .

  1. For α CH * ( U 1 , 1 ) and β CH * ( U 2 ) ,

    ( α × β ) = 1 ( α ) × β ¯ in  CH * ( Z 12 )

    where β ¯ CH * ( X 2 ) is any extension of β.

  2. The following diagram commutes:

    (2.15)

    where the arrow on the right is induced by the natural map

    Z 1 × X 2 X 1 × Z 2 Z 12 .

Proof.

(a) We first prove that the right-hand side is well-defined. For a different choice of extension β ¯ of β, there exists γ CH * ( Z 2 ) such that j 2 * γ = β ¯ - β ¯ . Therefore, the class 1 ( α ) × ( β ¯ - β ¯ ) on Z 12 is supported on Z 1 × Z 2 . In particular, it is a class pushed forward from CH * ( X 1 × Z 2 ) . Consider the following commutative diagram:

Then we have

1 ( α ) × ( β ¯ - β ¯ ) = f * ( id × j 2 ) * ( 1 ( α ) × γ ) = g * ( j 1 × id ) * ( 1 ( α ) × γ ) .

This class vanishes because ( j 1 ) * 1 α vanishes as a class in CH * ( X 1 ) .

We first prove the equality when X 1 , X 2 are schemes. The proof follows from diagram chasing. Recall that the connecting homomorphism : CH * ( U 1 × U 2 , 1 ) CH * ( Z 12 ) is defined using the following diagram:

For each class in CH * ( U 1 × U 2 , 1 ) take a representative in z * ( U 1 × U 2 , 1 ) . By taking a preimage under i * , applying the map δ and taking a preimage under j * , we get a class in CH * ( Z 12 ) which corresponds to the image of . Fix a representative of α in z * ( U 1 × R ) and β in z * ( U 2 ) . Let α ¯ be the closure of α in X 1 × R and let β ¯ be the closure of β in X 2 . Let α ~ be the closure of α ¯ in X 1 × 𝔸 1 . Then to compute ( α × β ) we observe that α × β = i * ( α ¯ × β ¯ ) . Applying δ, we have

δ ( α ¯ × β ¯ ) = α ~ × β ¯ X 1 × [ 0 ] × X 2 - α ~ × β ¯ X 1 × [ 1 ] × X 2
= j * ( α ~ X 1 × [ 0 ] - α ~ X 1 × [ 1 ] ) × β ¯
= j * ( 1 ( α ) × β ¯ )

and this proves the equality.

In general, let U 1 be a quotient stack by assumption. For a projective morphism S 1 U 1 from a reduced stack S 1 , there exists a projective morphism T 1 X 1 such that S 1 U 1 × X 1 T 1 ([28, Corollary 2.3.2]). Let E 1 be a vector bundle on S 1 . By [28, Proposition 2.3.3], there exists a projective modification T 1 T 1 and a vector bundle E 1 which restricts to E 1 . We perform a similar construction for the quotient stack U 2 . The image of CH * ( U 1 , 1 ) CH * ( U 2 ) under the boundary map

: CH * ( U 1 × U 2 , 1 ) CH * ( Z 12 )

is defined by the limit of boundary maps for naive higher Chow groups of E 1 E 2 E 1 E 2 (see [28, (4.2.2)]). The corresponding computation is precisely equal to the case above. Therefore the same formula holds for stacks X 1 and X 2 .

(b) Let α β CH * ( U 1 , 1 ) CH * ( X 2 ) . We take a natural extension β of i 2 * β . Then by (a), we have

( id i 2 * ) ( α β ) = ( α × i 2 * β )
= 1 ( α ) × β
= 1 id ( α β ) .

The same computation holds for CH * ( X 1 ) CH * ( U 2 , 1 ) and we get the commutativity of diagram (2.15). ∎

Remark 2.18.

By applying Lemma 2.17 to X 1 = U 1 = Spec k (so that Z 1 = ) and Z = Z 2 X = X 2 with U = X Z , we find that the composition

CH * ( k , 1 ) CH * ( U ) CH * ( U , 1 ) CH * ( Z )

vanishes since for α CH * ( k , 1 ) and β CH * ( U ) we have ( α β ) = 1 ( α ) β ¯ = 0 as 1 ( α ) lives in CH * ( Z 1 ) = CH * ( ) = 0 . This implies that factors through the indecomposable part CH ¯ * ( U , 1 ) of CH * ( U , 1 ) .

To prove the CKP for 𝔐 0 , n , we want to use that via the boundary gluing morphisms, the space 𝔐 0 , n is stratified by (finite quotients of) products of spaces 𝔐 0 , n i sm , for which we know the CKP. The following proposition tells us that indeed the CKP for such a stratified space can be checked on the individual strata.

Proposition 2.19.

Let X be an algebraic stack, locally of finite type over k with a good filtration and stratified by quotient stacks X = X i . Suppose each stratum X i has the CKP and the hCKgP for quotient stacks. Then X has the CKP for quotient stacks.

Proof.

Since X has a good filtration, the Chow groups of X and X × Y of a fixed degree can be computed on a sufficiently large finite-type open substack. This allows us to reduce to the case where X has finite type.

Now by assumption, there exists a nonempty open substack U X which is a quotient stack and has the CKP. Let Z = X U be the complement. For a quotient stack Y consider a commutative diagram

(2.16)

where the columns are exact by the excision sequence. Since U has the CKP, the arrow γ 4 is an isomorphism and by Noetherian induction, the same is true for γ 2 . We extend the domain of the map γ 1 by inserting an extra component CH * ( U ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) . Then the diagram

commutes by applying Lemma 2.17 to the map U × Y X × Y . Note that the new factor CH * ( U ) CH * ( Y , 1 ) maps to CH * ( X ) CH * ( Y Y ) = 0 under the top arrow, and so in particular the left column of (2.16) remains exact after the modification. Furthermore, the modified map γ 1 is surjective because U has the hCKgP for quotient stacks. Therefore γ 3 is an isomorphism by applying the five lemma to the modified version of (2.16). ∎

To apply this to the stratification of 𝔐 0 , n by prestable graphs, we need a small further technical lemma, due to the fact that the strata of 𝔐 0 , n are quotients of products of 𝔐 0 , n i by finite groups. The notion of taking a quotient of an algebraic stack by a finite group action is defined in [42]. See also [5, footnote 9].

Lemma 2.20.

Let M be an algebraic stack of finite type over k and stratified by quotient stacks with an action of a finite étale group G over k. Then the quotient map π : M M / G induces an isomorphism

(2.17) π * : CH * ( 𝔐 / G ) CH * ( 𝔐 ) G

from the Chow group of the quotient M / G to the G-invariant part of the Chow group of M . On the other hand, the map

(2.18) π * : CH * ( 𝔐 ) CH * ( 𝔐 / G )

is a surjection.

Proof.

The map π is representable and a principal G-bundle, hence in particular it is finite and étale. Thus we can both pull back cycles and push forward cycles under π. For g G let σ g : 𝔐 𝔐 be the action of g on 𝔐 . Then the relation π σ g π shows that σ g * acts as the identity on the image of π * and thus π * has image in the G-invariant part of CH * ( 𝔐 ) . The equality

π * π * = | G | id : CH * ( 𝔐 / G ) CH * ( 𝔐 / G )

shows that π * is injective and that π * is surjective (since we work with -coefficients). On the other hand, we have

π * π * = g G σ g * : CH * ( 𝔐 ) CH * ( 𝔐 )

thus restricted on the G-invariant part, we again have

π * π * | CH * ( 𝔐 ) G = | G | id : CH * ( 𝔐 ) G CH * ( 𝔐 ) G ,

showing π * is surjective. ∎

In the following, we typically apply the above lemma to the action of Aut ( Γ ) on the stack 𝔐 Γ (and open substacks of 𝔐 Γ ). Here Aut ( Γ ) is the constant group scheme over k associated to the abstract group of automorphisms of Γ, which thus is finite and étale over k.

Remark 2.21.

The above lemma is also true for the first higher Chow groups with -coefficients.

Corollary 2.22.

For all n 0 , the stacks M 0 , n have the CKP for quotient stacks.

Proof.

Recall that for a prestable graph Γ of genus 0 with n markings, there exists the locally closed substack 𝔐 Γ 𝔐 0 , n of curves with dual graph exactly Γ. By Proposition 2.19, it suffices to show that the stacks 𝔐 Γ have the CKP and the hCKgP for quotient stacks. Now from [5, Proposition 2.4] we know that the restriction of the gluing map ξ Γ induces an isomorphism

( v V ( Γ ) 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm ) / Aut ( Γ ) ξ Γ 𝔐 Γ .

