Startseite Intensification of thorium biosorption onto protonated orange peel using the response surface methodology
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Intensification of thorium biosorption onto protonated orange peel using the response surface methodology

  • Ali A. Ghorbanpour Khamseh EMAIL logo , Younes Amini ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Mohammad Mahdi Shademan und Valiyollah Ghazanfari
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. März 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this research work, intensifying the possibility of protonated orange peel to uptake thorium (IV) ions from aqueous solutions in a batch system was investigated and optimized using the response surface methodology. The effect of three independent process variables including thorium initial concentration, pH, and biosorbent dosage was assessed based on the central composite design. The validity of the quadratic model was verified by the coefficient of determination. The optimization results showed that the rate of thorium (IV) uptake under optimal conditions is 183.95 mg/g. The modeling results showed that the experimental data of thorium biosorption kinetics are fitted well by the pseudo-second-order model. According to the results, the biosorption process reached equilibrium after around 4 h of contact. The Langmuir isotherm describes the experimental biosorption equilibrium data well. The maximum absorption capacity of protonated orange peel for thorium adsorption was estimated by the Langmuir isotherm at 236.97 mg/g. Thermodynamic studies show that thorium adsorption on protonated orange peel is thermodynamically feasible, spontaneous, and endothermic.


Corresponding authors: Ali A. Ghorbanpour Khamseh and Younes Amini, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, E-mail: (A.A. Ghorbanpour Khamseh),

