Home Classification and authentication of operating conditions in different processes using Partial Least Squares
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Classification and authentication of operating conditions in different processes using Partial Least Squares

  • Rubal Chandra and Madhusree Kundu ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 1, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Partial Least Squares (PLS) is a supervised multivariate statistical/machine learning technique, which is used for classification and identification/authentication of a variety of operating conditions in tomato juice concentrator/evaporator, yeast fermentation bioreactor and fluid catalytic cracking process plants. Data for the three processes were generated pertaining to different operating conditions (for each of them) including faulty ones by simulating their mechanistic models over 25 h. The simulated data at transient conditions were chosen for further processing. They were divided into training and testing data pools. After training, the developed PLS model could classify various process operating conditions 100 % accurately and identify unknown process operating conditions (simulated using training pool with certain degree of variations in them) pertaining to the processes.


Corresponding authors: Madhusree Kundu, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: Mr. Rubal Chandra carried out the research work under the guidance and supervision of Dr. Madhusree Kundu. The conception and layout of the manuscript was accomplished by Dr. Madhusree Kundu. Mr. Rubal Chandra had written the manuscript. The corrections were made in the revised manuscript jointly.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  4. Research funding: This research was not funded one.

  5. Data availability: Simulation code and data are with the corresponding author and available on request.

References

1. Wold, S, Sjöström, M, Eriksson, L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2001;58:109–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1.Search in Google Scholar

2. Wold, H. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In: Krishnaiah, PR, editor. MultiVariate analysis II. New York: Academic Press; 1966:391–420 pp.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhang, J-N, Luo, A-L, Zhao, Y-H. Automated estimation of stellar fundamental parameters from low resolution spectra: the PLS method, Research in Astron. Astrophys Nor 2009;9:712–24. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/9/6/010.Search in Google Scholar

4. Karp, N, Griffin, J, Lilley, K. Application of Partial Least Squares discriminant analysis to two-dimensional difference gel studies in expression proteomics. Proteomics 2005;5:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400881.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Oliver, P, Whelehan, ME, Earll, EJ, Marianne, T, Eriksson, L. Detection of ovarian cancer using chemometric analysis of proteomic profiles. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2006;84:82–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rathore, AS, Mittal, S, Pathaka, M, Mahalingam, V. Chemometrics application in biotech processes: assessing comparability across processes and scales. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2014;89:1311–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4428.Search in Google Scholar

7. Nguyen, DV, Rocke, DM. Tumor classification by Partial Least Squares using microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2002a;18:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.39.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Nguyen, DV, Rocke, DM. Multi-class cancer classification via Partial Least Squares with gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2002b;18:1216–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.9.1216.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Andrade, JM, Muniategui, S, Prada, D. Prediction of clean octane numbers of catalytic reformed naphthas using FT-m.i.r. and PLS. Fuel 1997;76:1035–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(97)00095-1.Search in Google Scholar

10. Qin, SJ, McAvoy, TJ. Nonlinear PLS modeling using neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 1992;16:379–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(92)80055-e.Search in Google Scholar

11. Qin, SJ, McAvoy, TJ. Nonlinear FIR modeling via a neural net PLS approach. Comput Chem Eng 1996;20:147–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(95)00011-p.Search in Google Scholar

12. Qin, SJ. A statistical perspective of neural networks for process modelling and control. In: Proceedings of the 1993 international symposium on intelligent control, Chicago, IL; 1993:559–604 pp.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kaspar, MH, Ray, WH. Dynamic modeling for process control. Chem Eng Sci 1993;48:3447–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(93)85001-6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hair, J, Alamer, A. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: guidelines using an applied example. Res Methods Appl Ling 2022;1:100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.Search in Google Scholar

15. Hair, JFJr., Hult, GM, Ringle, CM, Sarstedt, M, Danks, NP, Ray, S. Partial Least Squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2021. Available from: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51463.10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Kundu, PK, Panchariya, PC, Kundu, M. Classification and authentication of unknown water samples using machine learning algorithms. ISA Trans 2011;50:487–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2011.03.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kundu, M, Kundu, PK, Damarla, SK. Chemometric monitoring: product quality assessment, process fault detection, and applications. Rourkela, India: CRC Press; 2017.10.1201/9781315155135Search in Google Scholar

18. Roels, JA. Mathematical models and the design of biochemical reactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1982;32:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5030320110.Search in Google Scholar

19. McFarlane, RC, Reineman, RC, Bartee, JF, Georgakis, C. Dynamic simulator for a model IV fluid catalytic cracking unit. Comput Chem Eng 1993;17:275–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80021-e.Search in Google Scholar

20. Ali, E. FCC Simulink module; 2004. Available from: https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/Emad.Ali/Pages/SimulinkModule.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-19
Accepted: 2023-10-08
Published Online: 2023-11-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2023-0074/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button