The product of spaces 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm has the CKP by Proposition 2.7 and the hCKgP for quotient stacks by Proposition 2.14 and Proposition 2.16. From Lemma 2.20 and Remark 2.21 it follows that the quotient of a space with the CKP (or hCKgP) under an action of a finite étale group still has the CKP (or hCKgP), so by the above isomorphism all 𝔐 Γ have the CKP and hCKgP for quotient stacks. This finishes the proof. ∎

We proved the Chow–Künneth property of 𝔐 0 , n with respect to quotient stacks. This assumption comes from technical assumptions in [28]. For example, the extended excision sequence is only proven when the open substack is a quotient stack. Such assumptions are not necessary for a different cycle theory of algebraic stacks constructed in [24]. Therefore, the following remark could remove the technical assumptions in the above Chow–Künneth property.

Remark 2.23.

Let X be an algebraic stack, locally of finite type over k. Let H * BM be the rational motivic Borel–Moore homology theory defined in [24]. There exists a cycle class map

cl : CH * ( X ) H * BM ( X )

which is compatible with projective pushforward, Chern classes and lci pullbacks. In [4], we will show that the cycle class map cl is an isomorphism when X is stratified by quotient stacks.

2.4 Tautological relations

In this subsection, we formulate and prove a precise form of Theorem 1.4, see Theorem 2.31. Recall that for a prestable graph Γ, a decoration α is an element of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) given as a product α = v α v where α v CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) ) are monomials in κ- and ψ-classes on the factors 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) of 𝔐 Γ .

Definition 2.24.

Define the strata space 𝒮 g , n to be the free -vector space with basis given by isomorphism classes of decorated prestable graphs [ Γ , α ] .

By definition, the image of the map

𝒮 g , n CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) , [ Γ , α ] ξ Γ * α

is the tautological ring R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) .[12]

For the proofs below, it is convenient to allow decorations α v at vertices of Γ which are combinations of monomials in κ- and ψ-classes as follows.

Definition 2.25.

Given a prestable graph Γ in genus 0 with n markings, an element

α = v V ( Γ ) α v v V ( Γ ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) )

is said to be in normal form if

  1. for vertices v V ( Γ ) with n ( v ) = 0 , we have α v = κ 2 a for some a 0 ,

  2. for vertices v V ( Γ ) with n ( v ) = 1 , we have α v = ψ h b , where h is the unique half-edge at v and b 0 ,

  3. for vertices v V ( Γ ) with n ( v ) = 2 , we have α v = ψ h c + ( - ψ h ) c , where h , h are two half-edges at v and c 0 ,

  4. for vertices v V ( Γ ) with n ( v ) 3 , we have that α v = 1 is trivial.

Note that because of the terms ψ h c + ( - ψ h ) c in case c) above, the element α is not strictly speaking a decoration, since the α v are not monomials. However, given Γ , α as in Definition 2.25, we write [ Γ , α ] for the element in 𝒮 0 , n obtained by expanding α in terms of monomial decorations.

Definition 2.26.

For g = 0 let 𝒮 0 , n nf 𝒮 0 , n be the subspace additively generated by [ Γ , α ] for α in normal form.[13]

Definition 2.27.

Let R 0 𝒮 g 0 , n 0 be a tautological relation. Given g , n , we say that the set of relations in 𝒮 g , n generated by R 0 is the subspace of the -vector space 𝒮 g , n generated by elements of 𝒮 g , n obtained by

  1. choosing a prestable graph Γ in genus g with n markings and a vertex v V ( Γ ) with g ( v ) = g 0 , n ( v ) = n 0 ,

  2. choosing an identification of the n 0 half-edges incident to v with the markings 1 , , n 0 for 𝒮 g 0 , n 0 ,

  3. choosing decorations α w CH * ( 𝔐 g ( w ) , n ( w ) ) for all vertices w V ( Γ ) { v } ,

  4. gluing the relation R 0 into the vertex v of Γ, putting decorations α w in the other vertices and expanding as an element of 𝒮 g , n .

More generally, given any family ( R 0 i 𝒮 g 0 i , n 0 i ) i I of tautological relations, we define the relations in 𝒮 g , n generated by this family to be the sum of the spaces of relations generated by the R 0 i .

On the level of Chow groups, the relations in Definition 2.27 are of the form

(2.19) R = ( ξ Γ ) * ( π v * R 0 w V ( Γ ) { v } π w * α w ) = 0 CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) ,

where π v , π w are the projections from 𝔐 Γ to the factors associated to v , w . The only additional observation needed to make sense of the definition is that the left-hand side of (2.19) also makes sense as an element of the strata algebra 𝒮 g , n if R is in 𝒮 g 0 , n 0 and the α w are monomials in κ- and ψ-classes.

Example 2.28.

Let n 0 = 4 with markings labelled { 3 , 4 , 5 , h } and let R 0 𝒮 0 , n 0 be the WDVV relation

For a prestable graph

and a decoration α w = κ 3 , the corresponding relation is

Definition 2.29.

Consider the family κ , ψ 0 of relations obtained by multiplying the relations of κ- and ψ-classes from Lemmas 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 with an arbitrary monomial in κ- and ψ-classes. Define the space κ , ψ 𝒮 0 , n as the space of relations generated by κ , ψ 0 .

Define WDVV 𝒮 0 , n nf as the space of relations obtained by gluing some WDVV relation into a decorated prestable graph [ Γ , α ] in normal form at a vertex v with n ( v ) 4 . In other words, it is the space of relations generated by the WDVV relation as in Definition 2.27 where we restrict to Γ , ( α w ) w v such that [ Γ , α ] (with α v = 1 ) is in normal form.[14]

Remark 2.30.

Let us comment on the role of the sets of relations appearing above. The relations κ , ψ 0 allow to write any monomial α in κ- and ψ-classes on 𝔐 0 , n as a sum α = α 0 + β of

  1. a (possibly zero) monomial term α 0 in κ- and ψ-classes such that the trivial prestable graph with decoration α 0 is in normal form (implying that α 0 restricts to a basis element of CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n sm ) as computed in Lemma 2.1),

  2. a sum β of generators [ Γ i , α i ] supported in the boundary (i.e. with Γ i nontrivial).

The relations κ , ψ allow to do the above at each of the vertices of a decorated stratum class [ Γ , α ] and by a recursive procedure allow to write [ Γ , α ] as a sum of decorated strata classes in normal form. The relations in WDVV then encode the remaining freedom to express relations among these classes in normal form generated by the WDVV relation. The following theorem and the course of its proof make precise the statement that these processes describe tautological relations on 𝔐 0 , n .

Theorem 2.31.

The kernel of the surjection S 0 , n CH * ( M 0 , n ) is given by

κ , ψ + WDVV .

In particular, we have

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) = 𝒮 0 , n / ( κ , ψ + WDVV ) .

We split the proof of the above theorem into two parts.

Proposition 2.32.

The map S 0 , n nf S 0 , n S 0 , n / R κ , ψ is surjective.

Proof.

The statement says that we can use κ , ψ relations on each vertex to express any decorated stratum class as a linear combination of stratum classes in normal form. This follows from Lemma 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 as described in Remark 2.30. In particular, for vertices v of valency n ( v ) = 2 and adjacent half-edges h , h , we know that any class α v on 𝔐 0 , 2 of codimension c can be written as a multiple of ψ h c plus an element of κ , ψ . Up to such relations, we have ψ h c = ( - ψ h ) c by Lemma 2.1, and so we obtain a more symmetric decoration by averaging and writing

α v ( ψ h c + ( - ψ h ) c ) + κ , ψ .

Theorem 2.33.

The kernel of the surjection S 0 , n nf CH * ( M 0 , n ) is given by R WDVV .

The proof is separated into several steps. The overall strategy is to stratify 𝔐 0 , n by the number of edges of the prestable graph Γ and use an excision sequence argument. For p 0 we denote by 𝔐 0 , n p the closed substack of 𝔐 0 , n of curves with at least p nodes. Similarly, we denote by 𝔐 0 , n = p the open substack of 𝔐 0 , n p of curves with exactly p nodes. It is clear that

𝔐 0 , n p 𝔐 0 , n = p = 𝔐 0 , n p + 1

and also

𝔐 0 , n = p = Γ 𝒢 p 𝔐 Γ ,

where 𝒢 p is the set of prestable graphs of genus 0 with n markings having exactly p edges. For the strata space 𝒮 0 , n , consider the decomposition

𝒮 0 , n = p 0 𝒮 0 , n p

according to the number p of edges of graph Γ.[15] This descends to decompositions

𝒮 0 , n nf = p 0 𝒮 0 , n nf , p , WDVV = p 0 WDVV p

for 𝒮 0 , n nf and WDVV . We note that WDVV p is exactly the space of relations obtained by taking a prestable graph Γ with p - 1 edges, a decoration α on Γ in normal form and inserting a WDVV relation at a vertex v 0 V ( Γ ) with n ( v 0 ) 4 .

From Proposition [5, Proposition 2.4] and Lemma 2.20 it follows that

(2.20) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p ) = Γ 𝒢 p CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) = Γ 𝒢 p CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) Aut ( Γ ) ,
(2.21) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p , 1 ) = Γ 𝒢 p CH * ( 𝔐 Γ , 1 ) = Γ 𝒢 p CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm , 1 ) Aut ( Γ ) .