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Ameri, A, Tamjidi, S, Dehghankhalili, F, Farhadi, A, Saati, MA. Application of algae as low cost and effective bio-adsorbent for removal of heavy metals from wastewater: a review study. Environ Technol Rev 2020;9:85–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2020.1831619.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Arthi, D, Jose, JMA, Gladis, EE, Shinu, PS, Joseph, J. Removal of heavy metal ions from water using adsorbents from agro waste materials. Mater Today Proc 2021;45:1794–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.738.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Niu, Y, Hu, W, Guo, M, Wang, Y, Jia, J, Hu, Z. Preparation of cotton-based fibrous adsorbents for the removal of heavy metal ions. Carbohydr Polym 2019;225:115218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115218.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Vardhan, KH, Kumar, PS, Panda, RC. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: current trends and future perspectives. J Mol Liq 2019;290:111197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Xu, J, Zhou, L, Jia, Y, Liu, Z, Adesina, AA. Adsorption of thorium (IV) ions from aqueous solution by magnetic chitosan resins modified with triethylene-tetramine. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2015;303:347–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3227-6.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Yener, I, Oral, EV, Dolak, I, Ozdemir, S, Ziyadanogullari, R. A new method for preconcentration of Th (IV) and Ce (III) by thermophilic Anoxybacillus flavithermus immobilized on Amberlite XAD-16 resin as a novel biosorbent. Ecol Eng 2017;103:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.056.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Soltani, N, Haddadi, H, Asgari, M, Rajabzadeh, N. Adsorptive stripping voltammetric detection of thorium on the multi-walled carbon nanotube modified screen printed electrode. Sensor Actuator B Chem 2015;220:1212–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.06.106.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Wang, L, Zhong, B, Liang, T, Xing, B, Zhu, Y. Atmospheric thorium pollution and inhalation exposure in the largest rare earth mining and smelting area in China. Sci Total Environ 2016;572:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.192.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Abdullah, N, Yusof, N, Lau, W, Jaafar, J, Ismail, A. Recent trends of heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by membrane technologies. J Ind Eng Chem 2019;76:17–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.029.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Bayat, B, Sari, B. Comparative evaluation of microbial and chemical leaching processes for heavy metal removal from dewatered metal plating sludge. J Hazard Mater 2010;174:763–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.117.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Chen, Q, Yao, Y, Li, X, Lu, J, Zhou, J, Huang, Z. Comparison of heavy metal removals from aqueous solutions by chemical precipitation and characteristics of precipitates. J Water Proc Eng 2018;26:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Ding, Z, Hu, X, Morales, VL, Gao, B. Filtration and transport of heavy metals in graphene oxide enabled sand columns. Chem Eng J 2014;257:248–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.034.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Esmaeili Faraj, SH, Nasr Esfahany, M, Amini, Y. Modeling of biofiltration process for removal of vinyl chloride from an air stream by modified ottengraf model. J Petrol Res 2014;24:21–30.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Ganesan PKamaraj, R, Sozhan, G, Vasudevan, S. Oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as adsorbent for the removal of manganese from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2013;20:987–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0928-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Ganesan, P, Kamaraj, R, Vasudevan, S. Application of isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic models for the adsorption of nitrate ions on graphene from aqueous solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2013;44:808–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.029.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Kamaraj, R, Pandiarajan, A, Gandhi, MR, Shibayama, A, Vasudevan, S. Eco–friendly and easily prepared graphenenanosheets for safe drinking water: removal of chlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicides. ChemistrySelect 2017;2:342–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201601645.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Kamaraj, R, Vasudevan, S. Evaluation of electrocoagulation process for the removal of strontium and cesium from aqueous solution. Chem Eng Res Des 2015;93:522–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.021.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Kamaraj, R, Vasudevan, S. Decontamination of selenate from aqueous solution by oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Powder Technol 2015;274:268–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.043.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Kamaraj, R, Vasudevan, S. Facile one-pot synthesis of nano-zinc hydroxide by electro-dissolution of zinc as a sacrificial anode and the application for adsorption of Th 4+, U 4+, and Ce 4+ from aqueous solution. Res Chem Intermed 2016;42:4077–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2259-z.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Lakshmi, J, Vasudevan, S. Graphene—a promising material for removal of perchlorate (ClO 4−) from water. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2013;20:5114–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1499-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Pal, P, Banat, F. Comparison of heavy metal ions removal from industrial lean amine solvent using ion exchange resins and sand coated with chitosan. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2014;18:227–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.02.015.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Pandiarajan, A, Kamaraj, R, Vasudevan, S, Vasudevan, S. OPAC (orange peel activated carbon) derived from waste orange peel for the adsorption of chlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicides from water: adsorption isotherm, kinetic modelling and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 2018;261:329–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Tran, TK, Leu, HJ, Chiu, KF, Lin, CY. Electrochemical treatment of heavy metal-containing wastewater with the removal of COD and heavy metal ions. J Chin Chem Soc 2017;64:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201600266.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Vasudevan, S, Lakshmi, J. The adsorption of phosphate by graphene from aqueous solution. RSC Adv 2012;2:5234–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra20270k.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Talip, Z, Eral, M, Hiçsönmez, Ü. Adsorption of thorium from aqueous solutions by perlite. J Environ Radioact 2009;100:139–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Bădescu, IS, Bulgariu, D, Ahmad, I, Bulgariu, L. Valorisation possibilities of exhausted biosorbents loaded with metal ions–a review. J Environ Manag 2018;224:288–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.066.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Chen, Y, Liu, Y, Li, Y, Chen, Y, Wu, Y, Li, H, et al.. Novel magnetic pomelo peel biochar for enhancing Pb (II) and Cu (II) adsorption: performance and mechanism. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2020;231:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04788-4.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Figueira, P, Henriques, B, Teixeira, F, Afonso, N, Pinto, J, Tavares, D, et al.. Potentialities of agro-based wastes to remove Cd, Hg, Pb, and as from contaminated waters. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2022;233:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05543-7.Suche in Google Scholar

