Home “Getting the protest post out”: To what extent and how social movements’ Facebook protest posts receive user engagement
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Getting the protest post out”: To what extent and how social movements’ Facebook protest posts receive user engagement

  • Luna Staes ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 23, 2025
Communications
From the journal Communications

Abstract

User engagement serves as a “public opinion cue” for social movements. Likes, shares, and comments on protest-related posts provide valuable insights for social movements to evaluate their protest communication, help to increase protest visibility, and bring up public discussions in the social media arena. But, to what extent do social movements’ protest-related posts resonate? And, which protest claims explain user engagement? In this study, I analyze Facebook posts (N=184,917) of social movements (N=163) staging street protests (N=207) in Brussels (Belgium) between January 2017 and December 2021. By comparing protest-related and non-protest-related posts, I show that protest posts receive more user engagement on Facebook. Explanatory analyses indicate that disruption, high number, and commitment claims in social movements’ protest posts trigger user engagement. Protest and social media features are controlled for as well. Results enrich the empirical framework on user engagement and contribute to the theoretical understanding of social movements’ protest claims-making online.

  1. Funder Name: Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek,

  2. Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003130, Grant Number: 1113222N

References

Bailey, E. R., Wang, D., Soule, S. A., & Rao, H. (2023). How Tilly’s WUNC works: Bystander evaluations of social movement signals lead to mobilization. American Journal of Sociology, 128(4), 1206–1262. https://doi.org/10.1086/72348910.1086/723489Search in Google Scholar

Barberá, P. (2020). Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy (pp. 34–56). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108890960.004Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.67066110.1017/CBO9781139198752Search in Google Scholar

Cammaerts, B. (2021). The new-new social movements: Are social media changing the ontology of social movements?. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-26-3-34310.17813/1086-671X-26-3-343Search in Google Scholar

DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in numbers. The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400855025Search in Google Scholar

Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.xSearch in Google Scholar

Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., & Soule, S. A. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.11060310.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110603Search in Google Scholar

Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science Advances, 8(10), 1–15. Retrieved from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl819810.1126/sciadv.abl8198Search in Google Scholar

Edrington, C. L. (2022). Social movements and identification: An examination of how Black Lives Matter and March for Our Lives use identification strategies on Twitter to build relationships. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(3), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699022110699410.1177/10776990221106994Search in Google Scholar

Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Gahn, C., Bodlos, A., & Haselmayer, M. (2022). Does social media enhance party responsiveness? How user engagement shapes parties’ issue attention on Facebook. Party Politics, 28(3), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406882098533410.1177/1354068820985334Search in Google Scholar

Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481667664610.1177/1461444816676646Search in Google Scholar

Gamson, W. A. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 242–262). Blackwell Publishing.10.1111/b.9780631226697.2003.00012.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.39210.1037//0033-2909.118.3.392Search in Google Scholar

Gerbaudo, P. (2016). Rousing the Facebook crowd: digital enthusiasm and emotional contagion in the 2011 protests in Egypt and Spain. International Journal of Communication, 10, 254–273. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3963Search in Google Scholar

Giugni, M. G. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.37110.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.371Search in Google Scholar

Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2018). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.144527310.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, K., & Gruszczynski, M. (2021). The influence of new and traditional media coverage on public attention to social movements: The case of the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.167022810.1080/1369118X.2019.1670228Search in Google Scholar

Jost, P. (2025). Popularity indicators. https://osf.io/t3upmSearch in Google Scholar

Karpf, D. (2018). Analytic activism and its limitations. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511775071810.1177/2056305117750718Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. (2016, November 1). More than 1 Million “check in” on Facebook to support the Standing Rock Sioux. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/01/500268879/more-than-a-million-check-in-on-facebook-to-support-the-standing-rock-siouxSearch in Google Scholar

Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481452295210.1177/1461444814522952Search in Google Scholar

Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2024). A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms. New Media & Society, 26(1), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444823116188010.1177/14614448231161880Search in Google Scholar

