Home Flat parabolic vector bundles on elliptic curves
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Flat parabolic vector bundles on elliptic curves

  • Thiago Fassarella and Frank Loray
Published/Copyright: May 9, 2018

Abstract

We describe the moduli space of logarithmic rank 2 connections on elliptic curves with two poles.

Award Identifier / Grant number: Proc. 234895/2013-6

Award Identifier / Grant number: ANR-16-CE40-0008 Foliage

Funding statement: The first author is supported by CNPq, Proc. 234895/2013-6. The second author is supported by ANR-16-CE40-0008 Foliage. The authors also thank Brazilian-French Network in Mathematics and MATH AmSud for support.

A Appendix

A.1 Parabolic vector bundles

Let C be a smooth irreducible projective complex curve and D=t1++tn a reduced divisor supported on n distinct points {t1,,tn}C. A rank 2 quasi-parabolic vector bundle on (C,D) is the data (E,𝐩), where E is a rank 2 holomorphic vector bundle over C and 𝐩={p1,,pn} are given one-dimensional subspaces pkEtk for k{1,,n}. An isomorphism between quasi-parabolic vector bundles is, by definition, an isomorphism between underlying vector bundles preserving parabolic directions. A parabolic vector bundle is a quasi-parabolic vector bundle together with a collection of weights μ=(μ1,,μn)[0,1]n. It allows us to introduce a notion of stability in order to introduce a good moduli space. Given a line bundle LE, the μ-stability index of L is the real number

Stab(L):=degE-2degL+pkLtkμk-pk=Ltkμk.

Definition A.1.

A parabolic vector bundle (E,𝐩) is called μ-stable (resp. μ-semistable) if for any rank 1 subbundle LE, the following inequality holds:

Stab(L)>0(resp. Stab(L)0).

It is well known, see [16], that the moduli space of μ-semistable parabolic vector bundles with fixed determinant line bundle is a normal irreducible projective variety. The open subset of μ-stable parabolic bundles is smooth. We note that the stability index of LE is zero if, and only if, the weights lie along the following hyperplane in [0,1]n:

deg(E)-2degL+pkLtkμk-pk=Ltkμk=0.

Each one of these hyperplanes is called a wall. If we cut out [0,1]n by all possible walls, one gets in the complement of finitely many irreducible connected components, which are called chambers. In each chamber, any μ-semistable parabolic vector bundle is μ-stable, and the moduli space is constant, that is, it is independent of μ. Nevertheless, it can be empty. When we have two adjacent chambers separated by a wall, then there is a locus of μ-stable parabolic bundles in each chamber that became unstable when we cross the wall. Along the wall, we identify strictly semistable parabolic bundles (E,𝐩) and (E,𝐩) with gr(E,𝐩)=gr(E,𝐩), see [16, Section 4]. Over the projective line, the description of the moduli space of quasi-parabolic bundles has been done in [3].

A.2 Elementary transformations

In the construction of the moduli space of quasi-parabolic bundles, the determinant line bundle is fixed. Actually, up to twists and elementary transformations, we can choose the determinant bundle arbitrarily, for instance the trivial line bundle 𝒪C. Twists preserve the parity of the determinant and elementary transformations change it. We start by recalling what is an elementary transformation as well as its main properties. Given tC and a direction pEt, the vector bundle E- is defined by the following exact sequence of sheaves:

0E-EE/p0,

where p appearing above is considered as a sky-scrapper sheaf. The new parabolic direction p-E- is the kernel of the morphism E-E. By identifying sections of E and E- outside of t, one obtains a birational bundle transformation

elemt-:EE-

with center at p, which is an isomorphism outside t. We shall say that it is a negative elementary transformation. At a neighborhood of t, it can be described as follows. We can choose a local trivialization E|UU×2 such that

p=(01)Et.

and elemt-:E|UE-|U is given by

elemt-(x,Y)=(1x001)Y.

