Strategic polarization? Filter bubbles, bridges and the role of politicians on Twitter during 2019 European Election in Slovenia

References

Aral, S. (2020). The hype machine: How social media disrupts our elections, our economy, and our health – and how we must adapt. Currency.Search in Google Scholar

Arguedas, A. R., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: A literature review. Digital News Project – Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-01/Echo_Chambers_Filter_Bubbles_and_Polarisation_A_Literature_Review.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Barberá, P. (2014, September 3–6). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US [Paper presentation]. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting 2015, San Francisco, CA, United States. http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761559462010.1177/0956797615594620Search in Google Scholar

Bastos, M., Mercea, D., & Baronchelli, A. (2018). The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign. PLoS ONE, 13(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.020684110.1371/journal.pone.0206841Search in Google Scholar

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.phpSearch in Google Scholar

Borgesius, Z., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., de Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.40110.14763/2016.1.401Search in Google Scholar

Bracciale, R., Martella, A., & Visentin, C. (2018). From super-participants to super-echoed: participation in the 2018 Italian electoral twittersphere. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 11(2), 361–393. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p361Search in Google Scholar

Bright, J., Marchal, N., Ganesh, B., & Rudinac, S. (2020). Echo chambers exist! (But they’re full of opposing views). ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11461Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A. (2017). Echo chamber? What echo chamber? Reviewing the evidence. 6th Biennial Future of Journalism Conference, UK, 0–11.Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real?. Polity Press.10.14763/2019.4.1426Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A. (2023). From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/CT/QTAD00710.1093/ct/qtad007Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2016). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 98–130). Routledge.10.4324/9781315716299Search in Google Scholar

Carpentier, N. (2017). The discursive-material knot. Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4331-3754-910.3726/978-1-4331-3754-9Search in Google Scholar

Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). Influencers in the political conversation on Twitter: Identifying digital authority with big data. Sustainability, 13(5), 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1305285110.3390/su13052851Search in Google Scholar

Casero-Ripollés, A., Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Marcos-García, S. (2021). The influence of political actors in the digital public debate on Twitter about the negotiations for the formation of the government in Spain. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221100315910.1177/00027642211003159Search in Google Scholar

Ceia, V. (2020). Digital ecosystems of ideology: Linked media as rhetoric in Spanish political tweets. Social Media and Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/205630512092663010.1177/2056305120926630Search in Google Scholar

Cota, W., Ferreira, S. C., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Starnini, M. (2019). Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science, 8(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-910.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-9Search in Google Scholar

Dehghan, E. (2020). Networked discursive alliances: Antagonism, agonism, and the dynamics of discursive struggles in the Australian Twittersphere [Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology]. QUT ePrints. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.17460410.5204/thesis.eprints.174604Search in Google Scholar

Diani, M. (2003). “Leaders” Or Brokers? Positions and Influence in Social Movement Networks. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action (pp. 105–122). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.000510.1093/0199251789.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information Communication and Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.142865610.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276421452708810.1177/0002764214527088Search in Google Scholar

Dugué, N., & Perez, A. (2022). Direction matters in complex networks: A theoretical and applied study for greedy modularity optimization. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 603, 127798. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSA.2022.12779810.1016/j.physa.2022.127798Search in Google Scholar

Erdös, P. and Rényi, A. (1960). On the Evolution of Random Graphs. Publication of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5(1), 17–61.Search in Google Scholar

Esteve Del Valle, M., & Borge Bravo, R. (2018). Leaders or brokers? Potential influencers in online parliamentary networks. Policy & Internet, 10(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/POI3.15010.1002/poi3.150Search in Google Scholar

Esteve Del Valle, M., Broersma, M., & Ponsioen, A. (2022). Political interaction beyond party lines: communication ties and party polarization in parliamentary Twitter networks. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 736–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443932098756910.1177/0894439320987569Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2022). Individuals – internet activities (ISOC_CI_AC_I). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_CI_AC_I__custom_8570330/default/table?lang=en&page=time:2020Search in Google Scholar

Firdaus, S. N., Ding, C., & Sadeghian, A. (2018). Retweet: A popular information diffusion mechanism – A survey paper. Online Social Networks and Media, 6, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OSNEM.2018.04.00110.1016/j.osnem.2018.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Freelon, D. (2018). Partition-specific network analysis of digital trace data. In B. F. Welles, S. González-Bailón (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication (pp. 1–27). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190460518.013.310.1093/oxfordhb/9780190460518.013.3Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/303354310.2307/3033543Search in Google Scholar

Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018). Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web, France, 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.318613910.1145/3178876.3186139Search in Google Scholar

Ghajar-Khosravi, S., & Chignell, M. (2017). Pragmatics of network centrality. In L. Sloan, & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 309–327). Sage Publications Ltd.10.4135/9781473983847.n19Search in Google Scholar

Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2014). Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of “superparticipants”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.1201610.1111/jcc4.12016Search in Google Scholar

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051179086710.1017/CBO9780511790867Search in Google Scholar

Herrero, L., Humprecht, E., Engesser, S., Brüggemann, M., & Büchel, F. (2017). Rethinking Hallin and Mancini beyond the west: An analysis of media systems in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4797–4823. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6035/2196Search in Google Scholar

Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2016.04.00710.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Indridason, I. H. (2008). Multiparty democracy: Elections and legislative politics. Perspectives on Politics, 6(1), 195–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270808041910.1017/S1537592708080419Search in Google Scholar

Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009867910.1371/journal.pone.0098679Search in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978110829782010.1017/9781108297820Search in Google Scholar

Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Governance by algorithms: Reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371664315710.1177/0163443716643157Search in Google Scholar

Kekkonen, A., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2021). Affective blocs: Understanding affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 72, 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2021.10236710.1016/j.electstud.2021.102367Search in Google Scholar

Kinkead, D., & Douglas, D. M. (2020). The network and the demos: Big data and the epistemic justifications of democracy. In K. Macnish & J. Galliott (Eds.), Big data and democracy (pp. 119–134). Edinburgh University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/big-data-and-democracy/network-and-the-demos-big-data-and-the-epistemic-justifications-of-democracy/AA98E294F857F1EE3DC6B803E1957AAB10.3366/edinburgh/9781474463522.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/278683510.2307/2786835Search in Google Scholar

Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.197607010.1080/23808985.2021.1976070Search in Google Scholar

Lasser, J., Aroyehun, S. T., Simchon, A., Carrella, F., Garcia, D., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Social media sharing by political elites: An asymmetric American exceptionalism. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06313Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, M., Freelon, D., & Aday, S. (2017). Online clustering, fear and uncertainty in Egypt’s transition. Democratization, 24(6), 1159–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.128917910.1080/13510347.2017.1289179Search in Google Scholar

Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/Search in Google Scholar

Micó, J. L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political activism online: organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 858–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.83063410.1080/1369118X.2013.830634Search in Google Scholar

Miconi, A., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2023). On Western and Eastern media systems: Continuities and discontinuities. In: S. Papathanassopoulos & A. Miconi (Eds.), The Media Systems in Europe. (pp. 15–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32216-7_210.1007/978-3-031-32216-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2003). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E – Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.02611310.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.3210.1017/epi.2018.32Search in Google Scholar

Orhan, Y. E. (2022). The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding: comparative evidence. Democratization, 29(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.200891210.1080/13510347.2021.2008912Search in Google Scholar

Örnebring, H. (2012). Clientelism, elites, and the media in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016121245432910.1177/1940161212454329Search in Google Scholar

Papacharissi, Z. (2016). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444022222624410.1177/14614440222226244Search in Google Scholar

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.10.3139/9783446431164Search in Google Scholar

Reiljan, A. (2020). ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.1235110.1111/1475-6765.12351Search in Google Scholar

Soares, F. B., Recuero, R., & Zago, G. (2018). Influencers in polarized political networks on Twitter. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.321790910.1145/3217804.3217909Search in Google Scholar

Stromer-Galley, J. (2017). Political discussion and deliberation online. In K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 837–851). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.015_update_00110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.015_update_001Search in Google Scholar

Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400884711Search in Google Scholar

Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021). Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258259. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.025825910.1371/journal.pone.0258259Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature. William & Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314413910.2139/ssrn.3144139Search in Google Scholar

Valicon. (2020). Uporaba družbenih omrežij in storitev klepeta v Sloveniji 2018 – 2019 [Use of Social Networks and Chat Services in Slovenia 2018–2019]. https://www.valicon.net/sl/2020/01/uporaba-druzbenih-omrezij-in-storitev-klepeta-v-sloveniji-2018-2019Search in Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.01310.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. L. (2018). Internet and democracy in the network society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978135111071610.4324/9781351110716Search in Google Scholar

van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J. (2020). The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023707310.1371/journal.pone.0237073Search in Google Scholar

Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2015.03.00610.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COBEHA.2020.07.00510.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005Search in Google Scholar