Laschever, E. (2017). Are they not worthy? How partisan political blogs legitimize the Tea Party Movement and Occupy Wall Street. Sociological Forum, 32(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.1233410.1111/socf.12334Search in Google Scholar

Leong, A. D., & Ho, S. S. (2020). Perceiving online public opinion: The impact of Facebook opinion cues, opinion climate congruency, and source credibility on speaking out. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2495–2515. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482093105410.1177/1461444820931054Search in Google Scholar

Mercea, D., Burean, T., & Proteasa, V. (2020). Student participation and public Facebook communication: Exploring the demand and supply of political information in the Romanian #rezist demonstrations. International Journal of Communication, 24, 4136–4159. Retrieved from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1436110.2139/ssrn.3684089Search in Google Scholar

Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media + Society, 4(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511880791110.1177/2056305118807911Search in Google Scholar

Neumayer, C., & Rossi, L. (2018). Images of protest in social media: Struggle over visibility and visual narratives. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4293–4310. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481877060210.1177/1461444818770602Search in Google Scholar

Norris, P., Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Antistate rebels, conventional participants, or everyone? Comparative Politics, 37(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/2007288210.2307/20072882Search in Google Scholar

Pang, N., Ho, S. S., Zhang, A. M., Ko, J. S., Low, W. X., & Tan, K. S. (2016). Can Spiral of Silence and civility predict click speech on Facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.06610.1016/j.chb.2016.07.066Search in Google Scholar

Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2018). Social media and new protest movements. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media. Sage.10.4135/9781473984066.n31Search in Google Scholar

Porten-Cheé, P., Haßler, J., Jost, P., Eilders, C., & Maurer, M. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Studies in Communication and Media, 7(2), 80–102. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-80Search in Google Scholar

Rosengren, K. E. (1974). International news: Methods, data and theory. Journal of Peace Research, 11(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433740110020810.1177/002234337401100208Search in Google Scholar

Schaaf, M., & Quiring, O. (2023). The limits of social media mobilization: How protest movements adapt to social media logic. Media and Communication, 11(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.663510.17645/mac.v11i3.6635Search in Google Scholar

Schwemmer, C. (2021). The limited influence of right-wing movements on social media user engagement. Social Media + Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121104165010.1177/20563051211041650Search in Google Scholar

Stier, S., Posch, L., Bleier, A., & Strohmaier, M. (2017). When populists become popular: Comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1365–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.132851910.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519Search in Google Scholar

Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: How social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.208741010.1080/01402382.2022.2087410Search in Google Scholar

Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226803531.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901665468210.1177/1077699016654682Search in Google Scholar

Waddell, T. F. (2018). What does the crowd think? How online comments and popularity metrics affect news credibility and issue importance. New Media & Society, 20(8), 3068–3083. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481774290510.1177/1461444817742905Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R. (2013). From the street to the screen: Characteristics of protest events as determinants of television news coverage. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 18(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.18.1.y6067731j484406710.17813/maiq.18.1.y6067731j4844067Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R. (2019). The persuasive power of protest. How protest wins public support. Social Forces, 98(1), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy11010.1093/sf/soy110Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R. & Walgrave, S. (2017). What makes protest powerful? Reintroducing and elaborating Charles Tilly’s WUNC concept. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=290974010.2139/ssrn.2909740Search in Google Scholar

Xenos, M. A., Macafee, T., & Pole, A. (2017). Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns: A study of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections. New Media & Society, 19(6), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481561661710.1177/1461444815616617Search in Google Scholar

Yang G. (2016). Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of# BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.69210.17645/mac.v4i4.692Search in Google Scholar

Ziegele, M., Breiner, T., & Quiring, O. (2014). What creates interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 1111–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1212310.1111/jcom.12123Search in Google Scholar

Ziegele, M., Weber, M., Quiring, O., & Breiner, T. (2017). The dynamics of online news discussions: Effects of news articles and reader comments on users’ involvement, willingness to participate, and the civility of their contributions. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1419–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.132450510.1080/1369118X.2017.1324505Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-09-23

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2024-0131/html
Scroll to top button