Note that we have a natural map 𝒮 0 , n nf , p CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) .

Lemma 2.34.

The composition

𝒮 0 , n nf , p CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p )

is an isomorphism.

Proof.

First we note that 𝒮 0 , n nf , p decomposes into a direct sum of subspaces 𝒮 0 , n nf , Γ indexed by prestable graphs Γ 𝒢 p , according to the underlying prestable graph of the generators. The analogous decomposition of CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p ) is given by formula (2.20). Now for two non-isomorphic prestable graphs Γ and Γ with the same number p of edges, the induced map 𝒮 0 , n nf , Γ CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) vanishes. Indeed, the locally closed substack 𝔐 Γ is disjoint from the image of the gluing map ξ Γ and all generators of 𝒮 0 , n nf , Γ are pushforwards under ξ Γ . Thus we are reduced to showing that 𝒮 0 , n nf , Γ CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) is an isomorphism. The image of a generator [ Γ , α ] under this map is obtained by pushing forward α CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) to 𝔐 0 , n p under ξ Γ and restricting to the open subset 𝔐 Γ . From the cartesian diagram

in which the vertical arrows are open embeddings, it follows that this is equivalent to first restricting α to 𝔐 Γ sm and then pushing forward to 𝔐 Γ . As we saw in (2.20), we can identify CH * ( 𝔐 Γ ) with the Aut ( Γ ) -invariant part of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) via pullback under ξ Γ sm . But clearly

(2.22) ( ξ Γ sm ) * [ Γ , α ] = ( ξ Γ sm ) * ( ξ Γ sm ) * α = σ Aut ( Γ ) σ * α ,

where the automorphisms σ act on 𝔐 Γ sm by permuting the factors.

Now by Proposition 2.7 we have

CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) = v V ( Γ ) CH * ( 𝔐 g ( v ) , n ( v ) sm ) .

Thus it follows from Lemma 2.1 that the set of all possible α such that [ Γ , α ] is in normal form is a basis of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) . Now given such an α CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) , consider the orbit of α under Aut ( Γ ) , recalling that the projection of α to the Aut ( Γ ) -invariant part of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) is given by σ Aut ( Γ ) σ * α . Then there are two possibilities:

  1. either the orbit contains - α , in which case σ Aut ( Γ ) σ * α = 0 , and likewise we have [ Γ , α ] = [ Γ , - α ] = 0 in the strata algebra. This can happen if there exists a vertex v of Γ of valency 2 and an automorphism σ of Γ switching the two half-edges adjacent to v, if α has a decoration ψ h c + ( - ψ h ) c at v with c odd.

  2. or the distinct elements in the orbit are linearly independent in CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) . This follows from the fact that α is already determined up to sign by the distribution of its degree to the factors 𝔐 g ( v ) , n ( v ) of 𝔐 Γ , so any two elements of the orbit which are not equal have pairwise distinct such multidegrees.

Basis elements α CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) of the first type neither contribute to 𝒮 0 , n nf , p nor to CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p ) . For basis elements of the second type, the automorphisms σ of Γ act on them by permutation. Hence a basis of the Aut ( Γ ) -invariant part of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) is given by the sums of orbits of these basis elements (with the dimension of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) Aut ( Γ ) being the number of such orbits). Now recall that we chose the basis of 𝒮 0 , n nf , Γ to be the set of [ Γ , α ] in normal form up to isomorphism. In other words, one can fix some ordering on the half-edges of Γ, look at all decorations α in normal form, and choose a representative in each Aut ( Γ ) -orbit. Then this chosen basis maps via (2.22) to the basis of CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) Aut ( Γ ) , by sending the representative α of an Aut ( Γ ) -orbit to the sum σ Aut ( Γ ) σ * α of the elements of the orbit. The fact that distinct elements of an orbit are linearly independent implies that the map α σ Aut ( Γ ) σ * α is injective, since there can be no cancellation between different entries of the orbit. ∎

Next we realize the WDVV relation as the image of the connecting homomorphism of the excision sequence

(2.23) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p , 1 ) CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p ) 0 .

By [5, Proposition 2.4], the stack 𝔐 0 , n = p is a quotient stack and hence the sequence (2.23) is exact by [28, Proposition 4.2.1].

Before we study the map in the sequence (2.23), we consider an easier situation: we show that in the setting of the moduli spaces ¯ 0 , n of stable curves, we can explicitly compute the connecting homomorphism , see Proposition 2.36 below. In the proof, we will need the following technical lemma about the connecting homomorphisms of excision sequences.

Lemma 2.35.

Let X be an equidimensional scheme and let

Z j Z 𝑗 X

be two closed immersions. Consider the open embedding

U = X Z 𝑖 U = X Z .

Then we have a commutative diagram

where and are the connecting homomorphisms for the inclusions of U and U in X.

Proof.

Elements of CH n ( U , 1 ) are represented by cycles a i W i on U × Δ 1 with the W i of dimension n + 1 intersecting the faces of U × Δ 1 properly. On the one hand, to evaluate the connecting homomorphism , we form the closures W i ¯ in X × Δ 1 and take alternating intersections with faces. This is a sum of cycles of dimension n supported on Z × Δ 1 and via j * we regard it as a sum of cycles on Z × Δ 1 .

On the other hand, to evaluate i * we first restrict all W i to U × Δ 1 , take the closure W i U × Δ 1 ¯ and take alternating intersection with faces. But the only way that this closure can be different from W i ¯ is when W i has generic point in Z × Δ 1 . But then it defines an element of z n ( Z , 1 ) and thus it maps to zero in CH * ( Z ) . ∎

Proposition 2.36.

For n 4 , the image of the connecting homomorphism of

CH 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) CH 0 ( ¯ 0 , n 1 ) ι * CH 1 ( ¯ 0 , n ) 0 = CH 1 ( 0 , n )

is spanned by the set of WDVV relations, where we identify CH 0 ( M ¯ 0 , n 1 ) as the Q -vector space with basis given by boundary divisors of M ¯ 0 , n .

Proof.

First, we prove this proposition when n = 4 . Identify

¯ 0 , 4 1 and 0 , 4 𝔸 1 - { 0 , 1 } .

Then CH * ( 0 , 4 , ) is a CH * ( k , ) -algebra generated by two elements f 0 and f 1 corresponding to two points in 𝔸 1 (see [8]). Fix a (non-canonical) isomorphism Δ 1 𝔸 1 and set the two faces as 0 and 1. Consider a line L 0 through the points ( 0 , 0 ) and ( 1 , 1 ) in 1 × Δ 1 restricted to ( 1 - { 0 , 1 , } ) × Δ 1 as illustrated in Figure 2. Then f 0 = [ L 0 ] and

( L 0 ) = [ 0 ] - [ 1 ] CH 0 ( ¯ 0 , 4 0 , 4 ) .

This is one of the WDVV relations on ¯ 0 , 4 after identifying [ 0 ] , [ 1 ] and [ ] with three boundary strata in (1.4). The second one is obtained from the generator f 1 in an analogous way, finishing the proof for n = 4 .

Figure 2

The line L 0 in ( 1 - { 0 , 1 , } ) × Δ 1

For the case of general n 4 , the space 0 , n is a hyperplane complement with hyperplanes associated to pairs of points that collide and there is a correspondence between generators of CH 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) and hyperplanes. On the one hand, the action of the symmetric group S n on 0 , n is transitive on the hyperplanes (and thus on the generators). On the other hand, we can obtain one of the hyperplanes as the pullback of a boundary point in 0.4 under the forgetful morphism π : ¯ 0 , n ¯ 0 , 4 and thus, via the action of S n , any hyperplane can be obtained under a suitable forgetful morphism to ¯ 0 , 4 (varying the subset of four points to remember).

Note that the morphism π is flat and that we have an open embedding

i : 0 , n π - 1 ( 0 , 4 )

and a closed embedding j : π - 1 ( ¯ 0 , 4 ) ¯ 0 , n . Combining the compatibility of the connecting homomorphism with flat pullback and Lemma 2.35 above, we obtain a commutative diagram

Thus, since (under a suitable permutation of the markings) every generator of CH 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) can be obtained as the image of one of the generators of CH 1 ( 0 , 4 , 1 ) , the image of

CH 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) CH 0 ( ¯ 0 , n )

is generated by WDVV relations on CH 0 ( ¯ 0 , 4 ) pulled back via π. ∎

We extend the above computation to 𝔐 0 , n .

Corollary 2.37.

For n 4 , the image of the connecting homomorphism of

CH + 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) CH ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 ) ι * CH + 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) 0

is the set of WDVV relations for = 0 and is zero for > 0 .

Proof.

By (2.13), we have CH + 1 ( 0 , n , 1 ) = 0 when > 0 and hence is trivial in this range.

For the statement in degree = 0 we in fact ignore the definition of and the machinery of higher Chow groups and simply use that here the image of is given by the kernel of the map

(2.24) CH 0 ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 ) ι * CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ,

in other words by linear combinations of boundary divisors adding to zero in CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) . Given such a relation, restricting to the open substack ¯ 0 , n simply kills all unstable boundary divisors and by Proposition 2.36 (or classical theory) the result is a combination of WDVV relations. After subtracting those from the original relation, we obtain a combination of unstable boundary divisors forming a relation. The proof is finished if we can show that this must be the trivial linear combination, i.e. that the unstable boundary divisors are linearly independent.

There are exactly n + 1 strictly prestable graphs with one edge. Let Γ 0 be the prestable graph with a vertex of valence 1 and let Γ i be the semistable graph with the i-th leg on the semistable vertex. Suppose there is a linear relation

R = a 0 [ Γ 0 ] + a 1 [ Γ 1 ] + + a n [ Γ n ] = 0 , a i ,

in CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) , then we want to show that all a i = 0 .

To see this, we can simply construct test curves σ i : 1 𝔐 0 , n intersecting precisely the divisor [ Γ i ] and none of the others. To obtain σ i , start with the trivial family 1 × 1 1 and a tuple of n disjoint constant sections p 1 , , p n . Let σ 0 be defined by the family of prestable curves obtained by blowing up a point on 1 × 1 away from any of the sections. For 1 i n we similarly obtain σ i by blowing up a point on the image of p i and taking the strict transform of the old section p i . Then we have 0 = σ i * R = a i for all i, finishing the proof. ∎

Remark 2.38.

As a consequence of the above result, for n 3 , the map

ι * : CH ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 ) CH + 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n )

is an isomorphism in degree 1 . Restricting to the locus of stable curves, the same proof implies that

ι * : CH ( ¯ 0 , n ) CH + 1 ( ¯ 0 , n )

is an isomorphism for 1 .

The surjectivity of ι * comes from the excision sequence that we discussed. The injectivity can be explained from the results of Kontsevich and Manin ([26]). Indeed, by Proposition [5, Proposition B.19], the vector space CH ( ¯ 0 , n ) is generated by boundary strata of ¯ 0 , n with at least one edge. To show injectivity of ι * , it is enough to show that any relation among boundary strata in CH + 1 ( ¯ 0 , n ) is a pushforward of a relation holding already in the Chow group of ¯ 0 , n . By [26, Theorem 7.3] the set of relations between boundary strata in CH + 1 ( ¯ 0 , n ) is spanned by the relations obtained from gluing the WDVV relation into a vertex v 0 of a stable graph Γ with at least edges. When 1 , this relation is a pushforward of a class

v v 0 [ ¯ 0 , n ( v ) ] × WDVV CH 1 ( ¯ Γ ) ,

where WDVV CH 1 ( ¯ 0 , n ( v 0 ) ) is the WDVV relation corresponding to the choice of four half edges at v 0 . Under the gluing map, this class is a relation on ¯ 0 , n . Therefore we get the injectivity of ι * .

This corollary is enough to compute the connecting homomorphism in arbitrary degree.

Proposition 2.39.

The image of

: CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p , 1 ) CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 )

in (2.23) is equal to the image of the composition

WDVV p + 1 𝒮 0 , n nf , p + 1 CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) .

Thus we can write

(2.25) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) / CH * + 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n = p , 1 ) = CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) / WDVV p + 1 .

Proof.

From the functoriality of higher Chow groups, it follows that we have a commutative diagram

where the sums run over prestable graphs with exactly p edges. By Remark 2.21, ( ξ Γ sm ) * are surjective. Thus the image of is given by the sum of the images of the maps ( ξ Γ ) * Γ .

From Remark 2.18 we know that Γ vanishes on the image of the map

(2.26) CH * ( k , 1 ) CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm ) CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm , 1 ) ,

and thus factors through its cokernel. On the other hand, it follows from Propositions 2.14 and 2.16 that the cokernel of (2.26) is generated by classes coming from the direct sum

v V ( Γ ) , n ( v ) 4 ( CH 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm , 1 ) v V ( Γ ) , v v CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm ) ) .

For an element α v v v α v in CH * ( 𝔐 Γ sm , 1 ) , choose an extension α ¯ v of each α v from 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) sm to 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) . By Lemma 2.17 (a), the boundary map Γ has the form

Γ ( α v v v α v ) = ( α v ) v v α ¯ v .

By Corollary 2.37, the elements ( α v ) at vertices v with n ( v ) 4 are precisely the WDVV relations on 𝔐 0 , n ( v ) , whereas the classes α ¯ v at other vertices v are exactly the types of decorations allowed in decorated strata classes in normal form. After pushing forward via ξ Γ this is precisely our definition of the relations WDVV p + 1 . ∎

Proof of Theorem 2.33.

Recall that by Lemma 2.34, the composition

𝒮 0 , n nf , p CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p )

is an isomorphism. Thus in the diagram

we obtain a canonical splitting of the excision exact sequence (2.23) and thus we have

(2.27) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) = 𝒮 0 , n nf , p CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) / CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n = p , 1 ) .

Combining (2.27) and equation (2.25) from Proposition 2.39, we see

(2.28) CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n p ) = 𝒮 0 , n nf , p CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n p + 1 ) / WDVV p + 1 .

Applying (2.28) for p = 0 , 1 , 2 , we obtain

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) = CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n 0 )
= 𝒮 0 , n nf , 0 CH * - 1 ( 𝔐 0 , n 1 ) / WDVV 1
= 𝒮 0 , n nf , 0 ( 𝒮 0 , n nf , 1 / WDVV 1 ) CH * - 2 ( 𝔐 0 , n 2 ) / WDVV 2
=
= p 0 𝒮 0 , n nf , p / WDVV p
= 𝒮 0 , n nf / WDVV ,

finishing the proof. ∎

Finally, we end the proof of the main theorem.

Proof of Theorem 2.31.

We know that the kernel of 𝒮 0 , n CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) contains κ , ψ . We define

res = ker ( 𝒮 0 , n / κ , ψ CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) .

Likewise, by Theorem 2.33 we know that the kernel of 𝒮 0 , n nf CH * ( 𝔐 0 , n ) is equal to WDVV . We then obtain a diagram of morphisms with exact rows

where the arrow 𝒮 0 , n nf 𝒮 0 , n / κ , ψ is surjective by Proposition 2.32. A short diagram chase shows that WDVV factors through res via the dashed arrow. By the four-lemma, the map WDVV res is surjective. This clearly implies the statement of the theorem. ∎

2.5 Relation to previous works

Let us start this subsection by pointing out several results in Gromov–Witten theory, studying intersection numbers on moduli spaces of stable maps, which can be seen as coming from results about the tautological ring of 𝔐 g , n .

Example 2.40.

In [32], degree one relations on the moduli space of stable maps to a projective space ¯ 0 , n ( N , d ) are used to reduce two pointed genus 0 potentials to one pointed genus 0 potentials. Note that [32, Theorem 1.(2)] can be obtained by the pullback of the relation in Lemma 2.1 along the forgetful morphism

¯ 0 , n ( N , d ) 𝔐 0 , 2 .

Similarly, [32, Theorem 1.(1)] can be obtained from Lemma 2.3 on 𝔐 0 , 3 . The relevant computations are given explicitly in [3].

From Theorem 2.31 we see that any universal relation in the Gromov–Witten theory of genus 0 obtained from tautological relations on 𝔐 0 , n must follow either from the WDVV relation (1.4) or relation (1.8) between ψ and boundary classes on 𝔐 0 , 2 .

Apart from applications to Gromov–Witten theory, there are several results in the literature which compute the Chow groups of some strict open subloci of 𝔐 0 , n .

Example 2.41.

Restricting to the locus ¯ 0 , n 𝔐 0 , n of stable curves, Theorem 2.31 specializes to the classical result in [22, 26] that all relations between undecorated strata of ¯ 0 , n are additively generated by the WDVV relations.

Example 2.42.

In [36], Oesinghaus computes the Chow ring (with integer coefficients) of the open substack 𝒯 of 𝔐 0 , 3 of curves with prestable graph of the form

where we denote by Γ k the graph of the shape above with k edges (for k 0 ). Oesinghaus shows that the Chow ring CH * ( 𝒯 ) is given by the ring QSym of quasi-symmetric functions on the index set > 0 . QSym can be seen as the subring of [ α 1 , α 2 , ] with additive basis given by

(2.29) M J = i 1 < < i k α i 1 j 1 α i k j k for  k 1 , J = ( j 1 , , j k ) 1 k .

Under the isomorphism CH * ( 𝒯 ) QSym , the element M J is a basis element of degree j in the Chow group of 𝒯 . As we explain in [5, Example 4.3], the cycle M J corresponds to the tautological class supported on the stratum 𝔐 Γ k given by

(2.30)

Using the correspondence, we can verify several of the results of our paper in this particular example. Indeed, one can use Theorem 2.33 to verify that the classes (2.30) form a basis of CH * ( 𝒯 ) . For this, one observes that decorated strata in normal form generically supported on 𝒯 must have underlying graph Γ k for some k, with trivial decoration on the valence 3 vertex and decorations ( - ψ h - ψ h ) c on the valence 2 vertices. Since every term appearing in a WDVV relation has at least two vertices of valence at least 3, all these relations restrict to zero on 𝒯 and thus the above generators form a basis by Theorem 2.33. Note that the form of these generators in normal form is not quite the same as the one shown in (2.30), but a small combinatorial argument shows that the two bases can be converted to each other by using relation (1.8) between ψ-classes and the boundary divisor on 𝔐 0 , 2 .

Note that [36] also computes the Chow group of the semistable loci 𝔐 0 , 2 ss and 𝔐 0 , 3 ss . By a straightforward generalization of the discussion above, a correspondence of the generators in [36] to the tautological generators on these spaces, as well as a comparison of relations can be established.

Example 2.43.

In a series of papers [15, 13, 14], Fulghesu presented a computation of the Chow ring of the open substack 𝔐 0 3 𝔐 0 of rational curves with at most three nodes, as an explicit algebra with 10 generators and 11 relations. Some of the generators are given by κ-classes, some are classes of strata and others are decorated classes supported on strata.

Establishing a precise correspondence to the generators and relations discussed in our paper is challenging due to the complexity of the involved combinatorics. However, as a nontrivial check of our results we can compare the dimensions dim CH d ( 𝔐 0 3 ) of the graded pieces of the Chow ring. Given any open substack U 𝔐 0 , we package the ranks of the Chow groups of U in the generating function

H U = d 0 dim CH d ( U ) t d ,

which is the Hilbert series of the graded ring CH * ( U ) .

In [14], Fulghesu has computed the Chow rings of the open substacks U = 𝔐 0 e for e = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 in terms of generators and relations. Using the software Macaulay2 [19] we can compute[16] the Hilbert functions H U F of the graded algebras given by Fulghesu. We list them in Table 3.

Table 3

The Hilbert series of the Chow rings of open substacks U of 𝔐 0 , as computed by Fulghesu; for space reasons we do not write the full formula for the rational function H , only giving the expansion.

U H U F
𝔐 0 0 1 1 - t 2 = 1 + t 2 + t 4 +
𝔐 0 1 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t ) = 1 + t + 2 t 2 + 2 t 3 + 3 t 4 +
𝔐 0 2 t 4 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t ) = 1 + t + 3 t 2 + 3 t 3 + 7 t 4 + 7 t 5 + 13 t 6 + 13 t 7 + 21 t 8 +
𝔐 0 3 H = 1 + t + 3 t 2 + 5 t 3 + 10 t 4 + 15 t 5 + 26 t 6 + 36 t 7 + 𝟓𝟓 t 8 +

On the other hand, since for stable graphs with at most three edges no WDVV relations can appear, Theorem 2.33 implies that the Chow group CH * ( 𝔐 0 e ) is equal to the subspace of the strata algebra 𝒮 0 , 0 spanned by decorated strata in normal form with at most e nodes (for e 3 ). By some small combinatorial arguments, this allows us to compute the Hilbert functions H U of the spaces U = 𝔐 0 e :

Case e = 0 . For U = 𝔐 0 0 the only generators in normal form are the classes κ 2 a , existing in every even degree d = 2 a , so that the generating function is given by

H 𝔐 0 0 = 1 + t 2 + t 4 + = 1 1 - t 2 ,

recovering the formula from Table 3.

Case e = 1 . On U = 𝔐 0 0 we get additional generators

Since the automorphism group of Γ 1 exchanges h 1 , h 2 , the numbers a , b above are only unique up to ordering. We get a canonical representative by requiring a b . Overall, we obtain the generating series

H 𝔐 0 1 = H 𝔐 0 0 + 0 a b t a + b + 1
= 1 1 - t 2 + t a 0 c 0 t a + ( a + c )
= 1 1 - t 2 + t ( a 0 t 2 a ) ( c 0 t c )
= 1 1 - t 2 + t 1 1 - t 2 1 1 - t
= 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t ) ,

where we used the substitution b = a + c . Again we recover the formula from Table 3.

Case e = 2 . The additional generators for U = 𝔐 0 2 are given by

The automorphism group of Γ 2 exchanges h 1 , h 4 and h 2 , h 3 , so a , c are only well-defined up to ordering. Moreover, for a = c and b = 2 + 1 odd, this symmetry implies

[ Γ 2 , ψ h 1 a ( ψ h 2 b + ( - ψ h 3 ) b ) ψ h 4 a ] = - [ Γ 2 , ψ h 1 a ( ψ h 2 b + ( - ψ h 3 ) b ) ψ h 4 a ] ,

so the corresponding generator vanishes. Overall, the numbers of basis elements supported on Γ 2 have generating series

t 2 ( 0 a c b 0 t a + b + c = 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t ) 2 - a 0 0 t 2 a + 2 + 1 = t ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ) = t 2 ( t 2 + 1 ) ( 1 - t ) ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 .

Adding this to the generating series for 𝔐 0 1 we obtain the formula

H 𝔐 0 2 = H 𝔐 0 1 + t 2 ( t 2 + 1 ) ( 1 - t ) ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 = t 4 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t ) ,

again obtaining the same formula as in Table 3.

Case e = 3 . For the full locus U = 𝔐 0 3 a discrepancy between our results and Fulghesu’s computations appears. There are two new types of generators appearing: firstly we have

giving a contribution of

t 3 0 a b c t a + b + c = t 3 ( 1 - t 3 ) ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t )

to the generating series. The second type of generator is

Since Γ 3 ′′ again has an automorphism of order 2, we count such generators using a trick: if the vertices of Γ 3 ′′ were ordered, the generating series would be

t 3 a , b , c , d 0 t a + b + c + d = t 3 ( 1 - t ) 4 .

Due to the automorphism, we counted almost all the generators twice, except those fixed by the automorphism, for which ( a , b , c , d ) = ( a , b , b , a ) and whose generating series is

t 3 a , b 0 t 2 a + 2 b = t 3 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 .

Adding these two series, we count every generator twice, so we obtain the correct count after dividing by two. Overall we get

H 𝔐 0 3 = H 𝔐 0 2 + t 3 ( 1 - t 3 ) ( 1 - t 2 ) ( 1 - t ) + 1 2 ( t 3 ( 1 - t ) 4 + t 3 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 )
= t 6 + t 5 + 2 t 4 + t 3 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t ) ( 1 - t 3 ) .

However, expanding this series we obtain

(2.31) t 6 + t 5 + 2 t 4 + t 3 + 1 ( 1 - t 2 ) 2 ( 1 - t ) ( 1 - t 3 ) = 1 + t + 3 t 2 + 5 t 3 + 10 t 4 + 15 t 5 + 26 t 6 + 36 t 7 + 𝟓𝟒 t 8 + .

Comparing with the expansion of the corresponding function H in Table 3 we see that the coefficient of t 8 is 55 for Fulghesu and 54 for us. We used a modified version of the software package admcycles [10] for the open-source software SageMath [43] to verify the number 54 above.

After revisiting Fulghesu’s proof, we think we can explain this discrepancy from a relation that was missed in [14]. In the notation of this paper, we claim that there is a relation

(2.32) r q - γ 3 ′′ s + 2 u γ 2 - γ 3 ′′ q κ 2 - s γ 2 κ 1 = 0 CH 8 ( 𝔐 0 3 ) .

Here the classes r , s , u , γ 3 ′′ are supported on the closed stratum 𝔐 Γ 3 ′′ 𝔐 0 3 . Relation (2.32) follows from the description of the Chow ring CH * ( 𝔐 Γ 3 ′′ ) and the formulas for restrictions of classes q , γ 3 ′′ , γ 2 , κ 2 , κ 1 to 𝔐 Γ 3 ′′ computed in [14, Section 6.2]. On the other hand, using Macaulay2 we verified that relation (2.32) is not contained in the ideal of relations given in [14, Theorem 6.3]. Adding this missing relation, we obtain the correct rank 54 for CH 8 ( 𝔐 0 3 ) .

Our numerical experiments indicated that there are further relations missing in degrees d > 9 . So while the general proof strategy of [14] seems sound, more care needed is needed in the final step of the computation.

2.6 Chow rings of open substacks of 𝔐 0 , n – Finite generation and Hilbert series

In the previous subsection, we saw some explicit computations for Chow groups CH * ( U ) of open substacks U 𝔐 0 , n and their Hilbert series

H U = d 0 dim CH d ( U ) t d .