From the point of view of ruled surfaces, it corresponds to a flip with center at [p]E, that is, a blow up at [p] followed by a contraction of the old fiber. If the direction p is contained in a line bundle LE, then it is left unchanged and one obtains a line bundle LE-. If LE does not contain p, then we get L-E, where

L-=L𝒪C(-t).

In addition, we have the following property:

det(E-)=det(E)𝒪C(-t).

When we perform an elementary transformation, the stability condition is preserved after an appropriate modification of weights. If (E,𝐩) is μ-stable and we perform an elementary transformation elemtk-, then (E-,𝐩-) is μ-stable, where

{μk=1-μk,μj=μj,jk.

If BunLμ(C,D) denotes the moduli space of μ-semistable parabolic vector bundles with fixed determinant line bundle L, then elemtk- defines an isomorphism between moduli spaces

elemtk-:BunLμ(C,D)BunL(-tk)μ(C,D),(E,𝐩)elemtk-(E,𝐩).

We can define a positive elementary transformationelemt+ as

elemt+:=𝒪C(t)elemt-:EE+,

where E+=E-𝒪C(t). It is the inverse of elemt-. As before, the stability condition is preserved by elementary positive transformations, with the same modification of weights.

A.3 Endomorphisms of quasi-parabolic vector bundles

The space of global endomorphisms of a rank 2 vector bundle as well as the automorphism group are well known, see for example [15, Theorem 1]. In this subsection, we study the space of traceless endomorphisms of a quasi-parabolic bundles over an elliptic curve.

Let (E,𝐩) be a quasi-parabolic bundle. We say that an endomorphism σEnd(E) fixes the parabolic structure 𝐩 if σ(pk)pk for all k=1,,n. Let End(E,𝐩) be the vector space of endomorphisms fixing the parabolic structure 𝐩 and End0(E,𝐩) its subspace of traceless endomorphisms. We notice that we have a canonical decomposition

End(E,𝐩)=IdEnd0(E,𝐩),

where IdEnd(E,𝐩) is the identity. This follows from the following simple remark: if A is a 2×2 matrix, then

A=tr(A)2Id+(A-tr(A)2Id).

Lemma A.2.

Let E=OCL be a rank 2 bundle over a projective smooth curve C with L of nonnegative degree. The following statements hold true:

  1. If L𝒪C, then

    End0(E)={(a0γ-a):a,γ={γi}H0(C,L)}.
  2. If =𝒪C, then

    End0(E)={(abc-a):a,b,c}.

Proof.

We leave the proof to the reader; see for example [15, Theorem 1]. ∎

We recall that a quasi-parabolic bundle (E,𝐩) is decomposable if there exists a decomposition E=L1L2 such that each parabolic direction is contained in L1 or L2. In this case, we write

(E,𝐩)=(L1,𝐩𝟏)(L2,𝐩𝟐).

A.4 The case of elliptic curves

In what follows we will determine the traceless endomorphisms of an indecomposable quasi-parabolic bundle over an elliptic curve. This will be useful to assure existence of logarithmic connections. Before that, we shall give one example.

Example A.3.

Let (𝒪C𝒪C(t1),{p1,p2}) be a quasi-parabolic bundle over an elliptic curve (C,{t1,t2}) with

  1. p1 outside 𝒪C|t1 and 𝒪C(t1)|t1,

  2. p2𝒪C(t1)|t2.

It is indecomposable because any subbundle given by an embedding of the trivial bundle 𝒪C𝒪C𝒪C(t1) corresponds to a section of (𝒪C𝒪C(t1)) which has (1:0) as a base point over t1. In fact, since C is elliptic, we have h0(𝒪C(t1))=1. On the other hand, if γH0(C,𝒪C(t1)) is a section which corresponds to the divisor D=t1, then

End0(E,𝐩)={(00cγ0):c}.

Proposition A.4.

Let E=OCL, where deg(L)0, be a decomposable rank 2 bundle over an elliptic curve C. Assume that (E,p) is indecomposable but not simple, i.e. End0(E,p){0}. Then we are in the following cases:

  1. End0(E,𝐩)=.

  2. The support D of parabolics splits as D=D0+D1 with deg(D1)>0.

  3. L𝒪C(D1) (and has >0 degree).

  4. Parabolics over D0 are lying on L.

  5. Parabolics over D1 are outside L and generic.

Here, generic means that there is no embedding OCE passing through all parabolics over D1, i.e. (E,p) is indecomposable.

Observe that, by Lemma A.2, one can find an embedding 𝒪CE passing through all but one parabolics over D1. In particular, given the decomposition D=D0+D1, there is a unique such parabolic bundle (E,𝐩) up to isomorphism.

Proof.

If L=𝒪C and (E,𝐩) is indecomposable, then there are at least three parabolics which not two of them lie in the same embedding of 𝒪C𝒪C𝒪C. Then it follows from Lemma A.2 (b) that End0(𝒪C𝒪C,𝐩)={0}. Let us suppose that L𝒪C and let ϕ be a traceless endomorphism that fixes the parabolics. Lemma A.2 (a) implies that we can choose a covering of C and trivializations such that the vector e1 generates 𝒪C, e2 generates L and

ϕ=(a0γ-a),

where a, γH0(C,L). If a0, we see that the locus of fixed points of ϕ outside L defines a section of E

(1γ2a)

which generates a subbundle 𝒪CE containing all parabolics outside L, showing that (E,𝐩) must be decomposable. We can thus assume that a=0.

Since ϕ preserves the parabolic structure, we have for each parabolic pk the following:

  1. either pk is in the subbundle LE,

  2. or the support tk of pk is a zero of γ.

Therefore, we can decompose D=D0+D1, where D0 is the support of those pk lying in L.

Since (E,𝐩) is indecomposable, there is no embedding 𝒪CE passing through all parabolics over D1. Assume that our decomposition E=𝒪CL maximizes the number of parabolics lying on the first factor. Set D1=D1+D1′′ with D1 supporting those parabolics in 𝒪C and deg(D1′′)>0. By maximality, we have that each section φH0(C,L) which vanishes on D1 automatically vanishes on D1′′. In other words, each section of L𝒪C(-D1) automatically vanishes on D1′′. On the other hand, we know that L𝒪C(-D1) admits a non-zero section defined by γ. But on the elliptic curve C, the only linear systems with base points are of the form |tk|, meaning that L𝒪C(-D1)𝒪C(tk) and D1′′=tk reduces to a single point. We therefore deduce that L𝒪C(D1) and all parabolics but pk, over D1, are lying on the first factor 𝒪CE.∎

Let E0 be the unique indecomposable rank 2 bundle, over an elliptic curve, with trivial determinant and having 𝒪C as maximal subbundle. It corresponds to the non-trivial extension defined by the exact sequence 0𝒪CE0𝒪C0.

Proposition A.5.

Let (E0,p) be a quasi-parabolic bundle, where E0 is the indecomposable bundle as above.

  1. If all parabolics lie in the maximal subbundle 𝒪CE0, then

    End0(E0,𝐩).
  2. If there exists at least one parabolic outside 𝒪CE0, then

    End0(E0,𝐩)={0}.

Proof.

The traceless endomorphism space of E0 is given by

End0(E0)={(0b00):b}.

Here we are considering that in local charts UiC, e1 generates the maximal subbundle 𝒪C. Then any traceless endomorphism leaves 𝒪C invariant. Also if a parabolic direction outside 𝒪C is fixed, one gets b=0. This is enough to conclude the proof of proposition. ∎

Proposition A.6.

Let (E,p) be indecomposable but not simple rank 2 quasi-parabolic bundle over an elliptic curve C. Assume that E has trivial determinant line bundle. Then, up to elementary transformations and twists, we can assume E=E0 with all the parabolic lying in the maximal subbundle OCE0.

Proof.

The proof follows essentially from Propositions A.4 and A.5. Suppose that E is decomposable, E=M-1M, degM=k0. Then it follows that E=(𝒪CM2). From Proposition A.4, the support D of parabolics splits as D=D0+D1 with deg(D1)>0 and 𝒪C(D1)=M2. The parabolics over D1 are outside ME (which corresponds to M2𝒪CM2) and generic. The parabolics over D0 are lying on M. After a composition elemD1 of 2k elementary transformation over D1 and twist (to get trivial determinant), we arrive in E0 with all the parabolics lying in the maximal subbundle. If E is indecomposable, the conclusion follows from Proposition A.5. ∎

A.5 Moduli space of connections

Let C be a smooth projective curve and let

D=t1++tn

be a reduced divisor on C, n1. We will fix the data in order to introduce the moduli space of connections. Firstly, let us fix a degree d line bundle L0 over C. We also set a local exponent ν2n satisfying the Fuchs relation

k=1n(νk++νk-)+d=0

and the generic condition ν1ϵ1++νnϵn for any ϵk{+,-}, to avoid reducible connections. Let ζ:L0L0ΩC1(D) be any fixed rank 1 logarithmic connection on L0 satisfying

Restk(ζ)=νk++νk-

for all k=1,,n. We denote by Conν(C,D) the moduli space of triples (E,,𝐩), where

  1. (E,𝐩) is a rank 2 quasi-parabolic vector bundle over (C,D) having L0 as determinant bundle,

  2. :EEΩC1(D) is a logarithmic connection on E with polar divisor D, having ν as local exponents and tr()=ζ,

  3. two triples (E,,𝐩) and (E,,𝐩) are equivalent when there is an isomorphism between quasi-parabolic bundles (E,𝐩) and (E,𝐩) conjugating and .

Actually, in order to obtain a good moduli space, we need a stability condition. A triple (E,,𝐩) is called μ-stable (resp. μ-semistable) if for any -invariant line bundle LE we have

Stab(L)>0(resp. Stab(L)0)

(see Definition A.1). But an invariant line bundle L would force a relation

ν1ϵ1++νnϵn+deg(L)=0,

which is obtained by applying the Fuchs relation to the restriction |L. This contradicts our hypothesis on ν. Therefore under the generic condition on the local exponent all the connections arising in our moduli space are stable. It follows from [17, Theorem 3.5] that Conν(C,D) is a quasi-projective variety.

A priori, Conν(C,D) depends on the choice of L0. But up to twists, we can go into either the even case L0=𝒪C or the odd case L0=𝒪C(t). In fact, given a rank 1 logarithmic connection η:LLΩC1(D) with local exponents (k1,,kn), we can define a twisting map

(L,η):Conν(C,D)Conν(C,D),(E,,𝐩)(EL,η,𝐩),

where ν=(ν1±+k1,,νn±+kn). Such a map is an isomorphism between moduli spaces, in particular our moduli space depends only on the differences νk+-νk-. In the even case, we can assume that (L0,ζ)=(𝒪C,d), where d means the trivial rank 1 connection. In the odd case, one may suppose that (L0,ζ)=(𝒪C(t),d-dxx-t).

Now let us deal with elementary transformations. When we perform a transformation elemtk-:(E,𝐩)(E-,𝐩-), the new connection - on E- has local exponents

(νk+,νk-)=(νk-+1,νk+)

and the other νj, jk, are left unchanged. Finally, we can go from the odd to the even case by performing one negative elementary transformation elemtn-.

In the case we are interested in, C is supposed to be an elliptic curve and D=t1+t2. For computation, we can assume that C2 is the smooth projective cubic curve

zy2=x(x-z)(x-λz)

with λ, λ0,1. By the above digression one can set L=𝒪C(w), w=(0:1:0). As local exponents, we can take

(ν1±,ν2±)=(±ν12-12,±ν22).

We note that for each k{1,2}, the condition νk+=νk- is equivalent to νk=0.

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank the Institut de Recherche en Mathématique de Rennes, IRMAR, for the hospitality and support.

References

[1] D. Arinkin and S. Lysenko, On the moduli spaces of SL(2)-bundles with connections on 1{x1,,x4}, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 1997 (1997), 983–999. 10.1155/S1073792897000639Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. F. Atiyah, Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1957), 181–207. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1957-0086359-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Bauer, Parabolic bundles, elliptic surfaces and SU(2)-representation spaces of genus zero Fuchsian groups, Math. Ann. 290 (1991), 509–526. 10.1007/BF01459257Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. Biswas, A criterion for the existence of a flat connection on a parabolic vector bundle, Adv. Geom. 2 (2002), 231–241. 10.1515/advg.2002.011Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. Boalch, Symplectic manifolds and isomonodromic deformations, Adv. Math. 163 (2001), 137–205. 10.1006/aima.2001.1998Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. Fernández Vargas, Geometry of the moduli of parabolic bundles on elliptic curves, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05417; to appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 10.1090/tran/7330Search in Google Scholar

[7] V. Heu and F. Loray, Flat rank 2 vector bundles on genus 2 curves, preprint (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2449v2; to appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Inaba, Moduli of parabolic connections on curves and the Riemann–Hilbert correspondence, J. Algebraic Geom. 22 (2013), 407–480. 10.1090/S1056-3911-2013-00621-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Inaba, K. Iwasaki and M.-H. Saito, Dynamics of the sixth Painlevé equation, Théories asymptotiques et équations de Painlevé, Sémin. Congr. 14, Société Mathématique de France, Paris (2006), 103–167. Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Inaba, K. Iwasaki and M.-H. Saito, Moduli of stable parabolic connections, Riemann–Hilbert correspondence and geometry of Painlevé equation of type VI. I, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 42 (2006), 987–1089. 10.2977/prims/1166642194Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Komyo and M.-H. Saito, Explicit description of jumping phenomena on moduli spaces of parabolic connections and Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces, preprint (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.00971v2; to appear in Kyoto J. Math. 10.1215/21562261-2019-0016Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. Loray, Isomonodromic deformations of Lamé connections, the Painlevé VI equation and Okamoto symmetry, Izv. Math. 80 (2016), 113–166. 10.1070/IM8310Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Loray and M.-H. Saito, Lagrangian fibrations in duality on moduli spaces of rank 2 logarithmic connections over the projective line, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015 (2015), 995–1043. 10.1093/imrn/rnt232Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Maruyama, On classification of ruled surfaces, Lect. in Math. Dept. Math. Kyoto Univ. 3, Kinokuniya, Tokyo 1970. Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Maruyama, On automorphism groups of ruled surfaces, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 11 (1971), 89–112. 10.1215/kjm/1250523688Search in Google Scholar

[16] V. B. Mehta and C. S. Seshadri, Moduli of vector bundles on curves with parabolic structures, Math. Ann. 248 (1980), 205–239. 10.1007/BF01420526Search in Google Scholar

[17] N. Nitsure, Moduli of semistable logarithmic connections, J. Amer. Math. Sci. 6 (1993), 597–609. 10.1090/S0894-0347-1993-1182671-2Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Oblezin, Isomonodromic deformations of 𝔰𝔩(2) Fuchsian systems on the Riemann sphere, Mosc. Math. J. 5 (2005), 415–441. 10.17323/1609-4514-2005-5-2-415-441Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. Simpson, Iterated destabilizing modifications for vector bundles with connection, Vector bundles and complex geometry, Contemp. Math. 522, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010), 183–206. 10.1090/conm/522/10300Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. Szabó, Deformation theory of Fuchsian equations and logarithmic connections, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 49 (2012), 466–481. 10.1556/sscmath.49.2012.4.1215Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Weil, Généralisation des fonctions abéliennes, J. Math. Pures Appl. 17 (1938), 47–87. 10.1007/978-1-4757-1705-1_28Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-07-20
Revised: 2018-03-08
Published Online: 2018-05-09
Published in Print: 2020-04-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2018-0006/html
Scroll to top button