Few-Step Kinetic Model of Gaseous Autocatalytic Ethane Pyrolysis and Its Evaluation by Means of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis

References

1. MatheuDM, GrendaJM. Pathways to the minor products. J Phys Chem A2005;109:5332–42.10.1021/jp0451804Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. MatheuDM, GrendaJM. Radical disproportionations, missing reaction families, and the consequences of pressure dependence. J Phys Chem A2005;109:5343–51.10.1021/jp0451647Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. PonomarevAV, TsivadzeAA. Gas-to-liquid conversion of alkanes by electron beam radiolysis. Dokl Phys Chem2006;411:345–51.10.1134/S0012501606120062Suche in Google Scholar

4. PushkarevAI, Ai-MinZ, Xiao-SongLi, SazonovRV. Methane conversion in low-temperature plasma. High Energy Chem2009;43:156–62.10.1134/S0018143909030023Suche in Google Scholar

5. ChavadejS, RueangjittN, SreethawongT. Reforming of CO-containing natural gas with partial oxidation using an AC gliding arc system. In: Proceedings of 18th international symposium on plasma chemistry, Kyoto, 2007;552–61.Suche in Google Scholar

6. MantashyanAA, KhachatryanLA, EduardAA. Slozhnyye gazofaznyye reaktsii prevrashcheniya uglevodorod-kislorodnykh smesey v usloviyakh lazernogo nagreva. Kinetika I Kataliz1989;30:272–6 (Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

7. KarlovNV, KirichenkoNA, Luk’yanchukBS. Laser thermochemistry: fundamentals and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge International Science Publishing, 2000:370.Suche in Google Scholar

8. SnytnikovVN, MishchenkoTI, SnytnikovVN, StoyanovskayaOP, ParmonVN. Autocatalytic gas-phase ethane dehydrogenation in a wall-less reactor. Kinet Catalysis2010;51:10–17.10.1134/S0023158410010039Suche in Google Scholar

9. SnytnikovVN, MischenkoTI, SnytnikovVN, ChernykhIG. A reactor for the study of homogeneous processes using laser radiation energy. Chem Eng J2009;150:231–6.10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.028Suche in Google Scholar

10. SnytnikovVN, MishchenkoTI, SnytnikovVN, MalykhinSE, AvdeevVI, ParmonVN. Autocatalytic gas-phase dehydrogenation of ethane. Res Chem Intermed2012;38:1133–47.10.1007/s11164-011-0449-xSuche in Google Scholar

11. SnytnikovPV, StoyanovskayaOP. Supercomputer simulation of laser-catalytic reactor of C2-C3 alkane pyrolysis. Proceedings of the International Conference “Advanced Mathematics, computations and applications – 2014”; 2014 June 8–11; Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SBRAS; Akademgorodok, Novosibirsk, Russia. Novosibirsk: Academizdat, 2014:122.Suche in Google Scholar

12. NorinagaK, DeutschmannO. Detailed kinetic modeling of gas-phase reactions in the chemical vapor deposition of carbon from light hydrocarbons. Ind Eng Chem Res2007;46:3547–57.10.1021/ie061207pSuche in Google Scholar

13. TomlinAS, PillingMJ, MerkinJH, BrindleyJ, BurgessN, GoughA. Reduced mechanisms for propane pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res1995;34:3749–60.10.1021/ie00038a010Suche in Google Scholar

14. TurányiT. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications. J Math Chem1990;5:203–48.10.1007/BF01166355Suche in Google Scholar

15. SobolIM. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simulation2001;55:271–80.10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6Suche in Google Scholar

16. MaselRI. Chemical kinetics and catalysis. New York: Wiley Interscience, 2001:952.Suche in Google Scholar

17. PolakLS, GoldenbergMY, LevitskiyAA. Computational methods in chemical kinetics. Moscow: Nauka, 1984:280 (Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

18. SaltelliA, RattoM, TarantolaS, CampolongoF. Sensitivity analysis for chemical models. Chem Rev2005;105:2811–28.10.1021/cr040659dSuche in Google Scholar

19. ZádorJ, ZsélyIG, TurányiT. Local and global uncertainty analysis of complex chemical kinetic systems. Rel Eng Sys Safety2006;91:1232–40.10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.020Suche in Google Scholar

20. HeltonJC. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models of complex systems. Comput Methods Transp Verification Validatio2008;62:207–28.10.1007/978-3-540-77362-7_9Suche in Google Scholar

21. TomlinAS, ZiehnT. The use of global sensitivity methods for the analysis, evaluation and improvement of complex modelling systems. In: GorbanAN, RooseD, editors. Coping with complexity: model reduction and data analysis. Heidelberg (Berlin): Springer, 2011:355.Suche in Google Scholar

22. YouXQ, RussiT, PackardA, FrenklachM. The role of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in combustion modeling. Proc Combust Inst2011;33:509–16.Suche in Google Scholar

23. FrenklachM, PackardA, SeilerP, FeeleyR. Collaborative data processing in developing predictive models of complex reaction systems. Int J Chem Kinet2004;36:57–66.10.1002/kin.10172Suche in Google Scholar

24. KantorovichLV. On some new approaches to computational methods and processing of observations. Sib Mat Zh1962;3:701–9.Suche in Google Scholar

25. TikhonovaMV, GarifullinaGG, GerchikovAY, SpivakSI. The kinetic model of n-decane oxidation in the presence of inhibitory composition. Int J Chem Kinet2014;46:220–30.10.1002/kin.20848Suche in Google Scholar

26. SaltelliA. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Comput Phys Commun2002;145:280–97.10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1Suche in Google Scholar

27. SobolIM. Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property. Zh Vych Mat Mat Fiz1976;16:1332–7 (Russian).10.1016/0041-5553(76)90154-3Suche in Google Scholar

28. SaisanaM, SaltelliA, UncertaintyTS. Sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J R Stat Soc A2011;168:307–23.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.xSuche in Google Scholar

29. TuranyiT, NagyT, ZselyIG, CserhatiM, VargaT, SzaboBT, et al. Determination of rate parameters based on both direct and indirect measurements. Int J Chem Kinet2012;44:284–302.10.1002/kin.20717Suche in Google Scholar