For U = 𝔐 0 e and e = 0 , 1 , 2 we have that CH * ( U ) is a finitely generated graded algebra by the results of [14]. But recall that any such algebra, having generators in degrees d 1 , , d r has a Hilbert series which is the expansion (at t = 0 ) of a rational function H ( t ) of the form

H ( t ) = Q ( t ) i = 1 r ( 1 - t d i ) for some  Q ( t ) [ t ]

(see [34, Theorem 13.2]). This explains the shape of the Hilbert functions of 𝔐 0 e from Table 3. We remark here, that all functions H ( t ) of the above form have poles only at roots of unity.

On the other hand, for the open substack 𝒯 𝔐 0 , 3 studied by Oesinghaus, we saw CH * ( 𝒯 ) QSym , where the algebra QSym had an additive basis element M J in degree d for each composition J of d. Since for d 1 the number of compositions of d is 2 d - 1 , the Hilbert series of the Chow ring of 𝒯 is given by

H 𝒯 = 1 + d 0 2 d - 1 t d = 1 + t 1 - 2 t = 1 - t 1 - 2 t .

From this we can see two things:

  1. The Chow ring CH * ( 𝒯 ) cannot be a finitely generated algebra, since the function H 𝒯 has a pole at 1 2 , which is not a root of unity.

  2. On the other hand, we still have that H 𝒯 is the expansion of a rational function, even though 𝒯 is not even of finite type.

The above observations lead to the following two questions.

Question 2.44.

Is it true that for U 𝔐 0 , n an open substack of finite type, the Chow ring CH * ( U ) is a finitely generated algebra?

Question 2.45.

Is it true that for U 𝔐 0 , n any open substack which is a union of strata 𝔐 Γ , the Hilbert series H U is the expansion of a rational function at t = 0 ?

For the first question, we note that by Theorem 1.2 we know that CH * ( U ) is additively generated by possibly infinitely many decorated strata [ Γ , α ] , supported on finitely many prestable graphs Γ. It is far from obvious whether we can obtain all of them multiplicatively from a finite collection of [ Γ i , α i ] .

For the second question, we observe that it would be implied for all finite-type open substacks U of 𝔐 0 , n assuming a positive answer to the first question. Further evidence is provided by the results from [36]: as we saw above, the open substack 𝒯 𝔐 0 , 3 has a rational generating series H 𝒯 . In fact, as mentioned above Oesinghaus computes the Chow ring for the entire semistable locus in 𝔐 0 , 2 and 𝔐 0 , 3 (see [36, Corollary 2,3]) and obtains

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 2 ss ) = QSym [ β ]

and

CH * ( 𝔐 0 , 3 ss ) = QSym QSym QSym .

Since we know that the Hilbert series of QSym is 1 - t 1 - 2 t and the Hilbert series of [ t ] is 1 1 - t and that Hilbert series are multiplicative under tensor products, we easily see that

H 𝔐 0 , 2 ss = 1 1 - 2 t , H 𝔐 0 , 3 ss = ( 1 - t ) 3 ( 1 - 2 t ) 3 .

So Question 2.45 has a positive answer for the non-finite-type substacks of semistable points in 𝔐 0 , 2 and 𝔐 0 , 3 .

Table 4

The rank of the Chow groups CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) .

d n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 6 n = 7 n = 8
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 2 3 4 6 11 23 50 108
2 3 5 9 16 33 80 215 621 1900
3 5 12 27 62 162 481 1572
4 13 32 84 235 739 2594
5 27 84 263 875 3219
6 70 234 837 3219
7 166 656 2683
8 438 1892
9 1135
10 3081

To finish this section, we want to record some numerical data about the Chow groups of the full stacks 𝔐 0 , n . Using Theorems 1.2 and 2.31, these groups have a completely combinatorial description. This has been implemented in a modified version of the software package admcycles [10], which can enumerate prestable graphs, decorated strata in normal form and the relations κ , ψ , WDVV between them. Thus, from linear algebra we can compute the ranks of Chow groups of 𝔐 0 , n in many cases. We record the results in Table 4.

3 Comparison with the tautological ring of the moduli of stable curves

3.1 Injectivity of pullback by forgetful charts

Assume we are in the stable range 2 g - 2 + n > 0 so that the moduli space ¯ g , n is nonempty. Since ¯ g , n 𝔐 g , n is an open substack, the Chow groups of 𝔐 g , n determine those of ¯ g , n : we have that CH * ( ¯ g , n ) is the quotient of CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) by the span of classes supported on the strictly unstable locus.

Restricting to the subrings of tautological classes, we note that the tautological ring R * ( ¯ g , n ) of ¯ g , n is the subring of CH * ( ¯ g , n ) given by the restriction of R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) inside CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) under the open embedding

i : ¯ g , n 𝔐 g , n .

Thus the tautological ring R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) determines R * ( ¯ g , n ) since the composition

R * ( ¯ g , n ) st * R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) i * R * ( ¯ g , n )

is the identity and thus R * ( ¯ g , n ) st * R * ( 𝔐 g , n ) is injective.

It is an interesting question whether the converse is true: do the Chow (or tautological) rings of the moduli spaces of stable curves determine the Chow (or tautological) ring of 𝔐 g , n ? The following conjecture gives a precise way in which this could be true.

Conjecture 3.1.

Let ( g , n ) ( 1 , 0 ) . Then for a fixed d 0 there exists m 0 0 such that for any m m 0 , the forgetful morphism

F m : ¯ g , n + m 𝔐 g , n

satisfies that the pullback

F m * : CH d ( 𝔐 g , n ) CH d ( ¯ g , n + m )

is injective.

We have seen in [5, Lemma 2.1] that (for m sufficiently large) the image of F m is open with complement of codimension m 2 + 1 . So for m 2 d , we have

CH d ( F m ( ¯ g , n + m ) ) CH d ( 𝔐 g , n ) ,

so certainly the image of F m is sufficiently large to capture the Chow group of codimension d cycles. Still, it is not true that a surjective, smooth morphism has injective pullback in Chow (if the fibres are not proper, as is the case for F m ), so this does not suffice to prove the conjecture.

One aspect of the conjecture we can prove so far is the statement that if F m 0 * is injective, it is true that for any m m 0 the map F m * remains injective.

Proposition 3.2.

For ( g , n ) ( 1 , 0 ) and 0 m m with 2 g - 2 + n + m > 0 we have ker F m * ker F m * . In other words, the subspaces ( ker F * ) form a non-increasing sequence of subspaces of CH d ( M g , n ) .

Proof.

It suffices to show the statement for m = m + 1 . Consider the following non-commutative diagram:

(3.1)

Here π is the usual map forgetting the marking p n + m + 1 and stabilizing the curve. For this reason, the diagram is only commutative on the complement of the locus

Z = { ( C , p 1 , , p n + m + 1 ) : p n + m + 1  contained in rational component of  C with three special points } ¯ g , n + m + 1 .

Let i : Z ¯ g , n + m + 1 be the inclusion of Z and let α CH * ( 𝔐 g , n ) be any class. By the commutativity of the diagram (3.1) away from Z, we know that the class F m + 1 * α - π * F m * α restricts to zero on the complement of Z and thus, by the usual excision sequence, there exists a class β CH * ( Z ) such that

F m + 1 * α - π * F m * α = i * β .

We want to transport this to an equality of classes on ¯ g , n + m by intersecting with ψ n + m + 1 and pushing forward via π. But notice that ψ n + m + 1 | Z = 0 since on Z the component of C containing p n + m + 1 is parametrized by ¯ 0 , 3 and thus the psi-class of p n + m + 1 vanishes here. Thus

(3.2) ψ n + m + 1 F m + 1 * α - ψ n + m + 1 π * F m * α = ( i * β ) ψ n + m + 1 = i * ( i * ψ n + m + 1 β ) = 0 .

Pushing forward by π and using π * ψ n + m + 1 = ( 2 g - 2 + n + m ) [ ¯ g , n + m ] , we obtain

π * ( ψ n + m + 1 F m + 1 * α ) = ( 2 g - 2 + n + m ) F m * α .

Thus, since 2 g - 2 + n + m 2 g - 2 + n > 0 , any class α with F m + 1 * α = 0 also satisfies F m * α = 0 , finishing the proof. ∎

Again, for g = 0 we can give some numerical evidence for the above conjecture. In Table 5 we compare ranks of the Chow groups CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) to (lower bounds on) the ranks of F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) . We see that the bounds for F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) increase monotonically in m (as predicted by Proposition 3.2) and, in all cases which we could handle computationally, stabilize at the rank of CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) , implying that the corresponding pullbacks F m * are indeed injective.

Table 5

The ranks of the Chow groups CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) compared to (lower bounds on) the ranks of F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) ; in many cases it was not feasible to obtain the precise rank of F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) , but a lower bound could be achieved by computing the rank of the intersection pairing of F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) ) with a selection of tautological classes on ¯ 0 , n + m .