29. García-Delgado, C, Alonso-Izquierdo, M, González-Izquierdo, M, Yunta, F, Eymar, E. Purification of polluted water with spent mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) substrate: from agricultural waste to biosorbent of phenanthrene, Cd and Pb. Environ Technol 2017;38:1792–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1246614.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Jaafari, J, Yaghmaeian, K. Optimization of heavy metal biosorption onto freshwater algae (Chlorella coloniales) using response surface methodology (RSM). Chemosphere 2019;217:447–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.205.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Kim, J-H, Lee, S-K. Selective adsorption of Ba2+ using chemically modified alginate beads with enhanced Ba2+ affinity and its application to 131Cs production. Nucl Eng Technol 2022;54:3017–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.03.009.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Lu, N, Hu, T, Zhai, Y, Qin, H, Aliyeva, J, Zhang, H. Fungal cell with artificial metal container for heavy metals biosorption: equilibrium, kinetics study and mechanisms analysis. Environ Res 2020;182:109061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.109061.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Noli, F, Avgerinou, A, Kapashi, E, Kapnisti, M. Uranium and thorium retention onto sorbents from raw and modified pomegranate peel. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2021;232:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05384-w.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Panasenko, A, Shichalin, O, Yarusova, S, Ivanets, A, Belov, A, Dran’kov, A, et al.. A novel approach for rice straw agricultural waste utilization: synthesis of solid aluminosilicate matrices for cesium immobilization. Nucl Eng Technol 2022;54:3250–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Rangabhashiyam, S, Balasubramanian, P. Characteristics, performances, equilibrium and kinetic modeling aspects of heavy metal removal using algae. Bioresour Technol Rep 2019;5:261–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2018.07.009.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Staroń, P, Płecka, A, Chwastowski, J. Lead sorption by Chrysanthemum indicum: equilibrium, kinetic, and desorption studies. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2021;232:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04956-6.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Torres-Pérez, J, Huang, Y, Hadi, P, Mackey, H, McKay, G. Equilibrium, kinetic and optimization studies for the adsorption of tartrazine in water onto activated carbon from pecan nut shells. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2018;229:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3680-2.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Zhuang, S, Yin, Y, Wang, J. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solution using chitosan grafted with maleic acid by gamma radiation. Nucl Eng Technol 2018;50:211–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.11.007.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Akinhanmi, TF, Ofudje, EA, Adeogun, AI, Aina, P, Joseph, IM. Orange peel as low-cost adsorbent in the elimination of Cd (II) ion: kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic and optimization evaluations. Bioresour Bioprocess 2020;7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-020-00320-y.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Liang, S, Guo, X, Feng, N, Tian, Q. Application of orange peel xanthate for the adsorption of Pb2+ from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 2009;170:425–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.078.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Yirga, A, Yadav, OP, Dey, T. Waste orange peel adsorbent for heavy metal removal from water. Pollution 2022;8:553–66.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Feng, N, Guo, X, Liang, S, Zhu, Y, Liu, J. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by chemically modified orange peel. J Hazard Mater 2011;185:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.114.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Guiza, S. Biosorption of heavy metal from aqueous solution using cellulosic waste orange peel. Ecol Eng 2017;99:134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.043.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Gunay Gurer, A, Aktas, K, Ozkaleli Akcetin, M, Erdem Unsar, A, Asilturk, M. Adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics, and kinetic modeling of methylene blue onto novel carbonaceous adsorbent derived from bitter orange peels. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2021;232:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05090-7.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Lasheen, MR, Ammar, NS, Ibrahim, HS. Adsorption/desorption of Cd (II), Cu (II) and Pb (II) using chemically modified orange peel: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Solid State Sci 2012;14:202–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.11.029.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Munagapati, VS, Wen, J-C, Pan, C-L, Gutha, Y, Wen, J-H. Enhanced adsorption performance of Reactive Red 120 azo dye from aqueous solution using quaternary amine modified orange peel powder. J Mol Liq 2019;285:375–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.04.081.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Tran, HN, You, S-J, Chao, H-P. Thermodynamic parameters of cadmium adsorption onto orange peel calculated from various methods: a comparison study. J Environ Chem Eng 2016;4:2671–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.05.009.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Bezerra, MA, Santelli, RE, Oliveira, EP, Villar, LS, Escaleira, LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008;76:965–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Allahveran, S, Mehrizad, A. Polyaniline/ZnS nanocomposite as a novel photocatalyst for removal of Rhodamine 6G from aqueous media: optimization of influential parameters by response surface methodology and kinetic modeling. J Mol Liq 2017;225:339–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.051.Suche in Google Scholar