( n , d ) CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) F m * ( CH d ( 𝔐 0 , n ) )
m = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
( 0 , 0 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
( 0 , 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
( 0 , 2 ) 3 1 2 3 3 3
( 0 , 3 ) 5 1 2 4 5
( 0 , 4 ) 13 1 2 7
( 1 , 0 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
( 1 , 1 ) 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
( 1 , 2 ) 5 1 3 5 5 5 5
( 1 , 3 ) 12 1 4 7 12 12
( 2 , 0 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
( 2 , 1 ) 3 1 3 3 3 3 3
( 2 , 2 ) 9 1 5 9 9 9
( 2 , 3 ) 27 1 7 11 27
( 3 , 0 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
( 3 , 1 ) 4 1 4 4 4 4 4
( 3 , 2 ) 16 1 5 15 16 16
( 3 , 3 ) 62 1 5 16 62

3.2 The divisor group of 𝔐 g , n

As for the moduli space of stable curves, the group of divisor classes on 𝔐 g , n can be fully understood in terms of tautological classes and relations. For g = 0 we already saw that all divisor classes are tautological and we explicitly described the relations, so below we can restrict to g 1 . As before, we also want to exclude the case g = 1 , n = 0 since 𝔐 1 , 0 does not have a stratification by quotient stacks.

Thus we can restrict to the range 2 g - 2 + n > 0 , where the space ¯ g , n is nonempty. Then we have an exact sequence

(3.3)

where 𝔐 g , n us is the unstable locus of 𝔐 g , n , i.e. it is the complement of the open substack ¯ g , n 𝔐 g , n . Using this sequence, we can completely understand CH 1 ( 𝔐 g , n ) from the explicit description of CH 1 ( ¯ g , n ) in [1, Theorem 2.2].

Proposition 3.3.

For ( g , n ) ( 1 , 0 ) we have R 1 ( M g , n ) = CH 1 ( M g , n ) . Furthermore, for 2 g - 2 + n > 0 , all tautological relations in R 1 ( M g , n ) are pulled backed from relations in R 1 ( M ¯ g , n ) via the stabilization morphism.

Proof.

As discussed before, for the statement that all divisor classes are tautological we can restrict to the stable range 2 g - 2 + n > 0 , since the case of g = 0 was treated before. For the moduli spaces of stable curves it holds that R 1 ( ¯ g , n ) and CH 1 ( ¯ g , n ) coincide by [1]. Since the locus 𝔐 g , n us is a union of boundary divisors, whose fundamental classes are pushforwards of appropriate gluing maps, the image of the pushforward map

CH 0 ( 𝔐 g , n us ) CH 1 ( 𝔐 g , n )

is contained in R 1 ( 𝔐 g , n ) . Therefore the excision sequence (3.3) gives the conclusion.

To compute the set of relations, we observe that

(3.4) CH 1 ( ¯ g , n , 1 ) H 0 ( ¯ g , n , 𝒪 ¯ g , n × ) = k ×

because ¯ g , n is smooth and projective over k. For smooth projective varieties X, the isomorphism CH 1 ( X , 1 ) k × is proven in [6, Theorem 6.1]. For connected smooth projective Deligne–Mumford stacks 𝒳 over k which are quotient stacks, the corresponding isomorphism also holds after tensoring with . Indeed, let q : 𝒳 Spec k be the structure morphism. By [29, Theorem 1] there exists a finite flat surjective morphism p : X 𝒳 from a smooth projective scheme over k. Then we have

k × CH 1 ( k , 1 ) q * CH 1 ( 𝒳 , 1 ) p * CH 1 ( X , 1 ) k × ,

where the composition is an isomorphism. This shows that p * is surjective, and on the other hand, by the projection formula (see e.g. [24, Section 2.3.4]) the pullback p * is injective. Thus CH 1 ( 𝒳 , 1 ) k × . Applying this to 𝒳 = ¯ g , n we obtain (3.4), where we use that ¯ g , n is a quotient stack (see [2, Chapter XII, Theorem 5.6]). Therefore, in the degree 1 part of the sequence (3.3), the image of the connecting homomorphism is trivial. Thus, since the pullback st * by the stabilization morphism defines a splitting of (3.3) on the right, we have

CH 1 ( 𝔐 g , n ) = Γ  unstable | E ( Γ ) | = 1 [ Γ ] CH 1 ( ¯ g , n ) .

It follows that all relations between decorated strata classes in codimension 1 are pulled back from ¯ g , n . ∎

3.3 Zero cycles on 𝔐 g , n

After treating the case of codimension 1 cycles in the previous section, we want to make some remarks about cycles of dimension 0. For the moduli spaces of stable curves, these exhibit many interesting properties:

  1. In [18], Graber and Vakil showed that the group R 0 ( ¯ g , n ) of tautological zero cycles on ¯ g , n is always isomorphic to , even though the full Chow group CH 0 ( ¯ g , n ) can be infinite-dimensional (e.g. for ( g , n ) = ( 1 , 11 ) , see [18, Remark 1.1]).

  2. In [39], Pandharipande and the second author presented geometric conditions on stable curves ( C , p 1 , , p n ) ensuring that the zero cycle [ ( C , p 1 , , p n ) ] in ¯ g , n is tautological.

We want to note here, that for the moduli stacks of prestable curves, the behavior of tautological zero cycles becomes more complicated:

  1. For 𝔐 0 , n with n = 0 , 1 , 2 , we have R 0 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) = CH 0 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) = 0 for dimension reasons.

  2. As visible from Table 4, the group R 0 ( 𝔐 0 , n ) is no longer one-dimensional for n 4 . Indeed, looking at the example of n = 4 we note that the boundary divisor of curves with one component having no marked points is a nonvanishing zero cycle (since it pulls back to an effective boundary divisor under the forgetful map F 2 : ¯ 0 , 6 𝔐 0 , 4 ), but it restricts to zero on ¯ 0 , 4 𝔐 0 , 4 and is thus linearly independent of the generator of R 0 ( ¯ 0 , 4 ) .

This indicates that for the moduli stacks of prestable curves, the group of zero cycles plays less of a special role than for the moduli spaces of stable curves.

Award Identifier / Grant number: ERC-2017-AdG-786580-MACI

Award Identifier / Grant number: 786580

Funding statement: Younghan Bae was supported by ERC Grant ERC-2017-AdG-786580-MACI and Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies (KFAS). Johannes Schmitt was supported by the SNF Early Postdoc.Mobility grant 184245. The project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 786580).

A Gysin pullback for higher Chow groups

In [9], Déglise, Jin and Khan generalized Gysin pullback along a regular imbedding to motivic homotopy theories. We summarize the construction in the language of higher Chow groups. For a moment, let X be a quasi-projective scheme over k and we consider higher Chow groups with -coefficients. For simplicity, we write 𝔾 m X = X × 𝔾 m . Let [ t ] be a generator of

CH 0 ( 𝔾 m , 1 ) ( k [ t , t - 1 ] ) ×

and let

γ t : CH * ( X , m ) CH * ( 𝔾 m X , m + 1 ) , α α × [ t ]

be the morphism defined by the exterior product. Let i : Z X be a regular imbedding of codimension r and q : N Z X Z the normal bundle. Let D Z X be the Fulton–MacPherson’s deformation space defined by

D Z X = Bl Z × 0 ( X × 𝔸 1 ) - Bl Z × 0 ( X × 0 )

which fits into the cartesian diagram

By [6, 7] we have the localization sequence

(A.1) CH d ( 𝔾 m X , m + 1 ) CH d ( N Z X , m ) CH d ( D Z X , m ) .

Definition A.1.

For a regular imbedding i : Z X , we define

i * : CH d ( X , m ) CH d - r ( Z , m )

as a composition of following morphisms:

(A.2) CH d ( X , m ) γ t CH d ( 𝔾 m X , m + 1 ) CH d ( N Z X , m ) ( q * ) - 1 CH d - r ( Z , m ) ,

where is the boundary map in (A.1) and the flat pullback q * is an isomorphism by [6].

This definition extends the Gysin pullback for Chow groups in the sense that it coincides with the Gysin pullback defined in [16] when m = 0 . This construction extends to all lci morphism and satisfies functoriality, transverse base change and excess intersection formula, see [9].

Given a line bundle q : L X with the zero section 0 : X L , the action of the first Chern class on higher Chow groups can be defined by

c 1 ( L ) : CH d ( X , m ) 0 * CH d ( L , m ) ( q * ) - 1 CH d - 1 ( X , m ) .

We want to note two basic compatibilities of this operation: firstly, given a proper morphism f : X X and the line bundle L X , a short computation shows the projection formula

(A.3) f * ( c 1 ( f * L ) α ) = c 1 ( L ) f * α for  α CH * ( X , m ) .

Secondly, intersecting higher Chow cycles with a Cartier divisor has the same formula as for ordinary Chow groups.

Lemma A.2.

Let i : D X be an effective divisor and let q : O ( D ) X be the associated line bundle. Then

(A.4) i * i * α = c 1 ( 𝒪 ( D ) ) α , α CH d ( X , m ) .

Proof.

Consider the following cartesian diagram:

where s : X 𝒪 ( D ) be the regular section defining D and 0 is the zero section. Recall that the action of the first Chern class can be defined by

c 1 ( 𝒪 ( D ) ) - : CH d ( X , m ) 0 * CH d ( 𝒪 ( D ) , m ) ( q * ) - 1 CH d - 1 ( X , m ) .

By the transverse base change formula [9, Proposition 2.4.2],

i * i * α = s * 0 * α .

Now we can conclude the result because s * is an inverse of q * . ∎

The above construction can be extended to global quotient stacks without any difficulty. Let X be an equidimensional quasi-projective scheme with a linearized G-action. Applying the Borel construction developed in [11] yields the definition of higher Chow groups for [ X / G ] , see [30]. For an arbitrary algebraic stack, the authors do not know whether a direct generalization of [16] is possible. Relying on the recent development of motivic homotopy theories, Khan used the six-operator formalism ([23]) to construct motivic Borel–Moore homology for derived algebraic stacks in [24].

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Andrew Kresch, Jakob Oesinghaus and Rahul Pandharipande for many interesting conversations. We also thank Lorenzo Mantovani, Alberto Merici, Hyeonjun Park and Maria Yakerson for helpful explanations concerning higher Chow groups. The first author would like to thank Adeel Khan who helped to understand the construction of Gysin pullback for higher Chow groups. The second author would like to thank the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn for its hospitality. Both authors want to warmly thank the referees for a very careful reading, and many suggestions to improve the clarity of the text.

References

[1] E. Arbarello and M. Cornalba, Calculating cohomology groups of moduli spaces of curves via algebraic geometry, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 88 (1998), 97–127. 10.1007/BF02701767Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba and P. A. Griffiths, Geometry of algebraic curves. Volume II, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 268, Springer, Heidelberg 2011. 10.1007/978-3-540-69392-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Bae, Tautological relations for stable maps to a target variety, Ark. Mat. 58 (2020), no. 1, 19–38. 10.4310/ARKIV.2020.v58.n1.a2Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Bae and H. Park, A comparison theorem of cycle theories for algebraic stacks, in preparation. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Bae and J. Schmitt, Chow rings of stacks of prestable curves I, Forum Math. Sigma 10 (2022), Paper No. e28. 10.1017/fms.2022.21Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Bloch, Algebraic cycles and higher K-theory, Adv. Math. 61 (1986), no. 3, 267–304. 10.1016/0001-8708(86)90081-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Bloch, The moving lemma for higher Chow groups, J. Algebraic Geom. 3 (1994), no. 3, 537–568. Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Chatzistamatiou, Motivic cohomology of the complement of hyperplane arrangements, Duke Math. J. 138 (2007), no. 3, 375–389. 10.1215/S0012-7094-07-13831-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] F. Déglise, F. Jin and A. A. Khan, Fundamental classes in motivic homotopy theory, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 23 (2021), no. 12, 3935–3993. 10.4171/JEMS/1094Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. Delecroix, J. Schmitt and J. van Zelm, admcycles—a Sage package for calculations in the tautological ring of the moduli space of stable curves, J. Softw. Algebra Geom. 11 (2021), no. 1, 89–112. 10.2140/jsag.2021.11.89Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. Edidin and W. Graham, Equivariant intersection theory, Invent. Math. 131 (1998), no. 3, 595–634. 10.1007/s002220050214Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Faber and R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and Gromov–Witten theory, Invent. Math. 139 (2000), no. 1, 173–199. 10.1007/s002229900028Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. Fulghesu, Tautological classes of the stack of rational nodal curves, Comm. Algebra 38 (2010), no. 8, 2677–2700. 10.1080/00927870903399844Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Fulghesu, The Chow ring of the stack of rational curves with at most 3 nodes, Comm. Algebra 38 (2010), no. 9, 3125–3136. 10.1080/00927870903399893Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. Fulghesu, The stack of rational curves, Comm. Algebra 38 (2010), no. 7, 2405–2417. 10.1080/00927870903399794Search in Google Scholar

[16] W. Fulton, Intersection theory, 2nd ed., Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3) 2, Springer, Berlin 1998. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Gathmann, Topological recursion relations and Gromov–Witten invariants in higher genus, preprint (2003), https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0305361. Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Graber and R. Vakil, On the tautological ring of ¯ g , n , Turkish J. Math. 25 (2001), no. 1, 237–243. Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman, Macaulay2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry, available at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/. Search in Google Scholar

[20] F. Janda, Relations on M ¯ g , n via equivariant Gromov–Witten theory of 1 , Algebr. Geom. 4 (2017), no. 3, 311–336. 10.14231/AG-2017-018Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Joshua, Higher intersection theory on algebraic stacks. II, K-Theory 27 (2002), no. 3, 197–244. 10.1023/A:1021648227488Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Keel, Intersection theory of moduli space of stable n-pointed curves of genus zero, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330 (1992), no. 2, 545–574. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1992-1034665-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Khan, Motivic homotopy theory in derived algebraic geometry, PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. A. Khan, Virtual fundamental classes of derived stacks I, preprint (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01332. Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Kondo and S. Yasuda, Product structures in motivic cohomology and higher Chow groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 215 (2011), no. 4, 511–522. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. Kontsevich and Y. Manin, Gromov–Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), no. 3, 525–562. 10.1007/BF02101490Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Kontsevich and Y. Manin, Quantum cohomology of a product, Invent. Math. 124 (1996), no. 1–3, 313–339. 10.1007/s002220050055Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. Kresch, Cycle groups for Artin stacks, Invent. Math. 138 (1999), no. 3, 495–536. 10.1007/s002220050351Search in Google Scholar

[29] A. Kresch and A. Vistoli, On coverings of Deligne–Mumford stacks and surjectivity of the Brauer map, Bull. London Math. Soc. 36 (2004), no. 2, 188–192. 10.1112/S0024609303002728Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Krishna, Higher Chow groups of varieties with group action, Algebra Number Theory 7 (2013), no. 2, 449–507. 10.2140/ant.2013.7.449Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Krishna, Equivariant K-theory and higher Chow groups of schemes, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 114 (2017), no. 4, 657–683. 10.1112/plms.12018Search in Google Scholar

[32] Y.-P. Lee and R. Pandharipande, A reconstruction theorem in quantum cohomology and quantum K-theory, Amer. J. Math. 126 (2004), no. 6, 1367–1379. 10.1353/ajm.2004.0049Search in Google Scholar

[33] K. Luoto, S. Mykytiuk and S. van Willigenburg, An introduction to quasisymmetric Schur functions, Springer Briefs Math., Springer, New York 2013. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7300-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] H. Matsumura, Commutative ring theory, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 8, Cambridge University, Cambridge 1986. Search in Google Scholar

[35] C. Mazza, V. Voevodsky and C. Weibel, Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Math. Monogr. 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[36] J. Oesinghaus, Quasisymmetric functions and the Chow ring of the stack of expanded pairs, Res. Math. Sci. 6 (2019), no. 1, Paper No. 5. 10.1007/s40687-018-0168-7Search in Google Scholar

[37] R. Pandharipande, Equivariant Chow rings of O ( k ) , SO ( 2 k + 1 ) , and SO ( 4 ) , J. reine angew. Math. 496 (1998), 131–148. 10.1515/crll.1998.025Search in Google Scholar

[38] R. Pandharipande, A. Pixton and D. Zvonkine, Relations on ¯ g , n via 3-spin structures, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 1, 279–309. 10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00808-0Search in Google Scholar

[39] R. Pandharipande and J. Schmitt, Zero cycles on the moduli space of curves, Épijournal Géom. Algébrique 4 (2020), Article ID 12. 10.46298/epiga.2020.volume4.5601Search in Google Scholar

[40] D. Petersen, Cohomology of moduli of stable pointed curves of low genus I, 2013, https://people.math.ethz.ch/~rahul/DP-notes1.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[41] A. Pixton, Conjectural relations in the tautological ring of M ¯ g , n , preprint (2012), https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1918. Search in Google Scholar

[42] M. Romagny, Group actions on stacks and applications, Michigan Math. J. 53 (2005), no. 1, 209–236. 10.1307/mmj/1114021093Search in Google Scholar

[43] W. A. Stein, Sage mathematics software (Version 9.0), The Sage development team, 2020, http://www.sagemath.org. Search in Google Scholar

[44] B. Totaro, The motive of a classifying space, Geom. Topol. 20 (2016), no. 4, 2079–2133. 10.2140/gt.2016.20.2079Search in Google Scholar

[45] V. Voevodsky, Motivic cohomology groups are isomorphic to higher Chow groups in any characteristic, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2002 (2002), no. 7, 351–355. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-13
Revised: 2022-12-21
Published Online: 2023-04-29
Published in Print: 2023-07-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2023-0018/html
Scroll to top button