50. Amini, Y, Hassanvand, A, Ghazanfari, V, Shadman, MM, Heydari, M, Alborzi, ZS. Optimization of liquid-liquid extraction of calcium with a serpentine microfluidic device. Int Commun Heat Mass Tran 2023;140:106551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106551.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Abdollahi, P, Karimi-Sabet, J, Moosavian, MA, Amini, Y. Microfluidic solvent extraction of calcium: modeling and optimization of the process variables. Separ Purif Technol 2020;231:115875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115875.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Hashemipour, N, Karimi-Sabet, J, Motahari, K, Monfared, SM, Amini, Y, Moosavian, MA. Experimental and simulation investigation on separation of binary hydrocarbon mixture by thermogravitational column. J Mol Liq 2018;268:791–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.098.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Schiewer, S, Volesky, B. Modeling of the proton-metal ion exchange in biosorption. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29:3049–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00012a024.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Hu, K, Liu, Z, Xiu, T, Zhou, L, Wang, Y. Removal of thorium from aqueous solution by adsorption with Cu 3 (BTC) 2. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2020;326:185–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07310-6.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Khalifa, EB, Rzig, B, Chakroun, R, Nouagui, H, Hamrouni, B. Application of response surface methodology for chromium removal by adsorption on low-cost biosorbent. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2019;189:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.03.014.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Marsousi, S, Karimi-Sabet, J, Moosavian, MA, Amini, Y. Liquid-liquid extraction of calcium using ionic liquids in spiral microfluidics. Chem Eng J 2019;356:492–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.030.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Jahromi, PF, Karimi-Sabet, J, Amini, Y. Ion-pair extraction-reaction of calcium using Y-shaped microfluidic junctions: an optimized separation approach. Chem Eng J 2018;334:2603–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.129.Suche in Google Scholar

58. Liao, X-P, Shi, B. Adsorption of fluoride on zirconium (IV)-impregnated collagen fiber. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39:4628–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0479944.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Vasudevan, S, Lakshmi, J. Electrochemical removal of boron from water: adsorption and thermodynamic studies. Can J Chem Eng 2012;90:1017–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20585.Suche in Google Scholar

60. Vasudevan, S, Lakshmi, J, Kamaraj, R, Sozhan, G. A critical study on the removal of copper by an electrochemically assisted coagulation: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2013;8:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.1657.Suche in Google Scholar

61. Ngwenya, N, Chirwa, E. Single and binary component sorption of the fission products Sr2+, Cs+ and Co2+ from aqueous solutions onto sulphate reducing bacteria. Miner Eng 2010;23:463–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.11.006.Suche in Google Scholar

62. Wibowo, E, Rokhmat, M, Abdullah, M. Reduction of seawater salinity by natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite): adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics and kinetics. Desalination 2017;409:146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.026.Suche in Google Scholar

63. Ganesan, P, Lakshmi, J, Sozhan, G, Vasudevan, S. Removal of manganese from water by electrocoagulation: adsorption, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Can J Chem Eng 2013;91:448–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.21709.Suche in Google Scholar

64. Kamaraj, R, Davidson, D, Sozhan, G, Vasudevan, S. Adsorption of herbicide 2-(2, 4-dichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid by electrochemically generated aluminum hydroxides: an alternative to chemical dosing. RSC Adv 2015;5:39799–809. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra03339j.Suche in Google Scholar

65. Vasudevan, S, Lakshmi, J, Sozhan, G. Electrocoagulation studies on the removal of copper from water using mild steel electrode. Water Environ Res 2012;84:209–19. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143011x13225991083640.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

66. Vasudevan, S, Jayaraj, J, Lakshmi, J, Sozhan, G. Removal of iron from drinking water by electrocoagulation: adsorption and kinetics studies. Kor J Chem Eng 2009;26:1058–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-009-0176-9.Suche in Google Scholar

67. Vasudevan, S, Lakshmi, J, Sozhan, G. Optimization of the process parameters for the removal of phosphate from drinking water by electrocoagulation. Desalination Water Treat 2009;12:407–14. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.971.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-12-20
Accepted: 2023-02-20
Published Online: 2023-03-03

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2022-0085/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen